« first day (1789 days earlier)      last day (2558 days later) » 

5:46 PM
0
Q: Isn't the tag 'tafsir' synonymous to the tag 'tafseer'?

ArmaanWe have two tags which sound the same and mean the same. They are: tafsir tafseer They are the same word but just spelt differently as there is no direct spelling of an Arabic word in English. For example, some people say assalamu alaykum and others say assalaamu alaikum. Question: Isn't...

 
 
1 hour later…
7:04 PM
Hey @G.Bach if you have some time I really hope you watch the above series. Each video is about 20 min.
 
7:20 PM
@Casanova cheers, but i dont think i'll get anything out of it
 
You might ;)
 
not a fan of lectures, i prefer text; and that guy is pretty bad
 
lol
 
 
1 hour later…
8:48 PM
Hmm How come ZamZam water never runs out?
 
9:08 PM
Oh and I forgot to mention that is in the middle of a dry desert ;)
 
it replenishes itself through an acquifer, like most wells
 
For centuries?
 
yes
rainfall replenishes the acquifer, like it does everywhere else
 
Ah rainfall. Yeah what mecca are you talking about lol?
Btw we are talking about 690 Millions liters of Zamzam being pumped in 24 hours
 
9:25 PM
the mecca in saudi arabia
 
"Rain usually falls in Mecca in small amounts"
 
yeah i can see that
rain also falls in small amounts in other desert cities, and they have wells too that support millions of people
 
sure but it last for centuries?
Btw we are talking about billions of people, not millions
 
yes, desert cities have often existed for millenia
no we arent
 
yes we are
 
9:28 PM
not in the course of a day or even a year
 
yeah
 
alright, what evidence do you have for that
 
for the billions thing?
 
yeah
 
i meant yeah for your statement. Billions as through out the centuries
 
9:30 PM
well obviously
even that is a bit of a statement
but it could be true
but that says nothing about how it replenishes itself o_=
*o_0
 
That is why I wonder how it replenishes itself lol
 
an acquifer
jeddah probably draws from the same acquifer, its not that far
 
how does that acquifer gets filled?
 
i dont know if theres a bedrock barrier between jeddah and mecca, but unless there is one, they will probably draw from the same source
with rainfall
An aquifer is an underground layer of water-bearing permeable rock, rock fractures or unconsolidated materials (gravel, sand, or silt) from which groundwater can be extracted using a water well. The study of water flow in aquifers and the characterization of aquifers is called hydrogeology. Related terms include aquitard, which is a bed of low permeability along an aquifer, and aquiclude (or aquifuge), which is a solid, impermeable area underlying or overlying an aquifer. If the impermeable area overlies the aquifer, pressure could cause it to become a confined aquifer. == Depth == Aquifers may...
 
but as i told you very little rain falls in mecca
 
9:34 PM
that goes for jeddah too, but somehow youre not surprised they have water
 
in jeddah i think it is from rivers and oceans i believe
not rain
 
how do you think it works in how does it work in madinah
 
?
 
you seem to think theres something special about zamzam
like its completely different from other desert cities
 
i do
 
9:39 PM
why
 
because the prophet talked about it
 
oh so its not actually because you have any data that suggests anything special
just that its a hadith
 
It contains more calcium and magnesium than the other wells.

Even though it never been treated with chemicals but it contains fluorides which can prevent bacteria growth and beneficial for health without any water treatment.
It has always maintained same salt composition and taste.

Even if you keep it still in a bottle or something for a long time, it will remain clear and appropriate for consumption.

It will never run out and always fulfill the requirement .

It has never overflowed.
 
yeah ive seen quora, that has zero references
thats a random muslim on the internet posting whatever
 
lol you say so
 
9:44 PM
well what evidence do you have that any of this is true, or somehow different to other desert cities
 
Most spring waters were found to have a relatively low calcium concentration, with an average of 21.8 mg/L. Purified waters contain a negligible calcium concentration.
According to wikipedia zamzam has 96 mg/L
 
where is this from "Most spring waters were found to have a relatively low calcium concentration"
 
did you even read what that said
"The calcium concentration of water varies from 1 to 135 mg/L across the USA and Canada"
 
we are talking about spring waters
 
9:53 PM
how much of a given mineral/element is in water depends on what rocks they flow through, how much of that element is in the ground in that region
 
ok so you are now convinced that it has more calcium than other spring waters?
 
it has more calcium than some other springs in completely different regions of the world
 
yeah
 
so?
 
so? you wanted proof and there you have it
 
10:00 PM
alright, and how does that make it special
does a high calcium content make other springs special too?
 
it is special for me at least lol
 
"The annual discharge from the well is restricted to around 500,000 m3. However, this limit can be modified if hydrological condition so permit. For example, due to last year 's high rainfall the augmented aquifer recharge allowed proposed production increase by about 92000 m3 for the year 1432 AH. "
thats the official institution in saudi arabia describing whats going on
they're saying a) they control the water so it doesnt run dry and b) that it gets replenished via an aquifer that's itself replenished by rainfall
 
what is m3?
 
its m^3, cubic meters
a cubic meter is 1000 liters
so, 500 000 000 liters
per year
 
so it is not 690 million a hour lol?
 
10:05 PM
of course not
that would be ridiculous
 
they just don't make miracles like they used to anymore. :(
 
:(
 
they do them exactly the same goldpseudo : P
well maybe more involved trickery
 
what do you mean?
 
i mean they dont make miracles
 
10:18 PM
I am going for umrah in the first day of ramadan if you want to come with me Bach hahaha
 
have fun!
 
@Casanova he is not allowed to get into . i think :)
 
lol he still has time to convert :P
 
why would i do that o_0
 
you will not know until u do !
(:
 
10:21 PM
(:
 
if you know why , you would convert now
 
then theres no reason to
 
i mean : you will know why before converting :)
 
well sure if anyone starts making sense of islam, but that seems unlikely
 
why doesnt it make sense? we dont have the god is three but one thing lol
 
10:23 PM
one of the sahaba said about umar :
umar will not accept until his donkey do
 
and he is the second caliphate in Islam :)
 
free will & qadr, evolution, sorcery, most of the criminal law, lots of ahadith, a lot of the stuff that science-in-the-quran apologists say, its got no more going for it than any other religion, hell and paradise vs justice,...
there's no shortage of things in islam that i cant see anyone making sense of
 
Imam Zaid didnt help you with the free will and qadr?
 
who?
 
Zaid lol
 
10:27 PM
he didin't like "imam " :P
 
nope
no i just dont know if theres some imam i dont know
 
haha i call him imam
 
bach i don't find evolution logical
am i wrong ?
 
yeah pretty sure
 
it doesnt make sense mustapha
 
10:28 PM
okey , i just wanted to know
 
i cant help you with specifics since im not a biologist, but if you have any somewhat general questions, maybe i can help you out
 
even darwin said he doesnt have proof
 
if it's fine to not believing in evolution
 
its pretty irrelevant what darwin said, what matters is what the evidence says
 
i am not a biologist
 
10:29 PM
not if you care about evidence mustapha
 
but i can understand big theories
 
well it is his theory lol
 
if you dont care about evidence then its also fine to not believe in gravity or electromagnetism or heliocentrism or bacteria
 
specially when it's talking about the roots
do you thing that i believe in gravity lol (:
 
thats the thing with science casanova, no one owns it, and no one is an authority; theres just experts and evidence
i dunno mustapha, do you?
 
10:31 PM
but gravity and the other things you mentioned was approved by all scientists. Not the same for evolution
 
find any topic in science where some major religion says "nuh-uh thats not how it goes", and you automatically got a bunch of trained scientists disagreeing with it because they prefer their religious beliefs over the conclusions arrived at by the scientific method
 
i thing i am wrong
but believing in something like gravity
is not easy to follow all the people
 
and evolution is so well subscribed by biologists all over the world, they arent even looking for evidence anymore, just like no one is looking for evidence of electromagnetism anymore
 
maybe one day you will be shocked
 
sure, could be; but if there is a shock, it'll be one that conforms perfectly to all the evidence we have now
 
10:34 PM
ok and how do you thing the apes came into existence?
 
my bbelieve is that gravity is just an Try to interpret what is happening
it may be totally wrong . but it's good for us now :)
 
groundbreaking scientific revolutions dont overturn completely what was before them; the things it got right stick, and the details it got wrong get refined
 
i am not trying to be stupid
i encourage people to study those things
 
@Casanova they evolved from other animals
 
even evolution
 
10:36 PM
and how did those animals came into existence?
 
@Casanova evolved from other life forms
 
but don't believe in it like it's a reality
specially sometthing Mysterious like evolution
 
how did those other life forms came into existence?
 
@MustaphaElbazi evolution is not mysterious, the very fine details are, but the overall process is very well understood
@Casanova you mean the very first ones? dont know
 
@G.Bach so why it's not easy to be explained
 
10:37 PM
Exactly. God created them
 
to simple people
 
@MustaphaElbazi it can be explained in rough ideas, i'll try if you like
@Casanova "i dont know, therefore god" is about the worst non-sequitur ever
 
hahaha but it makes sense
 
@Casanova it makes as much sense as "i dont know, therefore the flying spaghetti monster"
 
lol
but there must be a creator
 
10:39 PM
why
 
nop i am interesting now . i am sorry
I will try with it after studying some biology inshae allah
 
otherwise nothing would have come to existence
 
i am not *
you are writing very fast guys
 
@Casanova how do you know anything came into existence
why cant it just have always been
 
bach . i am sure you have seen the video about those people who were asked about evolution
 
10:41 PM
@MustaphaElbazi alright, feel free to ask questions about it, maybe open a chatroom if you do so we dont spam here in case it annoys people
could also recommend a book for it
 
i'm not annoyed. just having trouble keeping my inner snark in check.
 
lol
 
let the snark flow through you dude
 
but their is Opponents of it afak
 
how do you think earth came into existence?
 
10:42 PM
@goldPseudo what about evolution
what do u think ?
 
@MustaphaElbazi theres also opponents of gravity, a round earth, and people with phds in math who think the real numbers are countable
@Casanova clumped together matter
 
@G.Bach lol
 
and then separated?
 
i should ask @RebeccaJ.Stones if she believe the same lol
 
the earth is still here, so no, didnt separate
 
10:43 PM
@MustaphaElbazi my own opinions are more preadamic than you're likely to find in mainstream Islamic thought.
but even then i only hold them so dear to my heart. like most of my "this happened countless millenia before i was born" opinions.
 
@goldPseudo well , i have seen some preadamic opinions this week :)
i would n't mind to have more
 
i mostly believe that evolution happened more or less like the theory states. just because Adam was created from dust doesn't mean that there weren't other evolved chimps running around that looked like him.
 
haha
sorry didnt mean to laugh
 
@goldPseudo you mean kind of like if a person popped into existence now?
 
so Bach you say the universe had a beginning?
 
10:48 PM
@Casanova i dont know, the cosmologists arent sure
 
It does
 
my english don't help me
you believe that evolution happen to some animals but adam was created as a complet human ?
 
@G.Bach Qur'an says that the creation of Jesus was miraculous in the same way the creation of Adam was; there were definitely other humans putzing around during Jesus' time.
 
im not looking to argue that, just curious
 
well this is not so preadamic
i've hear of this last week
 
10:50 PM
Well Bach according to the Big Bang theory the universe does have a beginning
 
@goldPseudo i don't know how did you get this idea from this verse ?
 
i lean towards Adam not being the first "human" per se, rather the first one complete with a soul or free will or whatever metaphysical divine whatnot makes us "special" rather than "animal".
but that's just personal opinion.
 
@Casanova afaik the "big bang" tells us nothing about whether there was a "before" or not
 
The Big Bang theory states that around 12-15 billion years ago the universe came into existence from one single extremely hot and dense point, and that something triggered the explosion of this point that brought about the beginning of the universe. The universe, since then, has been expanding from this single point.
 
and there are very prominent physicists who think reality might well be infinitely old
 
10:52 PM
so it has a beginning
 
@goldPseudo are you sure it's personal . becaus i know many people believe the same !
i can give u arabic videos of famous characters saying the same thing !!
 
@MustaphaElbazi i didn't. i got the idea from my own knowledge and thought, the verse just doesn't contradict it.
 
@Casanova if you ask physicists very specific questions, like "does this mean there was nothing before that", then they'll say "hm not sure"
 
That is a very interesting point @goldPseudo!
 
> إن مثل عيسى عند الله كمثل آدم خلقه من تراب ثم قال له كن فيكون
 
10:53 PM
@goldPseudo so what's happend to other people who were existing before adam !?
 
well, they're probably dead now. it was quite a while ago.
 
not according to Hubble @G.Bach
 
@Casanova hubble has been dead a while and didnt have the data we have
einstein was wrong about quantum mechanics
 
but why they didn't just live with us !?
 
but the Big Bang theory is accepted by the vast majority of scientists and astronomers.
the universe does have a beginning. Allah says: He (God) is the Originator of the heavens and the earth
 
10:55 PM
marry and having children like us !?
 
the question "does the universe have an infinite past" is not one that's clearly settled
 
@MustaphaElbazi who says they didn't? just because we're all descended from Adam doesn't mean non-Adamic humans weren't just doing their own thing like anyone else.
 
heres some very renowned physicists saying the universe could have an infinite past: youtube.com/watch?v=QqjsZEZMR7I
 
then Noah's flood kicks in and all that's left is the Adamic line.
 
especially starting at 32:22
but seriously casanova, if you actually care what the state of the art in physics is, you should ask physicists, not islamic scholars
 
10:57 PM
like you said there is a mathematician with phd believing real numbers are countable
 
@goldPseudo i have heared the same idea from a man
 
i am telling you the Big Bang theory is accepted by the vast majority of scientists and astronomers.
 
in a near village :)
 
yeah, and its easy to prove hes wrong; but other physicists actually agree that what those guys are saying is a reasonable interpretation of the data
by "hes wrong" i mean the guy who said the reals are countable
the guys who say "the universe could have an infinite past" are not called charlatans by other physicists, other physicists acknowledge that the data doesnt contradict that
 
so basically you dont believe in the big bang theory?
 
10:59 PM
and we get the big bang out of relativity and quantum mechanics (i think), but we know they cant both be right
 
so @goldPseudo what about all those verses
 
im saying i know too little about physics, let alone the state of the art discourse about cosmology to say whether what ive got in my head is a good description of what we know
 
that said that we come from adam and eve !?
 
lol...
 
and if people like alan guth and sean carroll and alan aguirre say the universe might have an infinite past, and other physicists say "they could be right, the data doesnt contradict that", then that probably means that theres not enough data to say one way or another decisively
 
11:01 PM
ok
 
@MustaphaElbazi what about them? everyone's descended from someone.
 
Second thing, the Big Bang theory states something triggered off the explosion that brought about the the universe right?
 
and what "the universe had a beginning" means in the big-bang sense ive seen explained by leading physicists as "the entropic development of the universe means that we can't get information about what was before the big bang, if anything"
no it doesnt
 
if the Flood killed off everyone who wasn't descended from Adam, then naturally everyone after that would be descended from Adam.
 
@goldPseudo ah okey this is clear
 
11:03 PM
im not sure exactly what the issue is, but in the first moments after the big bang, causality and things like that just dont tell us anything
 
assuming there were even non-Adamic humans still around then. it's possible we just outlived all of them because we're better.
 
but we weren't involved in evolution !?
 
if we weren't involved in evolution, we'd all look the same.
everyone would just be an Adam clone.
 
@goldPseudo evolution could have happened after noah's flood?
 
@Casanova how long ago do you think noahs flood was
 
11:06 PM
centuries
 
i mean bach's evolution -_- :P
 
you could be right @goldPseudo!!
 
adam was a complete human
 
genetic diversity is all around. evolution is just a selective pressure which lets certain gene combinations promulgate and other ones die off.
 
emm
i still don't have an answer
 
11:07 PM
@Casanova evolution takes way longer
 
we were evoluted from adam who was a complete human ?
 
centuries is not long lol?
 
centuries is nothing for a species that has an average reproduction age in the decades
modern humans have been around for something like 100k-250k years
 
millennia then
 
are you just making stuff up now
 
11:10 PM
@goldPseudo what about ahadith ?
 
@MustaphaElbazi what about them?
 
they just support that their is no other human before adam
adak
afak *
 
According to wikipedia Noah's flood happened 5000 bc
 
1
Q: Do we have any information in Islam about who were on Earth before Adam?

AzadI didn't find any implicit Verse showing us who were on earth before Adam. I think according to this verse [2:30] And [mention, O Muhammad], when your Lord said to the angels, "Indeed, I will make upon the earth a successive authority." They said, "Will You place upon it one who causes c...

 
jinn were on earth @goldPseudo
 
11:14 PM
what about this
 
i've not seen any hadiths which clearly and unambiguously state that there were no preadamic humans or human-like species flopping around. not saying they're not there, i just don't know them.
 
وَلَقَدْ خَلَقْنَا الْإِنسَانَ مِن سُلَالَةٍ مِّن طِينٍ (12) ثُمَّ جَعَلْنَاهُ نُطْفَةً فِي قَرَارٍ مَّكِينٍ (13) ثُمَّ خَلَقْنَا النُّطْفَةَ عَلَقَةً فَخَلَقْنَا الْعَلَقَةَ مُضْغَةً فَخَلَقْنَا الْمُضْغَةَ عِظَامًا فَكَسَوْنَا الْعِظَامَ لَحْمًا ثُمَّ أَنشَأْنَاهُ خَلْقًا آخَرَ ۚ فَتَبَارَكَ اللَّهُ أَحْسَنُ الْخَالِقِينَ
(14) ثُمَّ إِنَّكُم بَعْدَ ذَٰلِكَ لَمَيِّتُونَ (15) ثُمَّ إِنَّكُمْ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ تُبْعَثُونَ (16) وَلَقَدْ خَلَقْنَا فَوْقَكُمْ سَبْعَ طَرَائِقَ وَمَا كُنَّا عَنِ الْخَلْقِ غَافِلِينَ (17)
 
@Casanova 7000 years is way too little time for human evolution
 
in this verse allah is talking about humans
الانسان
 
yes.
how is it relevant?
 
11:17 PM
is your non-adamic humans mentioned in this verse or not ?
 
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
what is this ?
 
it's just describing how men are created.
 
yes
but is non-adamic human made the same way
 
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
11:19 PM
or it's talking only about adamic ones
 
why wouldn't they be?
 
i believe it was way before that though @G.Bach
 
how are cats made? how are chickens made? this is biology, not divine creation.
 
because in other verses talking about this way of creation come after mentioning adam
 
11:20 PM
i don't see why preadamic humans would be made any differently than any biological creature.
 
okey
they will be asked on day of judgement ?
 
@Casanova how long, and what leads you to that conclusin
 
i don't think so.
 
but the verse say that those people who were made like adam will do :)
 
i would say a billion at least because noah came after adam and adam was the first human
 
11:22 PM
@Casanova there were no people a billion years ago
@Casanova there werent even trees a billion years ago
not even grass i think
 
@MustaphaElbazi Adam was special. the descendents of Adam were the ones who testified before they were born, not the preadamites.
or, if the preadamites had any covenant with the Almighty, we don't know of it.
 
there were creatures who lived in the earth about 2 billion years ago
 
bacteria-like things
nothing bigger
 
so you don't thing they were mentioned in quran ?
 
> وإذ أخذ ربك من بني آدم من ظهورهم ذريتهم وأشهدهم على أنفسهم ألست بربكم قالوا بلى شهدنا أن تقولوا يوم القيامة إنا كنا عن هذا غافلين
i don't think so, no.
 
11:26 PM
so all those verses are talking about adamics
but saying that they were humans is totally wrong
 
if preadamite man is extinct, not much point in talking about them.
the qur'an was a book of guidance to bring people to the right path, not a book of science to explain why 2% of your dna comes from neanderthals.
 
i know my friend
but such believes is not simple !
i want to know if we can call them human
like do preadamist believers say here
because of this hadith
 
you'd have to define "human" first.
 
wait to get the eng hadith
 
biologically, there'd be little to no difference.
 
11:32 PM
i am using the difinition of human = بشر = انسان
who is used in quran to describe those creatures
 
so far as the quran and hadith are concerned, when they refer to انسان i see no reason to believe they're referring to preadamic man.
 
did noah carry any human with him?
 
@Casanova Isn't it well-established that he carried his sons and their wives?
 
he carried his son?
 
i might be mixing that with the israiliyyat record, in which that is clearly the case.
 
11:37 PM
his son didnt make it
 
one of his sons rejected.
 
And Noah called upon his Lord, and said: "O my Lord! surely my son is of my family! and Thy promise is
 
noah had four sons, as far as i know.
biblical record mentions three of them. doesn't mention the one that drowned.
> ونوحا إذ نادى من قبل فاستجبنا له فنجيناه وأهله من الكرب العظيم
 
noah's wife died
only one son is mentioned in the quran though
 
afak as i know there is other sons
 
11:43 PM
not sure if the others were mentioned in the hadith or not. again, might just be israiliyyat.
the three sons of Noah are well-established in the biblical record.
qur'an does say that he brings his family and the believers with him though, except those who rejected.
> حتى إذا جاء أمرنا وفار التنور قلنا احمل فيها من كلّ زوجين اثنين وأهلك إلا من سبق عليه القول ومن آمن وما آمن معه إلا قليل
 
so @goldPseudo انسان = بشر in the quran or not ?
 
@MustaphaElbazi i 'unno.
 
well
i am still interesting in jesus verses
why it's used a lot by preadamists
?
 
i've never heard of this.
i don't claim to have any knowledge of what other preadamists think or believe. my opinions are my own.
 
well they believe that other humans were mentioned in quran too
but they are totally wrong according to al-bukhari hadith
and to the verses
but your idea is better than them
 
11:47 PM
i have an interesting theory
 
well , they reject ahadith easily
 
perhaps evolution happened after noah's flood?
 
lol
bach's evolution need millions of year
 
@goldPseudo it seems you were right. He had 4 and one died
bach's evolution lol
 
becaus i am not sure if it's the same Darwinian evolution
 
11:53 PM
evolution of one species to another is not a quick process. otherwise we'd've seen enough examples by now that nobody would be able to pull out the "evolution's just a theory" card.
 
yeah
 
@goldPseudo youll see that card being played regardless of the amount of evidence
flat earthers deny gravity and a round earth and say stuff like that
young earth creationists deny carbon dating and stuff like that
 
You are back :)
 
i was just watching, i got no skin in the doctrine game
 
aha ok
 
11:56 PM
@G.Bach muslims reject dating in general. maybe if you built your theory on evidence from carbon arranged marriages it would be accepted.
 
hahaha
 
it a question of knowing your audience.
 
So my grand father used to climb trees and eat bananas?
 
heck, I used to climb trees and eat bananas. climbing trees is fun.
 
i dont know your grandfather
 
11:59 PM
ahahhahah
 

« first day (1789 days earlier)      last day (2558 days later) »