« first day (3523 days earlier)      last day (1401 days later) » 

12:08 AM
@UlrikeFischer @JosephWright This is the offender: github.com/latex3/latex3/blob/…
 
 
1 hour later…
1:26 AM
I put \input{main.bbl} in my main.tex file, where the bibliography commands used to be. I submitted to arXiv, and the PDF that arXiv generated has an ugly bibliography where lines do not wrap properly:
 
@user1271772 -- Ick! It looks like the journal titles are set in unbreakable boxes. But without more information (or previous experience, which I don't have) it's not possible to say more.
 
This is what the same references look like when I run pdflatex on my own laptop!
@barbarabeeton You seem to be very correct. Every other example of lines not wrapping properly in this bibliography, corresponded to cases in which the journal titles were long. Very strange that the journal titles become hyphenated when I run pdflatex myself, but do not when arXiv compiles it. Do you have any idea how to force the journal titles to get hyphenated?
 
1:51 AM
@user1271772 -- I've never uploaded anything to arXiv, so I don't know if they have any idiosyncratic versions of document classes or packages. I assume that you inserted your .bbl file into the .tex file. (I believe that's part of arXiv's instructions.) A question on the main site with a small compilable example (two or three of the bib items should be enough, as long as you start with \documentclass and end with \end{document}) would get more exposure.
 
Exactly, I actually used \input{main.bbl} into the .tex file, in the place where the bibliography commands used to be.
 
@user1271772 -- you did keep the \bibstyle in the .tex file?
 
I'm having trouble doing multi-line code in this chat box!
I commented out \bibliographystyle{apsrev4-1} and {\tiny \bibliography{bib.bib}} and added input{main.bbl}
I'm quite inexperienced so it might have been the wrong thing to do! I did according to this answer:
23
A: How to obtain and use the .bbl file in my tex document for ArXiv submission?

MenschStart with an new directory. Copy your file mwe.tex and mwe.bib inside it. File mwe.bib: @Book{Goossens, author = {Goossens, Michel and Mittelbach, Frank and Samarin, Alexander}, title = {The LaTeX Companion}, edition = {1}, publisher = {Addison-Wesley}, loca...

 
@user1271772 -- I'm not sure, but I would have left the \bibliographystyle line in.
 
Okay that answer on TeX Stack Exchange has it commented, but I will try now with it left in!
 
2:05 AM
@user1271772 -- For information, my experience is with AMS documents, not physics. So I can make reasonable guesses at what the surface problem is, but not always how to fix it if non-AMS conventions are used.
 
@barbarabeeton Unfortunately uncommenting \bibliographystyle didn't help :'( arXiv is still producing bad PDFs!
Okay. I seem to have used amsmath and amssymb, but also aps and revtex4-1
\documentclass[british,english,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,aps,notitlepage,twocolumn]{revtex4-1}
This is one of the .bbl entries that doesn't wrap properly, I've never looked at a .bbl entry before, but does it not seem there's too many unnecessary brackets? The \bibfiled and \bibinfo are both new to me too.
 
2:24 AM
@barbarabeeton I now have a MWE that is 5 lines long for the main.tex, however the .bbl file has 42 lines starting with \providecommand which makes it quite bulky. I worry that deleting these lines might cause my example to lose whatever it is that's causing arXiv not to like it. How would I proceed?
My MWE compiles perfectly in Overleaf, meaning that the journal title gets hyphenated correctly, but if I start removing lines from the .bbl, there is no guarantee that my example will contain whatever causes it not to work in arXiv.
 
@user1271772 -- I'm not familiar with \bibinfo either. This really needs attention from someone who is familiar with the apsrev4-1 style. But I would guess that the version of the document class you have on your own system is not the same that is being used by arXiv, because the same .bbl file is being used. Very puzzling.
 
@barbarabeeton I'm not very familiar with asking questions on TeX.SE, and what the etiquette would be about MWE. I heard that people can be quite harsh when people don't provide a proper MWE. I have a 5-line main.tex, but I'm unsure what to include in my .bbl?
 
 
3 hours later…
5:55 AM
@user1271772 arxiv uses an rather old tex system. Yours is probably newer and the is the cause of the difference.
 
6:08 AM
@HenriMenke I'll sort it today
 
yo'
6:54 AM
@user1271772 switch the TeX Live version for the project in Overleaf (in the project's Menu) to 2017 -- that's a very similar setup to that of arXiv. Then you shall be able to debug the document and make it arXiv-ready.
 
@DavidCarlisle \something would need to be fully expandable and leave no trace (or has to catch the other prefixes and reinsert them as well), the question remains on how to know on which macro \global acts \global\def\foo#1{#1}\global\named\FOO#[something]{#[something]}. All in all, the limitation of putting \named before \global seems more reasonable.
@PhelypeOleinik just as unreadable as it would without using namedef in the first place.
 
7:53 AM
@barbarabeeton it won't do anything useful as bibtex isn't being used, so commenting it out makes sense.
@Skillmonlikestopanswers.xyz yes as i said there isn't a reasonable way to catch this, I was thinking you could be non-expandable as the following \def isn't but you are right that would make catching earlier prefixes hard, best not to step on to that slope
@user1271772 people aren't harsh but can get frustrated when people post (sometimes long) code that's essentially usless as you can not run it because it inputs files not provided, so if your test document is five lines and has just one \cite your matching bbl file just needs to have a single matching entry, basically something that people can copy, run in texlive2020 and see it working then run it in texlive2017 (like arciv) and see if it fails.
@user1271772 note that you were (somewhat unusually) setting the bibliography at \tiny size but in the non-bibtex version setting it at normal size. so the line breaking will be very different, perhaps you just want to add \raggedright before the \input
 
8:43 AM
@MarcelKrüger, Hi. Do you know whether there has been some progress on the OTF-dvilualatex-dvisvgm issue in the meantime? Q:tex.stackexchange.com/q/537281
 
@user1271772 type it elsewhere then paste it in, if the paste includes newlines a "fixed" button appears next to send which then indents it all by 4 spaces and marks it as a code block
 
yo'
@JosephWright Hi! Are there any plans to provide \int_to_symbols_repeated:nnn that would go x y z aa bb cc ... xx yy zz aaa bbb ccc?
 
9:21 AM
@yo' Not at present: I guess you are thinking of \int_to_alph:n past 26? That's at the typesetting end as there are multiple possible schemes (aa, A, za, ...)
 
yo'
@JosephWright actually not, for letters it's fine. I'm thinking *, §, †, ‡, **, §§, ††, ‡‡, ...
 
quack
 
yo'
for letters it's fine to have ac and ca, but for these symbols, †§ and §† are very hard to distinguish, and also it simply looks ugly :D
 
@JosephWright no need for a DVD, sir. Unless UK-TUG wants to show her love for me. :)
 
yo'
@PauloCereda *, §, †, ‡, quack, **, §§, ††, ‡‡, quackquack, ...
 
9:23 AM
@yo' ooh an atomic quack
 
yo'
@PauloCereda \quark_new:N \q_quack
 
@PauloCereda OK
 
@yo' ooh a quantum duck
 
yo'
\cs_new:Nn \overleaf_int_to_repeatedsymbols:nnn {
    \prg_replicate:nn { 1 + \int_div_truncate:nn { #1 - 1 } { #2 } } {
        \int_to_symbols:nnn { 1 + \int_mod:nn { #1 - 1 } { #2 } } { #2 } { #3 }
    }
}
 
@yo' We used to have one for that, but it's not really something that belongs in the int module as a 'programming tool'. It's more some kind of meta-data typesetting thing
 
yo'
9:26 AM
@JosephWright that's IMHO a matter of point of view, but I'm not gonna argue :D
 
@JosephWright same for me really, unless it's easier for you to send to the full list than make individual actions per user. Can't recall last time I took a uktug or tug texlive dvd out of its envelope
 
@JosephWright oh, what a cold reply. :)
 
@DavidCarlisle I'll yank yours too :)
 
@PauloCereda rather have a hot oven?
 
@PauloCereda I have a big pile of DVDs to post, so keeping a track is ... interesting
 
9:27 AM
@DavidCarlisle Does UK-TUG still exist? Can I propose to remove the hyphen?
@DavidCarlisle oh no
@DavidCarlisle He even included a smiley thingy in your reply! Joseph is mean.
 
@yo' Like I said, we used to have that, but it got dropped (was \int_to_symbol:n, the issue being 'symbol' is open-ended). Probably we could have \l_int_symbol_seq here to provide the necessary abstraction: one for the LaTeX-L list?
 
@JosephWright let's have a install party!
 
yo'
@JosephWright yeah, well, for me the interface is interesting itself. I am able to write { 1 } { * } { 2 } { \S } { 3 } {$\dagger$ } { 4 } { $\ddagger$ }, but shuffling with all the +1 and -1 to make div and mod work correctly, that was a challenge :D
 
@yo' personally I think that these symbols are like arguments: when you need more than 9 something is wrong and you should reconsider the design.
 
yo'
@UlrikeFischer well, that's for sure; OTOH you want your code for this to be robust
 
9:34 AM
@yo' \ifcase\or*\or\dagger\or\ddagger\else don't be silly\fi
9
 
yo'
@DavidCarlisle :D
 
9:56 AM
@JosephWright dagger dagger dagger dagger dagger MUSHROOM MUSHROOM
 
@PauloCereda :)
 
@UlrikeFischer what about continuing with the full unicode emoticon plane? ;-P /duck
 
@Rmano Hi mr. squirrel!
 
@PauloCereda hi Mr. Pato
 
@Rmano ooh
 
 
1 hour later…
11:14 AM
Hi, any tikz expert here? Where can I find the style elements for an edge?
 
@UlrikeFischer Took a while altering the internals for color, but I think it's clearer what's happening: now I need to sort \color_export:nnN ;)
 
@JosephWright can you merge the master into it? Or is the new stuff already there?
 
11:31 AM
@UlrikeFischer I can merge if oyou are happy with it
 
@Gergely Hmmm --- there is a chapter "Connecting Nodes: Using the Edge Operation" around page 253 in my TikZ manual. I think that you can use most styles you can use in \draw.
 
@JosephWright I thought it would fail in dev and xparse would be missing, but it seems to work.
 
11:50 AM
@Rmano thanks.
 
@UlrikeFischer The only reason I'm on a branch is so we can finalise interfaces before I merge, so we don't have any questionable stuff in the release
@UlrikeFischer I think the interfaces for export and multi-models are done, it's just a question of rounding out exactly how they interact, so if you like the general approach I can merge and finish on master
 
@JosephWright no i didn't mean that you should merge into master, more the other way round: I thought I would run into format problems if I switch to the color branch, but it looks okay.
 
@UlrikeFischer Ah, right
@UlrikeFischer It does need some extra prop function variants, which I could cherry-pick to master
 
 
2 hours later…
2:33 PM
@DavidCarlisle On arXiv right now, it says "arXiv now processes new submissions and replacements with TeX Live 2016."
I removed the \tiny command completely. I tried both:
\raggedright
\input{main.bbl}

and

{
\raggedright
\input{main.bbl}
}

But both resulted in the same output on arXiv (which now uses TeXlive2016)
@yo' I just check "pdflatex --version" and it turns out that I'm using texlive 2015 !! The right-justification of my bibliography entries is perfect when I compile on my laptop with texlive2015 and also with Overleaf's defaults settings (whatever texlive that may be) and arXiv is using 2016
pdfTeX 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.16 (TeX Live 2015/Debian)
 
@JosephWright actually I was right: it broke with the unicode engines. Can you run lualatex-dev in this branch?
 
yo'
@user1271772 ah, I saw you posting an Overleaf screenshot, so I thought you're working there.
@user1271772 btw, arXiv has more of a TL17 than TL16, it's quite a hybrid installation
 
@yo' Correct, I was trying to make a minimum-working-example for Barbara Beeton.
 
yo'
(if we knew what exactly arXiv has, we'd quite likely introduce the same version at Overleaf too)
 
@yo' ok, I see it says TL16 here: arxiv.org/help/faq/texlive
 
yo'
2:47 PM
@user1271772 yep, but the package versions are mostly TL17
 
But you're probably right that it is a bit of a hybrid. In any case, my laptop is using TL15 and Overleaf is using something else, and both my laptop and Overleaf are doing it right, but arXiv is not!
@yo' Are you an Overleaf developer?
 
yo'
@user1271772 Overleaf yes, developer no :-) I'm on support
 
@yo' I see :)
So is this something inappropriate to ask as a question on the main site? The issue is that I have a minimum working example, that WORKS on my laptop and overleaf, but I don't know why arXiv is giving strange output, so maybe no one can help fix this without submitting something to arXiv and debugging back and forth?
 
@user1271772 if you post the example on the main site several of us have texlives of assorted ages and could try a tl2016 to see what happens...
@user1271772 are you still getting good justification with full size text and not \tiny?
 
@DavidCarlisle Sure. The TL version might not be the problem since my laptop uses TL2015 and Overleaf uses TL2020 and both are working fine. It might be something to do with arXiv's specific "hybrid" installation which they call TL16 but user "yo" say that most of the packages are installed with 17
@DavidCarlisle Honestly I don't know if the \tiny was even working, because the output was always full-sized! I'm trying now to re-run bibtex on the .aux file.
In this message I mentioned that there's about 42 lines at the beginning of my .bbl, and I'm not sure whether or not to include those in my MWE
 
3:04 PM
@user1271772 if the total code is still less than a few hundred lines, include it
 
@DavidCarlisle Thank you, okay I will do that!
Still debugging a bit before I ask on the main site. Making sure I try EVERYTHING before asking.
 
3:15 PM
@DavidCarlisle Okay basically nothing worked. I deleted all my .aux and .bbl files, re-ran pdflatex with: \tiny removed + \raggedright before \bibliographystyle{apsrev4-1} \bibliography{bib.bib}, then ran bibtex main.aux, then ran pdflatex twice, then re-ran pdflatex with \input{main.bbl} and both bibliography lines commented (and still with \ragged right), and the PDF looks fine on my laptop. I submitted the latest main.tex and main.bbl to arXiv and the bibliography has lines that are too long!
 
@user1271772 add \listfiles to your document then you get the package versions listed at the end, compare with the list from arxiv (I assume you can get their log file?)
 
I will try that!
 
 
2 hours later…
4:57 PM
expkv is no longer the second fastest key=val package, and currently I see no way how I could catch up again :(
 
@Skillmonlikestopanswers.xyz You made it slower or someone made another package faster?
 
Can anyone help on using getting correct rendering of Gujarati fonts using LuaLaTex?
 
@UlrikeFischer interesting package
@Dr.DineshJ.Karia blame @UlrikeFischer if it doesn't work
 
Hey sorry, I did not type that blame @... if it does not work. It happened automatically.
 
@Dr.DineshJ.Karia no I did it:-) but anyway it is supposed to work like this:
2
A: How to add the text from Google Input Tools - Gujarati language

ArchhoofI'm not sure how to do this with Xetex, but if you can use pdflatex or xelatex, then you can use this method. If you don't have the font I used, you can use Arial Unicode MS and it will typeset (the glyphs might change a bit in their appearance). \documentclass{article} \usepackage[a4paper]{ge...

@Dr.DineshJ.Karia what errors did you get when you tried?
 
5:13 PM
@DavidCarlisle you mean the list?
 
@UlrikeFischer end of proof (or end of document, or somewhere in between)
 
The fonts do not render correctly. A file compiled correctly before three years now the fonts are not rendered correctly.
 
@DavidCarlisle yes, interesting way to add a small 5x5 pt pdf.
 
@Dr.DineshJ.Karia you should show a complete example.
 
5:19 PM
If you post a small example we (most likely @UlrikeFischer) will be able to help, note lualatex until recently wasn't so good at indic scripts but if you have a recent texlive or miktex you should be able to use harf mode (harfbuzz) which should give similar text shaping as xetex or your browser
 
@Dr.DineshJ.Karia we can do virtually nothing with such an image, try to make a small complete document with a single line of text that does not work, and post the source.
 
dI have Miktex 2.9 updated recently all packages. How do I use Harfbuzz? What is it?
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{comment,enumitem}
%\usepackage{amsmath,comment,enumitem}
\usepackage[nocfg,screen,panelleft,sectionbreak%,orange%,paneltoc
]{pdfscreen}
\usepackage[showgrayletters]{exerquiz}



\margins{.65in}{.65in}{.65in}{.65in}
\screensize{6.25in}{9in}
\overlay{overlay1.pdf}
\changeoverlay
\paneloverlay{but.pdf}
\def\pfill{\vskip6pt}

\begin{comment} %Change of panel and background
\panelwidth=1.3in
\def\panel{\colorbox{blue!20}
{\begin{minipage}[t][\paperheight][b]{\panelwidth}
 
that is rather more than one line of text and uses lots of files I don't have
 
OK
\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{fontspec} %for gujarati fonts in Dedication

\setmainfont[Script=Gujarati]{shruti}





\begin{document}

ગુજરાતના પહેલા મુખ્યમંત્રી કોણ હતા?
\end{document}
 
5:33 PM
but to use hardf mode you need to change the line \setmainfont[Script=Gujarati]{shruti} to add Renderer = Harfbuzz
 
It does not compile then.
Now my file is
\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{fontspec} %for gujarati fonts in Dedication

add Renderer = Harfbuzz




\begin{document}

ગુજરાતના પહેલા મુખ્યમંત્રી કોણ હતા?
\end{document}
And log file gives error
This is LuaTeX, Version 1.11.2 (MiKTeX 2.9.7300 64-bit) (format=lualatex 2020.3.23) 23 JUN 2020 23:05
restricted system commands enabled.
**sampleGuj.tex

("D:/Data/organized/Math/My Publ/Current/All Question List/EQuiz India/sampleGu
j.tex"
LaTeX2e <2020-02-02>
Lua module: luaotfload-main 2020-02-02 3.12 luaotfload entry point
Lua module: luaotfload-init 2020-02-02 3.12 luaotfload submodule / initializatio
n
Lua module: lualibs 2020-02-02 2.70 ConTeXt Lua standard libraries.
Lua module: lualibs-extended 2020-02-02 2.70 ConTeXt Lua libraries -- extended c
 
@Dr.DineshJ.Karia that looks wrong, I would expect it to say luahbtex 1.12 in an up to date system (@UlrikeFischer what should miktex say?)
 
I could not understand your reply. What is wrong?
 
@Dr.DineshJ.Karia your log shows This is LuaTeX, Version 1.11.2 I don't have miktex but the equivalent texlive log shows This is LuaHBTeX, Version 1.12.0 (TeX Live 2020) the HB means that harfbuzz mode is available.
 
5:49 PM
OK Thank you for helping by heart. Even if my problem is not solved. My first session in life with you was quite encouraging. Thanks a lot sir.
 
@DavidCarlisle luahbtex. This doesn't look up to date
 
6:32 PM
@UlrikeFischer So, Sir what is the remedy if you could suggest.
I posted the question on the TeX LaTeX also. The link is tex.stackexchange.com/q/550813/15139
 
6:56 PM
@Dr.DineshJ.Karia I will look later, I'm out currently. But please don't call me Sir, I'm a woman.
 
7:07 PM
@PhelypeOleinik both. I made it a tiny bit slower (added \detokenize to key names, having thought about it for a while, it was a bad idea to not do this in the first place) and simplekv made a performance leap in the v0.2 release. Still expkv is the fastest brace respecting and category code stable key=val parser.
 
@yo' As funny as it might be, I just checked the menu and it turns out Overleaf was already using something called "TexLive 2017 (Legacy)"
 
 
2 hours later…
8:38 PM
@JosephWright and @DavidCarlisle -- You might take a look at tex.stackexchange.com/q/479003 which asks about online LaTeX tutorials. Nobody has mentioned learnlatex yet.
 
@barbarabeeton I left a small answer
 
 
1 hour later…
10:07 PM
@DavidCarlisle -- Thanks. It seems to be welcome there. Regarding another question, old but with recent activity, about whether DVI is dead. Knuth still uses it, and Tom Rokicki has done some work to get around the disappearing ligatures when the DVI is converted to PostScript and then used to copy-and-paste.
 
@barbarabeeton yes I saw that one had some activity today, I already have an answer there
 
10:32 PM
@UlrikeFischer -- You commented on tex.stackexchange.com/q/550839 with what looked like the question, but I think he meant something else, and just didn't ask it well. All the page numbers are reported; it's just tgat the "missing" ones are reported starting after the report of a file name, so they're not at the left of the log listing. I would have made that comment, but my laptop won't let me do anything on a question page. (And I haven't found anyone to help fix the problem.)
 
@barbarabeeton I'm not sure but left a comment with this content.
 
11:01 PM
@UlrikeFischer -- Actually, I was wrong. There is a jump, and it happens at the beginning of chapter 2. Ask if he's using \includeonly and has skipped something; I never paid much attention to that, but it would make sense to skip page numbers if a chunk is omitted. Then there should be something at the beginning or end of relevant .aux files to reset the page number.
 

« first day (3523 days earlier)      last day (1401 days later) »