last day (22 days later) » 

2:42 PM
The os.se private beta failed.
What (if anything) can we learn from the failure?
What (if anything) positive can we salvage from a sad situation?
In particular: Area 51 attracted a bunch of users who are still completely unaware of cs.se.
if it is really true, as @GraceNote claims, that os.se was competing against cs.se and so, then shouldn't cs.se be attractive to those users if they knew it existed?
 
@Gilles any input on os.se failure?
@Raphael any input on os.se failure?
@Patrick87 any input on os.se failure?
@RobertCartaino any input on os.se failure?
@GraceNote any input on os.se failure?
 
The following "top" users on os.se have no cs.se account (or haven't logged into cs.se in months):
mmk
atur
superdesk
namehere
sparky
AshishKulkarni
DavidKohen
BryceAtNetwork23
AdamMatan
So well over half of the top 15 os.se users
Somehow Area51 "found" these users, but cs.se has not.
How can we do whatever it is that Area 51 did to "find" users like this?
 
 
2 hours later…
vzn
4:42 PM
14
Operating Systemsoperatingsystems.stackexchange.com

Beta Q&A site for the study, design, and development of Operating Systems.

Currently in private beta.

do they have a public chat room?
suggest pointing out Computer Science to its users eg in chat... ofc hasnt it already been pointed out in comments in its meta threads?
the bigger issue of se area51 dynamics does deserve some conversation. dont know if its been discussed anywhere. chat room somewhere? meta?
 
@vzn Yes, all chatrooms are public. And I copiously advertized Computer Science on meta.OS.
 
vzn
:)
 
@WanderingLogic as are doing Programming language theory and Compilers, both subsets of Computer Science
 
vzn
suggest invite the top users to chat & then try to promote Computer Science to them & ask for feedback
 
@WanderingLogic we did debate that on meta.CS. I said yes, you said maybe, Adam said no.
 
vzn
4:48 PM
tell them cs.se values contributions wrt OS topic
my suggestions to WL, nominate as "outreach coordinator". (mods are rather busy for this stuff, & gilles already proactively working to migrate good questions)
(fyi, not all chat rooms are public. there are mod-related ones etc.)
 
@vzn doing all I can. I don't have any way to contact the users unless they happen upon my meta post: meta.operatingsystems.stackexchange.com/a/53/106
 
vzn
WL you can invite users into a chat room. have you used that feature? its a bit obscure. you have to be currently in the chat room & then look up the (chat) user, & then a button appears on their chat profile.
 
@vzn only if you find their chat profile, though
 
vzn
so its a bit of work, up to you if its worth it. have tried it, occasionally users respond.
 
4:54 PM
And when proposals that should intersect with cs.se appear on Area 51 I try to encourage them to try cs.se in as positive way: discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/13940/85462
 
vzn
see? we are already doing quite a bit.
 
The net result of which is simply to move that proposal up the Area51 "Hot" list, and get more people to sign on to it.
 
vzn
area51 failures really are not very uncommon. its too bad there isnt a simple browsable history of this somewhere. but ofc se doesnt really want to make it all that visible...
no question area51 functions like a limbo "no mans land" at times... criticism of it/ frustration with it quite legitimate...
lets face it though, bottom line, its really precisely reflecting the substantial difficulty of forming engaging/ "sticky" online interest groups...
speaking of "limbo" have you ever noticed how many se groups are "still" in beta, for long periods?
 
For some reason the majority of people who participated in the os.se private beta seem to have had an easy time finding the Area 51, but (seem to be) completely unaware of the existence of cs.se. (Despite postings during the commitment phase.)
My real question is "how did they find the Area 51 proposal?"
Because if we knew that, and could replicate it, we could help them find the appropriate site they should have found in the first place.
 
vzn
it is remarkable how many subscribe to area51 groups. but even despite "committing" and "pledging" to generate content, that is not often carried out.
your word "participation" there is apparently a bit of an exaggeration.
clicking on a subscribe button barely constitutes "participation". real "participation" is time/ energy consuming.
 
5:02 PM
The top 3 users are all aware of cs.se.
nine of the next 12 either don't have accounts, or have visited only once, months or years ago.
 
vzn
"we" can make cs.se more appealing to the OS crowd through effective tagging.
 
I'm talking about users who scored points either by asking questions on os.se or by answering questions on os.se.
Yes, gilles, adam and I were more effective than most of those other people, but that doesn't mean the next 12 didn't actually try their best.
 
vzn
yes it is interesting how area51 definitely brings/ reveals different talent/ interests & shows that maybe the se groups have significant/ potential but "not comfortable" minorities aka "lurkers"...
 
unfortunately the vast majority of cs.se questions under OS-related tags are "please answer my undergraduate homework question for me."
But there are a few good ones.
Probably not enough to attract any new experts though.
 
@WanderingLogic we can improve the tagging. There are still few enough questions for that (unlike SO where it's a lost cause). As our (CS.SE) resident OS expert, I nominate you to make a proposal on meta.
 
vzn
5:07 PM
WL how about a blog, "why OS users should consider hanging out on cs.se" :)
& then we just cite that blog
 
@Gilles What's wrong with our OS tags?
 
vzn
WL maybe there are untagged questions, maybe there could be new tags found in area51 not on cs.se, etc
 
@WanderingLogic I thought you didn't like them (either the tags or the way they're used)
 
@Gilles I like 'em fine. That's why I posted my tags query: cs.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/…
It gives a pretty good idea of what we've got.
I don't doubt there are mistagged questions.
But i don't have any problem with tags like "scheduling", "synchronization", "virtual-memory"
 
vzn
> 224 users committed
> 57.6% signed up for beta
> 0% fulfilled commitment
people are "merely" clicking on area51 "commit" buttons to signal, roughly, "yes, like this idea, want others to build it for me & then will browse it"...
presumably this is not a communication problem. se sends out emails when it starts private beta right?
WL did you get an se email announcement when beta started?
can someone link in their chat room here?
 
5:16 PM
@vzn Ummmm. Well, yes, but I didn't actually see it in my email box. I only realized the private beta started when i happened to visit Area 51 a couple days later.
 
vzn
linking proposal here
14
Operating Systemsoperatingsystems.stackexchange.com

Beta Q&A site for the study, design, and development of Operating Systems.

Currently in private beta.

strange se is rewriting that from the area51 link. huh.
 
Here's the chat room
 
vzn
thx! couldnt find it in the chat search. strange
 
But you won't find much there. Mostly me and Gilles and some Adam.
 
vzn
oh was filtering it wrong. hmm ok.
do you know any OS blogs that are well read? cstheory.se was possibly started partly thru blog announcements. eg suresh.
 
6:05 PM
@Gilles Looks like several of them are missing tag wikis. I
I'll fix that.
(At least the excerpts.)
 
 
4 hours later…

  last day (22 days later) »