« first day (1 day earlier)    last day (1588 days later) » 

1:09 AM
@lockstep: we'd like to interview you too. :) When you have time, let us know. :)
 
 
9 hours later…
10:08 AM
@PauloCereda E.g., now. :-)
 
@lockstep Ah great! :)
Could you tell us a bit about you?
 
I've studied urban planning and am working as a zoning official in the Vienna city administration. My hobbies are biking, singing, tarock (an Austrian card game), and, obviously, (La)TeX.
 
How was your first contact to TeX, LaTeX and friends?
(@Joseph: feel free to ask questions too. :) )
 
In 1995, I wrote my master thesis with Word, which did horrible things to my headers and footers. Many years later, I decided that I needed something better for my (still to be written) Ph.D. thesis. I started to experiment with LaTeX in January 2008 and to delve into biblatex internals in the summer of that year.
 
@lockstep You seem to be the biblatex expert on TeX.sx. Do you have much to do with the development side of that project?
 
10:21 AM
In 2009, I bought the "classic" LaTeX books (Mittelbach/Goossens, Kopka/Daly), and finally also the TeXbook.
Starting in 2009, I have made several bug reports and feature requests for biblatex -- e.g., the several backrefstyles are based on one of my requests. I had also hacked together a personal authoryear-icomp style, which made it into v0.9 of the core package.
authoryear-icomp-tt was also the reason that I joined my first LaTeX forum (mrunix.de), because I noticed that a forum member was looking for the very biblatex style I had created.
 
As Joseph mentioned, you are the biblatex expert and the one-man tagging machine on TeX.sx. How did you become aware of this community? :)
 
10:36 AM
I occasionally peruse comp.text.tex via Google (I do not participate, though). There was a post about a proposed stackexchange group dealing with TeX, and (half a year later or so) another post that the private beta had started. I decided to give tex.sx a try -- it was already in public beta then. The rest is history. ;-)
 
@lockstep You do a lot of tagging: what approach do you take to find material in need of attention, and what for you makes a good tag?
 
I wasn't active on meta at first, and so the "big" decisions (e.g., concept tags instead of command name tags) were already made when I seriously started retagging. The "practical" part seemed to be somewhat in disarray, though -- e.g., what is today was divided into and then, with no discernible difference between the two tags.
A good tag a) should have an easily comprehensible meaning b) should be helpful in locating existing answers and avoiding duplicates.
That's for "new" users of tex.sx; for "power" users a tag should c) be helpful in notifying questions which one might like to answer.
 
(Friends, I have another mass to play. I'll be back in an hour or so. Here's one question.) The idxlayout package saved me a lot of times. Could you tell us a bit about your first package?
 
10:54 AM
When trying to typeset indexes, I soon noticed that the positioning of the sectioning heading was wrong (LaTeX bug 3126 in action). Mittelbach/Goosens gives the advice to use multicol to define a customized theindex environment. I wrote a small package for private use that also worked with KOMA-scripts index features. When a user on mrunix.de lamented about his wrongly positioned index heading, I decided to write something more general and put it on CTAN -- that was at the start of 2010.
Later, it turned out that my idxlayout package, which is partially a recoding exercise of KOMA-scripts and memoirs index environments, also solved issues with regard to the exact positioning of hyperlinks -- I got some unforseen praise from Geoffrey Jones, one of tex.sxs early high-rep users.
 
hi =)
 
@N3buchadnezzar Hello!
 
11:16 AM
I must just say that all of you are doing an amazing job on this site. It is just mindboogling. As a soon to be mathteacher the help I am getting here is enourmus, and it seems as the more i learn about latex. The more questions arise ^^
The only downside is that i wish there were more sites like this. I know there are other SE sites, but there is still not enough!. Even for schoolsubjects it great.

Although latex is somewhat amazing, I still feel it has some quite big drawbacks... To be able to track all the different packages, and what they do. Be able to deal with all the packages confl
 
I should add that idylayout today is partially superseded by @egreg's imakeidx which makes use of the \write18 facility. And if you want \write18 plus runin-typesetting of index items and affiliated subitems, use imakeidx plus idxlayout.
 
@N3buchadnezzar All good points, but probably better in the general chat room :-)
 
Sorrry =)
 
@N3buchadnezzar No problem: it happens to us all!
 
 
2 hours later…
1:00 PM
(I'm back)
@lockstep: Our community is very friendly. How do you feel about TeX.sx? :)
 
It's addictive, isn't it? ;-) Seriously, the stackexchange model has turned out to be very appropriate for questions/answers about (La)TeX -- fast response times, less duplicates than in traditional forums, and a "reward" system that attracts expert users.
 
:-)
How do you see another year for TeX.sx? Top voter, top editor, top tarock player? :)
 
1:17 PM
Top voter -- likely; top editor -- for sure; top tarock player -- there other Austrians at tex.sx, and who knows how good they are with respect to card gaming. :-)
 
You need to teach me. I only know how to play truco. :)
 
With regard to tex.sx in general, I'm hoping to see more "consolidated reference" questions/answers.
One has to walk a fine line between being too specific and answering too many questions at once, but I still think that tex.sx would profit from "consolidated" Q/A's.
 
Ready for LaTeX3? :)
 
Excited. I'm especially hoping for/looking forward to grid typesetting.
At the moment, there are partial solutions/workarounds, but several consecutive sectioning headings in larger-than-normal fontsize will destroy a grid almost for sure.
 
1:35 PM
What do you recommend for a newbie eager to learn TeX, LaTeX and friends? :)
 
Read "LaTeX Beginner's Guide" by Stefan Kottwitz (hello, @StefanKottwitz) -- this book features a well-considered selection of what new users need/don't need to know about LaTeX. If you speak German, also read "Wissenschaftliche Arbeiten schreiben mit LaTeX" by Joachim Schlosser.
BTW, Joachim Schlosser decided to include a chapter about biblatex in the 4th edition of his book, and more focus on biblatex is my "top request" for a 2nd edition of Stefan's book.
 
Ah how nice!
I'm out of questions. :P
Thanks for your time! Tausend Dank! :)
 
1:50 PM
You're welcome -- gern geschehen!
 
;-)
Friends, don't forget do ask lockstep too! :)
 

« first day (1 day earlier)    last day (1588 days later) »