[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Body starts with title and ends in url, link at beginning of body, link at end of body, potentially bad ip for hostname in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, +2 more (338): Video Sharing Websites by godsofseo godsofseo on superuser.com (@Ollie)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of answer, potentially bad ip for hostname in answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (64): Disable Profile Creation on Firefox by Ashok Kumar on superuser.com (@Ollie)
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
@cigien That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in link text in body, bad keyword with email in body, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, +1 more (222): Industrial parks in india -onehubchennai by onehubchennai on superuser.com (@Ollie)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in link text in body, bad keyword with email in body, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, +1 more (222): Industrial parks in india -onehubchennai by onehubchennai on superuser.com (@Ollie)
@Dharman Super fishy, and probably worth a mod flag. That many answers certainly hints at undisclosed affiliation, though I was unable to find any that reference "ram" or anything to do with that SO account. A PII match could confirm.
@Dharman Hmm, this user ramesh k, is basically the same as "ram", which is the one you linked, and has 4 answers linking to the domain. Still no affiliation I can see, but makes it even more likely to be spam. That's now 31/42 hits on SO :(
@Dharman Ok, I've flagged the "ram"s. I mentioned the deleted posts from other profiles as well. I think that covers it, but I'll take a look later today to see if any got missed (flags will likely have been handled by then).
For about a week now, SD reports in SOCVR don't get auto-deleted even if the post is deleted within 2 minutes. I'm not sure if this is happening in other rooms that get SD reports as well. Is this a bug, or an intentional change in behavior?
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
