@egreg I have edited the question substantially, made the question more clear, added the screenshots of my remake with plain TeX and also the code. So, is there a chance that it will be reopened?
For the reference, I am talking about this question: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/255063/… (Is this an originally typeset paper from 1946, or a new remake with TeX?) If you agree this is a good question, please vote for reopening.
@SeanAllred Yes, I think it does too, and biber is much slower than bibtex because it does more things (and is written in Perl). Although I've used this file before. But it just seems to hang.
@AlanMunn I keep electronic notes at my job. I've been employed for almost six months and I've over 8MB of plaintext notes.
I wonder if biber could be replaced with a compiled version… If another program took the same input and had the same output, I can't imagine there would be a problem.
Any other people interested in this question? tex.stackexchange.com/questions/255063/… (Is this an originally typeset paper from 1946, or a new remake with TeX?) Please vote for reopening.
@Ho1 Well DEK looked over a lot of material he considered to be 'good typesetting' when creating TeX. So it's not surprising that his outcomes are similar to those used by leading works for the past.
@Ho1 There are millions of existing documents: finding one that happens to come out with the same layout when typeset by hand and by TeX proves very little
As DavidCarlisle said: "this paper of Knuths where he explains that the design of cm fonts and tex came about partly to get back to that era of AMS publication quality..."
This question led to a new package:
lua-visual-debug
Some of you may know the Web Developer Toolbar for Firefox that can outline the block level elements of a page like this:
Is there a way to do something similar with TeX boxes for a complete document?
@DavidCarlisle That duck doesn't look like a proper duck because the beak does not look like a proper beak; where's the duck committee of the Unicode consortium? :)
@PauloCereda as explained in the notes above (which being a duck you probably didn't read) they are rough sketches not intended to represent real fonts, your phone supplier may supply a font with full colour animated quacking duck...
@ArthurReutenauer so according to xetex list \mdfivesum got added to xetex sources. So I rsync'ed to the head of svn and "mdfivesum" appears in lots of places but when I ran make it made a xetex that claims to be texlive 2016 dev but \show\mdfivesum says it is undefined.
@DavidCarlisle That’s what I suspected. Well, the primitive has just been added by Akira and is supposed to work, but I haven’t had a chance to test it myself so I really wouldn’t know for sure :-)
@PauloCereda I already pointed it out to you: unicode.org/alloc/Pipeline.html is the permanent link to the pipeline; the current one has U+1F986 DUCK.
@PauloCereda They’ll ignore it; representative glyphs are never supposed to be exclusive and you can design your own font if you want, with a proper beak for the duck character.
By the way @JosephWright, the primitive name is now \mdfivesum as you must have seen; that was a request from Jonathan.
@JosephWright that's what I assumed, although the "reply" indicated otherwise:-) Possibly. If something needs to define something for luaotfload, then I guess ltluatex may as well define it from the start to match the primitive callbacks.
@JosephWright Good. Karl wasn’t extremely happy with Jonathan’s suggestion to use \mdfivesum; I would tend to agree with Karl that it would have been better to use \pdfmdfivesum since it was preempted by pdfTeX; but Akira let himself be convinced that it was a good idea to use \mdfivesum and since he did all the job he’s the one who gets the last word :-)
@ArthurReutenauer I'm with Hans on primitive naming: \pdf... implies a relationship to PDF output so is fine for \pdfliteral , \pdfcatalog, ... but not really for \(pdf)strmcp or \(pdf)primitive so also not really applicable to \(pdf)mdfivesum
@nuttyaboutnatty get rid of multirow and use \begin{picture}(0,0)\put(0,-10){\includegraphics{...}}\end{picture} and adjust the coordinate until it looks right
@nuttyaboutnatty \ht\strutbox is essentially the height of the highest character in the current font, although why use that in the depth argument of \raisebox I can only guess.
@nuttyaboutnatty no well tex does no trial and error, you may be doing to come up with values (where did 0.8 come from?)
@nuttyaboutnatty if you want to raise something by 3mm then if you are in vertical mode put \vspace{-3mm} before it, if you are in horizontal mode use \raisebox{3mm}{...} this applies to any tex construct, a word, a table an image....
@nuttyaboutnatty get rid of multirow and use \begin{picture}(0,0)\put(0,-10){\includegraphics{...}}\end{picture} and adjust the coordinate until it looks right
@nuttyaboutnatty but this is the chat room for cricket results and other trivia, if you have a question that requires code in an answer, make a real complete example and post a question to the main site. But you know that:-)
@JosephWright Actually, I think one way to look at it, that was sported by Karl, is that pdf as a prefix has been preempted by pdfTeX and hence means that the primitive is related to that engine, not necessarily to PDF. But even then, the prefix hasn’t been used consistently anyway.
@JosephWright Jonathan was defending pretty much your point of view that prefixes only make sense when they’re related to some special capability of the engine.
@JosephWright And Akira, probably out of deference for Jonathan as the creator of XeTeX, surrendered completely to his opinion without arguing. Karl also gave up pretty soon, while incidentally calling the use of the pdf prefix for pdfTeX primitives “irrelevantly meaningless” (!)
@ArthurReutenauer Karl has a very definite opinion about primitive naming, but I am not sure he is really right. We have some LuaTeX issues to tackle in that area soon (cf. @DavidCarlisle and my ongoing work on LuaTeX support in the LaTeX kernel)
@DavidCarlisle -- information added, as the last in an interminable list of comments. (in those days, the compositing organization was proud to identify itself on the copyright page. quick trip to the in-house library was all it took.)
@Nasser -- of course this is possible; illustrations showing exactly this kind of output appear on p.65 of the texbook. the input code isn't shown there, and i'm not sure what to search for to find that (it has probably been published somewhere in tugboat, but i don't remember by whom). however, since the input for the texbook is included in tex live, the content of that page could be researched to see how it was done.
@SeanAllred Cricket is about going in and out in the right time, and sometimes you are allowed to be in when others are out, but not always vice-versa. And you have some ball hitting action happening while people are getting in and out, but not synchronously, because if you are out when others are in, the others have to go out, so you can go in, and the opposite is also true, but only when some guy who was allowed to be in went out for whatever reason, or just came in for the very same reason. :)
@Alenanno I remember also the first one: BC² = BX · AB
@Alenanno Together with the other relation AC² = AX · AB, it follows also Pythagoras' theorem that's however proved much earlier in the Elements, without using similarity between triangles. The proof is quite complicated, because it's based on a clever decomposition of the squares on the catheti in several pieces that can be reordered to give the square on the hypothenuse. Much like in tangram.
@SeanAllred You are at an advantage understanding cricket, then :-) Other than cricket, baseball and related sports, the idea of having two teams doing very different things seems not to occur in other sports
Rounders (Irish: cluiche corr) is a bat-and-ball game played between two teams. Rounders is a striking and fielding team game that involves hitting a small, hard, leather-cased ball with a rounded end wooden, plastic or metal bat. The players score by running around the four bases on the field. The game is popular among Irish and British school children.
Gameplay centres on a number of innings, in which teams alternate at batting and fielding. A maximum of nine players are allowed to field at any time. Points (known as 'rounders') are scored by the batting team when one of their players completes...
@SeanAllred Have you ever tried to explain baseball to someone from a country where it's not played and where they've never seen it played? I imagine it's much the same as trying to explain cricket to people: it's not at all easy
@egreg Thank you. I guess I took a long way around... ;). But it is somewhat reassuring to know that what I seemed to remember may actually be remembered !
@JosephWright: Should I come up with a beamer theme for @David's talk too? Unless he's gonna use the "latex.dtx opened in an emacs buffer" trick again. :)
@DavidCarlisle thanks for the link on visualizing boxes.
Is it really true I can't use luacode with tex4ht? I get an error when I do
tex4ht foo.tex
where foo.tex has any lua code in it and uses luacode package. The error is
"tex4ht" Package luacode Error: LuaTeX is required for this package. Aborting..
(/usr/local/texlive/2015/texmf-dist/tex/lualatex/luacode/luacode.sty
(/usr/local/texlive/2015/texmf-dist/tex/generic/oberdiek/ifluatex.sty)
! Package luacode Error: LuaTeX is required for this package. Aborting..
See the luacode package documentation for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...
l.51 to prevent additional errors.}
This is a major problem, since I compile each file using lualatex and tex4ht. This means I can't use lua. I was hoping to use it more. But if the file will not compile with tex4ht, this means I'll forget learning it.
can someone please confirm the status of lua code with tex4ht?
There is a specific command to run tex4ht with XeTeX: htxelatex (which doesn't really work actually as far as I'm concerned).
What is the command to run text4ht with LuaTeX instead?