« first day (2140 days earlier)      last day (2868 days later) » 

6:29 AM
@whuber I was surprised to see that cardinal got his diamond back (as per the update to your Meta post). What is actually the procedure behind "promotion to emeritus", as you put it? We have a very clear and transparent procedure for electing new moderators, but it seems that the procedure for moderator stepping down is not clear at all. Did they (mbq & cardinal) asked to step down? Did other moderators ask them based perhaps on some lack of sufficient activity? Does this happen automatically?
Apologies if you do not want or did not plan to reveal that.
 
 
9 hours later…
4:00 PM
@amoeba Those are good questions. I don't know whether there are standard procedures. What I can say in this case--to allay any concerns or speculation about what was going on--is that the actions were triggered independently by SE staff who were concerned about inactivity, not about anything else.
The remaining mods suggested it was not necessary to hold a replacement election immediately, and the SE staff agreed. Later this year, though, when activity picks up (as it seasonally does in the fall), I think I might suggest electing one or two new moderators, just to keep the rest of us from burning out.
 

« first day (2140 days earlier)      last day (2868 days later) »