last day (29 days later) » 

3:19 PM
in theory salon, Oct 6 at 12:07, by heather
@vzn, I've started coding that factorization program - I made an error (not syntax) in my prime number finder, so I'm working on that, but otherwise its going pretty well. Thinking about how to simplify the factorization once I get it.
in theory salon, Oct 6 at 15:10, by vzn
@heather hi heather thx for dropping by, your attn/ interest/ ambition/ effort wrt learning difficult areas is impressive/ somewhat rare & wanted to help out/ assist over time. you can easily post code for comment on gist.github.com ... have a bunch of refs wrt shors algorithm need to write em up on my blog.
in theory salon, Oct 6 at 15:12, by vzn
39
Q: Why polynomial time is called "efficient"?

Ran G.Why in computer science any complexity which is at most polynomial is considered efficient? For any practical application(a), algorithms with complexity $n^{\log n}$ are way faster than algorithms that run in time, say, $n^{80}$, but the first is considered inefficient while the latter is effici...

in theory salon, 2 days ago, by heather
@vzn, Thank you for your encouragement! I read through the questions and answers on the question you linked too - very clear; thank you. Would you mind linking to your blog? My dad works on all sorts of stuff - not completely sure what all he does. I know he works with circuit design; he doesn't work with the optical stuff nearly as much anymore.

Unfortunately, I think that question I posted on physics has kind of been forgotten; I don't suppose you think people would answer it here or on computer science? If you also want, we could start a chat room just for the two of us. I don't mind ei
in theory salon, 2 days ago, by vzn
@heather hey heather my blog link is in my SE profile, theres lots on QM/ coding etc. re your question, does it come from an exercise? better to point to that if possible
in theory salon, yesterday, by heather
@vzn, thanks for your response! I've already started looking at your blog a bit, and it is very interesting. No, the question does not come from an exercise, unfortunately; it is just a question of my own. Interesting article - I didn't realize that was how AI worked.
in theory salon, yesterday, by heather
Someone in physics chat helped me figure it out, so I no longer need the question answered. I didn't realize it was one four dimensional vector instead of two vectors - I wasn't quite thinking there. =)
in theory salon, 14 hours ago, by vzn
@heather cool! put it on gist.github.com when you get a chance & will take a look... its easy to cut and paste/ save versions. also recommend you try graphing results, theres some basic exercises to try when youre ready :)
8 messages moved from vzn/heather
 
room mode changed to Gallery: anyone may enter, but only approved users can talk
@vzn, I set this room up so we can talk a little more efficiently.
@vzn, I posted my current code. It is not perfect, but I'm working on it.
Here it is.
 
vzn
4:29 PM
@heather nice! :) any questions?
 
@vzn, well, I added a new section, here, I'll update the post, one moment
@vzn, okay, how do you edit?
=)
 
 
2 hours later…
vzn
6:41 PM
@heather edit what? gist posts? you just create new versions on top of prior ones.
 
 
2 hours later…
8:18 PM
@vzn, yes, edit gist posts. I'm not sure how to create a new version. Please note I don't have an account.
 
 
2 hours later…
10:07 PM
I'm also not really sure how to get the exponents in there if necessary
I have a function that checks if they are necessary
 
vzn
10:47 PM
@heather oh didnt notice you posted it anonymously. presumably the anonymous files arent editable. you can just post a new one if you want.
 
@vzn, ah, okay.
My big question at this point is how I get it to say $2^3$ (for instance) instead of just $2$.
Any advice would be appreciated.
 
vzn
11:12 PM
@heather usually "**" is the exponentiation operator eg in ruby
 
vzn
11:54 PM
(not sure what youre asking)
 

  last day (29 days later) »