I'm asked to divide up 10.64.0.0/15 into three subnets for
|Group | Min # of Hosts|
|Group 1| 70,000 |
|Group 2| 30,000 |
|Group 3| 12,000 |
so I start by figuring out that 32-15 = 17 => 2^17 = 131072 are the total amount of addresses. Begin to split that number into p...
1+2+3 can be computed using (3(3+1))/2; 1*2*3 can be computed using 3!
The currentProduct can grow large too, you probably don't want to use int for it either; for the sake of being safe you might even need it for currentSum depending on how high you the values are that you accept for n.
If there is a function for 3! then that might be more optimal than running over a loop, but I don't expect too much benefit.
Well, technically, one could implement that with a cache such that after a few calls to it it can start using the highest computed value and compute further.
Hey everyone. You know how some GPU reviews sometimes include power consumption charts? Are those charts predominantly of the whole system and not the GPU alone?
If that is the case, I find it very odd that a system with a card that's rated at 116 watts by Nvidia hardly ever turns out to consume more than 160 watts.
Yeah, that's what I'm assuming too
But how would you measure it? Perhaps they subtract what they recon rest of the test-bed draws?
Anything other than "at the plug" must be at least more complicated than the average hardware reviewer can manage, and probably way too expensive to set up.
But I don't get how they get such low numbers. I should probably do some experiments of my own...
I've always been pushing my PSUs to the limit. And now finally I've managed to over-tax a 5 year old 650 watt PSU. It has endured two CPU and GPU upgrades, along with two more drives than originally planned.
I always wanted to try two-psu in one comp. It's far easier than I thought :) With additional 350 watts (offloading all hdds and fans), the workstation is now stable again after preliminary stress-tests. My life is complete once again. hahah
@Bob yeah, but instead of supporting newer kernels, they're still supporting 2.6.32 atm, and mainlining more and more of their stuff so that you can kinda sorta get a working OpenVZ kernel on mainline if you enable all the cgroup stuff, but still no venet driver and a few other things missing
Also, BuyVM seems to be using 3.5 kernels on their Las Vegas nodes
root@vps-lv:~# uname -r
3.5.0-042stab076.7
Mid 2012 OpenVZ blog post:
> What's next? We will be rebasing OpenVZ to Linux Kernel 3.5 (most probably) and will try to re-use CRIU for checkpoint and restore of OpenVZ containers, effectively killing a huge chunk of out-of-tree kernel code that we have in OpenVZ kernel.
The problem is the requirement of cutting over completely, which we've now got half a dozen different barely-working bridging techniques to try to alleviate.
@barlop Once again: not everyone can get IPv6 addresses. And if IPv4 ever really 'runs out', then you'll also have people who can't get IPv4 addresses.
Software can support both IPv6 and IPv4. Great. But the nature of the problem, and what the article is complaining about, is the requirement to have a publicly visible IPv6 address and a publicly visible IPv4 address to work with both.
@barlop It's perfectly relevant.
Those who can't get IPv4 will have to use IPv6.
Which will be inaccessible to those who can't get IPv6.
@bob you're telline me the reality is that some can't get ipv6, and in the future they may not be able to get ipv4. so i'm answering regarding that reality
there's no point calling it stupid, if that's the reality we're in that has to be accepted.
sounds liek a programming/admin issue. not a technology issue. 2013 technology is fine i would think. The cost of not doing it better might push people to do it better.
How does the vector graphics formats svg , eps and pdf compare against each other(Quality, filesize etc)?
If I can generate(eg matplotlib) plot in any of the above formats, which format should I choose for output?
(Optional) Assume that the output graph is to be published using Tex.
I know th...
@bob you have compatibility via a proxy. It's idealistic to wish that doing that isn't work, but it is work. And it's adequate as a solution while both are about.
I'm saying it's very easy to contain the IPv4 address space within IPv6, and therefore allow IPv6 to directly route to IPv4 addresses with IPv6 capable software
that way, anyone with an IPv6 address can still communicate with those on IPv4 with only a software upgrade required, not relying on acquiring and setting up IPv6 addresses
of course, that may result in added software complexity
do you ever do a copy where you copy from source to dest e.g. doing a backup, copying only the files that are modified at the source with a later date/time?
Please try to limit yourself to one question per question. Feel free to open several questions for every question you have. — Oliver Salzburg4 secs ago
incremental seems to be doing little mini backups which then need to be combined. "when you want to carry out a complete restore, the most recent full backup and all of the subsequent incremental copies must be restored."
do you really do that? i'd choose differential backup over that.
differential backup "Differential backups copy those files that have been changed since the last full backup took place. ".
holy sheet, calculating the scalar product between two points in skyrim gives you the distance between them! I was expecting it to not work due to interior and exterior cells. If I can get the distance that way, why can't ObjectReference.getDistance() do the same?