« first day (1140 days earlier)   

2:42 AM
Apr 6 at 20:44, by DLosc
@nocomment Possibly, but in any case, ATO was never intended to be consistent enough for benchmarking purposes.
(Sorry sent the URL by hitting return by mistake...) I've just noticed the above message that "ATO is not intended for benchmarking", so please ignore my question about the number of cores etc. (By the way, thanks very much for the ATO site, which is great for trying a language of interest!)
 
 
18 hours later…
8:32 PM
@pxeger awesome! thanks
 

« first day (1140 days earlier)