There you go... is it legit now?

It is even really a question now?

Nope... don't care about opinions... just want to know the character's name...

While this technically might be a question as to what the default name of your rival is, it's rather trivially found, with even a hint of research. I certainly won't vote to reopen.

Where does it say that trivial questions cannot be posted?

It doesn't. You can. But don't expect a good reception for them; experts stick around because we like interesting questions. And when you re-word a closed question, don't expect the community to automatically reopen it. It might be; I don't know. But I, for one, will certainly not help in that endeavor.

Is there a definition of "interesting" question on StackOverflow? Reasons to close a question: duplicate, off-topic, unclear, too broad, opinion-based. "Frank not liking a question" is not a reason to close it ;-)

No, it's not. But that wasn't your original question, and you know it. Declining to reopen isn't the same thing as voting to close.

But I edited the question so it would follow the community rules. That is exactly why [on hold] exists, so users have a second chance to restate their questions. I did not comply with the rules. You guys voted to put the question on hold. I edited the question so it fits the rules. It should be reopened. You are just abusing your power as moderator.

For one, I am not a moderator. I am just a normal user; ergo, there is no abuse happening here.

I haven't done anything but downvote this. If this revision had been the original question, it wouldn't have been closed, I don't think. Fantastically downvoted, I bet, but probably not closed. Since this question lacks any sort of research or effort on your part, I am declining to vote to reopen it. That's not abuse, just using my privileges to help curate the site better. I don't believe this question is interesting enough to warrant the vote.

I know you are not one of the moderators. However you can act as one depending on reputation which you have.

My point here is: there is a process put in place by stackoverflow

Indeed there is.

And now that you have edited it, it will be reviewed by those with the power to reopen it.

And it might be. I don't know.

I just won't help.