« first day (3715 days earlier)      last day (1193 days later) » 

12:15 AM
The nomenklatura of the Soviet Union and Eastern bloc were certainly elite, elitist, and communist. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nomenklatura
 
Communists in power may become part of an elite.
But not in a Western country.
 
12:45 AM
@Færd What, are we auditioning for Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead?
@Cerberus All I'm saying is I'm fine with Twitter banning Trump. It's their platform, their call.
Right now, armed protests are being planned for all 50 states on Sunday. Armed protests. Is that protected speech?
 
More than 1.2 million COVID-19 vaccinations were reported in the U.S. today, the biggest one-day increase on record
 
Only 350 million to go!
 
> 'whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.'
 
1:03 AM
@Robusto When a platform is—alack!—so important, I think Merkel is right and it should be the state who limits someone's access to it, not some millionaire.
Trump cannot possibly reach the same audience on any other platform in the same way.
 
@Cerberus That's not how free enterprise works.
 
Fuck free enterprise.
 
@Cerberus Gee, that makes me feel so ... sad.
@Cerberus OK, don't let me stop you. You sell socialism to the USA.
 
As with the Turkish coup, I must disapprove of the means, but I'm secretly happy with the (potential) result.
 
1:15 AM
The 15 July 2016 coup d'état (Turkish: 15 Temmuz darbe girişimi) was attempted in Turkey against state institutions, including the government and President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. The attempt was carried out by a faction within the Turkish Armed Forces that organized themselves as the Peace at Home Council. They attempted to seize control of several key places in Ankara, Istanbul, Marmaris and elsewhere, but failed to do so after forces loyal to the state defeated them. The Council cited an erosion of secularism, elimination of democratic rule, disregard for human rights, and Turkey's loss of...
Muhammed Fethullah Gülen (born 27 April 1941) is a Turkish Islamic scholar, preacher, and a one-time opinion leader (as de facto leader of the Gülen movement: an international, faith-based civil society organization once aligned with Turkey's government, but since then outlawed as an alleged "armed terrorist group"). Gülen is designated an influential Ottomanist, Anatolian panethnicist, Islamic poet, writer, social critic, and activist–dissident developing a Nursian theological perspective that embraces democratic modernity, as a citizen of Turkey (until his denaturalization by the government in...
@Robusto If the USA reaches 1.5 mn/day, that will be 0.5% per day. In only 10 days the USA would then vaccinate a whole 5% of population, and in 40 days, 20% of population, which will permit vaccination of the majority of the elderly. Not bad!
 
@Cerberus I cannot but imagine that Mrs Merkel’s opinion would differ substantially if we were talking about Twitter providing a dissemination platform for use by the leader of some armed and arm-banded neo-Nazi militia calling for his followers to armor-up for a massive show of force at the Reichstag after flooding them with extremist lies and propaganda determined to overthrow her goverment.
 
This just in: Bill Belichick, winningest coach in (American) professional football history, just refused the Presidential Medal of Freedom which Trump wanted to award him.
@CowperKettle It certainly would be an improvement at this point.
 
Which, if you think about it, really is what happened here on Wednesday.
 
@tchrist And let's not forget that Germany absolutely forbids use of the swastika, period.
 
I keep thinking of Arnie's recent Kristallnacht video that he made about the Wednesday insurrection.
 
1:23 AM
@tchrist Why?
That is exactly the scenario she has considered.
 
How so?
Nobody has to give the Nazis a voice.
 
Well, it's the most obvious extreme scenario that we all keep in mind?
 
That just is not right.
It's not just "the most obvious extreme scenario". These were those people.
 
The point is not whether or not they should have a voice, but who may take it away from them.
 
Carrying the flags of rebellion, the t-shirts of Auschwitz.
 
1:26 AM
6 mins ago, by Robusto
@tchrist And let's not forget that Germany absolutely forbids use of the swastika, period.
 
This is a private business, even with monopoly power, which has not been federalized that I know of.
 
What is bare butt's wincing navel? 🤨🤔
 
Something only very very skinny people like long-distance runners have.
I'm kidding. I don't know.
 
@CowperKettle I believe that is a flowery reference to someone's asshole.
(Arsehole for you Brits.)
 
And right rooting is a flowery reference to homosexual sex?
 
1:30 AM
@tchrist You fall into the trap of thinking of what is, not of what ought to be.
 
@CowperKettle Dunno.
 
@CowperKettle I have no idea.
 
Jinx.
 
@Cerberus What do you mean? Is Twitter being taken over by the government what ought to be?
 
The rest of the poem doesn't make too much sense to me either without deeper scrutiny.
@tchrist Regulated by the government.
 
1:32 AM
@Cerberus Once in a while we all have to face reality and deal with it as a practical matter.
 
My sister in law told me the European Commission and the member-states are actually working on exactly that.
 
They'll love that.
Well, they are already regulated by the German government if they aren't allowed to swastika there.
 
The German Strafgesetzbuch (Criminal Code) in section § 86a outlaws "use of symbols of unconstitutional organizations" outside the contexts of "art or science, research or teaching". The law does not name the individual symbols to be outlawed, and there is no official exhaustive list. However, the law has primarily been used to outlaw Nazi, Communist, and Islamic extremist symbols. The law was adopted during the Cold War and notably affected the Communist Party of Germany, which was banned as unconstitutional in 1956, the Socialist Reich Party (banned in 1952) and several small far-right parties...
 
> The German Strafgesetzbuch (Criminal Code) in section § 86a outlaws "use of symbols of unconstitutional organizations" outside the contexts of "art or science, research or teaching".
The law does not name the individual symbols to be outlawed, and there is no official exhaustive list. However, the law has primarily been used to outlaw Nazi, Communist, and Islamic extremist symbols. The law was adopted during the Cold War and notably affected the Communist Party of Germany, which was banned as unconstitutional in 1956, the Socialist Reich Party (banned in 1952) and several small far-right
 
1:33 AM
18 hours ago, by Faheem Mitha
Ideally there would be some kind of judicial process instead of someone saying, right, that's it, your access is cut off. It's a general problem with private entities, not about a specific instance.
 
So it's not just Nazis, it's also Communist and Islamic extremist symbols.
 
I just can't imagine that the government gets to tell a private entity whom they can or cannot do business with.
 
So Angela Merkel, to you I say "Physician, heal thyself."
 
Except when an entire nation falls under sanctions.
Then you aren't allowed to do business with their businesses.
 
@tchrist Even in America, many large companies are already regulated.
 
1:35 AM
That's kind of what sanctioning is about, or is so in part.
 
Like electricity, Internet access.
 
@Cerberus The big (anti)social-media companies are very much afraid of this because it's their golden goose.
 
They are not regulated enough.
But they are already regulated.
In any case, this is not about how things are, but about how they ought to be.
 
You can never trust them, with anything, at all.
 
1:37 AM
@Cerberus OK, get those companies regulated, then we'll talk. Meantime, it's a moot point.
 
@tchrist "It"...
@Robusto So you say.
 
Well, it is. We are mooting it right now.
Tell me we are not.
moot: a. Subject to debate; arguable or unsettled: v.tr. a. To bring up (a subject) for discussion or debate.
 
@Tim Leo Tolstoy was part of the elite (nobility) but was non-elitist.
 
@Cerberus seems to be what you are talking about.
 
Perhaps I would have done the same thing, if I had been Twitter.
 
1:41 AM
The Tolstoyan movement is a social movement based on the philosophical and religious views of Russian novelist Leo Tolstoy (1828–1910). Tolstoy's views were formed by rigorous study of the ministry of Jesus, particularly the Sermon on the Mount. Tolstoy expressed "great joy" that groups of people "have been springing up, not only in Russia but in various parts of Europe, who are in complete agreement with our views." However, the author also thought it was a mistake to create a specific movement or doctrine after him, urging individuals to listen to their own conscience rather than blindly follow...
 
But the decision ought not to have been Twitter's.
@tchrist It was Tim who asked.
 
> They attempt to live an ascetic and simple life, preferring to be vegetarian, non-smoking, teetotal and chaste. Tolstoyans are considered Christian pacifists and advocate nonresistance in all circumstances.
 
What is this, some attempt to unite EU and USA?
 
@Cerberus The British are coming?
 
@Cerberus Those are historical US flags.
 
1:48 AM
You must not know our flag.
jinx again
The Betsy Ross flag is an early design of the flag of the United States, named for early American upholsterer and flag maker Betsy Ross. The pattern of the Betsy Ross flag is 13 alternating red-and-white stripes with stars in a field of blue in the upper left corner canton. Its distinguishing feature is thirteen 5-pointed stars arranged in a circle representing the 13 colonies that fought for their independence during the American Revolutionary War. == Betsy Ross story == Betsy Ross (1752–1836) was an upholsterer in Philadelphia who produced uniforms, tents, and flags for Continental forces...
 
Where do you think the EU got the idea for the circle of stars?
 
Funny.
 
Also, where do you think the US got the 13-red-and-white-striped flag from?
Apr 20 '20 at 13:55, by Robusto
The flag of the East India Company represented the British East India Company between 1600 and 1874. The flag was altered as the nation changed from England to Great Britain to the United Kingdom. It was initially a red and white striped ensign with the flag of England in canton. The flag was later updated to include the flag of Great Britain and flag of the United Kingdom in 1707 and 1801 respectively, as the nation developed. It was succeeded by the Star of India series of flags. == English control == Upon receiving Royal Assent to trade in the Indian Ocean by Queen Elizabeth I in 1600, the...
 
Wrong quarter...
 
Different canton.
But notice I said "13-red-and-white-striped flag".
And, indeed, those flags are the same in that respect.
 
1:51 AM
Odd.
 
The flag of Hawaii (Hawaiian: Ka Hae Hawaiʻi) has previously been used by the kingdom, protectorate, republic, and territory of Hawaii. It is the only US state flag to include a foreign country's national flag. The inclusion of the Union Jack of the United Kingdom is a mark of the British Empire's historical relations with the Hawaiian Kingdom, particularly with King Kamehameha I. The flag continued to be used after the 1893 overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom. == Origins == While many older Native Hawaiians prior to 1921 had erroneously believed the current flag of Hawaii was created by Captain...
 
@tchrist: One of your congresspersons faces arrest in connection with the Capitol riot.
 
@Robusto Ojalá
 
May Section 3 of the 14th Amendment have no mercy on her.
 
2:04 AM
"Eia, eia, eia! Alala!"?
 
Nov 11 '18 at 23:12, by Mitch
Blorp
 
That, too.
 
> Donanemab (Eli Lilly), an investigational antiamyloid therapy, significantly slowed decline in a composite measure of cognition and daily function in patients with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD)
Wow, might be the first ever anti-Alz drug
 
2:21 AM
One wonders how great the effect is. Does it say?
A score improved by 5% is not that promising, for example.
 
@Cerberus I don't think they would have said "significantly slowed decline" if the improvement were only 5%.
 
@Cerberus IKR!
10 hours ago, by Mitch
If you use that you'll explode
 
@tchrist Funny you should say that. Maybe that Section can rid us from Trump as well.
 
@Robusto it sounds pretty small, but 5% can be considered revolutionary, especially if it is starting from absolutely no treatment
alzheimer's ... they barely know how to diagnose it (until... afterwards)
 
@Robusto Well, a great many studies claim beneficial effects when those are in fact in the single digits.
So I think it is possible.
 
2:36 AM
was there an actual article to link to?
 
@Cerberus OK.
 
@Mitch Agreed, it is promising.
@Mitch Not that I know.
You really thought I was going to inform myself on a subject before talking about it on the Internet!?
 
@Cerberus but to be the devil's devil's advocate, it really isn't -that- much to make a difference to individuals.
@Cerberus it could happen
 
I want a drug that gives me back the memory I had when I was 10 years old.
 
@Mitch Yes, so it would be interesting as a first step, if the percentage should be low; but, in order to really make a difference, that percentage would need to be increased eventually.
@Mitch Naah.
 
2:47 AM
@Robusto I remembered a shit load of dumb stuff as a 10 year old
for example
 
@Mitch Exactly. I want it all back. Dumb stuff and everything else.
 
goddamit my much older me has forgotten
@Robusto Holy crap, I just remembered where i parked the car, thirty years ago.
I wonder if you could get rid of brain plaque like with a little hole in your skull, some rinsing wash and a stiff bristled brush
seriously
maybe not the brush
 
@Mitch Doesn't that sound suspiciously like Trump's cure for Covid?
 
like a vodka watermelon, you make a hole in a watermelon, poor in a bottle of vodka, and viola, a vodka watrmelon.
 
When I do a 50-mile ride in July, afterwards I have been known to eat a whole quarter of a watermelon by myself. Talk about rehydrating ...
 
2:55 AM
@Robusto little known fact, the whole uv light in your lungs -would- actually get rid of the virus. but only where the light shines, which is super hard in the lungs because it is so brachiated.
which is to say that a broken clock is sometimes right twice a day
@Robusto I really feel like I'm missing something but I just can't get excited about watermelon. a lot of work for somewhat insubstantial watermelon meat stuff.
and your fingers and face are all sticky afterwards
 
I love it. But only when I really need sugar and hydration.
 
I mean it's good but
if there's ice cream too, I'll have the ice cream
 
Today is hot chocolate weather.
No watermelon, please.
 
or hot apple cider
 
3:12 AM
> Speaker 1: “I can’t say anything.”
Speaker 2: “That’s fine, then I can say nothing, too.”
Speaker 3: “You’re both mice! I can’t possibly say nothing.”
Speaker 4: “Me, neither. I can’t not say anything.”
That one's for you, @Mitch. Any unacceptable "negatives" there? :)
Horn’s Law applies here: Simplex Negatio Negat; Duplex Negatio Affirmat; Triplex Negatio Confundit.
Also, how many "negatives" in each of those four?
Or even: "I can't not say anything either, sorry."
> "Even if two negatives make a positive, two positives never make a negative."

"Yeah sure."
It is not clear to me that negation is nothing but a parity bit.
How can that be the most diverse Cabinet ever? They're all lavender!
 
3:39 AM
@tchrist confundido is right.#4 is super hard for me to figure out "I can't not say nothing" makes sense (= "I must say nothing")
 
1 and 2 say nothing. 3 and 4 say something.
"Could you please not say anything?" "No, sorry, that won't be possible. I can't not say anything."
 
 
2 hours later…
5:29 AM
> Notably, the people with ASD were especially likely to have very large CNVs, with some involving 25 percent or more of a chromosome. The CNVs spanned a median of 7.8 million bases in the ASD group, versus 0.59 million bases in controls.
Autistic persons have mosaic copy number variations in their genome.
> "This is one of the more interesting and surprising aspects of our study," says Sherman, the paper's first author and a Ph.D. student at MIT. "The kids with ASD had very large CNVs that often hit dozens of genes, and likely included genes important for development. If the CNVs were in all their cells, rather than in a mosaic pattern, they would likely be lethal."
 
 
2 hours later…
7:06 AM
Eight people died from suffocation in a fire in Yekaterinburg this night, including a child.
I'm thinking about buying a special mask with a chemical filter that allows you to survive for up to 30 minutes in a fire smoke.
Because it's a horrible death.
They call such masks "samospasatel" or shortly "samospas" (self-savior)
 
7:48 AM
Trump will be sentenced to death for inciding a coup, but allowed one last tweet before death.
 
 
2 hours later…
9:34 AM
@RegDwigнt Because there's a thing called "freedom of speech". Generally considered important.
 
 
1 hour later…
11:02 AM
> Louis Armand de Lom d'Arce Lahontan — 'To survive the Canadian winter, one needs a body of brass, eyes of glass, and blood made of brandy.'
 
12:05 PM
Is it crazy yet?
 
Youtube has been demonitising LBGT+ channels (for no reason) for years. Twitter has been allowing hate speech to disenfranchise people for years. Facebook has been spreading misinformation for years. You see a couple of accounts get suspended, and now things look bad? Puhleez
3
 
I spoke against demonetizing leftist channels somewhere else. I'm not aware of the full scope, but YT did sap many right-wing channels as well. Twitter has also allowed hate speech for left and right. All that said, how would one breach or aggression justify another breach or aggression?
 
12:28 PM
The State Prosecutor's Office of Russia has demanded today that Alexey Navalny's provisional sentence in a trumped-up (and stricken down by European Court) case of 2014 be replaced with a real incarceration. novayagazeta.ru/news/2021/01/12/…
Isn't it funny, after failing to poison him they are still trying to jail him.
His subscription base on YouTube has increased by 260 thousand people in the last couple of months.
Putin's New Year address was watched by 26 mn Russians, while Navalny's investgation of his own poisoning has been wached 22 mn times.
 
@Færd My point is not justification, but that "Is it crazy yet?" seems to forget that it's been crazy for years
2
social media has been in control of what we can see (on social media) from day 1.
 
12:44 PM
@MattE.Эллен Yes, but that control is qualified and changeable in response to demands from various external factors like the public. People can encroach on their control, as they can encroach on people's freedom.
You should come to Iran for a while and see what real control of media looks like.
 
1:04 PM
@Færd I'll have to defer to you on that. However, there is a reason the website doesthedogdie.com has a section for lgbt deaths on screen, why so many TV shows are pro-police, pro-military, or pro the nuclear family, and it's not market forces.
 
1:17 PM
Today I learned:
Roderigue Hortalez and Company was a corporation created by Luis de Unzaga as coordinator of interests of Spain and France in may of 1775 in order to provide arms and financial assistance to American Revolutionaries in anticipation of the American Revolutionary War against Britain. The ruse was organized by Pierre-Augustin Caron de Beaumarchais, a French playwright, watch-maker, inventor, musician, politician, fugitive, spy, publisher, arms-dealer, and revolutionary. Weapons and materials were procured to help the Americans fight the British, enemies of France at the time, through the corporation...
> Before the Declaration of Independence was even signed, weapons and other necessities were already flowing via the ostensibly neutral Dutch island of St. Eustatius. Muskets, cannons, cannonballs, gunpowder, bombs, mortars, tents, and enough clothing for 30,000 men were sent.
The Brits should have banned George Washington from Twitter.
Or maybe Ben Franklin
 
 
1 hour later…
2:46 PM
@CowperKettle Hurray, Wikipaedia uses the word ostensible correctly.
Or so it appears (not: ostends).
 
3:15 PM
@Cerberus I can't recall ever seeing anyone use ostends in print. Nor have I heard it spoken.
 
Yeah, I don't read much philosophy.
 
 
2 hours later…
5:08 PM
1
A: Why does Steven Pinker say that “can’t” + “any” is just as much of a double-negative as “can’t” + “no” is in “I can’t get no/any satisfaction”?

David Schwartz I understand his broader point about one dialect being chosen over another as "the correct one", due to where the political power was, but I don't understand why "can't get any" is a double-negative. If "I can't get any satisfaction" and "I can't get no satisfaction" mean the same thing, and th...

@tchrist: New accepted answer on that question you linked the other day. ^
 
5:22 PM
> BTW, "incitement to violets" should read "incitement to violence"; I have nothing against violets.
 
If 2+2 and 2² mean the same thing (4), and if ² is an exponent, then +2 must also be an exponent. — Cerberus_Reinstate_Monica 33 secs ago
 
@Cerberus Well said.
 
The problem with applying pure logic to language is that this can usually be done in several different ways, depending on interpretation.
So it is best not to only apply simple logic to language, without considering the broader context, the possibility that there are things one didn't think of, etc.
 
Aug 1 '12 at 16:06, by Robusto
> "No language makes perfect sense." — John McWhorter
 
Heh.
 
5:28 PM
@Cerberus And you could as easily substitute "sexual" for "any" in that sentence ("I can't get sexual satisfaction") and conclude that "sexual" was a negative.
 
@Robusto Hah.
Would that sentence then mean exactly the same thing as the version with no?
 
According to his logic, I guess so.
 
Perhaps it does if the only satisfaction you could get was sexual.
So context is key.
In other words:
The meaning of a part follows from the meaning of the whole no more than the converse.
@Robusto It was quite normal in the 15th century.
 
@Cerberus So if you distend your belly to show it to someone, you are actually ostending it?
 
@Robusto Indeed.
Tend = stretch.
When you os-tend something, you stretch or tend it in front of someone, from ob/obs-/os-, "in the way of, in fronf of". Cf. ob-vius, from via "way", [adjective] "in someone's way", i.e. you'll practically stub your toe on it.
 
5:51 PM
@FaheemMitha Freedom of speech only applies to state organizations, never to private ones.
If I come to your home or office and start shouting "Kill all niggers! Kill all niggers!", you are very much free to call the police to escort me off the premises. I cannot hide behind freedom of speech. It is your home and your office.
Twitter is not a government organization. It is a company.
It can block absolutely anyone it wants, for any reason whatsoever, or a complete lack thereof.
It may well say in its ToS that anyone that mentions the word "rainbow" gets blocked for life. Or that you can't use their service at all if you're French. Or a woman.
Your site, your rules. You are not the state. You are you.
 
@RegDwigнt That's quite correct. Which is why running discourse through private organizations is a bad idea.
 
Well yes.
And yet we're running this discourse here through a private organization.
 
For the record, I was originally responding to:
yesterday, by RegDwigнt
Why is it news. Who the fuck cares if person X was blocked from accessing sewage plant Y.
@RegDwigнt The irony is not lost on me.
 
6:06 PM
I know. I know how to follow the arrows.
 
Just for the sake of clarity. And to avoid confusion.
@RegDwigнt I'm sure you do.
 
As I said, your sewage plant is your sewage plant. It is not the Congress. If you say "no Russians allowed" then no Russians allowed.
 
@RegDwigнt Well, you said "who cares"? I think people should care.
 
Anyhoo.
The only problem with Twitter is that Twitter exists.
 
I.e. that corporations can do arbitrary things at their whim.
 
6:08 PM
@FaheemMitha yes, and I disagree. I think way too many people care way too much.
 
@RegDwigнt I'm not a fan of Twitter myself, but I hear it has its uses.
@RegDwigнt I wasn't talking about the degree of caring.
There are certainly other issues.
 
The whole situation is the direct result of anyone at all caring about Trump at all.
I think by now it should be painfully obvious that the only way out is to not give a fuck about that fucker.
 
@RegDwigнt A lot of people voted for him. Twice. I think that got us to where we are.
 
Anastasia Panchenko from Krasnodar is charged with "denigrating Vladimir Putin"
She only made a post in Instagram saying that it is Putin who is an extremist, not Navalny
And voila, she is in the police station.
Lese-Majeste laws in Russia kicked in really hard this year.
Lèse-majesté ( or ), a French term meaning "to do wrong to majesty", is an offence against the dignity of a reigning sovereign or against a state. This behaviour was first classified as a criminal offence against the dignity of the Roman Republic of ancient Rome. In the Dominate, or Late Empire period, the emperors eliminated the republican trappings of their predecessors and began to equate the state with themselves. Although legally the princeps civitatis (his official title, meaning, roughly, 'first citizen') could never become a sovereign because the republic was never officially abolished...
 
You've been making daily posts in this room saying that Putin is an extremist for three years now, and voila, you're not in the police station.
 
6:11 PM
@RegDwigнt Nobody reads Stack Exchange chat. Except the people who are here, possibly.
And probably not all of them.
 
@FaheemMitha nobody reads Anastasia Panchenko, either. This is literally the first time anybody has heard of her.
 
@RegDwigнt I wouldn't know.
 
@FaheemMitha you very much would, from personal experience.
 
@RegDwigнt I don't follow.
 
@RegDwigнt Yes, because they target more visible persons, and do it at random, in order to instill fear in people. As was the case when Vladimir Putin ordered the poisoning of Alexey Navalny - to show a lesson to others. In Putin's criminal way.
@RegDwigнt She is a member of a local Alexey Navalny headquarters
Of course not many people know her, but Krasnodar police is known for being especially crazy in pursuing innocent people.
 
6:22 PM
Hear hear. He uses Putin's methods. In order to instill fear in people.
 
@FaheemMitha What?
 
@FaheemMitha you read Stack Exchange chat. But you don't read that other girl whose name you've already forgotten.
So that's SE 1, girl 0 right there.
 
@Mitch Not all the people who are idling in Chat are actually reading chat. That's what I meant to say.
 
Oh, even those who are active are never actually reading.
 
@RegDwigнt It's possible that more people read that girl's posts, because she's on social media. Vs messages SE, which isn't social media. Happily.
 
6:27 PM
Yes, and it's possible that my ass will sprout wings and fly me to space.
 
@RegDwigнt STAND BACK
Nov 30 '12 at 15:00, by Mitch
@KitFox I cannot read. I can only write.
 
Welcome to the Internet.
Nov 5 '15 at 11:34, by RegDwigнt
The bane of the Internet age. Everyone always writes. No one ever reads.
 
Like Finnegan's Wake
 
@RegDwigнt Have I been doing it wrong then?
 
maybe I'm just reading and never writing. and you can't tell because
because well I'm not writing
maybe not reading either
 
6:31 PM
@RegDwigнt I read. I just don't read everything.
 
@Mitch I'm pretty sure you read that single sentence you wrote.
 
@Færd what?
All I read is "@Mitch blah lbhla blhlab lhalbh lahblahl bl"
 
@Mitch I'M PRETTY SURE...
Oh never mind.
 
@Færd objective achieved
 
Sly!
 
6:38 PM
woo hoo!
cake for.a day!
 
6:58 PM
@RegDwigнt I disagree.
I'm not talking about legal definitions, but about what matters in society.
 
7:24 PM
@FaheemMitha No?
@RegDwigнt Private organizations are also a sub branch of the whole society as the state organizations are. So they cannot invent rules and make their own land there, the rules must also be a subset of the whole set.
I'm not into politics but can't stand your reasoning which is wrong.
 
8:07 PM
Every time I start answering a question on this site I get a couple sentences in and decide it's not worth the effort.
2
 
8:36 PM
Then you must write faster.
Get your sentences in before the mood leaves you.
 
Meh.
Been there, done that. Nothing is really interesting here anymore.
 
8:51 PM
By the way, the Latin site has existed for about four and a half years.
It gets about 2 questions daily.
How much reputation do you think our most active user has?
 
@Cerberus 90,332?
Just a wild guess ...
 
@Robusto You cheat.
 
^_^
 
But don't you think that number is huge, for a tiny, youngish site?
 
Pretty big. How does it compare in points-per-question? Is the site heavily trafficked?
I had 50K rep on ELU in about 9 months, IIRC.
 
8:59 PM
@Robusto Certainly not!
 
A dedicated following, perhaps?
 
We get about 80,000 visits monthly.
For the entire Latin stack.
Our most-voted question of all time is from 2017, having received 77 votes, and 28,000 views.
Oh, there is a question with 61,000 views.
On English, we have a question with a score of 611 votes, and we have one with a million views.
 
A Yoichi question?
I think Yoichi must have a following in Japan, on other social media, which he then cross-posts and gets lots of eyeballs. There is no other explanation for why he gets such interest in questions about periodicals.
 
9:22 PM
Really?
 
@Gigili That's ... I don't know ... creepy?
 
Creepy is the right word.
 
No pienso mucho en las flores plásticas.
 
Is there anybody on this planet as disgusting as Trump? I wonder.
@Robusto Bonne nuit.
 
@Gigili It's a small group. Kim Jong Un, Vladimir Putin, Dutarte in the Philippines, Bolsonaro in Brazil ...
 
9:31 PM
I get an itchy rash whenever I hear his voice.
 
I see his face and I just want him to disappear. I can't wait till I never have to see him or hear him again.
8 more days and counting ...
 
11:21 PM
@Robusto McCarthy lifted the whip in the House, which means it's now a free vote. Although not the first House Republican to declare so, Liz Cheney has publicly stated that she is going to vote to impeach. And McConnell seems to have let leak that he welcomes impeachment as a chance to purge his party of the Trumpistas.
 
> McConnell seems to have let leak that he welcomes impeachment as a chance to purge his party of the Trumpistas.
!
 
@tchrist The way I see all this is that whew the Republicans are starting to see that siding with trump will be toxic for their future, but...
 
@Mitch No bigger butt hath a partisan than....
 
...there's still a bunch of rabid nazis in the populace (and some hidden (shit is that a dogwhistle for 'crypto'?)) that very well may start a country wide armed insurrection that the legal armed forces will have questionable ability to control.
So there are plusses and minusses.
and hippopotamussesses
 
11:33 PM
Did you watch Colbert’s monologue from last night?
 
some hidden in leadershp...that's what I meant to qualify with
@tchrist To be frank, I think Stephen Colbert is great, had the oppportunity to see his show live once when in NYC, but...
and it's a big one...
 
I've never seen him like this.
 
I haven't been able to watch it for the past for years because it isn't funny to me any more. Too close to the inner rage.
that I share
 
Yes, that's the thing. He didn't hide it at all.
 
and I don't need that extra anxiety multiplied by someone else repeating the things I'm feeling.
I want something to not worry about while I'm asleep.
 
11:35 PM
The FBI is tracking some real plots right now.
 
like kittens nodding off
or dogs falling backwards off beds
or an elephant calf sliding down a muddy hill
I'm sensing a theme
Or Jackie Chan blithely stepping over a hall twice his height
theme broken
I will not watch before going to bed
news
 
So this is a problem. I did. Ruined my sleep. I'm a zombie today.
 
a Russian dude and his girlfriend doing handstands on the edge of a 15 story abandoned warehouse
(it's always a dude and his girlfriend, not the other way around)
@tchrist exactly
 
...that relaxes you?
 
for fun I like to peruse the comparison of prices for obtaining citizenship in countries with tropical weather.
@Cerberus no no no...that -doesn't relax me in the same way that the news doesn't relax me.
in that it doesn't
relax me
 
at all
quite the opposite
like a baby with a hammer whacking on the end of a mortar shell
like a dude (or chick) lighting up a cigarette while pumping gas
Like a bird cleaning the teeth of a crocodile
> Authoritarian regime aside, XXXXX is a magical country with stunning geography, archaeological sites for days, and access to all of Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and Africa with short flights. If you want to move here, you’ll have to invest in real estate or deposit a chunk of change in a local bank. Real estate minimums are around $250,000 plus fees. The best part of XXXXXX is that the cost of living can be as low as $700 a month.
how's the internet speed though
 

« first day (3715 days earlier)      last day (1193 days later) »