those are worth some serious money, like 6cents even :-)
The landlord just got done processing days of a coin collection, and it was rather depressing , how little money almost 100Year old silver coins were worth. A mint fault coin brings about 25cent to $7 , plus depends on someone thinking it was special.
It was unbelevable to me to see silver coin being sold for not much more than the raised up prices of silver. as if they would be melting down history
I speculated that the vast visability via the web of the quantities and e-bay auctions full of them, and web pages everywhere with them being sold that the percieved Rareness is not as big a factor. Really rare stuff , it is completely the reverse, the coins not found in the massive collection were the ones with most value.
And baby boomer collections going up for estate sale, as a mass of collectors is no longer alive.
if you do not get enough money for it , take it out back hit it with a ball peen hammer on a rock , and double the price ebay.com/itm/141733549870?rmvSB=true :-)
I saw one that pulled $30 and i swear it was put on a soda bottle cap crimping machine.
Wonder what you could do with a shell reloader :-)
> The command processor is an old and cranky program. The command processor yells at Explorer to get off his lawn. The command processor gets upset when his Internet connection flakes out while he's watching Matlock online. The command processor doesn't care about your fancy-pants localized file names; it shows the raw file system names. The command processor has hundreds of thousands of scripts, and there's no way of knowing how many of them depend on the exact way it formats dates.
> You may be able to wheedle the command processor into making some changes for you, but you'd better have a really good reason, and he's going to be really grumpy about it. The command processor was once cajoled into changing its date format to four-digit years back in the late 20th century, and he did it only because everybody insisted that it was soooooooo important. But he was so grumpy about it, he had an option to go back.
My laptop won't even connect to my main router anymore. I think it gets confused with two conflicting networks with same SSID. Main IP router 192.168.1.1, the repeater 192.168.1.2
When i have DHCP disabled on repeater i have DNS problems, but even after manually setting them on my laptop i still have problems
also i can't really access the repeater after I configure it. I have to reset it
you want the output connected to the main router or the repeater?
@Bob Well i configure it to be on the same subnet mask, but like you could see for some reason the repeater goes to the 255.255.0.0 subnet mask. Strangely this router only have one port for "Ethernet" it says nothing about being an WAN port or LAN port lol
Going off for a min, to check this again. And i'm sure that i have no other device on my network with .1 or .2 ip address
It may be not relevant but the main router is connected to another modem, that is on bridge mode and another subnet (192.168.0.1)
helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/… I do not do raw, but you can guarentee that direct import might be a problem for some cameras raw methods, and some versions of photoshop or it's plugs.
I would never observe such things as a limitation, when with raw uncompressed things, there is no loss when having to fix them up with a 3rd party thing, or exporting them to other uncompressed formats.
Those cameras love to have propriatry things, even if that is a first data chunk with loads of camera data, or (video) a stream even with camera info being written down. Some peoples Opinion of not compatable , may exist still if Just the Camera Info (or some GPS data) or some other less critical item to a good picture was not presented the same.
my sony video camera uses a propritary format that isnt really that different, just bloody incompatable direct. You can use thier supplied software , to export it, and i am sure it is not de-re-coding anything , probably just tearing out a special data stream, possibly rearranging the perception of how the audio streams exist. There is no button in the camera either back before recording it to say "Be Normal" which would only respond with "What is Normal" :-)
@Psycogeek Do you consider buying used cameras disadvantage compared to new cameras that include warranty? For used cameras should I always ask how long it has been used and how many times shutter was pressed?
@barlop with acronis when you restore to the partition it replaces all the existing data. If you had a unallocated hole you could toss in in there, after making a partition. If you want to just "move files" then you move files and do not restore a whole partition.
@JourneymanGeek what psycho says rings true.. I think i've created a partition before and then whacked it over a partition.. maybe but my memory is vague
@Boris_yo The condition of a used item is not dependant on how may hours are on the meter, but how it ws treated, dropped or if it has any problems. Best used items were bought and hung around in closets (which means they may not have hours on them) But low hours on a device that never worked correct, or was damaged would still exist.
@Psycogeek is that non-deletion of existing partitions, for imaging a partition and writing it into a partition, or just cloning a partition onto a partition?
I guess an image of a single partition should always exclude partition table, as long as it was made to be of the single partition and not of a whole drive with 1 partition.
So, yes.
A single partition, excluding partition table. And yes if there's enough contiguous space.
I think programs only allow you to write it over without deleting other stuff, when you tell the program to put it over an existing partition
So if you create a partition of very small size.. but there's enough space on the drive. then the program shouldn't really have a problem whacking a partition 'over' it
it could just use the existing partition to determine the offset you want.
usually if the data would not fit on the partition it would warn you of that before starting. changing the parittion table would be a seperate action, even if it was included in a package.
yeah I know it's possible in theory, i'm just wondering if all the major players allow it
e.g. acronis, ghost , macrium reflect, clonezilla
acronis- no doubt.. as psychogeek says.
I didn't ask / am not asking if it's safe / not safe. It's safe enough with acronis/ghost/macrium/clonzilla.. I'm just asking if the option exists in all the major programs i.e. those mentioned there.
I already mentioned dd, which is also probably the most "major" (commonly used?) tool for this operation
You can see why it's so hard to answer the general question.
Different people also have different ideas of what's major. What if I said it was safe, but you tried it with some tool I didn't consider, and lost your data?
e.g. I would never consider ghost major now. It's long outdated and discontinued. Does it even support gpt?
I would hope symantec.com/page.jsp?id=ghost ghost got all updates for the new stuff. After the Disaster it created :-) people might still be avoiding it some. Minor issues with it destroying everything when things changed and people used old versions.
@barlop back at the start, what are you trying to do ? Plop a partition in an unallocated spaces? Replace all the data on a parititon with the stored partition image? Copy all the files from an image into a existing partition leaving the existing data in the partition intact?
@Psycogeek That's strange. I often experience failed loads of images i.e. broken images in different browsers and devices. Clearing cache and flush DNS does not help etc. Today same thing but when I connected laptop to ISP modem, all was okay. So it's wireless router that fails? Do you know why? Does it have to do with its DNS?
@Boris_yo that is why it is called that, and not WireMore :-) big DNS problems more often, would result in never getting to a page to begin with, or parts of a web page that are not hosted on the same server, script parts and pieces, any frames not on that same server not getting any of it. Partials are usually due to poor connection, slow connection, time-out or corruption (and really corruption shouldn't be happening with any of it)
@Psycogeek To "Plop a partition in an unallocated space". And if it doesn't allow me to do that(for lack of an option), then to create a partition at the destination, and replace it with the one I want.
@Boris_yo but you said connect direct to the modem worked ok? Which assumes it is connected with a wired cable from the modems nic direct to the devices nic with like a Cat something cable , or a dog cable ??
@Boris_yo Then the next step to discover if it is a router doing something goofy, or the actual wireless signal, would be: have the router connected to modem with wire, and use a wire out of the router to the device.
@barlop I think some of them will create a partition in an unallocated space, but for the most part that it done a LOT when it is a full disk clone, as the partitions will be fully remade replaced . I do not know enough for sure, because I would try and control everything, so IF an image of a partition was going to a place, i would create the partition space first . (if it was not already there)
@barlop Dumping a partition image to unallocated space is pretty pointless, unless you intend to scan the entire disk to try to heuristically find it again.
If you want to do it properly, create the appropriate entry in the partition table with the correct size, and dump the partition image in there.
unallocated space should never be used without properly allocating it
unless you mean unformatted space, which is an entirely different matter (allocated partition without a filesystem)
@Boris_yo ohh one thing at a time :-) mobile data does not go through the same stuff at all. Is your mobile internet connection provided by the same people who do your home internet connection?
@barlop More specifically, I think MBR and GPT define partition sizes in logical sectors (512B), but I'm not sure. Most partitioning tools will take care of that anyway if you give them bytes.
But, seriously, are you asking this out of curiosity, or are you actually planning to do something?
Because there's probably an easier way if you wanted to do something like this.
Normally, you use whatever tool you took the image with to perform the restore.
If you Only see the kitty :-) then you have fleshblocker 4500 on .
@barlop usually the partition that i plop an image of a partition into is larger. Usually i only use the image method for the operating system part, because Sync methods and file copy methods with compares i find are better for regular data backups.
@Bob Sorry, there's a hell of a lot of stuff for me to take in. It's not helping that there are multiple languages here too. :P I'm working more on trial and error than anything else. Thanks for keeping on prodding me in the right direction, despite how simple some of my errors are.
@Bob https://gist.github.com/marcusdoesstuff/9df5aabd00382481706d I think this looks a little better. I'm just stuck on how to read the values from your script and feed them in as values in the INSERT INTO.
Been reading your code, trying to make some sense of it. :P
I was trying to bring up a dictionary list earlier but couldn't figure it out... so i was close, heh. I just had a few things wrong. I'll give this a go thanks.
