« first day (660 days earlier)      last day (4316 days later) » 

1:08 AM
@se-moderators: I would like to know why this question has been closed as 'not constructive'. Have a look: superuser.com/questions/444901/… . This question doesn't look much different from many other ones.
I can not see how this topic would be provocative to 'solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion'. The real danger would be that nobody will feel competent to provide an answer. The topic asked however is relevant and potentially interesting to many users. It's about automatically deskewing PDFs which have been created from scanned paper documents.
 
1:27 AM
@se-moderators: I've edited headline, text and tags for question 444901 a bit. Is it now acceptable to you?
 
1:57 AM
@KurtPfeifle It's a software recommendation question which is off-topic.
 
@KronoS: in that case you'd need to close about 1000% more questions than you do.
 
@KurtPfeifle we're slowly working on it, but this is a newer focus
 
No, it is a question about which available tool to use with which parameters.
I know it can be done, because I found a (surprisingly simple) solution using ImageMagick.
 
software recommendations lead to quickly out-dated answers, and aren't really useful for future or other users
@KurtPfeifle I've read it through a few times, and it still appears to me to be more of a tool request or software recommendation.
 
@KronoS: If that really becomes a 'focus', then the future of SE will see drop down in users. I myself will be one of them.
@KronoS: I'm pretty sure that my solution will be useful for future times as well as for quite a few other users.
 
2:03 AM
Besides it's a duplicate:
1
Q: Which free software can I use to deskew scanned images

fiktorI've scanned about 100 documents, so I have a folder with 100 jpg images, but they are rotated by the angle up to 15 degrees. Is there any free simple to use software I can use to rotate them to the normal orientation? It would be good if it works on Windows XP or Windows 7.

 
@KronoS: Ahh... now that's a better argument :-)
 
The software recomendation is still a valid arguement
The above question should be closed
If both of the question at hand were asked a little more or less like

> How do I rotate a large number of .pdf's automatically?

then it would be more on-topic
 
@KronoS: Even if it was about software recommendation (and not a duplicate) then which other place on the SE-platform would be better than the one targeting 'super users'?
@KronoS: C'mon, the way to ask isn't that much different... And the answers for the re-formulated questions would be the same.
 
@KurtPfeifle Software recommendation has been proposed on Area51 I believe, but the fact is when you ask "is there a free software that does XX?" The answer is typically No or Yes with a link to a website. It's not of the high quality that we promote and expect here at SU
 
/me has been checking for duplicates on this myself, but hadn't found one. Thanks for this. :-)
 
2:09 AM
@KurtPfeifle actually it is. It's the same things as shopping recomendations
10
Q: Laptop Battery Technology

KronoSMy laptop battery has finally taken the plunge and I'm looking online for a new one. However I'm getting lost in all of the specs of the batteries that are out there. I'm looking to gain a better understanding of what effect each spec has on the overall life of the battery (meaning length of ho...

 
@KronoS: In that case you would do a better job for increasing the quality if you wouldn't just close the question, but reformulate it.
 
Take this for example. I wanted to know about what to buy for a Laptop battery. Instead of asking "What's the best battery for my PC" I asked, what's the technology behind it
 
Or give at least a deadline, and ask the user to re-formulate it.
 
@KurtPfeifle We close because most users don't clean them up
and while it's a privilege for other users to edit, it isn't their responsibility
so there's a close, and if they (or another user) wants to change it to make more sense, then there's a request to reopen
 
You close despite there having been +2 upvotes for a first answer even. Which means that at least 2 users found the topic+answer useful...
 
2:12 AM
@KurtPfeifle just because an answer has upvotes doesn't make the question valid
 
@KronoS: Have you seen my edit of this question from an hour ago? Does this make it more acceptable?
 
not all the way... I'm looking through right now, but FYI you don't tag the potential answers
@KurtPfeifle All you did was change the title. The body still needs some work as well.
 
@KronoS: ya know -- in real life I'm meeting lots of real superusers and geeks (different OS platforms). Some even on a monthly basis for a drink or two. Half the time we talk about software recommendations. I don't see why this same topic should deteriorate the quality of a 'superuser' web portal...
 
@KurtPfeifle They just get out-dated so quickly, and they lead to exactly what you described... a discussion. This isn't a discussion site.
discussions are meant for chats like this
(note: I may be completely wrong on this. The more definitive answers are going to be @random @Sathya @IvoFlipse @nhinkle @studiohack)
 
@KronoS: I do not think a little bit of 'discussion' is wrong on the q+a pages. I even enjoy it if I come across one. It's often enlightening.
As I said, if you remove this liberty altogether, I'll find the SE-platform much less attractive, and so will many other users.
Users will leave. The 'older' users (like me) will be be for other reasons than 'newbie' users (who will find it very frustrating if they see their honest questions just put into the trashbin by an online police).
@KronoS: Anyway... thanks for the talk, even if it leaves me rather frustrated. I've to meet my bed now, it's waiting already :-)
 
2:38 AM
@KurtPfeifle sorry, I went out to play with the little brother :)
I can understand why you would be frustrated, but I've been on for a while now, and I agree with the changes.
Chattiness belongs on the chat. and Software recommendations are just too chatty IMO
 
@dragonlord If you could, just don't need to edit in a boilerplate for the spam. Just flag and it will be dealt with. Editing bumps it up and gives it more exposure
@KurtPfeifle When the only difference between a shopping question and a product recommendation is money, it's still a shopping question, which are off topic and/or not constructive.
@KurtPfeifle The constructive version would be to say that they want to achieve something with a certain program. And that they are okay if another tool does it better, but the forepoint is that they get it working/attempt in the current tool. If there is no tool, then it's a request for all and sundry
 

« first day (660 days earlier)      last day (4316 days later) »