@MonicaCellio [Just catching up on backread here now.] It's a curious case: the closure was as off-topic, and I don't see how the edits improved the on-topicness. They did improve the answerability (and I've just changed my downvote to an upvote), but that's not how it was closed. I don't know why it was closed as off-topic, tbh. Would any of the closers -- @YEZ is pingable -- like to explain? (That's a request, not a demand. Its remaining closed is not dependent -- to my mind -- on your answering.)

@Lee Looks like it captures what was said in chat. Thanks for posting.

@YEZ I see. I agree with them.

@msh210 I don't know how to change my close reason - I explained above I think it is too broad. I understand @IsaacMoses disagreed, but I am sticking to my guns.

@msh210 I guess you are catching up.

@YEZ :-)

@msh210 mods can't follow that link?

oops

I didnt cut and paste very well.

I deleted this when I realized it would still be there after the question was closed.,

@YEZ but I still think it's funny

@YEZ Well, it has two upvotes and another implied from @MonicaCellio above and another from me: that's 4 of the 5 necessary to reopen. If I see it garner another reopen vote, I'll reopen it, b'li neder.

@msh210 I wouldn't stage a rebellion if the community feels it should be reopened. I'm just saying I personally am not hopping on board.

is there any reason something like this isn't deleted? It is clearly spam and serves no purpose as a relic.

@YEZ It got a third reopen vote (besides mine and Monica Cellio's) so I've reopened it.

@msh210 NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

@msh210 the original version sounded more like a trivia question while the revised feels like a question that's more relevant to the Jewish community. So maybe that's a relevant factor? Anyway, thanks for reopening (after it got enough other votes, including yours and mine).

@YEZ just had to wait until somebody saw it (or, rather, flags on it). @msh210 has deleted it (thanks).