@Sklivvz - "No evidence.... all the same angle" - sorry, what do you call that huge photo that I posed of of the what was behind the stage, from a completely different angle, that we could match to what was seen on the cell phone screens was NOT the same video or angle? I mentioned it in my answer, and several times in comments, and you continue to ignore that it was a key part of my answer. And if the use of the word "reasonable" someone negates all of that, I'll remove the word.

@AndrewMattson If you leave that, put in a link to its origin so one can check the context and remove all the unsupported speculation (first 7, last 3 paragraphs and the links to the 3 videos), I think we can reinstate the answer.

@Sklivvz - The links to the videos are relevant because they demonstrate it's not from a central, single source, so that is relevant. I'll make sure I add that context. Pointing out that the camera shot is from a higher angle and not the same as the perspective from the actual audience at floor level is not "speculation," especially with the additional floor level shot that has been in the answer pretty much from the start. I'll trim it.

@AndrewMattson Thanks for that, undeleted. Cleaned it up by moving stuff around and fixed a couple of grammar issues. Feel free to roll back if you don't like it. I also removed some more subjectivity but toned up the conclusion. You have direct evidence that contradicts the claim, so say it :-)