« first day (2280 days earlier)      last day (2749 days later) » 

12:08 AM
Again, I have a paid but inexpensive SSL solution that I'll continue to use for the foreseeable future.
 
Dog
Well that was unexpected...
6-core 4Ghz dandy bridge-E processor is too slow to decode 4K24 video in software o_0
Also unexpected, Windows' built in video player will use all 12 threads at 100%
 
This is not a surprise. 4C/8T Haswell is barely enough to do 1080p30 in real time, so I doubt 6C/12T Sandy Bridge-E is going to handle 2160p24.
 
@Dog 0_0
tho, I've been gpu decoding cause I run madvr
 
Look at 2P Xeon machines with at least 16C/32T if you're going to do this a lot.
 
Dog
@Aibobot Yeah my 2-core 2Ghz mobile Sandy Bridge does it fine using the iGPU hardware acceleration
 
12:14 AM
The bare minimum for CPU encoding 4K content in real time is a high-clocked 8C/16T.
 
now I'm tempted to try ;p
I do have some 4k video
 
Dog
Well it looks like the MPC-HC LAV codec does it fine once you manually turn on hardware decoding, though quite what "hardware" it's using I have no clue
So it's just the Windows' built in media player that sucks, despite it being incredibly well multithreaded
 
Bob
cloudapp.net is for azure...
 
Dog
lol
> Not Revoked
eh
 
12:30 AM
@Dog VLC also seems to hoard processing to do the more mundane tasks of decoding and displaying a video. Why more people dont notice ? " hey hows come your program takes 20times the effort of another one doing the same thing the same way." They sure notice when a Game is horribly optimized.
in california it is important to notice which program blows flames out your computer and makes the power meter spin $$$ to watch a simple video.
 
Bob
12:54 AM
@Dog Have you tried Sandy Bridge instead? :P
 
this seems... ugly
@Bob or dodgy fridge?
 
Bob
of all the skins they could've chosen...
then again I wonder if they licensed the artwork properly
 
1:10 AM
@JourneymanGeek waste of paintjob
then again, I am one of those "ascetic cases are the best" people (have Define R5)
 
Dog
@Bob -_-
 
@tereško I like my cases quite unlike how I like my coffee. Big and black.
 
Dog
Note to self: Backup/sync your shit when you're still at the hostel with 100Mbps upload, not the one with 1Mbps
 
lol
 
Dog
Worst comes to worst I could just book myself a random day here while I'm staying elsewhere, just to use the internet
£10 a day is cheaper than most paid hotspot providers tbh, and they're usually shit
 
1:15 AM
lol
 
@Dog £300 / month? 0.o
 
Dog
WTF £110.00 on Nov 12th... in a room that normally costs £11
Surge pricing gone mad
 
@allquicatic just wonders why , when so cheap, 16g of memory not 8?
 
Dog
Phenom II X4 to Athlon X4 doesn't sound like much of an upgrade
 
1:27 AM
@allquicatic low cost (smaller?) SSD over 300 gb hdd. And Double the ram if you can. 4gb is 'sufficent' but just barely IMO
(hell, or drop the 300gb hdd)
 
Dog
Also whaaa?
> AMD Athlon X4 880K (2014, FM2+)
That CPU was announced six months ago, not two years...
 
also, are you in a rush?
this is really the sort of thing I'd want to do with a little more rest and my own PC ;p
 
Dog
Also getting a latest gen GPU for futureproofing doesn't really go with a near 3 years old EOL AMD socket.
(Nor does buying 16GB of DDR3)
 
especially when there's a socket change in the pipeline within the next few months
 
Dog
@Aibobot That's why I said it's basically EOL :-P
 
Bob
1:37 AM
I'd almost suggest a G4520, much better single-thread perf, but it costs a bit more. Especially for the LGA1151 mobo.
On the plus side, LGA1151 is very futureproof :P
 
Dog
Well right now I'm looking at an i3-6100 + H110M mobo for $150
 
Bob
@Dog Huh. I could only find H150 for the G4520
 
Dog
Not the cheapest, but a 3.7Ghz Skylake will beat the crap out of anything AMD has to offer, and the platform's as futureproof as you'll get
Could probably cut it down to a Pentium or something but I'm totally unfamiliar with the model numbering/naming so I haven't a clue what's good
Oh G4520 is a Skylake 3.6
 
Bob
G4520 looks to be basically the same thing, just without HT
 
Dog
The only reason I'd consider getting a latest-gen GPU is power efficiency, but bear in mind AMD's Polaris is only about as efficient as the better Maxwell 2 cards
 
Bob
1:40 AM
At $90 it's only $7 more than the 880K.
 
Dog
@Bob Yeah it pretty much is
 
Bob
Worse multi-thread, better single-thread.
 
Dog
Well you are looking at 4 cores vs. 2
 
Bob
@Dog You'd have a hard time finding a decent Maxwell 2 for $125, though.
@Dog And half the power consumption :P
 
Dog
the i3's 33% faster for single-threaded perf and 4% slower in multithreaded... chances are it'll be faster for pretty much all games
 
Bob
1:42 AM
@Dog $30 more than the Pentium
The Pentium's gaming performance is harder to figure out :\
 
Dog
@Bob Err, yeah. $112 on a GTX 950, I don't think you can get 940 AICs
 
Bob
More games can actually make use of 4 cores now
But a lot still can't
 
Dog
@Bob Still the ones that can don't necessarily make decent use of it, aka using twice as many cores but not performing nearly twice as fast
 
@Aibobot nope, no rush
@Aibobot not changing storage - he already owns those HDDs and any upgrade will necessarily cost money that isn't available for this
 
I'll go play around with builds over the weekend then
ah
 
Bob
1:43 AM
@Dog Hm. How does a GTX 950 compare with an RX 460?
 
just get storage out of your mind completely
 
Bob
I don't really consider 950 decent, though for such a low budget...
 
@allquicatic heh.
 
@Aibobot probably not waiting around for several months
 
yeah, then itmakes sense
 
Dog
1:44 AM
@Bob 560? A non-existent card? :-P
 
would like to order before christmas
 
Dog
I don't completely understand the desperate wish to stay away from second hand kit when you have such a low budget.
 
Bob
^
@allquicatic Wait for the Christmas sales
 
@Dog prices are somewhat more reliable, and warranties I suppose
 
@Dog Fallout / Skyrim mods. They use RAM. 64-bit engines. Plus multitasking (TS3, lots of Chrome tabs)
@Bob one advantage of going AMD is the extreme low cost of their motherboards o_O
 
1:45 AM
@allquicatic current gen AMD's kinda... inefficient tho
 
@Bob that would definitely be desirable for games IMO
 
Bob
@Aibobot Don't know about Skyrim SE, but original Skyrim apparently never used more than 2 cores.
So the 33% single-thread boost of that Pentium would be massive.
 
Dog
@Bob Only about 10% faster tbh, so not really worth it
 
he isn't planning on playing Ashes of the Singularity so multi core is kind of out of the question as being relevant :P
 
@Bob I think 2 cores is a reasonable assumption
 
Dog
1:46 AM
Gotta admit RX 4xx cards are really good value for money nomatter how you look at it
 
Bob
@allquicatic Yea... hard to find an Intel mobo for that cheap
 
@Dog the main attraction of nvidia is software
 
Dog
@allquicatic Well you can get an Intel board for <$40 as well, which is basically the same
 
well if you guys want to take a crack at modifying my pcpartpicker list within $20 of that price point that improves on single-thread CPU perf and/or GPU perf, or delivers similar perf for less money, I'm all ears
 
Dog
This is $20 over. But isn't the lowest you can go on an Intel systen
 
1:48 AM
@Dog can you give the permalink to that list?
 
Bob
@Dog Huh. That didn't come up with sort > price for the Pentium :\
 
Dog
Well, $320,94 with shipping, so actually only $10.03 more
 
Bob
Must be PCPP getting confused about FCLGA1151/LGA1151
 
Dog
@allquicatic Err, yeah, but it's a very quick "throw together whatever random first thing you see" list not a very thought out one: pcpartpicker.com/list/TVg64C
 
Dog
1:49 AM
Also I have never cross-checked PCPartPicker's prices vs. real life
So I dunno how accurate theyare
 
@Bob what's the difference?
 
Dog
@allquicatic None
 
Bob
@allquicatic Same thing
 
Dog
One just chops an extra two letters off the abbreviation
 
Bob
oh, PCPP wasn't happy about mixing H110 with DDR3
whoops
 
Dog
1:58 AM
lol
Wait you can put Skylake together with DDR3?
Oh wait of course you can
Duh
 
Bob
 
Dog
I wish you couldn't, heck people are still building Kaby Lake laptops with DD3 <_>
 
Bob
@Dog's list with a G4500.
 
Dog
They need to stop dat shit
 
Bob
Much cheaper than G4520, similar-ish perf.
It's also cheaper tha nthe original list at $297 incl $16 shipping :P
 
Dog
2:00 AM
Dangit Bob, you made something with better perf and less money
Cat outsmarted by a fox again
 
Bob
@Dog Well, better single-thread... worse multi.
For $5 difference :P
Oh, and more future-proof mobo and RAM as you did.
@allquicatic If you're really price-conscious, the G4400 is significantly cheaper: pcpartpicker.com/list/VjQ4NN
But noticeably worse perf.
Hm... I wonder how overclockable it is
Ack, it's locked multiplier
 
Dog
Also, I'm not entirely convinced about cpubenchmark being a wholly representative performance comparison
Erf $140 for an Ivy Bridge i3? No thanks
Going Haswell saves a whole $2 off the CPU :-/
But you get a whole lot more motherboard choice under $50
 
Bob
@Dog True. Take it with a massive chunk of salt. But it's better than cpuboss -_-
@allquicatic @Dog -- Assuming Witcher 3 is similar to Skyrim SE, legitreviews.com/… <== G4400 would be perfectly fine
 
Dog
@Bob Not nearly as good as HardwareCanucks though ;)
 
Dog
2:11 AM
That puts it 20% behind the i3-6100 even in multithreaded (cpubenchmark.net says it's 5% ahead)
IIRC Cinebench is unusually good with HT though
 
Bob
Huh. No AVX on the Pentium Skylakes
 
Dog
So the i3-6100 is anything from 30%-90% faster on most things, with a few multithreaded tests where it's basically equal, or at most, 5% behind
In other words I'd 100% recommend the i3-6100 despite the 4% lower multithreaded perf on cpubenchmark - most multithreaded applications are actually up to 50% faster on it
Not sure how to shave an extra $20 off the config though, short of halving the RAM
12GB? 8GB+4GB as a compromise?
Won't lose too much due to dual-channel when you have an external GPU, and a 4GB DDR4 stick is still going to be more futureproof than a 4GB DDR3 stick
 
Bob
Urk. Yea I'm a bit iffy about the G4400 actually :P
Benchmarks are all over the place.
@Dog At that rate you might as well just go 8 GB.
Considering old-Skyrim was only 2 GB, and you have to manually toggle the LAA flag for 3 GB...
 
Dog
@Bob Eh, 12GB brings it in line with the budget and if RAM's as important as @allquicatic makes it out to be, then 8GB => 12GB should make a big difference
 
Bob
Give the OS 2 GB, that's still 6 GB (2-3x 32-bit Skyrim) of RAM for the game, within 8 GB.
 
Dog
2:19 AM
But despite owning half the games on the list I've never played any of them, so I have no idea what they require
 
Bob
34 mins ago, by allquicatic
@Dog Fallout / Skyrim mods. They use RAM. 64-bit engines. Plus multitasking (TS3, lots of Chrome tabs)
Old Skyrim maxed out at 2 GB without setting LAA, 3.5 GB with.
I have a hard time imagining new Skyrim (64-bit) needing more than maybe 6 GB, even if you load a bunch of mods.
 
Dog
(Also bear in mind paging is going to be slow as crud with an old HDD system so extra disk cache is more important than usual)
 
Bob
And you're not gonna be loading a bunch of high-def textures on an RX 460...
 
Dog
That'd be a funny situation - GPU has 1/2 the RAM of the overall system
 
Bob
lol
 
Dog
2:21 AM
This page is great as it directly compares the 880K against a whole load of Intel CPUs including the 6100
There's no Pentiums included, BUT you can easily tell which games benefit from 4 cores by comparing the Skylake i3 and i5's
Oh yeah, most of those games are happily GPU limited even at 720p
 
@Dog my system is roughly like that ;p
 
Bob
@Dog Yea, really depends on the game you're playing.
Funnily enough, Source games (CS:GO, TF2...) are actually usually CPU-limited.
 
Dog
@Bob Funny enough most games I play are CPU limited :-P
Which is why it angers me a lot when ignorant fools on forums seem to believe no games are
 
Bob
@Dog What games are they?
 
@Dog especially when it comes to those times when a game frame rate chokes to those horrible frame rates. From what i have seen the Min frame rate stats have been at least as important as the hyped high frame rates.
 
Dog
2:25 AM
The games I play the most: Star trek online, GTA V, KSP, Cities Skylines
 
Hey a guy replied on Reddit
 
Bob
@Dog Oh. Don't know, don't know, heavy physics, lotsofshit :P
 
Dog
Wasn't me
 
@Dog I'm trying to recover the disk into usable state or see what happens when the reallocated sector count reaches its threshold. While I wait for the client to get back to me so we can talk about purchasing a new one
 
He suggested 8 gigs of ram
1 x 8 GB DDR4
 
Dog
2:26 AM
@Bob Aka smart games with lots of complex things happening vs. fancy graphics and explosions? :-P
 
Bob
Yea, simulation games are usually heavier on the CPU
@Dog ...pretty much
 
Dog
@allquicatic Yeah, I did suggest 8+4 as a compromise
 
Bob
@allquicatic lol. funny how everyone is on the same page
 
Dog
Hey I suggested the 6100+H110M first :-P
 
a 6100 with 1 x 8 GB DDR4 is extremely upgradeable as they get more money in the future, too
they can go to 16 gigs without tossing out any existing hardware, just using the empty slot
I think I'll recommend that build
 
Dog
2:31 AM
@allquicatic Yeah, was gonna say the RAM is going to be the easiest to upgrade
Though my 12GB recommendation comes in at $303.95 if you go with Newegg's free shipping
But you'd have to chuck the 4GB to upgrade OR chuck the mainboard
 
Bob
@allquicatic might wanna make sure the board has all the slots you need
though at $40 it isn't all that painful to just toss when upgrade time comes
@Dog yea, you did :P
 
Dog
TBH the 6100 was the smart choice (well the only choice I actually made based on knowledge and thinking, everything else was literally leave default compatibility filter on, sort by price, click cheapest)
Well, that's another total refresh of my "desperately cheap" component knowledge
A segment of the market I generally have little to no knowledge of, given that most of time I'm trying to build a system that's faster than the top i7
Now that I think about it, despite the very short period between Broadwell desktop and Skylake desktop, Skylake-E HEDT can't really come out after the same delay. In fact it can't really come out before Kaby Lake desktop, cause the model numbering would break (7900K etc. before any desktop 7-series CPUs are out)
 
heh
My low end is ... lower end
I either own mustangs, or mopeds, if you want to use a car analogy
 
@Bob Come on Bob, of course your need hot water at first, how else would you steep the tea?
@BenN what do you mean by let's Encrypt being incompatible with windows?
 
I couldn't find a Windows client for it
 
2:43 AM
@CausingUnderflowsEverywhere because civilisation has deteriorated to the point of instant tea
@BenN isn't there a manual setup option?
 
Uh, I'm not sure
There's no Windows entry on the Certbot page, and the LE web site doesn't seem to mention Windows
I guess I could set it up on a Linux machine and rig up some horrible thing to transplant the cert when it's updated
 
@bwDraco oooooooooooo what can I test my skylake on? :O
 
> oooooooooooo
lol
 
a windows client, what does that mean, like yeah I guess the bash script installed the certificate for me. but people made those scripts I'm sure you as an experienced programmer can create a a POWERShell scripts to do the job! :)
didnt see what got removed I was too busy typing powershell
cool 1 star
 
If I understand correctly, the scripts depend on some compiled package? Not sure TBH
 
Bob
2:49 AM
@BenN WSL might work, but it's supposed to be dev-only...
 
Oooh, I forgot about that
Aw, but my web server is Windows Server 2008 :/
 
Bob
@BenN Does Server 2016 even do WSL?
 
I'm not sure, let me check...
 
Bob
Huh, that reminds me. I should give 2016 a test run :D
*heads over to azure*
 
I don't see any mention of the WSL in the WS16 notes :(
 
Bob
2:54 AM
I just get redirected back to the homepage :\
 
Me too
 
Bob
fail
from their own site search too
 
Friend is going to wait til Black Friday / Cyber Monday week and see if the prices on this drop, then buy it
thanks all for the help
 
http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-RX-460-vs-AMD-R7-360/3641vs3572

nice gpu :( probably has better power consumption too
@Bob I think you're forgetting that 64 bit OS'es use a bit more RAM. More like 3 GB of RAM with the 64bit, and if it's windows 10, I've heard stories, it's not good
are 40 dollar motherboards reliable? I bought a 120 dollar cause I wanted to be safe
 
Bob
@CausingUnderflowsEverywhere Uhm, no. I run VMs with 0.75 GB RAM, and the OS is fine there.
If anything, 2 GB is far more than the OS needs.
 
3:03 AM
@Bob try removing the page file hehe
 
Bob
Also, don't let the FUD around the System process using large amounts of memory confuse you.
It's just reported under System but it's actually compressed pages (zram) from other processes.
 
well idk maybe it's necessary to use a page file if you have less then 12 gigs of RAM then. I completely forgot I removed mine
 
Bob
@CausingUnderflowsEverywhere You should always have a page file.
That has little to do with actual RAM usage.
A lot of memory is requested but never written to.
 
I will never have a page file
 
Bob
Windows will refuse to accept these requests unless it has sufficient backing storage for all allocated memory. Linux handles the same situation with its OOM killer randomly terminating processes when they actually try to use the memory they are allocated.
@CausingUnderflowsEverywhere Then don't bother getting into discussions about RAM usage, because you intentionally broke your own system.
 
3:06 AM
@Bob the system has been running for over a year without a page file with no issues
 
Bob
Says the guy who thinks the OS actually uses 3 GB of RAM.
 
I think it's actually at 16mb for the error messages let me check
very funny. okay let's hug now and say sorry to eachother
 
Bob
More practically, you've probably got at least a third, if not half, your RAM sitting completely idle and wasting power, while not being able to provide disk cache services.
The whole idea of removing the page file is utterly stupid and based on misinformation.
 
oh no I have the disk write cache enabled so my ssd lasts longer
okay I lied, minimum allowed for all drives: 16 MB, currently allocated: 0 MB . it's all good
actually my RAM is
not sitting completely idle. but Im sure it's wasting power being so filled up.

only 1 watts though
 
Bob
...
idle RAM still uses the same amount of power
"System Commit 15.9 GB" <== utter fail
You have zero disk cache because you've already hit your commit limit
 
3:12 AM
you're telling me utter fail. who the heck designed the software using up all my RAM?!
 
Bob
Oh wait you have 20 megs because you haven't quite hit it yet
...you're in a state where if you try to allocate 50 MB you get an OOM error
and you go blaming Microsoft
!!triplefacepalm
 
if I watch a video, firefox will crash
I do blame microsoft
 
Bob
omfg
this is all completely your fault
and you refuse to accept it, or fix it
when it's so bloody simple
 
do you see why I blame microsoft?
what I dont understand is why procexp thinks I have 300MB of RAM available even though commit charge is near its limit and I don't have a page file
 
Bob
3:16 AM
@CausingUnderflowsEverywhere Because you have absolutely no understanding of how virtual memory works.
 
wtf, why has chkdsk allocated 14 gigs of memory
 
That is true Bob. My knowledge is limited. Maybe it's a virtual amount programs asked for. why physical is what they are actually using of that virtual memory
 
that's completely ridiculous
 
because chkdsk will request more RAM until all your RAM is nearly gone, even though that doesn't seem to help it go faster
 
Bob
That's ~500 MB resident, ~14 GB commit. Commit that would not be using any actual RAM if only, oh, I don't know... the OS had somewhere else, like maybe a page file, to reserve for it.
It's never actually written to, anyway.
 
3:18 AM
@Bob is the 14GB commit being stored in physical memory due to the lack of a page file, then?
 
anyone here wants to tell me how to hack and free a bunch of chkdsk's allocated ram and see what happens? (hur hur hur)
 
Bob
@allquicatic Yup.
 
oh no those columns are 14 GB private bytes, 500mb working set, 14 GB virtual size
 
Bob
Windows will always make sure all committed memory has a place to go in the event of the program actually tryign to use it.
So, e.g., a malloc will return an error code instead of crashing when the successfully allocated memory is written to (*cough*linux*cough)
 
it's okay Bob my RAM never gets used anyways unless I decide to run 3 VMs at the same time, so I don't need a page file
 
3:21 AM
@Bob I believe Solaris takes the Windows approach.
 
I have a hard disk in here anyways that can hold the page file if I ever wanted one
 
Bob
@allquicatic This is also why one should always have a page file. Even if you have enough RAM that touched pages are always resident, the page file prevents committed-but-not-touched pages from using up RAM that can be better used for disk cache. Oh, and prevents this kind of fun situation where literally >85% of RAM is sitting completely unused because it's locked up as commit.
 
thanks for educating me Bob
 
Bob
So this guy is out of memory when > 85% of his RAM is never used and is in fact completely unusable.
It's a completely ridiculous situation of his own making.
Gah. I need more tea.
 
now I think that you're the ridiculous one putting in unnecessary energy into why I should use a pagefile when I am completely content with my life choice of not emplying one
 
Bob
3:25 AM
@allquicatic Linux will too, if you turn off overcommit. I think some distros do that by default.
 
Bob can I ask you a question?
 
Bob
@allquicatic As of 2008, Solaris won't overcommit unless specifically requested by the program: unix.derkeiler.com/Newsgroups/comp.unix.solaris/2008-03/…
I believe Windows has a similar option.
Can't think of when anyone would use it, though.
VirtualAlloc w/ MEM_RESERVE on Windows.
Ah... that's done so you can reserve a large contiguous block of addresses and then later commit them as necessary.
Reduce fragmentation, basically.
 
OMG I NEEDD sorry oh dang firefox almost crashed I had to kill a program to make more RAM space. I need 1 more reputation to comment on an answer that seems incorrect due to my findings
 
Bob
And now I'm starting to suspect trolling. Either that or you're actually proud of being in such an insane situation.
 
http://stackoverflow.com/a/3030323/4425643

"Virtual size is the number of pages that the process has allocated, those pages not currently in the working set (physically loaded in RAM) will be in the system's page file."

Right so the pages not allocated in the page file cause it's too small will be in RAM?

that doesn't work because if I add up all the process virtual sizes I get a big number.
I was semi trolling before because it was funny that you were angry due to my lack of page file
I have 5.1GB virtual size plus the 14.3 GB virtual size of chkdsk that's 19 GB of virtual size while I have 16 GB of RAM and 0 GB of page file
 
Bob
3:35 AM
@allquicatic btw, that's by design
 
and it's windows 7 so there isnt this RAM common things sharing like in windows 8
 
Bob
@allquicatic I think the idea is to commit ~sizeof(RAM) and let the OS swap it out if something else needs it. Basically, use as much physical memory as it possibly can, under the assumption that if you're running a chkdsk /r then something is already FUBAR and you want to fixitfixitfixitnowpleaseohgoddontlosedatafixitfixit!
chkdsk is one of those few programs that ideally would like so much more space than RAM anyone has, but of course trying to allocate so much is futile. At the same time, it's such a high-priority task that there's not much point in playing nice and restricting RAM usage to the minimum required (forcing more reads from the possibly damaged disk).
@allquicatic oh yea, that's coming up in a few weeks, isn't it? might be worth seeing if there's any other parts discounted more, or if there's a cheap prebuilt box? :P
heck, if shipping didn't cost so much, I'd send over an SSD... I've got more than the number of ports anyway -_-
 
true I should set the process priority to a higher value and see if that causes chkdsk to be the one who gets out of memory errors
@Bob you seem to be ignoring me. It is not my fault that your world stands on the existance of page files. have a good night.
 
Bob
3:52 AM
@CausingUnderflowsEverywhere Or, perhaps, possibly, I simply do not have anything further to say to you. It's entirely up to you if you want to run a system in a broken state that you chose to create.
If you're going to start blaming your own mistakes on others (e.g. MS, in this case) in a public forum, sure, I'll simply make sure it's clear to others that you're the one who caused the issue. Not much point in actually trying to teach one who won't listen, but preventing further spread of misinformation is useful.
 
Bob
4:26 AM
I think your options are 1. Your measuring technique is flawed, 2. The compiler writes better assembly that you, or 3. The compiler uses magic. — Galik 22 hours ago
 
5:22 AM
Asked at work what their plans are. I'll know at the end of the week if they want to keep me on after the contract ends.
If nothing else I have 2 days of leave I can't encash
 
Bob
6:09 AM
Microsoft.
What.
@BenN I don't see the BoUoW feature on Server
 
Bob
lol. it comes with IE11 but no Edge
ah, LTSB builds don't have Edge
and apparently there's no way to install it
fail, fail, fail
 
6:51 AM
erf. Printers
 
Bob
7:50 AM
@Aibobot printers!
 
morning yall
Appently the only one active is @bob, so hi :D
 
Hello
does anyone here knows about webkey?
 
Never heard of it
 
open source android app to share your screen with a webserver
I've noticing some delays when trying to play games
My internet speeds are OK, how I can know if it's because of my phone or the app?
 
hmmmmmmm
no idea :/
Though I'd be doubtful something like that is ever going to be fast enough for games
 
7:57 AM
I think 100ms is totally doable
they are both on high speed wifi
but it's like 500-700ms? Not sure
 
welp good luck, I have no idea how to test it :/
 
Bob
@djsmiley2k ello
@Freedo 500ms would be more than some delay...
like, an order of magnitude more
 
I can play online games with 500ms of ping
of course 100 is better, but it's not unplayable with 500
but yeah i think it's the app, because the phone doesn't lag
 
Most likely
is the app isn't designed for gaming responses, then i wouldn't expect it to be that fast
 
8:20 AM
ok just one more question about security
I can access it relayed by their servers but I also can asses with my internalIP:port and externalIP:port
then the connection will be direct between my phone and my browser right?
It does look more real time now
 
8:38 AM
I'd expect so
the fact it's going via their servers is horrible
 
@Bob I've moved 5 today
I need to prep another 18 for deployment
 
morning
 
9:03 AM
morning
 
9:20 AM
@Bob PRRRIIINNNNTEEERRRSSSSS!
 
9:55 AM
Hello!
 
Bob
10:14 AM
@JourneymanGeek bl tonight?
 
@Bob seems likely yes.
 
Bob
ph test strips arrived
ammonia turns them blue
soil is... neutral. or mistested
 
sounds about right
good soil then
 
Bob
it's clay soil
 
10:59 AM
Hi guys I need an advice
A teoretically really simple question. What Is the best monitor for mainly video editing and some gaming(1080p Is enough since I have got a gtx 1060) for around 300$?
 

« first day (2280 days earlier)      last day (2749 days later) »