« first day (2038 days earlier)      last day (2987 days later) » 
00:00 - 23:0023:00 - 00:00

12:30 AM
I suppose if there's anywhere on SE with mroe KSP players than here, it's gonna be there.
 
Yup
 
Anonymous
StackExchange needs KSP.SE
2
 
Anonymous
propostal time.
 

 The Bridge

General Arqade Chat. We tried to leave once, but the door lock...
 
1:13 AM
@PatoSáinz +1
 
1:27 AM
Oh man
I've managed to start a three-page discussion about rectums in the pod bay :-/
 
Anonymous
1:52 AM
@qasdfdsaq that's so qasdfdsaq
 
2:42 AM
Who didn't think of this before? An active HDMI cable that enhances video and upscales content before it gets to the display?
An HDMI cable with an image signal processor built into it. Wow.
Absolutely incredible what people can cram into a cable these days.
Active cables are not new—long cable runs, especially with the insane bandwidth requirements HDMI 2.0 has, can require them. However, I'm surprised someone actually put an ISP into an HDMI cable.
Dec 7 '15 at 19:45, by bwDraco
We're coming to a point where ordinary, low-cost copper cabling is going to be inadequate for cable runs of more than a few feet.
 
 
3 hours later…
5:23 AM
Well that's not what I was expecting :-/
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq It loaded in 240p :S
 
@Bob wow, and I thought my 360p was bad
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq switched it to 1080. apparently yt gets confused if I load a freshly uploaded video
 
Now I know YouTube often takes a while to reprocess the video at different resolutions but it should be done by now...
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq ...did you put the engines right next to the fuel tank?
 
5:29 AM
Ah. That's not too bad then. When first uploaded 360p is the only thing available for a little while
 
Bob
yea, that's normal
 
@Bob no, I didn't do anything...
I mean the last test run the plane basically made it into orbit. Then all of a sudden, the rear engine was pointing the wrong way round.
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq Wrong way around?! O_O
I didn't even see that
 
Gah, no 1080p option on mobile.
@Bob neither did I. But it isn't easily visible from that camera angle anyway, it's inside the tail.
What made me lol was the cockpit emerging out of the explosion going dead straight and balancing on one wheel.
Like, random explosion and rapid unscheduled disassembly aside, how the f is that even possible.
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq gotta love simplified physics :P
 
5:38 AM
Really odd. The cockpit separated from the fuselage.
Is this a bug in the physics engine?
Okay. Do I buy myself a copy of KSP?
 
Bob
@bwDraco It's not necessarily a bug, per se.
I wouldn't be surprised if there were a bit of a tendency for stability built in.
And, again, simplified physics.
It's not practical to simulate real physics that accurately, so a whole lot of minor variables are probably discarded.
 
 
5 hours later…
11:11 AM
We've been hearing cars doing donuts the last few nights... My wife went for a drive and found them.
 
 
1 hour later…
12:24 PM
Which "empty space" character can I use so that forum post form did not strip them in the beginning of line?
 
12:35 PM
@MichaelFrank O_o if you can see tire marks on Google maps it's clearly a spot that's been in use for a long time...
 
1:29 PM
It's quiet in here today. Too quiet. Something's not right.
<creepy suspensful music>
 
2:29 PM
@qasdfdsaq prolly cause I'm not there. Leaving this town tommorrow night, back to the land of somewhat less shitty internet, and such
 
 
2 hours later…
4:14 PM
roar
Perhaps I should start bounty-hunting like harrymc does.
 
@bwDraco Good afternoon. You got up late this morning?
 
4:33 PM
Yeah.
!!/wiki Sleep debt
 
Sleep debt or sleep deficit is the cumulative effect of not getting enough sleep. A large sleep debt may lead to mental and/or physical fatigue. There are two kinds of sleep debt; partial sleep deprivation and total sleep deprivation. Partial sleep deprivation occurs when a person or a lab animal sleeps too little for many days or weeks. Total sleep deprivation means being kept awake for days or weeks. There is debate in the scientific community over the specifics of sleep debt, and it is not considered to be a disorder. == Scientific debate == There is debate among researchers as to whether the...
 
Have you read my open letter?
It's going to be an uphill battle at this point. I'm hoping that with the changes I've implemented (this would not have happened if I weren't suspended, so thanks a million, @JourneymanGeek), I can fast-track the behavioral changes needed to move forward.
I'm serious about behaving better.
From the open letter:
> A key reason Journeyman Geek has proven highly successful as a ♦moderator, despite being an "impulsive hothead" in his own words, is that he avoids making moderation decisions when angry. As such, I am also taking steps to ensure that I make all moderation decisions on a sound basis and without allowing my emotions to cloud my judgment.
This will be a cornerstone of my goals here. I'll never allow myself to act om impulse again.
 
Anonymous
@bwDraco ok, but start behaving normally.
 
4:48 PM
Wish me luck :p
 
Anonymous
Because this whole open letter ordeal is still too much over the top
5
 
Is he at it again?
 
Bob
lol, the stars... that was fast
 
Alright. Let's move forward.
 
Urgh. This isn't a therapy group. Sure we're not adverse to a bit of emotional support once in a while but all day every day belongs somewhere else.
 
4:49 PM
It was worth starring.
To quote the letter was the wrong call on my part.
I just wanted to call attention to it.
 
why am I addicted to Sakura Clicker @_@
 
!!google sakura clicker
 
Bob
...I wonder if that's SFW
 
it's not
 
Bob
4:51 PM
> Please enter your birth date to continue:
LOL
 
it's a "clicker" game
 
It's on steam... Hmm
> Community content for this product may not be appropriate for all ages, or may not be appropriate for viewing at work.

Cancel

Continue
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq there's a couple more 'mature' games on Steam
most of them being VNs
 
The first image looked just like typical manga. Then the video started :-/
Yeah... NSFW
 
Now that this whole ordeal is out of the way, there's not much more to do except to just continue contributing normally.
 
4:52 PM
Unless you work in a Japanese game studio
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq Steam mutes audio by default.
The audio is very very much NSFW :P
 
the game "mechanics" basically consist of writing an AutoHotkey macro to auto-click as fast as possible anywhere on the screen to hurt/kill/vaporize these scantily-clad anime women dressed as various animals, and when they "die" (vaporize) you get coins, which increase in value exponentially after each "boss" you beat (boss = 2x normal hitpoints)
 
@Bob Ah I didn't listen to the audio. I have my epic dance playlist on in the background
By background I mean at very high volume in the foreground.
 
then you "level up" your "companions" by clicking Buy buttons, and your own damage by clicking another Buy button
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq Think sound effects ripped from a certain genre of 'anime'.
 
4:54 PM
I don't even like the game but I'm propelled forward to see how they refer to quantities of gold beyond quadrillion ("aa")
maybe it goes aa, ab, ac, ad, ... ba, bb, bc, ... zz?
do I win if I get to 999.99 zz?
 
Bob
Yes, that's your reason :P
 
or maybe I'll overflow the 64-bit integer
unless they use a 128-bit integer for it
in which case, I'm screwed
 
Bob
@allquixotic sure it's not floating-point?
or arb-length?
 
Let's not talk about NSFW content here.
 
could be arb-length, but not floating point, you always have an integer number of gold
 
4:56 PM
There's something to be said about hard house, flashing lights, and explosive flight testing in KSP.
I should probably try dubbing dubstep over my KSP videos
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq is that something "seizure warning"? :P
 
at least it's a fairly realistic game; the ones dressed as cats go "meow"
 
@Bob I'm pretty sure I could kill anybody with photosensitive epilepsy if they came in my room.
But personally, the flashing lights don't trigger seizures in me.
 
Bob
@allquixotic ah, because we all need realism for our VNs, of course :P
 
@Bob that was heavy sarcasm (and it's not even a VN)
 
Bob
4:58 PM
It isn't? Huh.
 
But all in all, I have about 100w of fully controllable LED lighting in here, all of which can be blinked, rotated or colour cycled at will.
 
@Bob no, there is no "novel" part... it's just a V
 
Bob
Ah.
 
What's VN?
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq Visual Novel
 
4:59 PM
Ah
 
Bob
Basically, you click through a story (textual) with accompanying static graphics.
 
I prefer to think of it as a game about chopping down human-shaped trees
 
Bob
Also kinda choose-your-own-adventure.
 
600w equivalent of flashing lights... hmm yeah that's a lot
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq Think Phoenix Wright if you're familiar with that.
 
5:01 PM
Right now they're not all flashing tho
 
Moderators' instructions to chill out and relax are binding. Sorry, folks, for whatever disruption may have happened due to my failure to do so.
 
wow, just spent 50 quadrillion gold on a companion that attacks for 80 trillion @_@
ah, the next companion solves my question about how they count higher powers of 10
the next one is 2.5 "bb"
so it doesn't go aa, ab, ac, etc... it goes aa, bb, cc, dd
so... one down, 25 to go! :P
 
Bob
@bwDraco If you're talking about what happened before: we're intentionally not discussing that in chat. There's no reason to, and no benefit to doing so. If you're talking about your request to avoid NSFW topics, afaict we've done so.
@allquixotic reminds me of Upgrade Complete
and now I suddenly want to go back to flash games :\
 
Discussing it would cause more disruption. Sorry.
 
Bob
oh wow, 2009. that was old.
 
5:04 PM
I can't forget about things like this easily, though.
 
you know, I'm actually a little disappointed... @Bob you would hate this game... they have cat-girls, wolf-girls (mostly satisfies JMG), but no fox-girls
 
Bob
lol
 
@allquixotic what is this game we are talking about?
 
Urgh. Cruciform tails are so ugly in KSP
 
Bob
(thanks)
 
5:06 PM
...
 
Whoa. I was about to repost it.
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq aren't they fairly standard?
 
Stepping out of the room as a precaution.
 
@Bob Not really.
 
hm, is the game kinky?
 
5:07 PM
@jokerdino do your own research (and don't share it here)
 
Bob
*drags conversation back to safer ground*
 
oh god, not scrolling down anymore.
 
Most IRL passenger jets are fuselage mounted tails, with some T-tails on smaller planes.
 
@qasdfdsaq I was able to create a successful T-tail subsonic aircraft with turbofans in KSP
reminded me a lot of the MD-80
 
Bob
@jokerdino here, have a pseudo-star (to avoid polluting the star-wall)
 
5:08 PM
 
Bob
@allquixotic Aren't T-tails at risk from deep stalls?
I wonder if you could simulate that in KSP
 
@Bob yeah...
 
@allquixotic Yeah I had a T-tail on this thing previously, but the levarage was too high
 
@Bob haha, that works too
 
@Bob IRL, yes. In KSP, no, even with "enhanced" aerodynamic models
 
5:09 PM
@Bob if you designed a craft similar to the MD-80 you could probably fly it into a deep stall with Ferram Aerospace
 
@allquixotic Nah, Ferram doesn't model airflow, occlusion, or anything like that
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq pity. that sounds like fun. unless your name is Jeb
 
Ferram is actually exceedingly dumb when it comes to aerodynamics.
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq Hm. I've never actually noticed those before.
 
That's my current craft I'm flight testing
 
Bob
5:11 PM
ah. the exploded one
 
I fixed the exploding.
 
@Bob you could definitely simulate it in X-Plane
 
Putting the horizontal tail fins on the fuselage would make them explode because of the main engine exhaust. Putting them at the top of the tail (T-tail) puts it too far off the centre of mass and wobbly. So I put it in the middle, where it's butt ugly, but functional
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq would placing the engines further out help?
 
Probably. I've done them at mid-span at some point. Problem is, you need to split the wing around it, or put them far enough back so the exhaust doesn't overlap with the wing.
And on a swept-back wing that means the further out you put them the further back they have to go, which knocks your centre of mass back and the plane flips out of control.
 
Bob
5:14 PM
:\
wings further forward? :P
 
Nah, that makes things worse.
I also have lots of crap under the wing that kinda limits what I can do
 
Bob
ah
 
Perhaps I should just get myself a copy of KSP?
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq holy mach 3
 
Let's focus on the future and not worry about past incidents.
 
5:15 PM
@Bob Wait till I get to mach 20...
 
Bob
@bwDraco only if you want to.
 
Not that I'm interested in buying another game at this time.
 
Bob
I find the tweaking is too finicky for my liking.
It's fun discussing it with others, though.
 
That's what I did before, with the engine between the two wing sections.
Thing is those engines were from the interstellar mod, and I'm trying to stay as near stock as possible and not use near-future technologies.
 
Bob
5:16 PM
@qasdfdsaq Are you trying to make a cargo spaceplane? :P
 
@Bob This one? Nah, well sorta.
 
0
A: Moving partitions with YaST Expert Partitioner: "already created on disk and cannot be moved"

bwDracoThe swap partition sdb5 is a logical partition inside an extended partition sdb2. The remaining space is not truly unpartitioned—it is part of the extended partition, though it could be used to add more partitions. An extended partition is essentially a container for more partitions. The purpose...

 
The "cargo" in the bay is basically for self-refuelling and setting up an off-planet base
 
Okay. Why does YaST still require partitions to start and end on cylinder boundaries?
 
I could have done it easier with a rocket but I like planes. TBH I have no idea what I'm trying to make, I just like flying shit.
Ah I remember what I forgot to put on this thing... airbrakes
 
5:20 PM
Sure, I understand that some very old legacy BIOS firmware still use (virtual) CHS addressing and cannot directly boot from a partition not on a cylinder boundary, but is this still an issue?
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq Did you find out while trying to land? :P
 
@Bob Nah, this design I've been working on for a few weeks is pretty damn robust at landing
It can lithobrake at mach 2
 
Bob
huh.
my pitiful spaceplane attempts tended to have rather abrupt landings
 
It's all about the landing gear.
 
Bob
as in "bounce bounce smash boom oh hey the cockpit survived"
 
5:22 PM
The stock landing gear is really really hard
 
I don't get why partitioning software still insist on CHS addressing.
 
Well, the original stock landing gear. The newer stock gears are a lot better.
 
Bob
ah
maybe I should try again sometime
 
The small white ones with built in lights (the only ones up until like, version 1.0) pretty much blow up anything but the most perfect landings
Also I haven't landed this thing yet, it's now at mach 13.
Grr how the hell do you see all your own videons on Youtube, I did it yesterday...
You're not alone... :-P
 
Bob
lol
 
5:26 PM
^^ Another failed attempt
Pretty much 95% of my landings are successful now, but that's not because I've gotten any better, it's literally just because I've found better landing gear.
The one thing about you get from having the same key set to temperature overlay in KSP also set to record in Fraps, is you get some silly hilarious unplanned videos.
Like a 7GB video of my Star Trek Online login screen.
 
Bob
16
Q: How did Alice and Bob die?

HDE 226868A police investigator walks into a room. He sees two dead bodies on the floor, those of the unfortunate duo Alice and Bob, the players in many physics thought experiments. They had been locked in the room together. The investigator notices several things: The door was sealed, and remained seale...

 
> ...are actually fish! They were in a glass fishbowl on the table that had shattered, perhaps due to an unfortunate resonant frequency*. This frequency also broke the glass window. This explains the broken glass and water on the floor, and the two dead (but otherwise uninjured) fish :(
The hell?
@Bob: One big drawback of the old stock landing gear in KSP is they were physicsless, and 100% rigid (and practically indestructable). Basically, they had zero spring or dampening functionality. They also had no steering originally.
 
Bob
Sometimes I feel like lateral-thinking is the fanfic of puzzles. :) — Trevor Powell yesterday
@qasdfdsaq yea, shock absorption was what I was missing :P
that and not being able to aim at the runway right, let alone other flat surfaces
I don't do well in flight sims :(
 
Gah, my Youtube uploads would be so much faster if I transcoded these 4GB files down to 0.04GB before uploading...
But I'm just too lazy
 
Bob
heh... I only ever upload tiny snippets
up is too slow
 
5:39 PM
Yeah I got complacent when I got my 20Mb upload >_>
Oops, guess I should have paused my music. Oh well
 
6:03 PM
Okay, back on the topic of certifications: How would I begin studying for RHCSA?
Do I do the official training (expensive and unlikely to be funded by my parents), or what other options should I consider?
 
6:16 PM
Called Mother. Seems I'll need to meet a high standard of proof (conclusive evidence required) that doing this would substantially benefit me in the long run and that less expensive alternatives, if any, would not provide a similar level of benefit before I can be funded.
We're talking about at least $3500 to $5000 here.
 
6:39 PM
There would probably be no problem with buying a RHEL Server license (entry-level self-support—$349 a year), but CentOS can act as a close substitute with a few minor differences.
So is getting started with Red Hat certifications a good idea?
 
(Your responses may be used as evidence in determining whether funding will be provided.)
 
Yay for shock absorbers
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq that looks awesome. now I want one.
That bounce :D just like a real plane
 
@bwDraco Any suggestions would be opinion-based, especially as we don't know what your future career path is going to look like.
 
6:50 PM
That's a... slightly less ridiculously overspeed landing
 
Bob
ow my ears
 
14 minutes left uploading the "stock" non-bouncy landing gear...
 
The training and exams are intended for people already working in the industry, so as I understand it, they're supposed to be paid for by their employers.
 
Yeah, sorry.
 
I'm just a student with some Linux sysadmin experience, but not in a serious, production environment.
 
6:51 PM
That's the one where I left my music while recording >_>
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq music's alright, but unexpectedly loud :P
my headset is set at 4% -_-
 
The youtube window the music was coming from was set to 25%
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq Did you build that plane yourself?
 
Also, that experience is primarily with the SUSE platform, which means there will be a bit of a learning curve to transition to the Red Hat plaform.
 
Yeah, I always build everything myself
 
Bob
6:52 PM
It looks just like a modern airliner
@qasdfdsaq nice
 
See the weird looking flying wing in the first video? That's a great example of Ferram being absolutely fucked up
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq The first landing?
 
Yeah
See the top and bottom are covered by wing surfaces?
They both get equal lift. Unless they're touching something, like, when the landing gear deploys, at which point they instantly drop to zero drag and zero lift.
 
Bob
o.O
 
And objects sandwiched between the top and bottom wings... get lift at all times
But if either wing touches say an engine on the inside, it gets zero
@Bob The whole "modern airliner" thing is what compelled me to build this very originally named plane I called "Jet!"
So there I was, going, I wonder if I can build something that looks like a modern airliner. So I came up with this
 
Bob
7:03 PM
@qasdfdsaq That is ridiculously accurate.
Stock parts?
 
And then at the end I went, "Hmm, what should I name this thing?" "I know! I'll call it... Jet!". Can you see how creative I am from the elegant names I give my planes
 
Bob
I'd probably call it Plane 23
 
All stock, except the slightly stock-alike landing gear. Some parts rescaled.
The earlier landing one was like, Space Plane Beta 3B4CA
Guess what? It actually flies like a real airliner too.
 
Bob
 
It actually takes a real minute or so to take off. And needs flaps.
 
Bob
7:08 PM
@qasdfdsaq Normal KSP solution: MOAR ENGINES
 
Yeah, I was tempted to put four engines on it, but meh. Turbojet engines don't go particularly fast
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq strap a booster rocket to it? :P
kinda breaks the realism though
 
Bob
@bwDraco KSP. Fuel cost?
 
Yeah I was trying to ... actually try to get close to the legit aerodynamic model of a IRL jet too
So these are the landing gear I use. Fairly similar to the newer stock gears but fully adjustable
 
7:09 PM
I know, but I'm wondering if fuel capacity is an issue in KSP.
 
Bob
KSP: if it doesn't fly, add more rockets. if it breaks, add more struts.
 
You can adjust the springyness, dampener amount, wheel angle, brakes, steering, motors, etc.
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq oh wow
that's the kind of complexity that's amazing to watch, but too much for my poor brain to handle :S
 
And of course, size.
You may want to mute
That's landing the same plane as the first one but with stock gears. Didn't go as horrendously wrong as I expected, but possibly because I didn't engage the brakes until it was flat and level
TBH you can just leave all the tweakables at default with the adjustable gear and only use the slider for size.
Like many performance tweaks, it makes considerable difference in synthetic tests but really very little difference in actual use
It's only meaningful if you're an anally retented perfectinolist like me
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq heh, the cockpit bobs almost in time to the music
 
7:15 PM
lol
It's not meant to Bob at all >_>
 
Bob
bit of a thud on the landing
 
I was expecting an explosion on landing tbh
 
Bob
lol
 
It seems that, despite still being so rigid it's like landing on a train wheel, they've improved the survivability of the stock gears
 
Bob
@qasdfdsaq The modded ones look like real airliner gears. The stock ones look like someone found some old wheels in their garage.
 
7:17 PM
Either that or the six days I spent tweaking the aerodynamic characteristics and weight distribution of the plane... worked.
 
Bob
...I bet that's what the part description says too.
 
heh
So as far as tweaking goes, here's an example of basically... leaving them on default settings
They work just fine, but you can tell it's a bit unbalanced from that very artificial test
And this is what you get after tweaking them to be "just right" for the particular plane:
 
Bob
Gravity hack o.O
wait why do you have RCS on an airliner?
 
Spaceliner.
 
Bob
ah
cool, cargo door
 
7:21 PM
Yeah that used to be part of a mod pack but they incorporated it into the stock game recently
 
Bob
anyway, I'm gonna go catch a bit more sleep. happy KSPing :P
 
K
You can watch me blow up carefully land with the absence of engines my jet tomorrow :-P
It seats 144 passengers + 4 crew, so that's what, A319 size? Maybe looks more like an A320.
 
s4.qasdf...
Are you running an RDP server? (or more accurately, why do you have an RDP session open?)
 
8:26 PM
@qasdfdsaq Yea, that Google Maps data was from this year actually. So maybe not as long as I thought. Since this is pretty much the first time we've ever heard them in 4+ years of living here.
 
 
2 hours later…
10:31 PM
Let's talk about storage systems.
With enterprises commonly selecting 2.5-inch drives for greater storage density (especially important with cloud servers), why aren't consumer storage systems moving in this direction?
Pretty much all consumer NAS / storage servers use 3.5-inch drives.
Short of rolling your own storage server, what consumer NAS enclosures are designed to handle 2.5-inch drives?
Okay. This is starting to make sense.
Storage density is gained at the expense of cost. The average consumer isn't trying to pack petabytes into a 42U 19-inch rack.
A power user might have up to eight disks in a RAID 10 or RAID 6 array, using high-capacity 3.5-inch disks. Eight 3.5-inch hard drives isn't exactly going to take up a lot of space.
It's extraordinarily unusual for a consumer to require substantially more than this much storage and be space-constrained at the same time.
I can see why a consumer would require 20+ TB of storage, but all this storage can still fit in a reasonably-sized box.
 
@bwDraco I'm still in the middle of what I'm here to do. Its extremely long and difficult, and it looks like it may not end well.
 
@JourneymanGeek Context?
 
I'd note the open letter and all that is kind of a symptom of the problem - that you're constantly demanding people pay attention to you
 
I've set aside the matter.
 
To the point where its tireseome.
 
10:43 PM
So what's next and are any additional actions planned against me?
 
I got pinged. I just got online properlike for the first time
@bwDraco I quite literally have no time to deal with you at the moment.
 
Oh, okay. You were away at the time I had pinged you.
As I said, this issue is behind me.
 
Just behave the next few days, Try not to fall back into that pattern and we'll see.
 
I'm just going to forget it.
(that isn't exactly safe)
Never mind.
 
@Bob @DavidPostill small correction, I'm here till the 16th. Likely to have better internet access from tommorrow.
 
10:46 PM
I'm rather confused as to what you're going through right now. Is this a job interview or something?
 
No
Family issues
 
I made the decision to not lurk chat during the suspension.
The whole point was to separate me from SE for a brief period.
I made sure of that and instead focused on how to address the issues at hand.
 
@JourneymanGeek Thx. I will continue to keep an eye on things while you are away. A kick will be forthcoming if necessary.
 
@DavidPostill: No need for special attention. The issues have been addressed.
 
@bwDraco It wasn't particularly addressed at you.
 
10:49 PM
Not to sound defiant, but I did take a close look at what happened and why and I'm 100% confident it won't happen again.
 
The proof is always in the pudding ;)
 
@bwDraco I'm relying on those two to keep an eye on things for me. We might also have some troubled trollish newbie
 
Hmm. I'll try my best to do my part. As noted before, I won't make moderation decisions in haste.
I have not seen any suspicious activity earlier today.
 
I'd originally assumed I'd be back on the 14th
 
@DavidPostill I was participating normally the last several hours. I know you want me to prove it, but I don't see anything to prove because at least in my eyes, the problem is already solved. This might seem overconfident and risky of me, but I'm ready to move forward.
In any case, I'll be on the lookout for any abnormal behavior in this room, including any signs of trolling.
 
10:53 PM
@bwDraco I already told you it wasn't particularly aimed at you.
 
@bwDraco "The proof is in the pudding" is a phrase that basically means "we'll just see what happens" it's not meant as a challenge or that you have to prove anything.
 
It's been very stressful these last several days, and I'm sorry to have added to the moderation workload. I'll play my role in helping to understand why those spurious flags and stars have been happening.
 
@bwDraco Though, as I mentioned in a comment on your meta question, actively hunting out and making a fuss when the troll gets triggered is likely what he wants. The key rule to remember is "Don't feed the troll"
 
I'm aware of that, and I don't object to the question having been deleted.
 
Just deal with it, make a note, let us know.
It was deleted?
 
10:57 PM
@Mokubai I suspect that user probably wanted me suspended. That's my fault.
@Mokubai Sathya pulled it. I have no plans to flag it for undeletion.
 
Then see Rule #2: Don't get trolled. (Refer Rule #1)
 
00:00 - 23:0023:00 - 00:00

« first day (2038 days earlier)      last day (2987 days later) »