@PaulVargas The description on that Amazon page doesn't match the title -- I don't think that sub-title does either. William Ross has a blog piece which is fairly informative. (And see his other links, too.)

@Dɑvïd I was misled again. Thank you for the warning.

^^ I don't follow how this is any more "primarily opinion-based" than anything else around here, but it's quite broad and not well researched.

@Susan Me either. I almost approved that edit too as I see it was trying to show how this is conceptually just like the other question that was okay, just lazily composed.

You are more of a man than I, @Dɑvïd. Surely your linguistic sensibilities, being deeper rooted than mine, are the more grievously affronted; yet your comments are consistently more forbearing.

@Caleb Errmmm... ahhh... I would normally take your work for it, but have a sneaky feeling that some aspects that comment might not be entirely accurate. ;) Btw -- I tried to get this font designer to call on you, but alas, his schedule was too tight.