OK, I have my nginx set up pretty good. I can switch between it and Apache without readers noticing ;) now git deploy

looks like it would be fun, to make branches deploy properly

@Letharion have you ever did it? ;)

I've almost worked my way through the entire close backlog now. Three more days, unless something drastic happens.

We have many virtual hosts, so I can sync them, and simply switch traffic

Sadly the queue is still huge.

My config was like that: git repo on server, developers committing to it when their changes was ready, auto-checkout to working directory, and manual move to stage, production etc if needed

But it is getting tiresome, and we need to develop few separate, independend, big changes

that's why I'd like branch-per-server, at least on devel. Manually moving code to production once in a while is not that bad. Not something I want, but I can live with it

Sadly, I'm more a developer, less an admin. I was using environment like that, but never needed to create it

Same here, more developer. I'm generally not involved at all in deployments at economist.

Being the one who can do weird things means I will be forced to do them, want it or not. Good if I'm bored, bad if I have some development task I really want to finish asap

I'm not sure, but I'd actually think the answer is yes. I can check. :)

I meant it as half-joke. But on the other hand, I have no bounds in Poland, nothing keeps me here except the fact I never felt strong enough urge to move.

Sweet! 20k rep :D

Congratulations :)

@Letharion How is the view up there? ;)

@Mołot It's pretty nice! ;) I'll have to read up on what sort of responsibilities I just earned myself.

"Skip" is your friend now

;)

Well, "just" 5k and I'll be there, too ;p

Seems I'm steadily slowing down

In all review queues you have "Skip" if you are unsure what to do

With new powers - inactivity is always a way, with no damage

@Letharion I need to visit England to really learn to talk clearly ;)

Oh, yeah, I don't think anything affects the reviewing though. Looks like I have some new voting options though. I no longer need to bother mods with "this is not an answer" answers, but can vote directly on their removal. Of course, there's probably not enough people to finish the vote without the mods yet, so they still need to do the work ;)

Upvote me a bit, I promise to be good and vote ;p

lol. I'd upvote all your posts, except I know they'll catch that tell me off ;)

(for any low-rep reading this: It was just a joke. Pleas do not serial-upvote anyone!)

Eh, it's not like it will hurt them either. System's just gonna reverse it.

First time, yes

second time, maybe

@Mołot It certainly helped my English, though it also had this weird effect, that I now sometimes think in English; and I'll do direct translations of english expressions into my native language, and catch myself only after I've said them, thinking "That made no sense".

few times - vote ban and mod alert

@Mołot Right, though I just expect people to get it after the first time.

It hit me once

one user just posted a lot of bad stuff on frontpage

and I was recognized as serial downvoter

and system never told me

I got no notification

Hmm, no, guess the system wouldn't want to let you know, as that would gradually tip you off about the exact rules.

only thing that made me check was that I've seen questions at 0 I saw at -3 or -5 dthe day before

so no, someone may be caught as serial upvoter and never notice he did anything wrong

Still though, even if it happened multiple times, as soon as anyone reviewed the case, it'd be obvious you had no malicious intent, and are an upstanding citizen. :)

Hard to "get it after the first time" if nobody tells you the firstt ime

well there was no consequences for me then

but I just wanted to make sure we will not put any innocents on mines here

You are absolutely right. :)

And I still think that people should be notified

The first time it happens, I mean

One time should not be enough to accurately scan the system.

@Rooby Hey :) Glad to have someone else in here ;) Not that @Molot isn't awesome company :D but the whole thing is gonna die out unless we get more people frequenting in here. I'm it could become a popular place to ask/discuss those more broad and open questions that off-topic on the main site. :)

I used to use IRC more but haven't for a while.

I use IRC as well, and I guess one reason why this chat isn't popular, is because IRC is very popular in the Drupal Community. But yeah, there's plenty of people who find IRC a bit scary, and those might be more inclined to hang out in here. :)

Well, people do post "all" questions as questions, which is something of a problem, for themselves if not for the rest of us. A lot of questions are just not suited to the site, but would be perfectly acceptable in here. Everything along the lines of "Should I use module X or Y" is off-topic, but could be discussed here, for example.

Yeah I often stop myself from posting comments that are kind of off topic but would be useful via chat.

Good evening, fellows :)

I got branch <-> server mapping up and running

my life will be much easier now ;)

Sweet. So what exactly are you using to achieve that?

Good old git and it's hooks

I set all repos on servers to their branches, and hook in central repo calls git pull on each directory. We settled on NFS, but ssh was OK, too. just slower

Now struggling with scanner but that has nothing to do with Drupal ;)

Well, git hooks are nice, too bad many people forgets about them

I wasn't able achieve half as much in SVN

I'm not saying it was impossible, but for me as non-admin git makes more sense