Sorry to ask what is such as a basic question but I'm reading about KVM. Wiki states that as of 2007 the KVM (virtual machine) is part of the Linux distribution. So does that mean the main versions of Linux, such as Debian, Ubuntu, RedHat will support this 1 VM
My research is suggesting yes but I've no guarantee that the sources I'm reading are trust worthy
@Dave There's no such thing as "the Linux distribution", as you know, there are many, independent and completely separate distributions.
I assume what the article means is either i) many/most main distros include it in their repositories or ii) perhaps the kernel has somehow been tweaked to make it run more smoothly with the virtualization software of kvm.
I do know that I've been running virtualware VMs on Debian and Arch hosts for a few years, with a Windows and Ubuntu guest, so it's not like kvm is the only virtualization solution supported.
@Dave No. I just know I've been using vmware happily on my home machines. I have no experience with VMs on production systems.
The company I work for uses Zen and we've never had an issue. I think (but stress that I don't really know) that it's up to you and a matter of preference. Presumably each solution will have its pros and cons but I'm not the right person to ask. They're all supported by Linux though.
My experience is that larger organizations will use VMWare because they're well-known and stable and they have very good automation tools and it's possible to get a good support contract. It feels safe to them.
@terdon I've not used Zen or KVM enough to give you a good response to that - I'm a consultant, but most of my work is in larger organizations. I've had good experiences with KVM but not in large settings.
But if you don't need the GUI and the fancy automation tools, I'd say there's really no technical reason to not use KVM instead. Downside is it'll be somewhat harder to find people who know how to manage it, and you have to build some of your own tools (although this may count as an upside for some people :-))
I'm actually using VMWare Fusion on my laptop for my lab environment.
But this is a Big Data solution (I should point out) running with our modules (our hardware and software tool pumps the data in, hardware runs seperatly (obviously) but the software will be on same cluster)
So I'm hoping that KVM will be fine if it's stable. not sure if it has any heartbeat functionality or if it can keep the states
@JennyD yes it is, too big for us here (it's being outscourced) but it's important we (I) understand the technologies they're using so I can quizz them etc
I can tell you that we use Zen on a 48-core machine which runs 3-4 VM guests in parallel, two of which run computationally intensive processes pretty much constantly. So, medium size but it seems to be working fine.
@Dave I personally have an OpenVZ Ramnode VPS, fwiw. Though I don't have any idea what OpenVZ is.
Maybe I did once. It's hard to keep these things straight.
There are a lot of different virtualization technologies floating around. Some require you to patch the kernel. Those are usually not great choices because it's extra overhead and fewer people use them.
I once used something called Linux-VServer that falls into that category.
It's still around, but I don't think many people use it. The lead dev is quite friendly, though. Bertl, I think.
Linux-VServer is a virtual private server implementation that was created by adding operating system-level virtualization capabilities to the Linux kernel. It is developed and distributed as open-source software.
The project was started by Jacques Gélinas. It is now maintained by Herbert Pötzl of Austria and is not related to the Linux Virtual Server project, which implements network load balancing.
Linux-VServer is a jail mechanism in that it can be used to securely partition resources on a computer system (such as the file system, CPU time, network addresses and memory) in such a way that processes...
It worked quite well for me while I was using it, but I wouldn't recommend to anyone for the reasons above.
@FaheemMitha The dictionary was descriptive, not prescriptive. It described the meaning of the words, it didn't (AFAIK) set a standard of spelling. But when you start teaching all children to read and write, you need school books, and those were prescriptive - not following them was considered an error.
@FaheemMitha I was tempted to leave an answer featuring cryptsetup luksErase because of course someone who may need to delete everything on his computer on a moment's notice would have full-disk encryption set up to make it easy.
A conflicting package foo can be made to work with bar, after dpkg --force-conflicts -i foo. But eventually it's time to upgrade, and 'apt-get' objects:
% apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
You might want to run 'apt-g...
@FaheemMitha parallel conflicting with moreutils sounds annoying. Maybe one of them should rename (hard, since they're used in scripts) or use alternatives (but that could make for fun scripting...)
I don't think there is a good way to fix it locally, other than rebuilding one of the packages.
@FaheemMitha yeah, that timers answer is rather rambling. A lot of it seems to be you get all the systemd features...
Although, I bet systemd can prevent it from running twice at once—I've certainly had that fun with cron jobs. Something gets fired off every half hour, expected to finish in a second or two. But due to some problem (e.g., NFS mount down) it hangs... by the time you look in to it next morning, cron has spawned 10 of them...
But the problem is various packages & scripts just calling it as parallel.
Alternatives need to have some level of agreement on interface. Some have explicit specs (e.g., x-terminal-emulator is in policy, I believe). Others don't.
Pretty sure all the things that can provide editor don't agree on anything, except that they take a file name as an argument.
It is possible to migrate a question from one Stack Exchange site to another by closing, but if I have a question that I think is on-topic for multiple Stack Exchange sites, is it OK to post it on both (multipost)?
For example, I have a question that's earned me the tumbleweed badge on SO and I...
this can be OK, so long as the question is tailored to each audience on the different sites and is materially different in each case. Just to be 100% clear, copy-pasting a question across sites with no changes is considered abusive behavor. — Jeff Atwood ♦Jan 15 '11 at 3:51
... even if you go with the it can be OK sometimes, see that comment
I have to run... but your xinput test looks similar to what my mouse produces, except those values are huge. The mostion[0] and motion[1] I get correspond to positions (pixels) on screen.
I would see if one of the corners of the device gives smaller numbers (with xinput test)... see if that part moves the pointer. If it does, I think you can probably fix it by feeding xinput a Coordinate Transformation Matrix.