last day (15 days later) »
Augustin
8:27 PM
So what's wrong with the covariance matrix?
sepideh
I mean the definition of being $WSS$
is WSS random processes only require that 1st moment and autocovariance do not vary with respect to time
Augustin
It's just two things.
1. E(X_t) does not depend on t.
2. The autocovariance depends only on the lag.
sepideh
yeah
so why don't we prove this in order to show that a process is WSS
and instead
we prove
Augustin
This is exaclty what you should prove if you want to prove that a process is WSS
sepideh
1.E(X_t) dows not depend on t
2.autocorrelation depends only on the lag
Augustin
8:31 PM
yes that's all
sepideh
you mean using either of them
is true?
Augustin
No no no, you have to prove both
sepideh
OK so I should prove
Augustin
a process is WSS iff these two conditions are true
sepideh
1. E(X_t) does not depend on t.
2. The autocovariance depends only on the lag.
Augustin
8:34 PM
yes
sepideh
3.autocorrelation depends only on the lag
Augustin
3 is a consequence of 2
because autocorrelation is covariance/sigma^2
sepideh
OK
so when we say R(\tau) it means that autocovariance=f(\TAU)
and there's no difference whether to showIt's just two things.
1. E(X_t) does not depend on t.
2. The autocovariance depends only on the lag.
or
1.E(X_t) dows not depend on t
2.autocorrelation depends only on the lag
?????
Augustin
yes it's the same thing because autocorrelation is just a renormalization of autocovariance
sepideh
OK thanks
but about my second question
here in my question we have
which is f(A,B,\Phi;t)
so the autocovariance matrix should be 3x3
right?
Augustin
8:42 PM
$A$ and $B$ are constant scalars, vectors, random variables, random vectors ?
sepideh
the exercise says that
B, A, and Ф are
independent random variables. A and B and Ф are uniformly distributed
over (0,1] and (0,2] and (0, 2π] respectively
Augustin
so X_t is a 1D random variable, for each t
sepideh
so why?
Augustin
then the autocovariance function is a real valued function
sepideh
autocovariance matrix is 1x1
????
why?
Augustin
8:45 PM
because it's the covariance of 1D random variables
sepideh
X(t) a function of three random variables!!!
Augustin
yes but X(t) is 1D
the autocovariance is not between A, B and phi, it's between X(t) and X(t+h)
sepideh
OK
there's an example in the tutorial
X(T) = A sin(w0 t + Ф)
A and Ф are independent
A is uniformly distributed over (0,1)
Ф is uniformly distributed over (0, 2π)
and is solved like this:
so this is true!
I think I understood now
thanks for your help
Augustin
yes, so X is WSS
sepideh
yeah
very nice
thanks alot
!!!
Augustin
8:50 PM
you're welcome
sepideh
bye
Augustin
bye
last day (15 days later) »
all rooms
Transcript for
Aug '15
3
Aug
18
stochastic process
sepideh & Augustin
join this room
about this room
00:00
06:00
12:00
18:00
all times are UTC
site design / logo © 2024 Stack Exchange Inc;
legal
mobile