« first day (641 days earlier)      last day (2797 days later) » 

Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
11:46 AM
@MartinSleziak the first looks like a great target to me, the second seems outdated as the feature appears to have been modified. — quid 2 hours ago
@quid As usual, you are right. I should have read the post more carefully before linking to it.
Would it be reasonable to edit Jeff Attwood's answer, so that it does not confuse users who stumble upon it?
I would imagine something like this
EDIT: The behavior of rollbacks changed since this answer was posted. For a more up to date description see here: meta.math.stackexchange.com/questions/17111/…
 
quid
quid
Maybe we could dupe close it into the newer with a comment that the more recent one give the current behavior. It is not exactly exact duplicate but maybe close enough.
 
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
in Tagging, 21 secs ago, by Martin Sleziak
In connection with several recent questions I have created rollbacks tag on meta. If there are some suggestions how to improve the tag-info, go ahead.
@quid I leave it up to you. Do whatever you consider a cleaner solution.
To me, both possibilities sound relatively reasonable.
 
 
2 hours later…
quid
quid
2:18 PM
@MartinSleziak dupe voted.
 
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
I see you also left a comment explaining the duplicate vote.
I voted to close this older question as duplicate of a newer, as the behavior change and this is outdated. — quid 3 mins ago
Thanks for that, I voted too. I suppose it gets closed pretty quickly once it gets into the review queue.
 
 
1 hour later…
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
3:23 PM
It seems that some users voted to leave open: meta.math.stackexchange.com/review/close/3629 We wills see how this pans out after the review is finished.
 

« first day (641 days earlier)      last day (2797 days later) »