« first day (1619 days earlier)      last day (3352 days later) » 
00:00 - 02:0002:00 - 00:00

12:00 AM
We're struggling with "Meisterparade" here
 
...Oh, dear. Storium just added a private messaging feature.
 
"Wuchtschlag" mioght suffice as well
 
@Airatome Stamina would be what he means.
 
right then
sounded like it from the version of the book I'm reading
I jsut got to the section that talks about 'Combat Talents'
 
@npst I have played the fourth edition only once or twice, I am familiar with stamina and the fighting system in general though, I think it stayed very similar to the third edition.
I do have the rulebooks here though, I think
 
12:02 AM
"...Combat Talents are used to Modify the Base Value for Attack, Parry, and Ranged Combat..."
 
@BESW Is that as bad an idea as it sounds?
 
@SevenSidedDie I really suspect it is.
 
Hello!
 
I'm pretty sure that when the whole point of your service is providing loose structure for collaborative freeform gaming (an enterprise which requires a lot of trust and group cohesion to be healthily functional), institutionalising table-level secret-keeping is not the way to go.
When you're talking about doing all of that on the Internet, the potential for mishap increases exponentially.
 
@npst Sorry, only ever played in German
 
12:05 AM
Hmm. [pokes translators]
 
I'm horribly confused by this book......but it's all in english
 
re
 
I can't find anything precise to answer your question npst :/
my apologies
 
"Meisterparade" seems to mean roughly "expert countermove."
 
my brain hurts.....
 
12:05 AM
Well, in the german books (4.0 and 4.1) Endurance is always marked as being optional
 
@IronHeart *waves!*
 
there's also the mention of "using a combat talent costs 1 endurance point"
 
@npst I've just read, if you want to play with Stamina, you should get "Wege des Schwerts" (Way of the Sword?)
 
(Well, literally "master parry," but yeah.)
 
Well, we decided to play wihtout endurance.
And the question is if there#s anything restricting us from using talents each and every action?
 
12:07 AM
@npst Well, then you have two options, I guess. Either allow moves that cost Endurance all the time, or limit them in some other fashion.
 
yea since I can't find the part where it mentions endurance is optional......because it seems any sort of Technique costs Endurance and doesn't give an option for what it would cost or how it would operate if you were NOT using Endurance.....
it almost seems like Endurance is NOT optional
 
And for that purpose the GM looked at Drakensang (the Dark Eye PC Game) for that one dongeon
oh, that's weird
 
or else dogs and cats would live together, and mass hysteria would ensue
 
maybe this has grown annoying enough for us to open a different room?
 
but more than likely there's some sort of system where such a cost is optional and I'm missing how it explains it's optional use.
 
12:10 AM
@npst Are all the special maneuvers from the book that gives the extended rules on endurance? Then you'd also have the option to just play without the maneuvers. ;)
 
I quit :/
 
i feel like a third grader again, not knowing every second word
Airatome, thank you VERY much for your help
 
Of course.....I found a PDF but combing through it really didn't provide me with knowledge of how to answer your question....
 
@Airatome I think the main problem is that nobody ever plays with Endurance. It is way too much book keeping.
 
attack versus parry versus Armor Points = damage to Vitality Points?
?.?
 
12:13 AM
Oh, those are the basics :D
(did i mention it#s a german game?)
 
@Airatome I believe there is an extra roll for the damage.
 
then I just opt for continuous allowance for formerly Endurance based techniques. If they would normally expend Endurance to be able to use, but Endurance is somehow 'optional' that means one of two things
if you throw Endurance out the window, you also throw all Endurance Requiring techniques out the window......or you have free reign to use them as often as needed
Yea....I found out it was a german game that never saw a North American release due to Wizards of the Coast having just released 3.5E at the time
along with other contenders it didn't want to try it's hand against
shame...it looks rather fun if I could wrap my head around how it works
 
What.. i just opened a chatroom with murch and lost it.
ah, there it is
 
oops
/end the Dark Eye Troubleshooting
_________________________________
we now return you to your regularly scheduled shenanigans
 
That was fun to watch. [lurks in German chat with auto-translate on]
 
12:19 AM
........
Auto - Translate.....
 
@Airatome ^^
 
why didn't I think of that
apparently it's over 9000
my brain just can't....
 
Mechanical translation is notorious for not retaining the spirit of the original message.
 
Auto-translate is not very good (Google uses United Nations documents for most of its translation database, so the less like United Nations documents the subject material is, the worse the translation is), but it's not nothing.
 
hehe
if you have quesitons, I can translate
 
12:22 AM
Don't want to interrupt your flow. I can get the general gist of things, though Google just gives up every now and then.
 
w00t. After 12 attempts. I have updated java and adobe reader installed. :/
 
Grats!
 
@JohnP I abandoned all hope at staying current with those at home some time ago. Here at work...we have a guy who deals with that stuff
(honestly, I think I've thus far avoided even installing java on my desktop)
 
@waxeagle No you haven't. It's there, you just don't know it. Otherwise a lot of teh interwebz wouldn't work.
 
^ what he said
 
12:27 AM
@JohnP you mean on the servers? Cuz not too many things use java plugins anymore (thankgoodness)
 
...I think Google's giving up. The auto-translate is getting more and more incoherent.
 
Not plugins, just java and javascripting in general.
 
@JohnP javascript != java at all
 
"All Fall Cube Good" would be a good name for a Tetris-themed concept album.
 
!= but a subset. I can still say with 95% certainty that you have java installed on your home system.
You can check, just go to your control panel and look at installed programs.
Oh, that reminds me I need to uninstall the SDK.
 
12:36 AM
“What if we crossed kale with spiders?” ~@UrsulaV
 
Java as a runtime for consumer applications is less common now
and that was long before the slow death of the applet
 
@Tritium21 yep. I'm thinking with a clean win 8 install, and minimal programs installed, I might not actually have it.
 
@waxeagle You likely don't need it...until you need it
 
that said, I know how hard it is to avoid...
 
maptool
 
12:37 AM
@Tritium21 yep
@JohnP not even a subset. javascript was named as such as a marketing ploy
 
There are German general chats, @BESW?
 
javascript has nothing to do with java. it was named that cause java was the new-hotness in 1994 and netscape was riding the wave, man
 
@Tritium21 yep
 
Then java got renamed c# ducks
 
What do you mean don't have Java installed what is this madness how do you even play Minecraft then.
 
12:39 AM
@Tritium21 heh :)
 
@npst I don't know of any established non-English chat rooms on RPG.SE, but I know there are chats in other languages elsewhere in the Stack.
 
devil works
 
@SevenSidedDie lol, I'm thinking steam (or a game installed via steam) might be one of the few things I've installed that might have bundled in java....
 
/me throws coffe beans at Tritty
 
@waxeagle I thought when netscape changed it from livescript to javascript they included some of the OOP features? I could be wrong, I was deep in other programming at the time.
 
12:41 AM
@npst is thrown at?
 
@waxeagle Even then, Steam tends to sandbox all dependencies, so if it installs Java, it'll be a private copy just for that game. (Redundant, but it works for avoiding DLL Hell and other issues.)
 
is thrown at indeed!
 
Goodnight all
 
ttfn
 
nini
 
12:41 AM
now that we've taken over rpg chat with programming talk :), anyone familiar with X++?
 
@JohnP Yes, but OOP features are a high-level thing that lots of languages have. Javascript (properly called ECMAScript) has no Java DNA.
 
@waxeagle Is that a Vin Diesel film?
 
Only to know its Microsoft's language for expression studio...
 
@BESW oh I wish.
 
@waxeagle You're making that up. [deadpan]
 
12:42 AM
I offer only Java as true knowledge. Could order a beer and hook up in others
 
@waxeagle cant you use any .net language where you need x++?
 
@Tritium21 nah, this is specialized to dynamics AX
 
@waxeagle I like how Microsoft is jumping on the cool 90s naming trend.
 
@SevenSidedDie IIRC this was actually named by drunk danish people...MS just bought them out a few years ago
 
1998 drunk danes
 
12:44 AM
The product I'm working on used to be called Axapta..it's an ERP
 
@waxeagle So it's not really Microsoft's fault. That's somewhat comforting. I was pretty sure they'd caught up to the 00s at least by now.
 
I was under the impression "drunk" is redundant when talking about the conditions under which languages are named.
 
@BESW very likely
 
I don't even know what enterprise resource planning software does... like all enterprise names, its both clear and opaque at the same time
 
@SevenSidedDie nah, it's been x++ since before they acquired it. And I'm getting the impression that they are an edition or two from deprecating the language (yeah soon to be useless new skills!)
 
12:46 AM
prolly deprecating it for .NET
 
Grrr...I hate when people deliberately misconstrue facts to support their slanted argument.
 
@Tritium21 honestly, if you can think of a business function...this software does it, or there is a vendor who provides a chunk to do it. Accounting, expensing, proj managemnet...
@Tritium21 yeah, it already complies to the .net runtime
 
@JohnP Sometimes it's not deliberate. Also, what do you have against slopes?!
 
So its a catch all term for line of business applications
 
@Tritium21 yeah, basically, usually an ERP is an all encompassing single program solution
 
12:47 AM
er, or is for anything that ISNT line of business
 
@SevenSidedDie Slopes are inclined to be slippery.
 
@BESW Touché
 
this particular one, in a weird turn of events for it being a MS product, is the super customizable kind, so you need in house programmers for it. Hence..me
 
@SevenSidedDie "Ok, so sally mcburger flipper wants $15/hour, yadda yadda 35,000 a year, when a E-1 private makes 18k. NOT FAIR RANT WAAWHAA!"
 
@JohnP ah yes, I've seen that one on FB recently.
 
12:50 AM
Are not the only people who stay E-1 for any length of time...uh...prisoners?
 
Ignores the fact that an E-1 also gets free housing (or an allowance), free food, free health care, uniform allowances....their equivalent income is 35k.
 
you get promoted rather quickly out of that rank
 
@JohnP Uh. I suppose room and board is free outside the military, right.
If only.
 
I know my brother was only E-1 while in BCT
 
@SevenSidedDie No, they are saying that an E-1 only makes 18k a year AND has to pay housing, etc.
@Tritium21 E-2 is generally automatic after 6 months if you don't kill yourself or anyone else.
 
12:51 AM
@JohnP Oh, do they? I know nothing about this, but 18k seems low to have to pay for any living expenses.
 
and if you DO kill someone else, you will stay E-1 while in levenworth
 
Besides, anyone who rants about paying a decent minimum wage is just loudly braying that they know nothing about how capitalist economies work.
 
you make 18k while still making 3AM runs and bunking with 49 other recruits
 
@SevenSidedDie No, they don't have to pay living expenses. That's why it's slanted, they are arguing why a burger flipper shouldn't make $15 an hour when a E-1 "only" makes $8ish an hour
 
That's kinda missing the point, though. The rant's erroneous assumption goes a lot deeper than that.
 
12:53 AM
Burger flipper WANTS 15/hour. I WANT a Ferrari. My employer is not going to give one to me
 
@JohnP Yeah, that's what I thought. Stupid rant is stupid.
 
@Tritium21 That's why I was AF. Straight out of medic school I had my own room and only shared a bathroom with one guy. Of course, he was a 5 star idiot, but...
He used to haul a leather armchair into the shower to sit and smoke in the shower for hours. Naked and water running. :/
 
My brother was ANG, so he was roomed with his wife after BCT and follow-on school
 
@Tritium21 Nice!
 
Army paid for his networking and systems maintenance training. what does he do in civilian life now? Paints machine tools.
 
12:56 AM
@Tritium21 Unlike a Ferrari though, someone making $15/hour (rather than less) creates a net positive effect on the health of the country's economy. A durable (depreciating) good is not comparable to improving spending power
 
If fast food franchises had to pay their 100+ employees 15/hour, the price increase on the product would put them out of business. They would sooner automate the entire process.
 
It's creating a false idea that "living wage" values should be applied unequally across professions, that one person's right to a living wage is a challenge to a totally unrelated group of people. Further it's buying into some pretty toxic ideas about the privilege and demographic of the lower class.
 
I was a shift manager in a fast food joint, only made 14/hour
 
why is this chat not displayed on my living room wall at all times?
3
 
@npst Because you haven't bought a projector and installed it yet.
 
12:59 AM
@npst it can be...
 
working on it
the other apartment DOES have a living room, yay
 
@Tritium21 for context, I was same and made slightly more than half that.
 
There are actually some pretty cogent dissections of that rant, if you look for them.
 
@waxeagle This was likely more recently than you
 
@Tritium21 In isolation, yes. But not when it's a minimum wage not in isolation. But then, I believe in instituting a living wage, because science shows it increases efficiencies and lowers costs, counterintuitively, so perhaps we will not see eye-to-eye. :)
 
1:01 AM
@Tritium21 yeah, mine was...wow...11 years ago
 
This one seems to be fairly good at challenging the causal attitudes underlying its appeal, rather than just attacking the symptomatic faulty information.
 
As a Yuropee, do things cost basically the same all over the US?
including water/rent/food
 
@npst not at all.
 
why is a minimum wage a state wide discussion then?
 
for instance, in California, the cost of living is much higher than other places. And costs in cities are much higer than the cost outside of them. And the larger the population center, the higher the COL
 
1:06 AM
Talking minimum/living wages in America really needs to be done in the broader cultural context, including how the American psyche, deeply invested in the idea that "anyone who works hard can succeed," has fallen into an attitude that "Anyone who does not succeed has only themselves to blame."
 
@npst there are typically two minimums in play. The federal minimum wage, and a state one. Sometimes you'll have a local municipality institute one too.
But basically the federal one brings up the low cost of living states while the high cost of living states generally have state minimums that are higher than the federal
 
So the discussion is workin g in the right direction?
leveling states first
 
Tracking minimum wadge in the us needs to be taken on a hyper local scale. 7.25 an hour in Peoria is a lot more than New York City
 
(sorry for misunderstandings. i do NOT support bombardement)
 
[amused]
 
1:08 AM
@BESW words are difficult
 
@npst specially when you heap in US politics
which are weird.
 
oh, i never noticed.
tell me more
 
well for a start apparently their nation is ruled by an elephant and a donkey
2
which most nations have not seen fit to put in leadership positions
 
Elephants and Jackasses
 
i was just about to say the elephant and donkey also have age differences, the elephant will survive longer and thus be more conservative and the donkey will be more progressive but then I realised I was actually describing the parties at that point
 
1:15 AM
odd thing is...
when those mascots were chosen, the Dems were conservative and the GOP was progressive
 
And there wasn't a two-party system, and the concept that every issue must have exactly two sides with a winner and a loser wasn't quite so firmly ground into the culture.
 
you're saying there wasn't a two-party system a few decades ago?
 
The two party system pre-dates the GOP. The Whigs were replaced. there was very little time of an overlap
 
@BESW wait, this is a thing?
 
and i think the dems replaced the federalists...
 
1:19 AM
It wasn't codified.
 
Early american politics is not my strongest subject.
 
Up until the early 1900s, third party candidates were still taken seriously and the mechanisms of governance weren't tuned to ignore them so thoroughly.
I mean, technically we still don't have a two-party system.
 
it's just functionally 2 party
 
[shrug] It's just part of the cultural psyche's need for dichotomous conflict, whether that's a false simplification or not.
Coke or Pepsi, Edward or Jacob, 3.5 or 4e.
 
There is, iirc, 2 third party representatives in congress. out of 460-something reps
 
1:22 AM
/me wonders how much of that is a fruit of a largely judeochristian history
 
That need for every issue to have a winner and a loser is one of the underlying appeals of the rant which started this conversation.
 
The two party system arose from there being two camps in the early united states - federalists and anti-federalists
 
It combines nationalist pride with economic prejudice to frame a "heroes and villains" conflict, because if someone gets something that must mean someone else loses something in turn.
 
@waxeagle The counterexample in Canada and various European states would say no.
 
The sad part is, this is all rooted in a very laudable desire to see justice and mercy played out properly. It's just twisted up in knots by various conflicting forces which manipulate that desire to their own ends.
The rant uses the word "deserve" like a scalpel to cut into that soft, sensitive underbelly of the American thirst for justice.
 
1:28 AM
@BESW well it's also because you have a non-preferential voting system, so any vote cast on a non-winning party just gets obliterated.
(IIRC in some way that ends up helping the winning parties?)
the winning parties in this case are the republicans and democrats
 
@doppelgreener Ooh, does Australia have something other than First Past the Post?
 
The electoral college is only for presidential elections.
all other elections are plurality
 
@Tritium21 Plurality is the same thing, just for >2 sides.
 
The way that the seats in congress are decided (by state, not by party) make a two party system virtually the only possible outcome.
 
Greener is referring to a completely different way to count votes.
 
1:32 AM
15% of the vote for one party means 15% of the seats for that party...
 
@doppelgreener We had a referendum to introduce Single Transferable Vote here, and it failed by the slimmest of margins. I was bitterly disappointed.
 
Instant-runoff voting (IRV), alternative vote (AV), transferable vote, ranked-choice voting, or preferential voting in Australia, is an electoral system used to elect a single winner from a field of more than two candidates. It is a preferential voting system in which voters rank the candidates in order of preference rather than voting for a single candidate. Ballots are initially distributed based on each elector's first preference. If a candidate secures more than half of votes cast, that candidate wins. Otherwise, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated. Ballots assigned to the...
 
We cant do that with seats assigned by state
 
right, there's the name for it
 
Bahá'í elections use something like that.
 
1:33 AM
@BESW IIRC correctly, so does Monaco, Ireland, and a bunch of others.
 
basically we can vote in order of preference. in federal elections we have to fill out EVERY box, in state elections we can leave boxes blank if we want.
 
@SevenSidedDie I'd be a fan. Though, thinking of my county, trying to explain it might be hard
 
Oh wow.... Florida voters would never be able to handle that.
 
@waxeagle That was the "no" vote strategy: "it's too complicated! scary!"
 
Bahá'í voting isn't exactly preferential, but it's kinda similar.
 
1:33 AM
And it worked.
 
I can vote 1 for a party that might not get a seat in parliament. if they don't, they're eliminated, then my votes count toward whoever I wrote down as 2. repeat until we reach a point where my votes go toward a party has secured seats in parliament.
i can't remember the exact mechanisms but that's a rough idea.
 
(Despite it not actually being complicated, just unfamiliar.)
@doppelgreener That's the gist of what we nearly had and I envy you for having.
 
In the last election I voted for some minor parties because it had a chance of getting them in, and because votes would increase their funding for the next election. Then I listed the major parties I knew would get in. Then I listed all the rest I didn't like.
 
@SevenSidedDie right, that's the key, different can easily be cast as complicated. and when you're arguing for changing the status quo it doesn't take much to cast anything new as complicated. (if you want a good, real world, low stakes example, look at the anti-stats backlash in baseball)
 
If we're voting for a nine-member body, our ballots have nine slots. They aren't preferential in order, but all nine of my votes count. (The ballot is void if I fill in more or less than nine separate names.)
 
1:35 AM
Throw away less information, basically, and you get results that better represent the actual populace.
 
This is all predicated on a federal government that is a government of the people. in the US that is not the case, and it never was. The federal government of the US is a government of the states. The State governments are governments of the people - by design at least
 
@BESW Less than, too? That's unusual.
 
Then it's a simple matter of finding the top nine pluralities out of all the votes cast by everybody.
 
@Tritium21 Actually, IRV can be applied just fine to the electoral college.
 
@Tritium21 you're australian right?
 
1:38 AM
(If there are ties for ninth place, there's a re-vote in which only those who got the tie are eligible and each voter writes down just one name.)
 
(i cannot 100% remember but i am pretty confident that's the case)
 
the electoral college will be rendered moot soon anyways. There is a movement of states declaring their electoral votes will be cast only for the winner of the national plurality. if a few more states sign on to the pact, then those states will have enough electoral votes to outvote all other states.
I am from New York State >.>
 
@waxeagle functionally?
 
[bemused] Wasn't the point of the electoral college originally to vote for the guy in your state whose opinion you respected enough to think he'd vote for the right President?
 
@npst As in, it's not 2-party by law, just 2-party in fact.
 
1:39 AM
oh, sorry. forgot to scroll down
I assumed "funtioning"
*c
 
@BESW Kind of made sense when phones didn't exist and getting around a continent-wide country involved horses. More direct voting makes more sense today, I guess?
 
@SevenSidedDie Bahá'í national elections have something very similar to the original concept of the electoral college, too.
 
@Tritium21 oh! ok.
drat
 
@BESW It was designed to remove the people from the election of the chief executive. Again, the system was designed to be a government of the states. the only concession to the people (directly) was the election of the representatives (President and Senate were elected by state legislatures.)
That was changed with amendments
 
and yeah i can confirm the federal government here is designed for the people
when we had federation, the idea was: there's a bunch of things that are best handled by individual states, and a bunch of things best handled by one country-wide government
e.g. the states handle roads and schools, the federal government handles (i don't remember acutally)
some of that stuff has shifted over time, so e.g. the federal government is in charge of the national highways i think.
 
1:45 AM
The US Federal government was also never designed to have the power in the interior that it currently does, so there needs to be changes made.
 
@Tritium21 Ah, found what you're talking about here.
 
Delegates for each area are elected from and by the grass roots, in the same way that local administration is elected (everyone votes, and everyone who can vote can be voted for, no candidacy or campaigning allowed). The delegates in turn elect the national body, and the national bodies elect the international body.
 
The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is an agreement among several U.S. states plus the District of Columbia to allocate their presidential electors to the winner of the national popular vote, rather than to the winner of the popular vote of their particular state. Proposed in the form of an interstate compact, the agreement would go into effect among the assenting states once the states in the compact collectively represent an absolute majority of votes (at least 270) in the Electoral College. In the next presidential election, those states would award all their electoral votes...
 
Yus, that
 
@Tritium21 what's this mean? what's the power in the interior? what power was it supposed to have? what power does it have now?
 
1:46 AM
@doppelgreener This sounds a lot like Canada's federation.
 
tritium, I know othing about all that. but "X was never meant to Y ... so changes are needed" is not valid anywhere
 
@doppelgreener beyond what was in the constitution, it was never intended to be able to pass laws effecting united states citizens (except in inter-state maters)
 
@BESW Interesting. So it's a winnowing all the way up. Similar but different to how a parliament forms a government from its membership.
 
@SevenSidedDie Yes, except that in the national and international elections, the eligibility to be voted for doesn't narrow; it's still basically "anyone who voted for a national delegate can be voted for by a national or international delegate."
So the people who vote get winnowed, but the potential candidacy pool doesn't.
 
@npst The system was setup for a method of operation that it is not currently using and is ill-equipped to function optimally or even justly. It was never designed to be a government of the people and for the people, but it is acting like it is. it needs to be made an actual government of, by, and for the people - and there needs to be some structural changes to make that happen.
 
1:50 AM
and those are two opinions, not some kind of conclusion
three opinions maybe
 
You have just defined politics.
 
you sounded kinda sure in your (what i at that time confused for wrong) logic
 
I am very confident in my opinions. And they match, at least my, observations.
 
@Tritium21 oh, i see now.
 
so you're confident in saying that your opinion does have no influence of changing the current state of .. eh.. state
(there might be an *about needed anywhere)
 
1:54 AM
Thus far we've been doing astonishingly well being civil about this discussion.
 
we have
 
My opinions will not change a damn thing. They are just my opinions.
 
@Tritium21 also yes this sounds accurate
 
But if it's going to get confrontational and devolve into "No, you're wrong," I'm going to dump the whole thing into the Not A Bar.
 
in the australian federal and state governments there are mechanisms ensuring fairness that suit their operations
 
1:55 AM
 
i was only following basic logical thingamabobs
 
@BESW i love this bit.
 
I admire the system that the US was setup to have (but never actually had).
 
some of those seem to be absent from US federal politics, e.g. the idea of being able to vote via preferential voting for federal candidates.
 
i couldn't care less about inner US politics
 
1:56 AM
that said i can understand why there is no preferential voting; the parties that are in power to create it have nothing to gain and everything to lose.
(the individuals have something to gain, but also their jobs to lose)
 
hi, doppelgreener
 
I can imagine a few.... in my opinion minor... changes in procedure that would have drastic changes in the makeup of the federal government.
 
but you're thinking about assasinations and stuff. this is not on topic right now
 
@npst Hi!
 
(unbind House or Senate seats from the states and make then national elections with preferential voting. Second place in the presidential election is VP/President of Senate)
 
1:59 AM
are you saying the Vice President position is bound to be the President of the Senate?
 
00:00 - 02:0002:00 - 00:00

« first day (1619 days earlier)      last day (3352 days later) »