« first day (1428 days earlier)      last day (3511 days later) » 

12:04 AM
@egreg Looks amazing.
 
12:16 AM
@percusse It is.
 
 
8 hours later…
8:41 AM
@cgnieder: One for you, I suppose: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/203528/…
 
9:00 AM
Morning all
 
@JosephWright: Good morning (to the others as well, of course ;-))
 
 
1 hour later…
10:04 AM
@egreg are you sure they weren't tex.sx members waiting for you?
 
@DavidCarlisle :)
 
10:54 AM
@DavidCarlisle LOL
 
@PauloCereda: A bad joke: egreg's new movie: TeX from Dusk Till Dawn ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer :)
 
@PauloCereda: "I've got six bullets and they all can run faster than you can!" (Seth Gecko)
 
@ChristianHupfer The original is one of the worst movies I've ever seen. Mine will be way better.
 
@PauloCereda: I transcribed some of the Word (fie, fie) documents needed for the meeting to TeX
@egreg: I contradict you :-P
 
11:03 AM
@ChristianHupfer I think Rich Hall once said that if you and a friend face an alligator, you do not need to outrun the alligator. You just need to outrun your friend. :)
 
@PauloCereda: If you've got such friends ...
Oh my, someone downvoted Percusse's recent question on Meta!
@PauloCereda: Wtf is Rich Hall, by the way? :D
 
@ChristianHupfer American comedian. :)
 
@PauloCereda: Is he still alive, half alive but in future not so well or dead, really dead?
 
@ChristianHupfer Alive. :)
 
@egreg: I am sure, in the new TeX From Dusk Till Dawn - movie, you will slay the vampires with various \expandafters and LaTeX3 syntax, apart from typographical suggestions ;-)
@PauloCereda: He's fame seems to be limited to the American continent
 
11:09 AM
@ChristianHupfer Some parts of the UK, I guess.
 
@PauloCereda: That's what I said :-P
 
11:44 AM
@ChristianHupfer I think he's been evicted from the americas and mostly lives in UK in re-runs of UK comedy quiz shows (from where certain people gain all their information)
 
12:16 PM
Hello
Are questions related to TeXlive on-topic on tex.sx.com?
Nevermind, I did not see before that there's even a tag for it. Thanks to all of you for answering our stupid questions!
 
@Nicolas Yes, of course. There are and
 
12:32 PM
@JosephWright did we? must have been while I wasn't looking:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle Yes
@DavidCarlisle Around 2009 I think (when I joined the team: expl3 was a lot rougher then)
 
@JosephWright ah i wasn't really paying much attention first decade of this century:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle I noticed
 
@JosephWright :-)
 
1:35 PM
@DavidCarlisle Does that mean you are old? :)
 
@PauloCereda not as old as egreg
 
@DavidCarlisle But you're as old as George Clooney.
 
@egreg wrong as ever: George Timothy Clooney (born May 6, 1961)
 
@DavidCarlisle Can some month make a difference at your age?
 
@egreg maybe it's different in Italy but here we were taught that less than was not a partial order
 
2:34 PM
@DavidCarlisle oy
 
@PauloCereda "if the cap fits, wear it" (as my mother would say if we complained about unspecific accusations:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle We have a similar expression in here. :)
@David: I gather all information I need from a vim buffer. :)
 
@PauloCereda probably explains why it's so inaccurate
 
@JosephWright In interface3.pdf the function \prop_get:Nn is mentioned (and also defined in expl3), but not documented. The documented one is \prop_item:Nn.
 
@Manuel \prop_get:Nn has recently been renamed \prop_item:Nn. A couple of places in the documentation still have the old name. The old name will still be valid for some months.
 
3:05 PM
@Manuel Will fix
 
@egreg Ah. I just found that \prop_get:Nn worked because that's what I intuitively wrote first, but after looking in the documentation I saw it nowhere. @JosephWright Nice.
 
@Manuel get is for non-expandable functions, hence the change
 
@JosephWright I don't know about those conventions. The same as case is for expandable functions, isn't it? I think you said it some time ago.
 
@Manuel Yes
 
@JosephWright I need to learn :)
 
3:21 PM
Any way to properly format this definition?
(\forall a \mathrm{,} L \in \mathbb{R} \mathrm{if} \ \forall \varepsilon>0 \in \mathbb{R} {\exists \delta(\varepsilon) > 0 \in \mathbb{R} \mathrm{s.t.} [\forall x][0 < \left | x -a \right | < \delta(\varepsilon) \implies \left | f(x) - L \right | < \varepsilon ] } \mathrm{then} \lim_{x\to a}f(x) = L \ \mathrm{exists}).
 
@Jun-GooKwak I'd use many more words.
 
@egreg why does that make me smile
 
@egreg Hi, :p. I wrote the definition in words as well, but I wanted to illustrate it how even in symbols, the definition of limit is still confusing.
But it just goes off the page :(
 
@Jun-GooKwak you can use one of the many muti line math environments from amsmath (but code formatting in chat is rubbish, better to make a test document in a question on the main site)
 
@Jun-GooKwak \mathrm => \text. \left| … \right| => \abs{…}. If you are in a paragraph, put what is math between $…$ and the text (what you have now as \mathrm outside it.
 
3:28 PM
@Manuel @DavidCarlisle Alright, I'll try what you guys recommended. The document in question is here sharelatex.com/project/542436ec0ceb09954f015aee and the problem I'm encountering is at the bottom.
 
@Jun-GooKwak not brilliant but gets you started:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}

\begin{document}


\begin{flushleft}
$\forall a, L \in \mathbb{R}$\\
if\\
$\forall \varepsilon>0 \in \mathbb{R} {\exists \delta(\varepsilon) > 0 \in \mathbb{R} \mathrm{s.t.} [\forall x][0 < \left | x -a \right | < \delta(\varepsilon) \implies \left | f(x) - L \right | < \varepsilon ] }$\\
then\\
$\lim_{x\to a}f(x) = L \ \mathrm{exists}$.
\end{flushleft}

\end{document}
 
@DavidCarlisle Thank you very much. I think breaking up the definition into parts like that will make it a lot more readable.
 
@ChristianHupfer It's already answered, I guess :)
 
3:50 PM
@cgnieder: Yes, but not at the time of my message to you ;-)
@DavidCarlisle: Thanks for information -- I think, Rich Hall is not very known in Germany. I never heard of him
 
 
3 hours later…
6:55 PM
@VáclavPavlík Ahoj! :D
 
7:28 PM
@tohecz :D Ahoj.
 
(finally I can speak Czech here to someone, to annoy the mods and other people :p )
 
@tohecz yeah
 
7:56 PM
@PauloCereda Are you involved in DuckDuckGo?
 
cis
Good Evening. Somebody, who could send me scrletter.dtx and scrletter.ins :()
?
 
@cis CTAN?
 
cis
It has not become public, as to my knowledge - I could send you the KOMA-Page-Link... komascript.de/node/1837 ... but the text is completely german ;)
OK, I will write to MArkus KOhm
 
8:41 PM
@egreg I wish. :)
 
8:59 PM
@PauloCereda Hi
 
@barznjy Hello.
 
I have submitted a paper to a conference, I used IEEE standard conference Latex template, but now it gives me the following error (in the paper)
sidemargins The widest page of the paper has a text width of 7.153 inches on page 1 (widths: 7.153; 7.153; 7.153; 7.153; 7.153; 7.153 inches), which does not leave 1 inches each of left and right margin on a page of 8.5 inches (letter paper). -
bottommargins The paper has a bottom margin of 0.861 inches on page 2, which does not leave 1 inches of margin. -
spacing The paper has an average line spacing of 11.388 pt, but should have 12. You may need to increase your font size.
I used the template, I don't changed any margins, why this happen?
@PauloCereda do you have any idea about that?
 
@barznjy This does not sound to me like an error, more of a warning.
Or is it a proper error?
 
@PauloCereda OK, but how I can eliminate these warnings?
 
@barznjy The warning message tells you what to do. :) But if you do so, you are probably not complying with the conference guidelines. A warning is not an error, so I'd leave things as they are.
 
9:10 PM
@PauloCereda Thanks
 
@barznjy My pleasure. Sadly, it's not wise to tweak the document for a conference.
 
@barznjy because the conference's LaTeX expert is not quite an expert, if you didn't change anything in the template, just ignore the warning
 
9:25 PM
@tohecz This. :)
 
@PauloCereda :)
@PauloCereda btw, went to Montmartre today, that quarter has never betrayed me, always something new :)
 
@tohecz :)
 
@tohecz And, unless you really choose to, you can't see the horrible thing.
 
@egreg which thing? Moulin rouge? :p
 
@tohecz “The horrible thing up the Montmartre hill” can refer to just one object. ;-)
 
9:29 PM
@egreg the .... funicular? :p
 
@tohecz Don't be silly! ;-)
 
and if you mean Sacre coeur, then I think it fits into Paris very well: it's as horrible as most of the monuments here, and that's what people so love about the city :)
 
cis
@tohecz "Moulin rouge" - I made a reservation for my holidays there - something special with it, I should know?
 
@cis at Moulin rouge? you know what type of place it is, right?
 
cis
@tohecz Mmmh, I know nothing :)
 
9:31 PM
@cis Moulin rouge is a sex theatre
the whole street around is full of sex shops, peep shows and stuff, and the area is not exactly safe at night
 
cis
@tohecz Oh my dear, I booked a wicked hotel ... :()
 
@cis but maybe there's another place called this way here, have you got a link?
 
cis
@tohecz No no, it was a joke, from the beginning
 
@cis the two of us need to have a private talk, I'll get my neighbours from Pigalle in :D :P
 
10:15 PM
@egreg: the girls of Brazil will play in Verona. :)
 
@PauloCereda Volleyball? No, thanks. ;-)
 
@egreg So you won't go see Jaqueline? C'mon. :)
 
@PauloCereda Beautiful girl indeed.
 
@egreg 100% agree. :)
 
@PauloCereda Already married, it seems. With a 190 cm tall hitter.
 
10:25 PM
@egreg Yes, married to Murilo, who also plays in the national team. :) I need to take a look at the list. :P
 
10:46 PM
today married
tomorrow divorced
that would be no
surprise
with such a very
superstar
@Paulo ^^
 
@tohecz o.O
 
@PauloCereda especially since he's obviously a superstar too
 
11:03 PM
All those years, I didn't know that this song was the original
 
@percusse Wow.
 
@PauloCereda Wow indeed. My stupidity knows no limits.
I've covered this song at least a good hundred of times.
 
@percusse I didn't know either. :)
 
I always thought this was Ugly Kid Joe
 
11:21 PM
ok guys, good night
 
11:34 PM
Hello! Just a quick 'meta' question. Some days ago I found a page with some common answers to welcome new users, to ask for a MWE... I'm trying to have look at it now, but can't find it. Could you tell me how to get to it?
 
170
Q: I've just been asked to write a minimal example, what is that?

Juan A. NavarroI was posting some question about this strange thing LaTeX is doing when I try to compile my thesis. Someone asked me to provide a minimal example that reproduces the problem. My thesis is now a few hundred pages long and spans along ten different source files! How am I supposed to know what or w...

@U.Martinez-Corral This one?
Or you need the text blocks?
129
Q: Text building blocks

CaramdirThere are some replies that are used quite often. For example, the first reply to many questions is a demand for a minimal example. These replies should typically include a link with additional information. So I thought that it might be useful to collect some standard replies for quick copy&paste...

 
I was looking for the text blocks. Thanks a lot!
 
@U.Martinez-Corral No problem.
 
Is there a 'direct link' in any section of the 'Help Center' or should I just save the link?
 
@U.Martinez-Corral What are you planning to do with it?
 
11:44 PM
Since I couldn't find the link, some minutes ago I copied the first one of them from another user to reply here‌​.
Now i just want to know where to find it quickly, in case I want to look at it again
 
@U.Martinez-Corral Some people put it in their About me box in their profile. Some favorite it. Some bookmark it.
There is no direct link mechanism as far as I know
 
Ok. I'll save it then. Thanks again.
 
my pleasure
 
@percusse: sir I need a song for the arara 4.0 video.
But it's better to not reveal in here. :)
 
@PauloCereda Sir yes sir. What's the feeling ? :P
I'll email Pwning noobies.mp3 :P
 
11:51 PM
@percusse Stealth mode in progress. :)
 
Aight
 

« first day (1428 days earlier)      last day (3511 days later) »