Hello. I have been spending some time trying to answer a new question (mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/45996) but I don't think it is possible. It appears neither Wolfram|Alpha nor Mathematica have complete enough TimeZone data. Is it acceptable to answer, "No, this is not possible?"
@hftf Define "complete enough". W|A has more data that Mathematica, but I don't know the largest city that W|A is missing. You can start requesting the data from W|A starting with the largest cities like this.
That just gets 10, but you could fill in the gaps with the largest cities from CityData that have missing timezones pretty well with that approach I think.
That gives the name of the time zones, but then you can manually map those to UTC offsets or get that info from W|A as well.
I'm somewhat puzzled to see wolfram.com adding new Mathematica 9 -advertising material practically daily (mostly in non-English pages though). Is 10 coming or not?
The question Series expansion of a complex function was migrated to Math.SE because it wasn't explicitly a Mathematica question. However the original poster Accepted the Mathematica answer that was migrated along it, implying that it was in fact a Mathematica question. I would be inclined to re...
True, or where would they find the time and ammunition to count 30,000 data points while fighting off the zombies?
It's entertaining though. I just read a summary of Pirates of Venus from 1934, where the protagonist accidentally arrives at Venus instead of Mars because he forgot to include gravity from the Moon when computing his trajectory. Very imaginative.
Indeed. And then his information that Venus was inhospitable turned out to be completely wrong and he could breathe just fine. I guess you can apply the anthropic principle to fantastic stories though. The stories where expected luck occurs are too boring to write about.