« first day (82 days earlier)      last day (2018 days later) » 

5:04 AM
Posted by Simon Sheehan on June 6th, 2011

 

Being an avid computer user for years now, the PATH is something that has crossed me quite a few times now. So when I saw this question, it was time to put my learning hat on.

So now that we know what the PATH is, where are these things set? With a quick look around, I found it was easily found on Windows 7, by simply popping open the Start Menu and typing in “Environment.” The first option was Edit environment variables for your account. Click it, and here we are:

Let’s say I wanted to add my own, for a folder I frequently visit. I shall use eclipse for example. Currently my eclipse folder is located in C:\Users\Simon\eclipse. I hit NEW, and add in this: …

 
 
6 hours later…
11:09 AM
@TomWijsman What do you mean with the emphasized interesting?
 
 
2 hours later…
12:56 PM
@slhck: Asking something that is interesting to the majority of the readers.
 
 
5 hours later…
6:09 PM
@TomWijsman Oh okay now I got it. I though there was an emphasis on the content we had not being interesting -- But yeah, seems like a good idea.
 
6:54 PM
Hey guys, just letting you know I have submitted a blog post about Firefox Nightly.
 
7:07 PM
@SimonSheehan: I'm going to proof read it now. :)
I'm running a severely optimized version of Firefox Nighly.
But I'm still on 6.0a1 and need to optimize the compilation so that it takes reasonable less time and I can weekly compilations...
Parallel, caching amongst other things that boost it...
 
7:22 PM
@TomWijsman Haha, im a tad bit updated :P I like to keep up with the absolute latest. You optimize it yourself?
 
Yes, passed along a lot of optimization flags to the compiler.
 
ah, i see. I do not compile it myself, although i really should try it
 
I want to keep up with it to, but haven't recompiled one yet. Will surely do one of these days now that they are on 7.0a1.
 
Yeah, their really jumping version fast.
I dont totally understand why they are pushing for such a fast release schedule
 
Well, I took the defaults and added the optimization and now it takes some hours to compile.
 
7:24 PM
:o
Well then, guess its quite a bit to maintain then
 
But you can go through the advanced tutorial and use another make thing made in Python which allows you to do something like -j5 and such things to get the compilation time down.
 
Ah, isnt that for multiple processors?
Thats what i understood -j to be
(i'm very unfamiliar with compiling anything outside of java.)
 
2
Q: Why does make -j perform better when it is passed a number larger than the number of cores available?

DamirI have Quad core processor with hyper threading. When I use make -j8 it is faster then make -j4 (I read number of cores in Java and then call make -j number of processors and that is ok). I don't understand why make -j32 is faster then make -j8 when I have (read in Java) just 8 cores (hyperthre...

It is about the amount of cores, then you set it to something like 1.5 * amount of cores and it gives a noticeable decrease in compilation time.
 
Oh Thanks, ill take a look at that
 
I generally don't care for compilation time for a lot of my own things, but for things the size of Firefox it really does help a lot...
Hope that I can get it down to something that I can do on a weekly basis.
 
7:32 PM
Right now I'd like to just get a linux system going to learn about this kind of stuff. Seems to be the right envrionment for it
 
Well, worked on Windows to me.
I'm way to dependent-on/used-to Windows to go and work in Linux; although I do have Gentoo for when it's necessary...
Hmm, they seem to have changed the silly about:memory list into a cool about:memory tree.
 
Yeah, I did find it interesting though
 
Hmm, 64 bit Firefox...
 
Yep. I'm talking to you from it right now :P
As i said though, with that comes the issue of some plugins requiring 64bit. Such as flash
 
Yeah, but according to your article Flash isn't a problem. Do you know about Java and Silverlight?
 
7:37 PM
I've had no issues with Java so far, using 64bit JRE.
 
And how do the speed tests compare between 32 bit and 64 bit? Because looking at IE9 I saw that they didn't write an optimized version for 64 bit.
Ah, no problem for the two major then. I believe it's possible to just use IE Tab for when Silverlight is needed?
 
I have honestly yet to see much of a speed difference between 32 and 64bit versions so far.
Well, ive actually never even touched silverlight in any way, no site but Microsoft's seems to use it
 
Always respond to a user action within 50 ms seems interesting...
 
That part struck me as interesting too.
I suppose their trying to make the entire engine faster.
 
Well, I see some sites that use it. But most of them are probably Microsoft-related.
 
7:39 PM
Well, i can give it a shot. One moment
 
And I used Silverlight to write an order tracker for my father because it seemed the easiest to write at that moment.
 
@TomWijsman Got any sites that use it you could link me too?
 
Although I'm planning to maybe rewrite it into a MVC 3 application with HTML 5 and CSS 3.
 
be right back
 
@SimonSheehan: Good article, only the last sentence needs to get some fixes:
> So if your feeling like trying out the latest and greatest Mozilla has to offer, and try out the Nightly Build.
"So if you are feeling" or "So if you have the feeling"
"then try out"
Scheduled it for tomorrow.
@BloodPhilia: I think Songbird is along the lines of the other four players in your article, it's up to you whether to add it or not... :)
Or well, it was popular some years ago but I don't know about it now so you should check Wakoopa out (which doesn't seem to work fine for me at the moment).
 
7:57 PM
@TomWijsman Great, ill fix that up :D
and done :D
Scheduled...tomorrow, awesome
 
 
3 hours later…
10:36 PM
Hey, does anyone know if there's a Markdown plugin installed on the blog?
Nevermind.
 

« first day (82 days earlier)      last day (2018 days later) »