« first day (1716 days earlier)      last day (3218 days later) » 
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 23:00

12:47 AM
Does biber read in the whole bib file? It seems to be hanging on a really large one.
 
Ho1
1:09 AM
@egreg I have edited the question substantially, made the question more clear, added the screenshots of my remake with plain TeX and also the code. So, is there a chance that it will be reopened?
 
1:20 AM
@AlanMunn This is one of those times I really wish I understood Perl.
 
@SeanAllred Who does? :)
 
@AlanMunn From what I can tell, yes, but I wouldn't take my word on it.
@PauloCereda That's an excellent question
 
@SeanAllred :)
 
Ho1
For the reference, I am talking about this question: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/255063/… (Is this an originally typeset paper from 1946, or a new remake with TeX?) If you agree this is a good question, please vote for reopening.
 
@SeanAllred Yes, I think it does too, and biber is much slower than bibtex because it does more things (and is written in Perl). Although I've used this file before. But it just seems to hang.
 
1:29 AM
@AlanMunn I don't suppose you could provide a minimal working example ;)
@AlanMunn With anything that big (I'm imagining at least a 50MB .bib), I would try to split it up by category.
 
@SeanAllred Do you really want a 3.5 Mb bib file with almost 6000 references... :)
 
@AlanMunn If you want to email it to me, I'd be happy to try to pin down the problem over here. No guarantees, though :(
 
@SeanAllred 50 Mb would be huge indeed.
 
Ho1
Compress it. Text files like bib files, can be compressed a lot with zip, gzip, etc.
 
@SeanAllred No, it's ok. Thanks. I just switched to natbib and bibtex and it worked.
 
1:31 AM
@AlanMunn I keep electronic notes at my job. I've been employed for almost six months and I've over 8MB of plaintext notes.
I wonder if biber could be replaced with a compiled version… If another program took the same input and had the same output, I can't imagine there would be a problem.
It's a pity that it can't handle all that.
 
1:45 AM
@PauloCereda In case you are interested:
find . -name '*.tex' -execdir arara -v {} \;
note -execdir
 
2:00 AM
Is there any value in converting this answer to a comment?
14
A: No room for a new \dimen

HerbertThis is a FAQ, which is answered at http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=noroom

 
2:26 AM
@SeanAllred ooh that looks awesome!
 
@PauloCereda It's quite useful :) I just can't have any parent-directory dependencies :)
 
@SeanAllred :) Is it POSIX?
 
@PauloCereda Almost certain, but let me check
 
@SeanAllred it is it is, I just checked. :)
How nice!
 
@PauloCereda Woohoo!
 
2:28 AM
@SeanAllred <3
 
@PauloCereda <3 Currently writing up a script for a video: "Just Enough TeX to Get By"
 
@SeanAllred ooh
 
@PauloCereda I'm planning on putting that intro video to use some time this week :)
@PauloCereda Any ideas for a sound clip to play during that intro though? You seem to be a creative type :)
 
 
4 hours later…
Ho1
6:07 AM
Any other people interested in this question? tex.stackexchange.com/questions/255063/… (Is this an originally typeset paper from 1946, or a new remake with TeX?) Please vote for reopening.
 
@Ho1 I have no idea what you are actually asking
 
Ho1
Why are these so similar.
I found an article from 1946, and the output is like what I get with the TeX system that I have now.
 
@Ho1 Well DEK looked over a lot of material he considered to be 'good typesetting' when creating TeX. So it's not surprising that his outcomes are similar to those used by leading works for the past.
 
Ho1
So, I learned a lot from the comments. Specially the paper from Knuth was really helpful and interesting.
And it gave me insight about the history of TeX.
 
@Ho1 There are millions of existing documents: finding one that happens to come out with the same layout when typeset by hand and by TeX proves very little
 
Ho1
6:15 AM
So, I think it deserved to be asked.
 
Ho1
6:30 AM
This is one of the interesting papers I was suggested to read: math.lsa.umich.edu/~millerpd/docs/501_Winter13/Knuth79.pdf
As DavidCarlisle said: "this paper of Knuths where he explains that the design of cm fonts and tex came about partly to get back to that era of AMS publication quality..."
 
7:00 AM
@Ho1 it's an interesting subject but off topic for this site.
@Nasser search this site for topskip's visual-lua-debug package (which is now in texlive but started as an answer here)
@Nasser vvv
59
Q: How can I visualize boxes?

h0b0 This question led to a new package: lua-visual-debug Some of you may know the Web Developer Toolbar for Firefox that can outline the block level elements of a page like this: Is there a way to do something similar with TeX boxes for a complete document?

 
8:04 AM
I'm quietly reading source3e.pdf, on page 11 about protected. Is that a hypen in the name or is _-protected a part of the syntax?
Reading on, it just seems to be a bad hyphenation...
 
@daleif Just the usual automatic hyphenation: we (or rather @WillRobertson) haven't set up hyphenless line breaking
 
@JosephWright just noted it as it might be confusing to readers ;-)
 
8:23 AM
@daleif Complain at @WillRobertson :-)
 
8:47 AM
@JosephWright Waiting for Unicode being implemented in TeX. ;-)
 
@egreg Certainly an interesting quote
 
@WillRobertson, source3.pdf, page 36, 2nd paragraph, first line: firs -> first?
 
@daleif That one is just a typo, so I can deal with it :-)
 
9:20 AM
@JosephWright I see @barbarabeeton gets quoted as well:-)
 
@Johannes_B not as famous as barbara!
 
@DavidCarlisle That is correct :-)
 
9:53 AM
@SeanAllred I guess not. Not after so many years.
 
10:05 AM
@JosephWright: how do you like the second image? :)
 
10:47 AM
Oh, Mr. Iwata has passed away. :(
 
@PauloCereda: Who is Mr. Iwata?
 
@ChristianHupfer Global president of Nintendo. One of the kindest persons in the gaming industry.
 
@PauloCereda Oh, I've got a WII U, but I've never heard of him...
 
@ChristianHupfer He was a very nice person. :) Let me try to find out one of his jewels.
@ChristianHupfer: Here: nintendoeverything.com/… The interview is simply amazing. :)
 
@PauloCereda Thanks, I will read it later on.
 
11:02 AM
@ChristianHupfer ;)
 
@PauloCereda :-)
 
@JosephWright How about using this second image as background for your first slide (title)? :)
The only "heavy" slide. :)
 
11:49 AM
@DavidCarlisle I want to be quoted too. :(
> It's outrageous to not have a Unicode duck glyph.
 
@PauloCereda have you seen the 9.0 pipeline....
 
@DavidCarlisle ooh link
 
@PauloCereda you should be more careful what you wish for:
U+1F986
 
@DavidCarlisle That duck doesn't look like a proper duck because the beak does not look like a proper beak; where's the duck committee of the Unicode consortium? :)
I want to register a complaint.
@JosephWright @ChristianHupfer ^^
 
@PauloCereda Some Norwegian Blue Duck which is nailed to a stick?
 
11:54 AM
@PauloCereda as explained in the notes above (which being a duck you probably didn't read) they are rough sketches not intended to represent real fonts, your phone supplier may supply a font with full colour animated quacking duck...
 
@DavidCarlisle oooooooooooooooooooooh
@DavidCarlisle I did a vertical reading. :P
 
@PauloCereda Japanese duck
 
@PauloCereda: By the way: Have you renewed your Duck licence already? That's a very important act, of course ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer Pining for the Volkswagens Chryslers Fords Fjords.
@ChristianHupfer I thought licenses were only applicable to pets named Eric. :)
 
🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆
3
@PauloCereda come back to ^^^ in a years time and you may see a row of ducks....
 
11:57 AM
@DavidCarlisle LOL
@DavidCarlisle Starred for future reference. :)
 
@PauloCereda Just rename all your ducks Eric then? ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer No. :)
 
@PauloCereda Das Spaßbremse :-P
 
@ChristianHupfer I don't know that word, there is a ß in it! :)
 
@JosephWright yes new name fine:-)
 
12:00 PM
@PauloCereda Well, the funny ß letter ... yes. It means fun killer or party pooper :D
 
@ChristianHupfer :)
 
@PauloCereda I wish to report a burglary ...
 
SPAẞBREMSE
Looks odd.
 
@Johannes_B Looks like a B is on diet --> ß ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer Looks better with Libertine :-)
 
12:07 PM
@Johannes_B I was too lazy to change the font
 
@ChristianHupfer I know from experience ;-)
 
@DavidCarlisle What were you trying to do exactly?
 
@ArthurReutenauer so according to xetex list \mdfivesum got added to xetex sources. So I rsync'ed to the head of svn and "mdfivesum" appears in lots of places but when I ran make it made a xetex that claims to be texlive 2016 dev but \show\mdfivesum says it is undefined.
 
12:32 PM
@PauloCereda Ooh I've never seen this site :)
 
@SeanAllred They have some nice things. :)
 
1:02 PM
@DavidCarlisle So next add user callbacks to our suggestions?
 
@DavidCarlisle That’s what I suspected. Well, the primitive has just been added by Akira and is supposed to work, but I haven’t had a chance to test it myself so I really wouldn’t know for sure :-)
@PauloCereda I already pointed it out to you: unicode.org/alloc/Pipeline.html is the permanent link to the pipeline; the current one has U+1F986 DUCK.
 
@ArthurReutenauer ducks have very short memory span
@JosephWright to ltluatex or xetex ?
 
@PauloCereda They’ll ignore it; representative glyphs are never supposed to be exclusive and you can design your own font if you want, with a proper beak for the duck character.
By the way @JosephWright, the primitive name is now \mdfivesum as you must have seen; that was a request from Jonathan.
 
@ArthurReutenauer ooh sorry I have very short memory span. :)
@ArthurReutenauer ooh more ducks!
 
1:49 PM
@DavidCarlisle ltluatex
@DavidCarlisle I probably need to address @UlrikeFischer's request for l3keys too: no feedback from anyone else
@ArthurReutenauer Yes, saw that, entirely sensible
 
@JosephWright that's what I assumed, although the "reply" indicated otherwise:-) Possibly. If something needs to define something for luaotfload, then I guess ltluatex may as well define it from the start to match the primitive callbacks.
 
@DavidCarlisle OK, I'll do it later today unless you beat me to it
 
user image
2
I guess this is what happens when you leave chat open at work over the weekend.
 
@SeanAllred oooooh
 
@PauloCereda I blame you :)
 
2:01 PM
@SeanAllred Me? :)
 
@PauloCereda At least partly :)
 
I am a innocent duck. :)
 
@JosephWright would need to be late evening in my case. will make the luatexbase emulation in doctest.tex shrink to almost nothing:-)
 
2:19 PM
@JosephWright Good. Karl wasn’t extremely happy with Jonathan’s suggestion to use \mdfivesum; I would tend to agree with Karl that it would have been better to use \pdfmdfivesum since it was preempted by pdfTeX; but Akira let himself be convinced that it was a good idea to use \mdfivesum and since he did all the job he’s the one who gets the last word :-)
 
user image
5
@JosephWright ^^ :)
 
@ArthurReutenauer prefixes are bad:-)
 
2:38 PM
@PauloCereda This makes me smile :)
 
@SeanAllred Joseph doesn't like "heavy slides", but I'm telling him to leave at least this title. :)
 
@PauloCereda I think @JosephWright should at least have this as an alternative title slide -- one to show after the first, more formal title slide :)
 
@SeanAllred :)
 
2:55 PM
@ArthurReutenauer I'm with Hans on primitive naming: \pdf... implies a relationship to PDF output so is fine for \pdfliteral , \pdfcatalog, ... but not really for \(pdf)strmcp or \(pdf)primitive so also not really applicable to \(pdf)mdfivesum
 
3:05 PM
da demblade is givin me heddegg
 
hello
have been pokin' around and wasting far too much time on this:
getting an image to align vertically as desired in a tabular environment
 
@nuttyaboutnatty sounds like a baseline alignment question?
what exactly does 'as desired' entail? (and why not just ask a question on the main site? ;))
 
@nuttyaboutnatty There have been a few questions about that before I think. What do you have, and what is desired?
 
& \multirow{7}{*}{\raisebox{-.3\height}[\ht\strutbox]{\includegraphics[trim=0mm 0mm -50mm 0mm, clip, scale=0.21]{./figures/my_image}}}
compiled a million times
encapsulating multirow with raisebox and vice versa
 
@ArthurReutenauer We can talk about primitive naming at TUG2015 :-)
 
3:14 PM
addding parameters to raisebox {}[]
some take radical effect
others don't do nothing
prowled SX
wiki
google
nowhere could I yet find (or make good sense) of what's going awry :(
 
@nuttyaboutnatty I was thinking more of the [t] and [b] specifiers for baseline alignment, but i can't remember how \includegraphics deals with that
my LaTeX knowledge is waning these days :)
 
@nuttyaboutnatty get rid of multirow and use \begin{picture}(0,0)\put(0,-10){\includegraphics{...}}\end{picture} and adjust the coordinate until it looks right
 
"Images are added with a zero depth" - tex.stackexchange.com/a/15858/27721
 
@nuttyaboutnatty by default, yes
 
this is approaching what I want:
& \multirow{7}{*}{\raisebox{-.8\height}[\ht\strutbox]{\includegraphics[trim=0mm 0mm -50mm 0mm, clip, scale=0.21]{./figures/bla}}}
however,
ht strutbox is still latin to me (I read up on "h" and "t", but I don't know why I should know about it)
all I'd want is to push the image up, say, 3-4mm
simple.
{-.8\height}[\ht\strutbox] is probably taking a huge detour and a lot of unnecessary and frustrating trial-and-error compilation, no?
 
3:20 PM
@nuttyaboutnatty \ht\strutbox is essentially the height of the highest character in the current font, although why use that in the depth argument of \raisebox I can only guess.
@nuttyaboutnatty no well tex does no trial and error, you may be doing to come up with values (where did 0.8 come from?)
 
@DavidCarlisle because for some to-me-arcane reason dropping that [] parameter would result in my raisebox having no effect what-so-ever
@DavidCarlisle from my repeated trial-and-error compilations :-)
far from "elegant"
 
@nuttyaboutnatty if you want to raise something by 3mm then if you are in vertical mode put \vspace{-3mm} before it, if you are in horizontal mode use \raisebox{3mm}{...} this applies to any tex construct, a word, a table an image....
 
TeX in a nutshell: stacks on stacks on stacks
 
@DavidCarlisle & \multirow{7}{*}{\raisebox{15mm}{\includegraphics[trim=0mm 0mm -50mm 0mm, clip, scale=0.21]{./figures/bla}}}
has no effect (in my case)
 
8 mins ago, by David Carlisle
@nuttyaboutnatty get rid of multirow and use \begin{picture}(0,0)\put(0,-10){\includegraphics{...}}\end{picture} and adjust the coordinate until it looks right
@nuttyaboutnatty but this is the chat room for cricket results and other trivia, if you have a question that requires code in an answer, make a real complete example and post a question to the main site. But you know that:-)
3
 
3:27 PM
Speaking of, what is the !!/score?
 
@JosephWright Sure :-)
 
@SeanAllred Clearly you were not paying attention! We won first test, second hasn't started yet.
 
@DavidCarlisle Clearly :)
Also I have no idea what you're talking about with these tests
I have no knowledge whatsoever of the workings of cricket
(Other than that, superficially, it looks kinda like baseball)
 
@DavidCarlisle ok... :-)
 
@JosephWright Actually, I think one way to look at it, that was sported by Karl, is that pdf as a prefix has been preempted by pdfTeX and hence means that the primitive is related to that engine, not necessarily to PDF. But even then, the prefix hasn’t been used consistently anyway.
@JosephWright Jonathan was defending pretty much your point of view that prefixes only make sense when they’re related to some special capability of the engine.
 
3:33 PM
@ArthurReutenauer LuaTeX is rolling this back at the engine level
@ArthurReutenauer I see the logic but then what about Omega, Aleph, eTeX, ...
 
@ArthurReutenauer I agree with Jonathan and Joseph.
@SeanAllred get @PauloCereda to explain it to you.
 
@JosephWright And Akira, probably out of deference for Jonathan as the creator of XeTeX, surrendered completely to his opinion without arguing. Karl also gave up pretty soon, while incidentally calling the use of the pdf prefix for pdfTeX primitives “irrelevantly meaningless” (!)
 
@DavidCarlisle I might get another 189 pings by the end of that :)
 
@DavidCarlisle Oh, I don’t really have an opinion any more at this stage, I’m merely summing up the discussion :-)
 
@ArthurReutenauer :-)
@ArthurReutenauer Karl has a very definite opinion about primitive naming, but I am not sure he is really right. We have some LuaTeX issues to tackle in that area soon (cf. @DavidCarlisle and my ongoing work on LuaTeX support in the LaTeX kernel)
 
3:49 PM
@DavidCarlisle -- information added, as the last in an interminable list of comments. (in those days, the compositing organization was proud to identify itself on the copyright page. quick trip to the in-house library was all it took.)
 
@barbarabeeton thanks:-)
 
@Nasser -- of course this is possible; illustrations showing exactly this kind of output appear on p.65 of the texbook. the input code isn't shown there, and i'm not sure what to search for to find that (it has probably been published somewhere in tugboat, but i don't remember by whom). however, since the input for the texbook is included in tex live, the content of that page could be researched to see how it was done.
 
I was unsure whether to post my solution which was too similar to an existing one, and @cfr steals my thunder. >_> Shame on you! :P lol
 
@SeanAllred Cricket is about going in and out in the right time, and sometimes you are allowed to be in when others are out, but not always vice-versa. And you have some ball hitting action happening while people are getting in and out, but not synchronously, because if you are out when others are in, the others have to go out, so you can go in, and the opposite is also true, but only when some guy who was allowed to be in went out for whatever reason, or just came in for the very same reason. :)
 
cfr
@Alenanno Then mine is too similar?
Would somebody be so kind as to check my maths?
It is a really long time since I did any geometry ;).
 
4:04 PM
@cfr No, the other one was too similar. You don't use intersections because you're calculating C, I got it from the intersection with the arc.
 
cfr
@Alenanno But does mine work?
I tend to avoid anything relying on a subject I haven't studied in a very, very long time ;).
 
@cfr The result of your calculation is 3.2. Let me see if mine shows the same number.
...if I manage to see it.
Uhm ok maybe mine is too different.
 
@cfr Yes, CX² = AX · BX (Euclid's second theorem)
 
Euclid, crafty little devil. :P
 
@Alenanno Well, I'm supposed to remember it, as I give a short course on Euclid's Elements. ;-)
 
4:13 PM
@egreg Well, apparently you do remember it.
:P
 
@Alenanno I remember also the first one: BC² = BX · AB
@Alenanno Together with the other relation AC² = AX · AB, it follows also Pythagoras' theorem that's however proved much earlier in the Elements, without using similarity between triangles. The proof is quite complicated, because it's based on a clever decomposition of the squares on the catheti in several pieces that can be reordered to give the square on the hypothenuse. Much like in tangram.
 
@DavidCarlisle I hope my reply to the latest LaTeL-L message is about right
 
@egreg I don't remember much from my geometry classes... :P
 
@JosephWright I'd half written a reply but deleted when yours came:-) Yes was saying same more or less.
 
4:32 PM
@DavidCarlisle Am tempted to add that nothing is decided (hence the code is not the the team SVN)
 
@PauloCereda color me enlightened
 
@PauloCereda Could you perhaps combine the two graphics? I like the little chap looking for a codepoint but also the various 'wild' codepoints!
@SeanAllred Do you understand baseball?
 
@JosephWright Your wish is my command. :)
 
@PauloCereda Great
 
@JosephWright Baseball has the advantage of being a native sport
 
4:40 PM
@PauloCereda We should co-opt you as official LaTeX team artist :-)
@SeanAllred /me Mumbles 'rounders'
 
@JosephWright all in favor: aye
@JosephWright That went over my head, sorry
 
@SeanAllred You are at an advantage understanding cricket, then :-) Other than cricket, baseball and related sports, the idea of having two teams doing very different things seems not to occur in other sports
Rounders (Irish: cluiche corr) is a bat-and-ball game played between two teams. Rounders is a striking and fielding team game that involves hitting a small, hard, leather-cased ball with a rounded end wooden, plastic or metal bat. The players score by running around the four bases on the field. The game is popular among Irish and British school children. Gameplay centres on a number of innings, in which teams alternate at batting and fielding. A maximum of nine players are allowed to field at any time. Points (known as 'rounders') are scored by the batting team when one of their players completes...
 
@JosephWright Oh, I meant that I'm native to the sport, not the other way around :) I've known baseball for as long as I can remember
 
@SeanAllred Ah :-)
 
@JosephWright that is definitely interesting -- never noticed that
 
4:43 PM
@SeanAllred Have you ever tried to explain baseball to someone from a country where it's not played and where they've never seen it played? I imagine it's much the same as trying to explain cricket to people: it's not at all easy
 
@SeanAllred oh no!
 
@PauloCereda >:)
@JosephWright Certainly :) I'll just have to watch a few (tens of) games, then
 
@JosephWright: you got mail. :)
 
Out of curiosity, did anybody understand this?
2 hours ago, by Johannes_B
da demblade is givin me heddegg
 
@Johannes_B Das template ist giving sie sehr headakhes. :)
 
4:48 PM
@Johannes_B something is giving you a headache
 
@Johannes_B You get headaches from templates. Nothing new there.
 
^ smarter men than i
 
@SeanAllred Nah you are smarter than the average duck. :)
 
@TorbjørnT. <3 This time it is a specific template :-)
 
4:49 PM
@PauloCereda <3
 
@Johannes_B it could be a drunk German trying to speak Welsh. <3
 
@PauloCereda @Johannes_B not enough Ls
 
@SeanAllred ooooh
 
20 hours ago, by Sean Allred
> They've gone mental with the L
 
@PauloCereda More like a saxon trying to speak english. We don't have p, k or t in our spoken language. As is said by so many.
 
4:52 PM
Jun 8 at 15:56, by Paulo Cereda
@ArthurReutenauer You are jealous because I have a wagenbobl and you don't. :P
<3
 
cfr
@egreg Thank you. I guess I took a long way around... ;). But it is somewhat reassuring to know that what I seemed to remember may actually be remembered !
 
@PauloCereda All i can say to this is: quack :-)
 
@Johannes_B quack! :)
 
@cfr The proof is exactly using your tools: similar triangles.
 
@StefanKottwitz Are you noticing any performance issues? My system is always slow (as you know :-) ) but Besserwisser reported issues today as well.
 
4:57 PM
@PauloCereda Looks great
@PauloCereda @DavidCarlisle's seen a draft of the slides but not the amazing graphic: I'll hold it back for the real thing :-)
 
@JosephWright oooh :)
 
@PauloCereda @PauloCereda Probably can't get it into TUGBoat (colour printing) so I might pop it on my blog, but not until after the talk
 
@JosephWright Oh. :)
 
@PauloCereda I'll see how it greyscales
@PauloCereda Hmm, might work OK
 
@JosephWright I am waiting to see my printed article and how the arara logo looks greyscale. :)
 
5:03 PM
@PauloCereda Indeed
@PauloCereda I've got at least three TUGboat articles to write before the end of the month! (I've ended up with an extra talk)
 
@JosephWright Oh my! That many!
Well, I have one for ArsTeXnica. :)
 
@JosephWright can't do any harm
 
@PauloCereda One will be short, one is half-written (Unicodeland), one yet to write (through the parshape)
 
5:20 PM
@Johannes_B I did, but not currently
 
5:33 PM
Quick survey, please raise your hands: Who does not know, what package setspace is doing?
 
@Johannes_B Evil. Did I win?
 
@egreg Not sure, did you?
We need a judge. @DavidCarlisle, wanna do the honours?
 
5:50 PM
@Johannes_B judge what?
@Johannes_B oh judge egreg? he lost.
 
@DavidCarlisle Of course. ;-) Go Aussies!
 
@DavidCarlisle boolean judge(Person person) { return person.name.equals("egreg") ? false : Dice.roll() % 2 == 0; }
 
@PauloCereda sure that would pass our peer review process
 
@DavidCarlisle :)
 
6:29 PM
@DavidCarlisle :-)
 
7:00 PM
I have a palindrome reputation! :P
Except for that comma. grrr
 
@Alenanno \sisetup{group-digits = false} ;-)
 
@JosephWright Eheh
 
@JosephWright: Should I come up with a beamer theme for @David's talk too? Unless he's gonna use the "latex.dtx opened in an emacs buffer" trick again. :)
 
@PauloCereda Don't think @DavidCarlisle is talking
 
@JosephWright o.O
 
7:10 PM
@PauloCereda BTW, I think your graphic would make a good first slide: not sure whether to go with that alone or add some text too
@PauloCereda @DavidCarlisle might get roped in by Frank in his talk (but then so might I!)
 
@JosephWright You could add your title. :)
 
@PauloCereda Indeed
 
@PauloCereda they don't trust me to talk about anything
 
@DavidCarlisle You could have given your 'fixing LaTeX' talk to a bigger audience :-)
 
@JosephWright or the year before's longtable bugs
 
7:20 PM
\documentclass[11pt]{beamer}

\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\title{Joseph's Adventures in Unicodeland}
\author{Joseph Wright}
\date{\today}

\begin{document}

\usebackgroundtemplate{\includegraphics[width=\paperwidth,keepaspectratio]{unicodeland_final.png}}

\begin{frame}

\begin{textblock}{8}(7.5,1.5)
\centering
{\Large\bfseries Joseph's Adventures in Unicodeland}

\vspace{2em}

Joseph Wright
\end{textblock}

\end{frame}
@JosephWright ^^
@JosephWright: what if I put the glyphs on the ground, only?
@JosephWright: you got mail, cleaner version. :)
\documentclass[11pt]{beamer}

\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\title{Joseph's Adventures in Unicodeland}
\author{Joseph Wright}
\date{\today}

\begin{document}

\usebackgroundtemplate{\includegraphics[width=\paperwidth,keepaspectratio]{unicodeland_cleansky.png}}

\begin{frame}

\begin{textblock}{8}(6.5,1.5)
\centering
{\Large\bfseries Joseph's Adventures in Unicodeland}

\vspace{1em}

Joseph Wright
\end{textblock}
 
@PauloCereda Will go with
\begingroup
  \usebackgroundtemplate
    {\includegraphics[width=\paperwidth, height=\paperheight]{unicodeland}}
  \begin{frame}
    \begin{textblock}{8}(7.5,1.85)
      \begingroup
        \noindent
        \usebeamerfont{title}%
        \usebeamercolor[fg]{title}%
        \inserttitle
        \par
      \endgroup
    \end{textblock}
  \end{frame}
\endgroup
I think
Just wondering about the font colour
 
@JosephWright color.adobe.com
:)
They have nice combinations.
 
@PauloCereda Ah, you slightly misunderstand me :-)
 
7:35 PM
@JosephWright Oh no!
:)
 
@PauloCereda I tend to use the colours set out by my uni for structural elements:
\definecolor{UEAblue}{RGB}{0,89,127}
\definecolor{UEAgrey}{RGB}{153,139,125}
\definecolor{UEAorange}{RGB}{215,128,25}
 
@JosephWright ooh :)
 
So normally with a white background the title is in UEAblue, but here I think black might be better
 
@JosephWright Good plan. :)
 
7:53 PM
@DavidCarlisle thanks for the link on visualizing boxes.
Is it really true I can't use luacode with tex4ht? I get an error when I do

tex4ht foo.tex
where foo.tex has any lua code in it and uses luacode package. The error is
"tex4ht" Package luacode Error: LuaTeX is required for this package. Aborting..
(/usr/local/texlive/2015/texmf-dist/tex/lualatex/luacode/luacode.sty
(/usr/local/texlive/2015/texmf-dist/tex/generic/oberdiek/ifluatex.sty)

! Package luacode Error: LuaTeX is required for this package. Aborting..

See the luacode package documentation for explanation.
Type  H <return>  for immediate help.
 ...

l.51     to prevent additional errors.}
This is a major problem, since I compile each file using lualatex and tex4ht. This means I can't use lua. I was hoping to use it more. But if the file will not compile with tex4ht, this means I'll forget learning it.
can someone please confirm the status of lua code with tex4ht?
 
@Nasser Have you seen this?
9
Q: text4ht and LuaTeX

ℝaphinkThere is a specific command to run tex4ht with XeTeX: htxelatex (which doesn't really work actually as far as I'm concerned). What is the command to run text4ht with LuaTeX instead?

@Nasser And also this: github.com/michal-h21/lua4ht
 
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 23:00

« first day (1716 days earlier)      last day (3218 days later) »