The Time Machine

General discussion for history.stackexchange.com. For urgent i...
Dec 18, 2021 21:02
I see you already deleted all comments. Anyways
Dec 18, 2021 21:01
ok
Dec 18, 2021 20:51
I pointing at the source of his partisan political views.
Dec 18, 2021 20:50
It was not me making the first political statement but it was him. Since he attacked the conservatives it looks to me very well balanced to strike back and to point at the fact that it's the liberals who incite such attacks. Which IMO is part of the larger Western propaganda tactics.
Dec 18, 2021 20:45
Considering the fact that he attacked conservatives, the fact that I react with pointing the liberal propaganda as the source of such attacks does not look inappropriate to me.
Dec 18, 2021 20:45
It's the liberals who create outrage (which is part of a larger Western propaganda pattern) - and that encourages people like him to make such statements - to dismiss any mention of Rockefeller as a ridiculous conspiracy theory and to bring his political views (ridicule of the conservatives) into a question that has nothing to do with today's politics.
Dec 18, 2021 20:45
Therefore I took the liberty to point at a liberal conspiracy theory (Trump-Russia conspiracy theory) and in the comment you mention I pointed the source of his political bias.
Dec 18, 2021 20:44
It doesn't distract at all. By the contrary, it focuses at the source of his partisan political views that he exposed. In his deleted answer he ridiculed conservatives for creating conspiracy theories.
Dec 18, 2021 20:19
I mean I replied to him with comments. After admitting he was busted, he deleted his "answer".
Dec 18, 2021 20:18
Lucian posted a very bad answer, teaching everyone this is a ridiculous conspiracy, I replied to him in that answer like 3-4 times until he admitted was busted. What I forgot to mention in the comment you point at is that the propaganda has the same pattern, that's why the middle is not very good
Dec 18, 2021 20:04
Thanks!
Dec 18, 2021 19:46
I have a question ban at History SE. The last question has I posted 2 days ago has 4 upvotes. What I would like to know is how many times I have to ask (every 6 months) such a question with 4 upvotes? 10 times is enough? If not then maybe 100 times? The users should see a counter with how many upvotes they need in order to lift the ban. If I need to ask 1000 such questions then I will plan the next questions much more carefully.
Dec 18, 2021 19:39
If any moderator can read this, I posted a question here - meta.stackexchange.com/questions/374233/…
Dec 18, 2021 19:38
Ok ty
 
Dec 18, 2021 19:45
ok ty cya
Dec 18, 2021 19:43
I voted your answer up but it looks like 2 other guys voted it down lol
Dec 18, 2021 19:40
I had some similar questions on the topic, that's the only one I've been here
Dec 18, 2021 19:40
The youngest is 114 years, 180 days :)
Dec 18, 2021 19:39
These are lists of the 100 known verified oldest people sorted in descending order by age in years and days.The oldest person ever whose age has been independently verified is Jeanne Calment (1875–1997) of France, who lived to the age of 122 years and 164 days. The oldest verified man ever is Jiroemon Kimura (1897–2013) of Japan, who lived to the age of 116 years and 54 days. The oldest known living person is Kane Tanaka of Japan, aged 118 years, 350 days. The oldest known living man is Saturnino de la Fuente García, of Spain, aged 112 years, 310 days. The 100 oldest women have, on average, lived...
Dec 18, 2021 19:39
yes
Dec 18, 2021 19:38
I was here before some 2-3 years ago I was asking about youngest oldest people :)
Dec 18, 2021 19:33
I will ask there too
Dec 18, 2021 19:33
Thanks a lot for your help!
Dec 18, 2021 19:33
I can't find the data. But that's not an opinion. That's an unknown (by me) number. So I can't find it problematic
Dec 18, 2021 19:32
Ahh ok, I will ask there too, thanks
Dec 18, 2021 19:31
Well the EE have a certain percent in USA. The fact that I don't know that percent doesn't mean the percentage doesn't actually exist. Maybe they are 7 percent or 20 percent IDK.
Dec 18, 2021 19:30
No, I can ask questions at Meta History SE
Dec 18, 2021 19:27
I'm not a native English speaker
Dec 18, 2021 19:26
yes
Dec 18, 2021 19:26
True
Dec 18, 2021 19:26
Yes thats kind of vague language, but unfortunately I don't have a better way to express it. I'm not super-skilled in English Language
Dec 18, 2021 19:25
It's a good anwser, has 4 votes, that means the question actually makes sense. A -1 score doesn't actually prove that the question is bad
Dec 18, 2021 19:24
The EE question is a good one - the accepted answer has 4 votes
Dec 18, 2021 19:24
Dec 18, 2021 19:23
I think the page lacks basic information like how long the new ban lasts and how many upvotes I need to lift the ban
Dec 18, 2021 19:22
yw
Dec 18, 2021 19:21
Dec 18, 2021 19:20
I mean the Help Center is a link to history.stackexchange.com/help/question-bans
Dec 18, 2021 19:19
sure
Dec 18, 2021 19:19
Dec 18, 2021 19:19
When I push the button "Ask Question", it sends me to a page saying "You have reached your question limit
Sorry, we are no longer accepting questions from this account. See the Help Center to learn more."
Dec 18, 2021 19:19
Sure
Dec 18, 2021 19:18
ty
Dec 18, 2021 19:18
Ahh, now
 

 The Periodic Table

Haikus are awesome / Chemistry's even better / So pull up a chair
Mar 8, 2016 00:53
(for proteins) i mean
Mar 8, 2016 00:37
but the question already has an answer with 4 votes (mine not included) that confirms the claim.
Mar 8, 2016 00:35
no, unfortunately
Mar 8, 2016 00:03
So, I've fixed the problems of my only question on this site - cleared the language and removed the cross-posting, can anyone take a look at it and ask for re-opening (if it looks ok, ofc), please? - chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/44513/…
Mar 8, 2016 00:00
ahh it has a very faint button "Okay" at the bottom, i got it :D
Mar 8, 2016 00:00
Ehm, how can I close the chat bubble "Welcome to Stack Exchange chat! Keep these in mind: (..)" - it's always on top and can't see the last messages - sorry for dumb question :D