Wolfram Mathematica

« first day (1217 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (3273 days later) »

2:15 AM

@Guesswhoitis. could you please help me understand: pd[pts_?MatrixQ, n_Integer] := (Dot @@ #[[{1, -1}]]) & /@ Partition[pts, n, n - 1] ?

Guess who it is.

2:55 AM

@psimeson, execute test = Table[{Subscript[x, k], Subscript[y, k]}, {k, 10}].

psimeson

did it

I got a list with {{x1,y1},......,{x10,y10}}

I am having hard time understanding the part with pure function

The Toad

@psimeson You can try breaking it into smaller parts and trying with the right arguments to see what happens

#[[{1, -1}]] &@{{1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6}}

Dot @@ {{1, 2}, {5, 6}}

psimeson

@TheToad Thanks.. I will try it that way.. I was trying to do so but I messed up

2012rcampion

Okay guys, I have a stupid question: If I buy 10.1, will I be able to upgrade to 10.2 through 10.xx for free?

I'm trying to decide whether I should renew my school license ($35) for another year. Currently they're only providing 10.0.1, but I do get 8 subkernels instead of 4 under the regular home-use version.

The Toad

3:11 AM

@2012rcampion I think WRI charges for every update.

psimeson

3:25 AM

I still don't understand what's the use of pure function pd[pts_?MatrixQ, n_Integer] := (Dot @@ #[[{1, -1}]]) & /@ Partition[pts, n, n - 1]

I can get the same result by doing this : pd[pts_?MatrixQ, n_Integer] := Dot @@@ Partition[pts, n, n - 1]

The Toad

3:56 AM

@psimeson Are you sure about that? Have you tried comparing the two using the definition of test from above?

They don't do the same thing.

psimeson

test = {{1, 2}, {2, 3}, {4, 5}, {6, 7}, {1, 3}}

(Dot @@ #[[{1, -1}]]) & /@ Partition[test, 2, 1]

gives: {8, 23, 59, 27}

Dot @@@ Partition[test, 2, 1]

gives: {8, 23, 59, 27}

The Toad

What if you do Partition[test, 3, 2]?

psimeson

in that case i get a different result

what does this mean #[[{1, -1}]] ?

psimeson

5:04 AM

finally understood what #[[{1, -1}]] means and how it's working :)

Guess who it is.

5:40 AM

Oops, sorry about getting cut; I had to attend to something. I'm glad Mr. Toad was able to fill in. :)

3 hours later…

Shutao Tang

8:40 AM

Select[
Names["System`*"],
MemberQ[Options[ToExpression@#][[All, 1]], Assumptions] &]

I'd like to know what functions contain the option of "Assumption"?

The code gives the warning information Options::opmix: Cannot mix streams and non-streams in {Courier,10.}. >> ToExpression::notstrbox: FEPrivate`FrontEndResourceString[GetFEKernelInit] is not a string or a box. ToExpression can only interpret strings or boxes as Mathematica input. >>

@2012rcampion, Could you help me to detect the problem? thks:-)

2 hours later…

halirutan

10:39 AM

@ShutaoTang What about

names = Names["System`*"];
Quiet@Select[names,
  MemberQ[
    Function[sym, Options[Unevaluated[sym]], {HoldFirst}] @@
     MakeExpression[#], Assumptions, 2] &]

Meta

Q: Our language when we talk about Mathematica functions

The discussion in the comments in two recent AspectRatio threads (1,2) has highlighted one important aspect of our established way of expressing our thoughts about the Mathematica (or Wolfram Language) functions: we tend to use the names of built-in system Symbols instead of the corresponding wor...

discussion

1 hour later…

Szabolcs

11:56 AM

Is there any convenient way to Merge using different functions based on keys? This is in the context of Dataset and GroupBy.

Here's an example:

data = Table[<|"name" -> #, "a" -> RandomReal[],
        "b" -> RandomReal[]|>, {RandomInteger[{3, 8}]}] & /@ {"p",
      "q", "r", "s", "t"} // Catenate // Dataset;

Now I can do data[GroupBy["name"], Merge[Total], {"a"}] or data[GroupBy["name"], Merge[Mean], {"b"}]

But I'd like to get a single dataset containing both the reduced "a" and "b" columns.

What's the simplest/shortest/easiest way?

1 hour later…

Szabolcs

1:20 PM

It would be `Query`: `data[GroupBy["name"], <|"a" -> Query[Total, "a"],
"b" -> Query[Mean, "b"]|>]`.

4 hours later…

Martin John Hadley

5:31 PM

I've already reported to support@wolfram.com but today both my Mac and Windows installs of Mathematica lost their definitions for `Classify` and report the same terrifying message "Users/martinjohnhadley/Library/Mathematica/Paclets/Repository/\
MachineLearning-1.0.5/Kernel/64Bit/MachineLearning.mx has been \
written by a newer version of DumpSave and cannot be loaded" ... anybody else seen something like this?

ilian

5:57 PM

@MartinJohnHadley seems like an incorrect version requirement in the paclet, until it's fixed, perhaps try using 10.1.0

Martin John Hadley

@ilian I've discovered I do HAVE a license for 10.1.0 but contending with user.wolfram.com download speeds now. I didn't see anybody else ask on MMA.SE hence the sky is falling resort to chat, thanks for replying

psimeson

6:58 PM

how can I extract 29 from SplineFunction[", Cubic, ", ", {0., 29.}, ", ", "<>", "]

that is a result of sp1 = SplineFit[data1, Cubic]

Guess who it is.

7:10 PM

…you really still want to use that old function?

Anyway, try sp1[[2, -1]].