I have looked a bit, but not too extensively. However, rather than spending a long time looking, I thought I'd drop in to see if anyone could tell me how to have my graphics generated by Mathematica 10 come out the same as those generated by earlier versions.

The colors are all wonky

I've played a bit with the themes, but to no avail

@robjohn PlotTheme -> "Classic"?

Hah, finally downloaded and installed 10.2. Took a day and a half, but the thing's done!

@J.M.isback. Still using 10.1. (And welcome back!:D )

It's going to be isomorphicQ[{g1, "VertexColors" -> ...}, {g2, "VertexColors -> ...}]

Mathematica does not directly support checking the isomorphism of multigraphs. Neither does igraph. But igraph supports isomorphism checking on edge-coloured graphs, so we have a way out:

Now that v10.3 documentation is out... time to start fruitlessly pondering when the actual product might become available.

@kirma How long did it take between 10.2 docs popping up and the software finally being available?

@J.M.isback. Typically I receive an email saying "Mathematica 10.X will be released soon...and your site will be one of the first to get this update". Then I wait usually a week or two, and then it becomes available to other people on MMA.SE, but not to me. Then after another week, I finally get it. So the email isn't actually telling the truth...

Crucially, I'm yet to receive such an email...

@blochwave Last time I got it a few days after most people, yet the email still said that my site is among the first. Maybe all academic licenses use that text.

It would seem v10.2 new features list was up on Jul 7, and download was available on Jul 14.

So, a week at the least, indeed.

@Szabolcs Well you have to encourage big sites to keep paying, right?

@Pickett I've changed your role to "contributor" from "subscriber". I'm not really sure of the difference between "contributor", "author" and "editor" (I guess the last one allows editing of other user's posts as well?). Just let me know if this is not sufficient and I'll bump up the privileges.

@R.M. Thank you, it appears to be sufficient.

I intend to use it to write a post that summarizes problems that have often come up re. interacting with websites/APIs using Mathematica. Since the blog is so rarely used, I am assuming that there aren't a lot of strong opinions on what a blog post "should be".

@belisariusisforth Pfft, so how come nobody's knocking at my door. The media does have a skewed sense of importance sometimes...

How do I distinguish between Integer[1] and an actual Integer 1? For example I would like to match separately the function calls and where the Integer actual is.

{1, Integer[1], 1} /. {x___Integer} :> f[x]

I'm looking for something like

{1, Integer[1], 1} /. {x___Integer, y___Integer[z___], a___} :> f[x, 2, y[z], a]

@J.M.isback. You need a better campaign manager. See what you could achieve

I think I could hack something together with IntegerQ and Sequence.

@MichaelE2 I think I tried that, or something similar. I will try it and see. Thanks.

@William Position[{1, Integer[1], 1}, x_Integer?AtomQ]

Please explain if you don't mind.

@William It identifies the literal integer 1, in its three positions where it appears in that list

I thought that was what you wanted, ish

Position[{1, Integer[1], 1}, x_Integer?(Not@*AtomQ)] identifies where Integer is used as a head

Thank you sir that is by far the most elegant solution

I don't know about that, but it's certainly a solution :P