The Bikeshed - 2015-06-26 (page 1 of 3)

« first day (2 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (3185 days later) »

12:10 AM

@Zizouz212 of they're into open source, certainly!

Thing is, they're all in high school... :/ But they're really good at what they do. Since we need more of a creative genre, I can catch them up with things and they will likely contribute lots here (as well as the other SE sites, like Graphic Design for one of my friends)...

0

Q: Vote appropriately to set the lines of our scope

As many members of the community were concerned that the scope was too narrow and that many questions were veering towards a particular topic, some members of the community have now started to draw questions that are quite different from what we have been seeing. Many of us have discussed in chat...

discussion scope

HS probably shouldn't be an issue, at least for the age restrictions (COPPA and such).

@KevinBrown You would be surprised at some of the ages of Stack Exchange users. All over 13, but younger than you'd think.

I suppose, but a lot of us are quite generally nervous that we'll get into some sort of trouble, or worse treated differently (Even though that's not normally the case). I'm more open about it, advertising myself on my profile page :P

12:17 AM

Honestly, in my experience, people really don't care. Be mature and that's fine.

@Air How did softball go the other day?

I think it's just that stereotypical fear that bugs us. But, I agree. It's not normally the case

@HDE226868 I'm in my fifties, why should I start being mature at this late stage? If I wanted to grow up I would never have gone into embedded systems where i get to play with all the new toys years before they hit the markets

4

Youth is wasted on the young.

@overactor ?

12:32 AM

@HDE226868, why not link to this question instead of wiki?

@Zizouz212 A quote from George Bernard Shaw

@kdopen Yes..........

Wait! How come @Ziz pings me?

@overactor Thanks, I had forgotten about that one.

Not sure: I hit enter to get autocomplete and it sent instead. Guess tat was enough to identify you

@HDE226868 No problem, it just so happened that I read it earlier today.

12:35 AM

It was completely empty... Hence the Yes.........

:)

@Zizouz212 What was completely empty?

@kdopen post. It's removed because it was empty.

Oh, now I follow you

Actually I removed it. I'll do it again if you want :)

Regarding GBS, he had some great quotes. Take a look at brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/g/george_bernard_shaw.html

@over @ziz that should ping both of you

@kdopen It did indeed

Marriage is an alliance entered into by a man who can't sleep with the window shut, and a woman who can't sleep with the window open.
Brilliant

12:40 AM

Especially as he was gay at a time when it was still illegal

I think that "The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." could be the motto for many SE sites

@kdopen That is a good one

And I'm pinged!

@HDE226868 It was a crazy game. We were short one girl (it's a co-ed league where you have to bat boy-girl-boy-girl) and ended up borrowing a girl from the other team's bench so that we could play.

We won 21-12.

It was horrendous.

How many innings?

so ... while we have the room to ourselves (not), regarding my call for nominations. I'm going back through the blog and the "7 essential questions" link. It doesn't say they will call for elections during the public beta. It says that SE will appoint 3 pro tem leaders which they select to serve until they call elections

12:48 AM

But the nomination should come a few days into public beta

It then goes on to say "If your meta site does not have a post to nominate Moderators, start one now!"

Not wait until the public beta

I'll try and find the link again...

Just give me a sec

because "The more guidance we receive, the more informed our choice."

this is why I created the question as soon as I could.

> If your meta site does not have a post to nominate Moderators, start one now! Pro Tem appointments will begin about two weeks after the site is created. The more guidance we receive, the more informed our choice.

We probably also want a question to feel out what we want in our moderators, what we feel are essential qualities. I have no intention of nominating myself or accepting one. I don't have the bandwidth for it

But I would like to have the best possible mods

12:51 AM

@kdopen seconded

Talking about mods, I was thinking about nominating myself :)

@overactor then please consider voting to reopen meta.opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/93/…

@Zizouz212 I think you'd be a fine candidate

I was so tempted to self-nominate on Law just so there could be a minor helping to run it.

@Zizouz212 I second that.

@kdopen Ignore the “7 essential questions” blog post, it's out of date and unclear. It was posted back when Area 51-incubated sites were just starting and was never updated based on experience of actual betas. Instead, read this:

57

Q: The Real Essential Questions of Every Beta

The blog post Seven Essential Meta Questions of Every Beta gets linked to prominently from every beta's meta. However, this blog post is somewhat inaccurate and misdirects new users. In almost every beta, the site design question, for example, gets asked and undergoes a fair bit of discussion eve...

support faq beta-phase beta-sites

Oh wow guys! Thanks!

12:53 AM

@kdopen I'm not 100% on the question already being open though

@kdopen I personally think that we should reopen a day or two before we get the sign that we go public.

@Zizouz212 s/before/after/

@HDE226868 I think we played 5 innings.

Grr, then why do they still link to the old version on the top of every single Meta page?

@Air That score is incredible for a 5-inning game.

12:55 AM

@Gilles Sorry, I'm confused...

@kdopen beats me

@HDE226868 I completely agree! Awesome! :D

@Gilles any chance of getting that osi rss feed?

unless people disagree of course...

Just trying to follow the process and help ensure we get to public. But they still have the "start one now!" call in the "public beta" stage

@overactor I'm not familiar with it. How frequent are items?

12:56 AM

@Gilles bit more than weekly

@kdopen yes, a few days into the public beta is the right time

@overactor then I think it should wait a few weeks, and be handled by appointed mods

then I suppose get it up to "reopen(4)" and leave it there

@Gilles fair enough

0

Q: Is [license-compatibility] the same as [compatibility]

I was approving edits in the Suggested Edits queue while I came across this: http://opensource.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/268 I approved it due to the description, we have a new tag. However, with a significant lack of tag wikis (For those of you who contribute, I applaud you), it...

discussion tags

Thank you @Meta_Data :)

1:05 AM

@HDE226868 Yeah, it was kind of unbelievable, but the sun was shining from behind home plate at an angle that hit right underneath a hat brim for the shortstop and outfielders,which might have had something to do with it. Also the pitching on both sides was awful.

Regarding the "real" 7 questions post, I think it's worth noting that the answer there is entirely the work of one user.

@Air Also, it's comm-wiki with 11 revisions

So, you know, grain of salt and all. Take both that post and the original blog with a grain of salt, and apply common sense.

With no cm or mod attention...

@Zizouz212 Asheesh is a mod.

Oh. I was just checking for diamonds...

Never Mind! There's no CM Attention! :/

1:08 AM

There are no elected moderators on MSE. Only staff have diamonds there.

Yeah, that's why I revised to no cm attention

I'm sure they've read it.

Trevor Clarke is posting an awful lot of questions...

I can talk to him about that.

He's asked a lot of good questions too

1:22 AM

He did. But yes, I feel like he should slow down a little... :/

yeah

sorry guys

just a bit excited

Don't worry. :)

@TrevorClarke No problem at all.

and thanks, I try to think of question that will lead a good example

when it becomes public

Don't slow down!! More questions is exactly what we need...

1:28 AM

@trichoplax Not necessarily.

@TrevorClarke You're dong better than me, I'm running out of ideas and resorting to stealing them from @trichoplax :)

lol

lol

i went onto cc faq

but that was not

a good

We can't run out of questions, and each one is either on topic or helping narrow down the scope. The only thing we want to avoid is easy questions

1:29 AM

I think sitting on a question a bit before asking can be advisable

yeah

yeah i agree

That's a good idea.

@trichoplax No, what you want to avoid is useless questions. Easy is fine if it's useful.

0

Q: Questions that only arise in an open source context

I'd like to see discussion following this comment: I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is more about the personal security of the user than open-source in general, although the question only tends to arise in an open-source context. (emphasis mine) How will we treat q...

discussion on-topic

ok lets brainstorm here

1:29 AM

then again, @TrevorClarke you're doing more to help the site than I am, so who am I to complain :]

@Meta_Data strikes again!

@overactor

@kdopen I just stole one from you too :)

There's a world of difference between "easy for someone to answer" and "trivial for the asker to answer on their own"

well thanks @overactor

I try

1:30 AM

I think though before we start brainstorming for question, we need to figure out all the possible elements that's in our current scope.

Yep, easy questions are going to flood in when we go public ... they're called FAQ's. It helps to have canonical answers to point to when you "close as dupe"

Otherwise, we will run out

@trichoplax Wait, what, where? I want it back!

Oh btw, since so many of us are gathered here

ok so what is our scope

1:31 AM

This is what we've got so far: open source, marketing projects, organizing projects (as per area 51), copyright, creative commons, collaboration (as long as related to open source) and that's all I can find on meta
and licensing, but thats obvious

Now that's a good question to post on Meta

@kdopen I like yours - not sure why it's being downvoted. +1. I meant I stole your comment and turned it into a meta question...

people are going to ask how they can join up with other members in an open source project

ok

@kdopen I had suggested it but people didn't want that yet

1:31 AM

or which project they can contribute to as beginners

can we cater to that, possibly with a cw question on meta?

guys hee

0

Q: What is the scope of Open Source?

I would like to define what we want to ask on here. Please leave answers regarding what exactly we want to ask!

feel free to edit the question

but try to post your ideas there

@TrevorClarke It would be great if you can have it comm-wiki

Something like a list of projects run by members of os.se

ok i added the tag

I think advice on starting out would be good to have to point new users to (their question will be a duplicate of it). I'd prefer to see it on main than meta - main is where new users ask, and where they will see it in the list of similar questions

1:34 AM

yeah

but we cant do that it is not a question about open source=... that is what the meta is for

@trichoplax I see your point, i guess it being a CW question is enough to make clear it's not an example of a good question

@TrevorClarke Whoa my upvote was instantly cancelled

@TrevorClarke That's what I was thinking too

wait what why

If we're taking things literally...

1:37 AM

literalness is good

literality?

yeah

ok

Especially if you're an Aspie

(like me, trendsetter that I was long before there was a diagnosis)

who marked it for close

and please upvote

this could be useful

Guys, I can facilitate the moderation of the post, if we're nervous of improper use

yup ok

what other meta posts should we do?

1:39 AM

@TrevorClarke I did, and presumably Gilles.

why

What you are trying to do does not work and is not useful.

please retract it

this is useful

if done correctly

Can you show me evidence?

yes

1:43 AM

@TrevorClarke It's not a question about the site either, so I don't think it belongs more on one that the other

it is its about the scope of the site itself

Guys, if it turns out messy, we'll delete it. Right now, one of the biggest issues is the lack of clarity for the scope. I'll facilitate it, I'll make it work.

so please listen to @Zizouz212 and if it goes bad we can remove it instantly

@TrevorClarke If that was to me, I was replying to your earlier comment (the arrow on mine links back to yours)

@TrevorClarke I was talking about the other question - not the scope question

ohhh

1:45 AM

:)

@Zizouz212 I'm not nervous about improper use. The problem is that it'll become messy, and then some issues will be discussed in comments somewhere and people who weren't involved will have no chance of finding them.

Each issue belongs in a separate thread.

Same thing as on the main sites.

@Gilles If we all moderate it we can keep it in check

Would that just mean starting a new thread for each suggestion?

Perhaps, but it will summarize. It will only hold results. You may have misunderstood, the issues won't go on that thread

@TrevorClarke it's not just about keeping it in check, it's also about people having a chance to find out what's being discussed

@trichoplax yes

1:46 AM

So is it better to not have the general question, or to have it and have someone who restarts each suggestion as a new thread?

It will basically summarise all the "Is [x] considered on-topic" threads that are already existing

i dont think so but i could be wrong

wait so lets make a post saying that @kdopen

And would provide the core for the "What can I ask questions about?" FAQ in the help center for this site

Well, I'm off for the night

baii

Well, @kdopen That's the point. A one stop place to have a clear version of the scope.

1:49 AM

@trichoplax cut out the middleman, don't have a general question which will be missing some updates and will have additional discussion that won't be visible from the appropriate thread

the general question has no advantage and only downsides

@Zizouz212 But it does not give you a clear version of the scope!

I see your point, but do you have any other suggestions? Because right now it doesn't look clear

And I was in the process of editing it :)

@Zizouz212 individual threads, one per issue

how many times do I need to repeat that?

I'm just scared of the scope changing, and things won't be clear on that. Right now, we're getting waaay too many questions on licensing, and it needs to change.

here guys

0

Q: Use the title "Is [x] considered on-topic"

In many stack exchange sites the scope of what questions should be answered has been lost. I propose to keep this in check anybody that want to suggest topics for the scope of this site should use: "Is [x] considered on-topic" and the tag: is-this-on-topic This will allow users to ea...

discussion is-this-on-topic

try that

Let's have one place to keep all the on-topic questions. Let's call it "Meta"

1:52 AM

@trichoplax Well, obviously... :)

Use the tag "is-this-on-topic"

1

Q: What is the scope of Open Source?

The purpose of this post is to make clear the scope of Open Source, having the results of various meta threads as well as the Area 51 proposal here. If a result arises from a meta thread, please add it here so that the information is accessible to everyone! Just add to or update the answer! It's ...

discussion scope

0

Q: Use the title "Is [x] considered on-topic"

In many stack exchange sites the scope of what questions should be answered has been lost. I propose to keep this in check anybody that want to suggest topics for the scope of this site should use: "Is [x] considered on-topic" and the tag: is-this-on-topic This will allow users to ea...

discussion is-this-on-topic

We already have on-topic

@TrevorClarke Two things: The post doesn't serve to do much that people should already know, and the tag doesn't do anything as we already have on-topic

oops didnt see that

1:52 AM

Why are you guys making this so complicated?

2

Well, if consensus rules against me, then let's go back :)

@TrevorClarke Do you mind deleting the post?

i did

We already have a working system, and you completely ignore what exists and invent your own. Is that some kind of metaphor for the messiness of bazaar-style development?

already

brb

@TrevorClarke Both of them, pls! :)

2:00 AM

@Gilles Chat needs to be able to inteligently parse commands like xkcd: 14 competing standards

I agree. :)

I wish I had more of a background to be able to post good questions on this beta. I tend to be one of those types who will only write up a question to SE as a last resort, and half of the time solves it mid-writeup.

@Air The syntax is http://xkcd.com/927

@Gilles Is that supposed to be active?

wait what are you talking about

2:03 AM

@Gilles But then I need to memorize them by number, or heaven forbid, open another tab!

c.f. wiki: articlename

@Zizouz212 not in my post, no, I was quoting the syntax

if you type the URL alone in a message, you get

Fortunately, the charging one has been solved now that we've all standardized on mini-USB. Or is it micro-USB? Shit.

lol

ok guys

gtg to bed

il be here tomorrow

see ya there

see you

Let me take care of that test ~~post~~ message for you. ;)

2:05 AM

trevorc.ca/test

nm

ceya

35

Q: Which links and sites are handled specially in chat?

There is special linking to some sites in chat. What is the full list of supported and integrated sites? Return to FAQ index

support faq chat hyperlinks onebox

the syntax if you don't remember the number is

http://c.xkcd.com/random/comic/

Like so:

c.xkcd.com/random/comic

Hmmm

Perhaps unsurprisingly an address with random output doesn't onebox

Works if you click on it though :)

The point is that it's easier to remember keywords from the title or dialogue, when you want to "relevant" something

@Air If you solve a question half way through writing it up, self answer!

2

@trichoplax If you don't feel like a complete and utter idiot for not thinking of the answer earlier

2:15 AM

@overactor I have the advantage of feeling that way most of the time, so it doesn't bother me :)

@trichoplax I have done, on occasion. But when I solve the problem, usually I have to continue working.

Also, sometimes the solution ends up revealing that the problem statement was a red herring, or the keywords I was searching were wrong and it's actually a dupe

@Air Worth the extra effort in private beta though...

@Air yeah I get that - nothing you can do then

Unless the question it's a dupe of is really bad, then you can close it in reverse ;)

I'm suspicious at the number of times I've clicked on the xkcd random comic button and got the Ayn Random one

@trichoplax xkcd.com/404

I wouldn't put it past him.

2:22 AM

xkcd.com/r

I just clicked on that random link and got your 404 one!!!

Um wait. I must be doing something wrong

Yes. I was. Ignore me.

6 hours later…

8:30 AM

0

Q: License recommendations

Intro: Contrary to popular belief, recommendation questions can work well on Stack Exchange. See for instance Software Recommendations, where questions and answers are of high quality. QUESTION: Should we offer to help people who are looking for a particular license? As a rule, each question sho...

discussion scope

4 hours later…

12:05 PM

Given the role they play in every process in my body, really, they deserve this award more than me. Just gotta figure out how to give it to them. Maybe I can cut it into pieces to make it easier to swallow ...

1 hour later…

1:32 PM

0

Q: Are questions about specific software on-topic?

Let us say I have a question about an open source project that looks something like: Hi! I am a newbie user of XYZ. So, while I was referring to XYZ's API doc, I couldn't understand what function ABC() does. Well, obviously doubts like these get asked on SO all the time and are on-topic (s...

discussion on-topic

1:48 PM

1

Q: What advantages and/or risks are involved in open sourcing teaching materials?

Teaching materials like textbooks or work sheets can be opened up to free redistribution and free change for everyone. What are the advantages and the risks of doing so in comparison to keeping it closed? Are there different advantages/risks for the public and the publishing instance?

@Mnementh You have three close votes marking this as 'too broad'. What can you do to make it more specific and answerable?

I think we need more questions like this that are not aimed purely at software, so it would be good to try and rescue it

Yeah, I specifically asked about risks/advantages, so that it hopefully isn't too broad

Thats far more specific than: How well does it work to open source teaching materials?

OK, I may try to split it up. Let's see...

2:10 PM

Guys, I'm going to send in a few questions on creative works. Get Ready! :D

Thank god, I could ask at least one more questions but it starts to look like I'm the only one asking today.

And I'm trying to get my friends to help on the creative side of open source too :)

@Zizouz212 Nice, as activity goes down I get the feeling some fresh blood is needed.

They should be coming, right when I convince them (that might not go so well...)

@Zizouz212 I wish you luck :-)

2:15 PM

Thanks!

I just thought of something: Should we have case studies?

Well, allow them?

Actually, that should be for meta :)

On the subject of badges ... anyone got beyond a progress of '1' for 'Curious'? Most of us must have asked upvoted questions on more than one day by now.

I have a progress of 3 i think...

And for some reason, the next recommended badge is 'Excavator' .... love to see someone get that in the near future ;)

On set for 4 :)

Let's excavate the core of the earth!

My recommended is excavator too :)

Well I'm stuck at 1, so I must be failing either the 'good question' or 'positive question record' criteria

2:26 PM

Oh. Normally it allows any up voted question to increment the amount.

Even if you have a bad question record.

You can be at 5 and not get the badge, because quite frankly, you're bad at asking about things :/

Well I have 7 upvoted questions over three days ...

And I don't think I have any closed ones

That's weird. I don't know what's up with that. Did you ask the questions on the same day?

Or maybe they mustn't have attracted any downvotes. It's hard to get a clear definition

No, something each day, I think

definitely more than one day

Well, I don't know. Sorry bout that. :/

Nobody here can earn Curious right now because the site doesn't even exist 5 days.

> Ask a good question on 5 separate days, and maintain a positive question record

So if you ask a few more questions next days, you'll get it :)

2:31 PM

I call being the first to get it!

probably ... but it seems it's not well defined

63

Q: Misleading description of new Curious badge

The description of the new Curious badge currently reads: Asked a good question on 5 separate days, and maintains a positive question record. The term "good question" seems to be defined by the badge Good Question: Question score of 25 or more. Curious seems to use another criterion, ...

discussion badges badge-description

And you should at least be showing progress

Seems like they didn't implement the new wording...

My highest voted question has 20 votes, and the highest voted question has 23. So '25' does not seem to be a trigger if @Zizouz212 is at four

0

Q: Should we allow case studies?

The question speaks for itself: Should we allow case studies? For example, should we look at the practices and results that other organizations or projects have taken, and sort of make case studies out of there: Ex (A bad ex though): Is blah blah grow faster because of blah blah blah. Feel free...

discussion case-studies

lol I don't know

2:33 PM

Guess I'm just curious about the badge

2:47 PM

@Zizouz212: Your question about free cultural work is great. I didn't know about that before, but read it up now. I didn't know it existed, but recently thought something like that should be defined.

@Mnementh Thanks. My next one is on marketing, but I'll post that in about 15 minutes. See y'all!

ahh well, back to the grindstone. Gotta pay some bills

3:03 PM

There's a marketing question! :D

0

Q: Can I use the OSI logo to help me advertise my project?

Suppose I want to release a software program to the App Store, under an open source license. As I want to increase the number of downloads, I want to advertise that the software is an Open Source Project. I want to use the logo of the Open Source Initiative, to help me do this. Assuming that I w...

Oh I figure out that badge from this post: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/234259/asking-days-badges

Seems any downvote bars a question from counting as 'good'

I've asked questions on 3 separate days, but other than on 6/24 every question got at least one downvote

On 6/24, all questions were 'good'

Seriously? Thank god there's nothing like that on answers... I have at least one down vote on like 8 of the 12 answers I have. Feels kind of suspicious in a sense though.

"and none of your questions that day are deleted, downvoted, or closed, you get one more day of credit toward the badge"

seems one bad question a day ruins the day even if you have 10 good ones

Yeah...

Does anyone know if the OSI is still up to this site?

17

Q: Could this be the "Official" site for the Open Source Initiative?

Proposal: Open Source The OSI (Open Source Initiative, http:opensource.org) was contacted regarding the use of the OSI logo (http://opensource.org/files/osi_standard_logo.png) as part of this site proposal. After a bit of discussion, the OSI would be interested in promoting this forum, should i...

@Zizouz212 no: chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/info/25118/open-source?tab=feeds

@Zizouz212: oh, you didn't meant the newsfeed...

3:13 PM

Sorry what?

On SO the awards are Curious: 173k, Inquisitive: 17.5k, and Socratic: 2k ... so it's not that easy to get. Though Mortarboard and (curiously) Talkative seem the least awarded

No, I meant if the OSI was still interested in helping us promote the site

@Zizouz212 Yeah, got it now, didn't even know there was an effort.

@Mnementh Oh.

3:28 PM

0

Q: OSI and Open Source.SE

According to this Area 51 Discussion Post, the Open Source Initiative was contacted regarding the use of their logo. In the end, the OSI was interested in promoting this site, hoping to use it to discuss Open Source related topics. The OSI currently provides mailing lists and email contacts f...

discussion support site-promotion

Guys: Some Additions to Scope from Area 51:

The OSI currently provides mailing lists and email contacts for people to ask questions related to open source issues: copyright/licensing/patents, funding models, community development & management, etc.

As per what the OSI would like to promote here.

I think actual promotion should wait until we are in public beta

I agree, but I'm just looking for sort of like a status update on Meta. I know some of the CMs wanted to be in contact with the OSI

@Zizouz212 just a note: mentioning that you've doe voted someone in comments can lead to some heated discussions... Not to stop you, but it's a possibility.

My god these stupid chat noises scare me at the wrong times

Still to broad, even after I focused it on one aspect? opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/427/…

3:42 PM

@ArtOfCode That's true,

@Mnementh Now people may argue its a law migration candidate

@Zizouz212 Damn, this is hard.

I found another place that can help us with questions: okfn.org/opendata

tbh, I feel like we should rename this entire site to something like Open Information.SE

Or even better, Open Info.SE

@Mnementh that was me from the close review queue. I'd say it's on topic, but just "what risks" is pretty broad - there are literally hundreds. You could ask about financial risk, perhaps?

That way, it will make other elements more accepting

@Zizouz212 After knowing the term now, I think free culture is pretty cool.

3:46 PM

@Mnementh Same! And it has a nice ring to it :)

@ArtOfCode Oh well, I look what I can do. But later.

3

Q: OSI and Open Source.SE

According to this Area 51 Discussion Post, the Open Source Initiative was contacted regarding the use of their logo. In the end, the OSI was interested in promoting this site, hoping to use it to discuss Open Source related topics. The OSI currently provides mailing lists and email contacts f...

discussion support site-promotion

For now I asked another part of the previously too broad question about open teaching materials.

I have a strong feeling, that today I ask more questions than the previous days together.

@Mnementh you've already got a too broad close vote on that. I think you could ask about how it makes lesson prep easier, or about whether there are other things they can be used to teach instead.

@ArtOfCode It was an opinion based vote

3:54 PM

@Zizouz212 it's changed then... When I saw it it was definitely too broad.

We're talking about this... Right? opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/445/…

@Zizouz212 ja

Yeah, single opinion based vote, no broad votes

I also see opinion based

If @ArtOfCode Saw broad, it means that there would've been two close voters, with the broad voter retracting the vote

3:57 PM

Aye, that was my synopsis too. Well at least it's not too broad :)

Agreed :D

I'm bad at asking questions :-)

But I tried to bring some stuff up that leads a bit away from licensing and software.

@Mnementh Lol, but clearly good at giving awesome answers, (and getting impossible rep)!

« first day (2 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (3185 days later) »

Transcript for

Jun '1526

The Bikeshed

General discussion for opensource.stackexchange.com. Confused ...

bikeshed discussion

join this room
about this room

00:00

06:00

12:00

18:00

all times are UTC

site design / logo © 2024 Stack Exchange Inc; legal

mobile