hey guys,what are some reasonable estimates on the latency i should expect from a sensor to a (medium performance) fpga to a another device (in my case a camera).
just trying to do a few order of magnitude calculations to get some basics down
I feel like we need some numbers to help understand the problem here. I'm not going to draw any conclusions, just present some data that's a bit hard to get... If you think of something else that'd be useful here, let me know.
I grabbed some numbers from questions posted between 60 and 90 days a...
Juggling the SO numbers a bit, if your rep is <10, you are more than twice as likely to ask a question that gets downvoted
Very good question (I have it too now), but look at the first line of the first answer... anyone else think this guy should be fired from software development of any kind?
Id rather fire that guy who gave back this ticket about a crashing server, which we fixed, and he gave the ticket back so that we make sure that in the future this will not happen again. I have set the ticket to on-hold til 2038
@PlasmaHH That probably makes him think he achieved something. You should find a non-destructive way to make it clear doing that will make bad shit happen
If all other ideas fail, lift up his car, put blocks under the axles that are 3mm higher than his tyres and remove all evidence of something happening (one wheel at a time, to not move it in the space)
See how long it takes before he is able to leave in the evening
@Asmyldof just opened for the photo, I doubt that bit of UV exposure has destroyed more than time lying around, specially since you needed -48V for programming these
hello, do you know maybe if PC can detect when monitor is tuned on - I mean do common display interfaces (VGA, HDMI, DisplayPort, etc.) allow for such detection?
@Marla specifically a 1702a, one of the earliest eproms, with a rather horrible interface, compared to today standards. so what did the east block do when they needed some, but couldn't find any?
@PlasmaHH well done Plasma . . I do enjoy a mystery.
BTW, that made me remember when I used a Commodore 64, re-programmed it to be a Print Buffer. It was so annoying back then to have computer unavailable during printing operation.
it took me a few days of search to find that site or any info about it... am still wanting to know about the code that is in there, but nobody seems to know that macro language
probably because a lot of people (like me) are fed up with shit and stop doing anything in the review queues because everyone is insisting we have the wrong attitude and are not needed
so they better step back and let people handle shit that are in line with the central committee
the problem is that the mechanics is retarded at times (e.g. you can fail close audits without actually doing a close/non-close action) and there is no automated mechanism to appeal, and if you do on meta, they say "oh its allright, just sit it out" but that is not right because your penalties are exponential and there is virtually no cooldown if you properly participate in close vote queue auditing
meaning (-4) + (-6) = (-10), but 2's compliment gives you an answer of (+6). The "saturating logic" notices the overflow, and gives the result of (-8) which is the most negative number possible
I have a noise rejection question for a part. Trying to see if I'm reading this correctly. On page 10 of this pdf, it has a graph for PSRR (dB), one with no load and one with a 1k load. It looks like in both cases, it doesn't drop down to 3dB for a while, but those are usually in -dB. ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/20005474B.pdf
and they talk about symmetry in this saturating logic because the most negative 4-bit number is (-8) and the most positive is (+7), and maybe that's also undesirable.
@BrandenBoucher I don't think either drop to 3dB, but I don't think that's relevant for PSRR
@trilolil And the sum being replaced with "011...11" means that you fill the "..." with 1's to make the most positive number that fits in your output. For 4-bits, that would be (0111)
@trilolil Because you spend your 20's stuck in a lab, doing the will of your advisor, not making much money, not getting much social life, and not moving on with your life.
@trilolil OK, different system. In the US, most Ph.D. students just apply for a Ph.D. program after undergrad. Masters is just kind of a stop along the way.
@trilolil That would be good if you can get it. Also give you a chance to compare what kind of work regular graduates and phd graduates do in the real world.
But 1 month is a very short internship. Not a lot of time to do a good project.
@trilolil Does you masters program require a thesis, or just course work?
there's a different mind-set for how PhD/masters students are treated in europe/US compared to Australia
in Australia they are respected, and supported and do their own shit. everywhere else i've heard, they are abused, made to work on random extra stuff unrelated to their goals, and basically used as assistants for everything
so a PhD might take 3 years full time effort on the research topic in AU, but elsewhere, can take 5-6 years because the student is constantly distracted and over-worked on other stuff not related to their thesis
i think the only difference is the students in EU/US are paid for all these distractions
@KyranF Also the flip side is that in the US system you don't have to already have to be so self-directed at age 24. You can basically work on your advisor's ideas (and if you're brilliant and your advisor isn't an ass, then when you do start to get your own ideas your advisor should let you run with them)
@KyranF My advisor was really good about only giving me things to do that contributed to my project. But students down the hall spent a lot of time doing data analysis and equipment maintenance for long-running projects that they weren't going to get much credit for.
So in my experience it's more the advisor (and the kind of projects they're working on) than the whole institution.
I mean look at this famous (Australian) experiment:
hey guys, for an active filter op-amp selection, if i have a band-pass filter with 0 gain at pass band, 5MHz signals being processed, what sort of GBWP or -3dB BW values should I be looking at? I'm trying to find real-world op-amps that I can simulate. i think i've been going way too low for my opamps and my results are retarded because of it
To me, that's a problem for a simulation study. Compare results with two different op-amps, one with 10 MHz GBWP, one with 100 MHz. See if it makes any difference (depending on the criteria for your application).
@PlasmaHH a passive op-amp filter compared to an "active" one like a multiple-feedback topology filter, why would one choose one over the other?
I need (as far as I can tell currently) a pretty good Q factor and rejection of non-targeted frequencies. I want to have some significant signal if it's the center freq, or very low signal if it's outside of the pass-band.
as a practical example, my 800mV P-P signal should be >= 200-300mV p-p after the filter stage if it's the correct frequency, else it should be very low, like 1/10th that
so i guess i'm aiming for -20dB for the channels that i'm not filtering for. 5MHz filter output should show like ~80mV or less if i pass a 5.5Mhz or 4.5Mhz signal into it. These are the test conditions i'll be using in my simulations