2:59 AM
@wizzwizz4, I wasn't able to view that page, but do you think it's consistent with your moderator status to keep participating in this conversation, but then use your privileges to simply remove everything I actually say because you find some author somewhere who happens to say different? It's surely not your responsibility to be a political censor.
3:24 AM
Some of the speculation about people's motives has its critics. (I wouldn't say it's "controversial" – more, there are multiple schools of thought on a few matters, and this book is from one of them.) You're welcome to pick another history book if you would prefer: you've got a lot to choose from.
1 hour later…
4:52 AM
@wizzwizz4, so if you accept there are "multiple schools of thought" - and what I've previously said (that the gas chambers were not a publicly advertised policy of the Nazis) is consistent with an ordinary historical view and with plenty of books on the matter - then on what grounds are you using your moderator privileges to censor my remarks?
1 hour later…
6:04 AM
I'm not sure how you got from "there are multiple schools of thought on a few matters" to "the things I'm saying are among them".
yesterday, by wizzwizz4
Or, you know, you could consult a history book – because Hitler talked about this a lot. On Page 134 of Hitler's willing executioners, we find a 1920 speech of Hitler's, with such choice phrases as:
6:18 AM
7:02 AM
@wizzwizz4, I got from "multiple schools of thought" to "the things I'm saying are among them" by pointing out that the reference you gave is merely from a controversial author. Even the Allies only learned of the death camps from actual escapees during the war - I'm not sure why you think it's plausible to think it was common knowledge amongst the German public in the early 30s.
My understanding of the history is that the death camp policy was not even formulated until the late 30s, and it was a secret policy, not something broadcast to the public.
This is besides the point now anyway. The question is what basis you have for saying this is "unsubstantiated" worthy of censorship from a site for political topics on stack exchange. Is it simply that you disagree with the claims, or that you've read something somewhere that contradicts them?
My main substantiation for the claim that the public could not have known for sure that death camps were operating, is that people continued to get on trains taking them there. The Nazis frequently used the technique of offering safe passage out of the country, to get Jews in a locality to reveal themselves and submit to transport. They victims would not likely have done that
- with their families and children - if they knew they would be killed.
- with their families and children - if they knew they would be killed.
15 hours later…
10:07 PM
Jun 19 at 10:34, by haxor789
@Steve Seriously dude that's not even funny get a fucking history book. Like Hitler wrote down his bullshit in Mein Kampf long before being in power and he wasn't actually subtle about it in most cases. There's plenty of discrimination and deportation and Jewish emigrants who told the stories. That there was no stronger backlash to begin with doesn't mean that nobody knew what the Nazis were doing.
« first day (33 days earlier) ← previous day
Transcript for
Jun23
Jun '2324
Discussion on answer by Steve: What w…
Imported from a comment discussion on politics.stackexchange.c...