« first day (102 days earlier)      last day (3031 days later) » 

user43095
1:30 AM
Whoa
 
user43095
That's like
 
user43095
Crazy
 
6:55 AM
Oh, ZugAddict hosted an Atomic-compatible simul 9 hours ago, too bad I missed it.
 
7:08 AM
@Unihedron I've found that you can play crazyhouse on FICS.
 
7:49 AM
Good morning chess folks!
 
@ProgramFOX :O
 
Morning @Byte!
 
No need for a chess bot?
 
Let me try connecting to FICS again.
 
It requires signing up, doesn't it?
 
7:52 AM
yes it does
you'll also need a good chess client. I use BabasChess for FICS.
 
I don't like registrations... :p
Is it Ubuntu-compatible?
 
I'm trying to use Raptor for playing on my ubuntu.
 
Oh, right, I forgot that you use Ubuntu. No, it isn't
 
5
Q: What FICS chess clients are available?

z7sgI have pychess but it seems to load the CPU excessively, even without the background evaluation tab. I used to use xboard but by now the UI feels somewhat outdated. I'm looking for good FICS integration rather than engines or analysis tools.

 
YES! It works!
 
7:58 AM
@Unihedron I would rather add the github link than replace the google-code link. It still is active.
@uni I changed your edit: askubuntu.com/a/191886/367990
 
@ByteCommander The Google Code repository for raptor is already discontinued.
 
But at least the documentation is only there. That's even stated on github, which seems to be an unofficial repository anyway...
Therefore I added the footnote.
You already installed Raptor? How does it look?
 
First PR in Raptor after github migration! github.com/evilwan/raptor-chess-interface/…
Is there a friend system for FICS? @ProgramFOX
 
not that I'm aware of
 
I've found "follow" though
Whoa!
This team has an awesome intra-tournament system.
 
8:22 AM
@Unihedron Do I really have to build Raptor myself? I am so much not in the mood for this...
 
@ByteCommander there are jars in the release page
 
From 2013.
 
Ah... Well, my github-fu is still improvable ;)
@Unihedron >.< No 32 bit...
 
... 32-bit systems are deprecated already, aren't they? >_>
 
8:26 AM
I don't care, I have one! That's everything that counts at the moment. :P
Besides, I don't think so.
 
wow
I've placed a seek for a game with standard-1min, but no one saw it
Your seek has been posted with index 43.
(0 player(s) saw the seek.)
This must be a really popular chess server
 
I'm trying eboard from the repo now...
 
I'm watching some people with "(50)" next to their names shout and gossip about soccer and husbands in public
while waiting for my bullet game to be picked up
 
@Unihedron I should be online on FICS now through eboard...
This terminal interface to FICS is awful... :P
 
8:42 AM
what's your username?
 
What you would expect.
ByteCommander
 
use "play Unihedron" to join my seeking game of crazyhouse 5+0
I'm not sure how you'd play without a GUI though
(it's unrated, so you can try it out)
 
It is a GUI board, but the player seeking/matching is CLI-style.
 
oh cool, mine is too
 
How did you start the crazyhouse game?
(command)?
 
8:47 AM
seek 5 0 zh u f
 
And what means zh u f?
 
You're asking me?!
 
zh=crazyhouse, u=unrated, f=?
Of course I ask you!
Who else should I ask?
 
match ByteCommander unrated 5 0 crazyhouse
Match request does not fit formula for ByteCommander:
ByteCommander's formula: (blitz || standard) && !abuser
........
 
I did not set anything yet...
I guess it's default to only accept standard games.
 
8:52 AM
Tell me when you decide to seek a game, then I'll join you.
 
@uni index 84
 
play ByteCommander
Match request does not fit formula for ByteCommander:
ByteCommander's formula: (blitz || standard) && !abuser
play 84
Match request does not fit formula for ByteCommander:
ByteCommander's formula: (blitz || standard) && !abuser
lol
 
F#ck you FICS!
>:P
 
Ignoring (formula): ByteCommander (----) Unihedron (----) rated crazyhouse 2 12.
 
@Unihedron Run set formula !abuser
That should stop the auto-blocking.
 
8:59 AM
done
 
YAY! :D
 
scholar's mate?!
 
Just idiot.
(me.)
A break please...
 
oh wow, I figured out how to pause on the last second
 
xD
Ouch...
 
9:11 AM
There's a +12 second increment, you'll live :P
I can't figure out how to add time though
 
command "moretime"
And I have to run "unpause" before I can play on, so that's tricky within 1 second...
 
You just got a minute up!
 
eboard is buggy... :(
good game!
 
gg
rematch!
 
You'r gonna lose again! ;D
How to castle?
It doesn't work...
Oh, the bishop...
sure.
 
9:24 AM
@ByteCommander Sure. :P
 
Ugh. :P
Rematch?
 
I like crazyhouse more and more... :D Of course!
 
I've calculated a win and made sure you won't be quick enough. :P
 
Hey, that's against the rules!
I thought one can't drop into checkmate
 
9:31 AM
No, that's only in shogi.
 
23 hours ago, by Unihedron
> Drops resulting in immediate checkmate are permitted. Unlike in shogi, this includes pawn drops.[2]
Pawns may not be dropped on the players' 1st or 8th ranks.[2]
Promoted but captured pawns are dropped as pawns.[2]
 
Oh well...
Hey that rating calculation is unfair too!
I won two games and lost one. But Your rating is now higher than mine! :(
1730 (you) vs 1710 (me)...
 
@ByteCommander That's because my win was of better performance than both your two wins combined.
{Game 162 (redbliss vs. Unihedron) redbliss forfeits on time} 0-1

Lightning rating adjustment: 0 --> 1853
Performance(lightning 1 game(s)): 2024
Series(redbliss): 1.0/1
Average Move Time(you/opponent): 1.9sec/2.2sec
Premoves(you/opp): 3/0
YES
 
Sure.
 
9:39 AM
I so thought I was losing... both on time and material
 
It's probably just that before the last game, I had ~ 1900 and you 1500.
 
then the player took too long to think and they lost on time lol
 
Oh, and @Unihedron: did you check oratio-slack recently?
Gabriel is pretty pissed off by you...
You're going to get fired if you don't show more effort and respect deadlines.
 
@ByteCommander Nope
 
You should do this then...
 
9:42 AM
@ByteCommander It's not my responsibility to run by deadlines that I've shown clear disconsent against.
 
Don't discuss that with me, I am not the team manager.
But I agree with Gabriel somehow...
 
I didn't plan, insist, bother, or have to discuss it with you, really.
 
Why are you always so grumpy and egoistic?
I sometimes really don't understand what's going on inside your head...
 
@ByteCommander An answer would be too long for this format.
By "this format", I mean this medium of communication via text in your Earth language.
 
Oh, 500 characters per post is pretty much, especially as you can write as many posts as you want.
Oh.
Slow chat...
Anyway, you should really behave a bit more altruistic.
 
9:49 AM
@ByteCommander Plaintext answer would consume at least 5TB.
 
I have enough time to download...
;)
 
Reading it is another matter.
Plus, my keyboard won't survive that many keystrokes.
 
You need a new one because of your ants anyway, don't you?
 
@ByteCommander This "advice" coming from you really cuts off the effectiveness.
 
Why? o.O
I am not behaving like an asshat, at least not online.
 
9:51 AM
That has nothing to do with altruism.
 
I fear this dialogue leads to nothing except both of us being upset...
However, you are still the 2nd team leader of oratio.io, so you should definitely show a bit more responsibility.
You can't expect your team to work if you don't do it yourself.
 
@ByteCommander I'm not upset at all, I'm just disappointed.
 
Disappointed by what?
I am not deeply involved into the oratio team yet, but I really don't see any reason why you should be disappointed.
 
@ByteCommander It's not really my team. In fact, Oratio has to be the most poorly organized team out of all the current circles I'm in [who works on projects]. Firstly, integrations are subpar and project management is done in a chat room (that doesn't even keep archived logs!) Secondly, despite being one of the founders, I'm not even alerted, consulted or notified when someone new joins the crew. I'm not sure how you infer at all any responsibility on my end.
@ByteCommander By how you misuse the word "altruistic" and criticize me with it? :P
 
Okay, so but then if you don't want to be a team leader or member at all, you should state this and leave!
 
10:00 AM
@ByteCommander I'm indifferent mostly.
It's not like I have to be active to be part of a project.
 
I just know that people without motivation in important positions destroy the project.
One should expect the leaders to be... leading.
 
@ByteCommander That's only your opinion. Additionally, "important" is relative when it comes to projects.
 
So why do you think you should keep that position if you don't want it?
 
@ByteCommander Expectations are confronted by cruel reality most of the time.
@ByteCommander I'm not sure how you convey that I didn't want it.
2 mins ago, by Unihedron
@ByteCommander I'm indifferent mostly.
 
3 mins ago, by Unihedron
@ByteCommander It's not really my team. In fact, Oratio has to be the most poorly organized team out of all the current circles I'm in [who works on projects]. Firstly, integrations are subpar and project management is done in a chat room (that doesn't even keep archived logs!) Secondly, despite being one of the founders, I'm not even alerted, consulted or notified when someone new joins the crew. I'm not sure how you infer at all any responsibility on my end.
 
10:03 AM
Continue?
 
Okay, if it was my team, I would gather all members together and restructure the whole crap.
Everybody says what he can and want to do and the whole team democratically decides.
 
Tell Gabriel that, it's his team. I only participate in it with a title "Lead R&D" (and you should research what R&D means before you claim my responsibilities)
 
It does not work with this old structures.
You don't wanna know how much I am researching during this conversation...
 
I'm tempted to just say that your research efforts are futile, but that would be extremely sad.
> Co-founder, CTO and Lead R&D.
and the other day I wrote a legal document :P
 
I hate those C-level abbreviations...
More research effort >:P
I don't really know why you guys are that stuck with your c-levels and positions anyway.
In my opinion a team of (how many? 10?) people should not need that much hierarchy.
 
10:09 AM
@ByteCommander I wholeheartedly agree.
 
A team needs a leader that controls the progress and tells where it has to go, while the rest should operate at an equal level.
That's my experience with teamwork.
And we would need a better progress documentation.
Trello is useless.
 
Now you know why this team is the most poorly organized compared to all the other teams I'm in.
It's not just a relative matter.
 
I know that it is not optimal, but that's why it needs strong leader(s) to guide it back to the right path.
And you won't help by ignoring every task.
 
I'm not a leader. Additionally, I've only ignored 45% of the tasks, which is very little.
 
O.O Your definition of little is pretty arguable...
And as co-founder and C(whatever 2 letters), you are also pretty much kind of a leader.
 
10:13 AM
CTO, chief tech officer.
@ByteCommander Your definition of "pretty much" is scary.
 
You are administrator of most or all groups belonging to the team too.
Can't we have a serious discussion?
 
@ByteCommander That's part of the 45% of tasks that I've done - to administrate occasionally.
@ByteCommander This discussion is very serious.
 
Without leaving the topic and having you bring up your death-punch arguments?
Okay, I'll link this conversation to Gabriel in Slack and will ask him to strongly reorganize the group.
But you will have to participate then!
This is the chance to re-shape the organization.
If we do it, you have no better time to improve it as you want than then.
 
@ByteCommander I haven't left the topic once aside from making meta-commentary.
 
Maybe not now, but you tend to do this.
I don't know.
I forget arguments as soon as they're over.
 
10:35 AM
It's hard to be an editor
 
10:46 AM
OMG
lichess.org/3HJFUiWZakJY I gotta checkmate with two knights
 
Can you even force checkmate with 2 knights?
 
Even if it is, I'm too bad for it
drew -_-
Hi @AngusAtkinson!
 
11:09 AM
@ProgramFOX two knights is a draw with best play, but it's possible for someone to hang mate in one
 
The two knights endgame is a chess endgame with a king and two knights versus a king, possibly with some other material. The material with the defending king is usually one pawn, but some positions studied involve additional pawns or other pieces. In contrast to a king plus two bishops (on opposite-colored squares), or a bishop and a knight, a king and two knights cannot force checkmate against a lone king. (However, the superior side can force stalemate.) Although there are checkmate positions, the superior side cannot force them against proper (and easy) defense (Speelman, Tisdall & Wade 1993...
Oh, only in some positions
KBN v K is force checkmate though
I made us a team on Challonge! challonge.com/teams/se-chess
 
I see no reason why I would need this...
 
Me neither.
 
11:25 AM
>.<
 
@Andrew I see, thanks!
 
bongclouding in rated bullet lichess.org/NflJuo1tG0tF
checkmated yay!
something about bongcloud gives me unknown strength
I should stop before I lose my hard(ly) earned rating.
 
11:47 AM
 
12:01 PM
I made a Facebook page for the bongcloud opening, since it doesn't have one! facebook.com/bongcloud
 
1:25 PM
@Unihedron I have 5 minutes if you want to work on our game
 
user43095
@Unihedron on mobile, the new lichess beta is pretty neat.
 
@Seth gg :)
bongcloud ftw!
 
gg
The bongcloud is stupid though
 
no it's not
 
 
2 hours later…
3:28 PM
??? I won a losing game lichess.org/kLP4oYVoRAso
 
 
1 hour later…
4:39 PM
Bongcloud Attack tournament! en.lichess.org/tournament/H8to2BQ9
cc @Uni
 
What?!
 
thematic tourney
I really need to fix my blitz rating as it kinda sucks now xD
 
I won!
I lost against the tournament leader! Oh no!
thibault is playing xD
 
5:03 PM
Okay, I lost the three games I played so far...
anyway my tourney got popular, lol
eh I lost my 4th game too
... and my 5th game
 
my 33% winrate rule has got a nerf! My winrate is now higher!
Wait, that'd be a buff, not a nerf
 
5:19 PM
I lost all my games -_-
 
:(
So sorry >_>
Hey, guess what?
Maybe you should learn normal chess as well instead of only focusing on atomic. xD
 
...
Thanks for the suggestion, my puzzles rating just dropped by 100...
 
:(
I should mentor you through a few puzzles. Maybe it will help.
 
oh hey it's rising again :D
Always, at a certain point, those puzzles become a bit harder and then I fail those which makes my rating drop and then I get puzzles again which I can solve and so on...
 
... maybe that's why they had to place a rating on them? ;)
 
5:28 PM
:p
 
TheIceManV (the player around lichess forums) sent me a corresp. game request!
I'm totally going to play the bongcloud!
 
lol
 
> TheIceManV bongcloud????
Unihedron Muahahahaha!
Unihedron Fear my bongcloud attack!
 
xD
yay it's above 1200 again
uh nevermind :p
 
5:44 PM
0
A: Is there an effective attack as white after Nf3 with e5 response in Atomic chess?

TanjThere is a very interesting website with opening theory from the very first moves of atomic chess : https://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~chess/atomic/ To answer your question, after : 1.Nf3 e5 ? 2.Cg5 f5 ! ( Qxg5 lose the queen and ...f6 3.Nf7 Qe7 4.Nd6+) 3.h4! (cover h4 square from the black queen) a...

someone explain what "C" is
 
I have no idea.
 
2...e5? 3.Nb5! Bb4 4.c3 Qe7 5.Nd6!
^ got that from the book itself
Wow, nice read, I'm enlightened at the depth
 
6:04 PM
wait, that makes no sense
I'm looking at the wrong line!
1... e5?

   2.Ng5 Qxg5 [Vlasov-Defence Lindam Variation] 3.e4
     2...f6? 3.Nf7 Qe7 4.Nd6
     2...f5! [Vlasov-Defence Mainline]
	      3.h4! [Vlasov-Defence Esha Variation]
		  3...c6 4.Nxh7! [Esha Variation Mainline]
		  3...Bc5 [Esha-Nightrider Variation]
			 4.d4! Bb6 5.Nf7 Qe7 6.Nd6 Kf8 7.Nxb7
	      3.d3 [Vlasov-Defence JoelH Variation]
		  3...Nf6 ? 4.Nf7
	      3.Nf7?? Qh4 4.g3  Qd4
Oh! After Ng5, h4 is the key!
It makes sure the queen doesn't escape.
So black, who defends, must open up c6 for an escape route, or expect the weak home row to survive with Bc5 or Nf6.
 
6:22 PM
@Unihedron The master of arrows is back in town? o.O
 
 
4 hours later…
10:07 PM
meplays daily three-check!
there aren't many contestants
 
10:18 PM
I was doing horribly, so I resigned before I lose rating (net +1)
Let's not play chess right after I wake up >_>
 
10:51 PM
chessbrahs irl ^
haha, someone resigned after seeing my bongcloud defense: lichess.org/rpXvdlMxjNSb
 

« first day (102 days earlier)      last day (3031 days later) »