8:37 AM
> - "changes are not that deep"
- "we have been careful to maintain the storyline from the original game"
- Oh and here are the whispers, a massive story deviation that ends by destroying an entity called "fate"
- Barret dies in the remake, but whispers resurrect him
- Zack is alive at the end of Remake, dead in the original
- remake has Extra chapters that never even happened
- New trailers show whole party dead at the end of first game just before entering the "Crossroad of Fate", but alive a second later in another place
- "we have been careful to maintain the storyline from the original game"
- Oh and here are the whispers, a massive story deviation that ends by destroying an entity called "fate"
- Barret dies in the remake, but whispers resurrect him
- Zack is alive at the end of Remake, dead in the original
- remake has Extra chapters that never even happened
- New trailers show whole party dead at the end of first game just before entering the "Crossroad of Fate", but alive a second later in another place
> I’ve seen conflicting points FROM THESE SAME DIRECTORS, for example at tgs they make a big deal about how the future is up in the air and anything can happen, they have an ign interview where they in the same quote say it will follow the same story and then talk about how important Zack is gonna be and can’t spoil too much. Also on one of maxs videos there was an interview where they build up this “new mystery” in rebirth.
If you played ever crisis at the beginning of the game sephiroth confirms he’s remaking the events of the original, and they have a time traveling watermelon that deliv…
If you played ever crisis at the beginning of the game sephiroth confirms he’s remaking the events of the original, and they have a time traveling watermelon that deliv…
9:01 AM
and both those comments don't even mention the very first tv ads for the game, the one I quoted multiple times
> A- This is exactly why the "net generation" is... Another route... Something like that... Does not exist!
B- Sorry...
A- Right, mother?
(the mother just nods to agree)
B- Mother?
C- Aw, ther is no such thing? I thought there was...
A- However, young one.. The important talk starts here. What I have been talking about now.. is about the 1997 Original game. BUT! What we do from here on.. will happen in the new 2020 Final Fantasy Remake! FF7 of 2020! In FF7!
A- Has the past changed? no... Or it stayed the same?
B- Sorry...
A- Right, mother?
(the mother just nods to agree)
B- Mother?
C- Aw, ther is no such thing? I thought there was...
A- However, young one.. The important talk starts here. What I have been talking about now.. is about the 1997 Original game. BUT! What we do from here on.. will happen in the new 2020 Final Fantasy Remake! FF7 of 2020! In FF7!
A- Has the past changed? no... Or it stayed the same?
10:08 AM
problem is that apparently the monster then goes about details from the Remake plots, making its appearance canonical to the story.
The Servant of Two Masters (Italian: Il servitore di due padroni) is a comedy by the Italian playwright Carlo Goldoni written in 1746. Goldoni originally wrote the play at the request of actor Antonio Sacco, one of the great Harlequins in history. His earliest drafts had large sections that were reserved for improvisation, but he revised it in 1789 in the version that exists today. The play draws on the tradition of the earlier Italian commedia dell'arte.
== Plot ==
The play opens with the introduction of Beatrice, a woman who has traveled to Venice disguised as her dead brother in search of the...
5 hours later…
3 hours later…
Anyway, I stand my words. They crafted expectation from a different outcome, and if they don't deliver it they will be roasted
And trust me, they have played a lot with the "Aerith lives" thing, even more the average Joe realizes
« first day (1886 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (409 days later) »