« first day (2142 days earlier)      last day (2747 days later) » 

11:47 AM
0
Q: How do hackers obtain the memory addresses of variables?

Jake WickhamI've seen countless tutorials on hacking telling you that all you need to do is find the memory address of a variable and edit it, the problem is, they never explain how to do it. I'm not one for blackhat hacking and am only interested in making sure that my programs are as secure as possible but...

fucking hell
talk about blind leading the blind on this one
 
@Polynomial o/
 
You should come hang out on Slack. :P
Also, that answer was a direct copy paste of a comment. :P
 
Sigh.
-1
Q: Is it possible to crash the Internet?

MountainSide StudiosCould a skilled hacker given the resources crash the internet itself? With more and more people joining the internet everyday, it would be becoming increasingly easier for hackers to just, overload the internet and crash it, or at least make it become extremely slow to the point it's unusable. I ...

same shit again.
@TerryChia what's the slack url? lost it when I switched machines
 
Hope you got that.
 
12:00 PM
nope
wasn't paying attention
 
Blegh.
 
lol
gotcha
Hmm, can't even figure out how to sign into that.
I did have an account at one point but now Slack doesn't remember me and says my email address doesn't match any accounts.
CONFUSING
 
Not sure how I can help you there. I can't see anything about your account info except for the handle.
 
goti t
I'm in
 
Ah hah. :)
 
12:32 PM
0
Q: What product should we treat passwords like, now that underwear and toothbrushes are not accurate anymore?

NzallTraditionally, when people were asked how to treat their password, the general consensus was either as a toothbrush: don't share it with anyone; replace it regularly; or as your underwear: don't share it with anyone; replace it regularly; don't leave them around where people can see them. ...

really hope that the answer I gave to my own question is acceptable for this community
wasn't 100% sure, but Meta argued recently that self-censorship is not the correct response to internet filters
 
Don't take this the wrong way, but what are you smoking and where can I buy some?
 
The "replace it regularly" is bad advice anyway (for passwords, not for toothbrushes)
 
and underwear
 
I'm not sure whether it's good advice for sex dolls either.
They're often pricey.
 
heh, hadnt read the question before my comment, it actually works anyway....
 
12:43 PM
@Polynomial I'm not using drugs, it's just how I am normally. I got autism, it sometimes makes me act weird.
 
@Polynomial also, I wouldnt be surprised if @simon shared his with his mates.
sorry, "m8s"
 
@Nzall I was joking. But yes, that question is weird, and the self-answer is super weird. Autism-related or otherwise.
 
@Polynomial Yeah, I am fully aware that it's weird. The reason I asked it is because I want to find a less weird comparison
But yeah, I know that the question comes across as weird, and that the self-answer is super weird, but the toothbrush/underwear soundbite is used regularly, and I was hoping we as a community could get something more accurate.
 
 
1 hour later…
2:13 PM
@Anders @SteveDL why did you rejected the edit? (http://security.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/87617)
The link states "At this point we know this was a sophisticated, highly distributed attack involving 10s of millions of IP addresses", but the question misrepresents it saying "of devices". How is correcting this a bad edit?
 
2:35 PM
@Federico While I'm not either one of them, the edit was superfluous. While you're correct that it does make the question match the language in the press release, it doesn't materially improve or clarify the question, and so isn't worth accepting and bumping the question.
 
@Xander you can imagine that I generally disagree, while still seeing your point. I was more upset/surprised by the "deviates from the original intent of the post" than the "Changes are either completely superfluous" (for me correcting a mistake is not superfluous, but I can accept that different SEs have different approaches)
 
@Federico I picked the wrong reason - it should have been that it is to minor. Sorry about that. I don't think the clarification was worth bumping the question, and I stand by that. In general, one word changes will need to be of major importance for the meaning for me to approve.
 
@Anders I can accept that. thanks for explaining.
 
@Federico Thanks for asking and giving me a chanse to clarify! :-)
 
3:18 PM
geez, have you all gone canadian on us?
You cant all be so polite and tolerant here, this is the internet!
quick, lets talk politics.
 
Shuddup @AviD
 
@AviD Off course, I will vote for Trump. (So you all will move up to Canada, eyh.)
 
Did you hear about the time that Mark Godwin himself, creator of "Godwin's Law", explicitly said, regarding certain current US presidential candidates, that Godwin's Law does not apply to literal nazis?
Good times. Oh wait, I mean "End times."
 
I remember hearing about a poll suggesting that 30% or so of Americans thought they would live to see The End of Times. Now apparently 40% are voting for it...
 
3:36 PM
"This country leads the world in only three categories: the number of incarcerated citizens per capita, the number of adults who believe angels are real, and defense spending - which is greater than the next 26 countries combined. 25 of whom are allies... "
 
Hi all. Are there guidelines (OWASP, NIST, Sans...) in regards to protecting applications that depends on libraries or frameworks that have reached End of Life (EOL) with known and unpatched vulnerabilities?

It might take organizations, especially smaller ones, months (maybe years) to upgrade their systems. This might require increased development efforts, hirings... etc. As such the upgrade might be delayed.

I am looking for specific guidance to how to protect these applications in the interim.
 
@Cripto Burn it with fire?
 
@TerryChia: lol. I wish I could, but I need some sources that say that
Boss: @TerryChia told me to set it on fire...
/me i wish
 
4:08 PM
@Cripto So is the application unpatchable, or just the EoL library the application uses?
 
 
4 hours later…
8:22 PM
@TerryChia why isn't the link public?
(and if it's to keep me out, you know I can read deleted chat messages, do you?)
 
@Gilles AFAIK the Slack channel isn't intended to be public access.
It's a less official place for regulars.
 

« first day (2142 days earlier)      last day (2747 days later) »