« first day (3249 days earlier)      last day (1672 days later) » 

4:28 AM
@SwapnilDas I can't help with fluid dynamics I'm afraid. It's not a subject I love, and at college I did my best to avoid it. Sorry :-(
 
@JohnRennie oh nvm
@JohnRennie Do you know anyone here who could help?
 
@SwapnilDas I don't recall any discussion of fluid mechanics. It seems most of us feel no great enthusiasm for it.
We do have a question on the main site for book recommendations.
313
Q: Book recommendations

David ZEvery once in a while, we get a question asking for a book or other educational reference on a particular topic at a particular level. This is a meta-question that collects all those links together. If you're looking for book recommendations, this is probably the place to start. All the question...

 
@JohnRennie Ohk. Why such aversion for the subject, isn't it beautiful?
 
@SwapnilDas There are a couple of fluid dynamics links there.
Fluid dynamics was invented by the Devil to stop physicists feeling too smug.
6
 
@JohnRennie lol.
 
4:38 AM
On the seventh day God rested, and the Devil snuck in and created the Navier-Stokes equations.
5
 
@JohnRennie My gawd, you make it sound harder than string theory
 
@SwapnilDas I'm not sure the two can be usefully compared, but I note the NS equations have an outstanding Millennium prize associated with them while string theory doesn't.
 
@JohnRennie True that. What do you think is the bothering side of the subject, the math, physical intuition , or what?
 
Terry Tao has a nice article on why the NS equations are so troublesome. It's on his blog somewhere.
 
thanks
 
 
1 hour later…
6:15 AM
I mean it's not rocket science
It's nonlinear
 
 
4 hours later…
10:59 AM
@JohnRennie actual physicists don’t care about the NS equations...
Their regularity properties, I mean
 
@RyanUnger
I need you to steal a paper
It's the declaration of independence
 
Oh no
I’m not nick cage
 
Sent a request for that thesis to Princeton
Hopefully they will acquiesce
Though I don't think you'd enjoy it
It's like 60's experimental GR stuff
Very much not rigorous
 
11:14 AM
@Slereah what's it called
 
The book I found contains a trimmed down version of that thesis
 
@Slereah I know exactly where in the library it is
I'll check it out so they can't scan it for you >:3
 
Nooooooooooooooooooo
It's weird that there doesn't seem to be any effort made to digitize thesis
I know that Tipler's thesis has also never been digitized
there's just a bunch of thesises in various libraries that nobody can read
 
yeah it's annoying
there's a thesis from 2010 that I wanted but isn't digitized
well it probably is but you can't download it
 
Did you try asking the author for it
2010 the author probably has a digitized copy
I'm not sure Tipler would even have a copy of his thesis these days
He'd have to check his old boxes in the attic
with his grampa fragile bones
 
11:26 AM
I didn't but his advisor is a professor here
 
My master thesis has bibliography stuff that I have not read
for shame
But I wasn't gonna read a proof of the Lie-Trotter-Kato theorem
I think the best way to get a good sense of what a proton may be like in GR is to take a coherent state for the Dirac equation and see what it looks like in the limit of zero radius
Probably the best way to get the idea of a point charge in non-static spacetimes
 
Periodic reminder Kaku's string books are insane
 
What did he do now
 
11:43 AM
"This is a warning that the supersymmetric string is not going to be as simple as super-Yang-Mills or supergravity theory."
They are a walk in the park after all
 
12:51 PM
@bolbteppa Did they only discover that now
 
Bit of a hype article in fairness ' "I think there is a non-zero chance that some of our great castles are built on sand," Buzzard wrote in a slide presentation. "But I think it's small."'
 
Also rly
I'm thinking the big proofs have been tested over and over again
I'm guessing the theorems in danger are going to be fairly specific
 
well, the one billion dollar question is: Who is going to check that the AI have done the proofs correctly
 
1:25 PM
@Secret other AIs
 
How did the reconstruction era ended? Did the South accept black people as equals and accepted the fact that they'll vote?
 
Bit of an odd topic to bring here
 
I read, but I still don't understand what the reconstruction era after the civil war is all about
@Slereah pls
 
Apparently Marzke is still alive
His thesis was published in 59, so he's probably about 80 years old
Hang in there old man
 
@NovaliumCompany There's a history SE chat you know :P
 
1:36 PM
@NovaliumCompany You should probably chat about that topic with historians, as Sir Cumference suggested. In the mean time, take a look at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Crow_laws
 
@PM2Ring I read it, but why did you send it?
Racist people are dumb people... what they say it's the same as saying, people above 1,70 m will be respected and treated well, and people below 1,70 m will be treated horribly. You don't judge people on genes...
 
bold stance
 
I think you're preaching to the choir
 
Is there a racist stack exchange
 
@Slereah ok
 
1:54 PM
@NovaliumCompany I sent it as an answer to "Did the South accept black people as equals".
 
@PM2Ring ok
 
Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong is a 1995 book by James W. Loewen, a sociologist. It critically examines twelve popular American high school history textbooks and concludes that the textbook authors propagate false, Eurocentric and mythologized views of American history. In addition to his critique of the dominant historical themes presented in high school textbooks, Loewen presents themes that he says are ignored by traditional history textbooks. == Themes == In Lies My Teacher Told Me, Loewen criticizes modern American high school history textbooks...
 
@Slereah we could propose a "racism.se"
 
2:10 PM
@skillpatrol might be poorly received
 
true dat
sexism.se
 
2:46 PM
...anyway
How's life with y'all
 
 
3 hours later…
5:29 PM
@SirCumference noice
 
vzn
5:40 PM
@bolbteppa lol ofc not physics teacher(s) o_O :P
@SwapnilDas nice, great! keep up the good work :)
 
@vzn the people who imply physicists/mathematicians are lying are more like the 'lying teachers' referenced in that book than the actual teachers, a counter-intuitive point to the 'skeptics'
 
vzn
@bolbteppa ah, so only history teachers lie. right. figures. @#%& humanities/ liberal arts lol
 
I guess that's too 'authoritarian' for the free-thinking skeptics eh haha
 
vzn
or, theres a concept of "blind spots" in psychology...
 
 
4 hours later…
10:04 PM
0
Q: We need systematic improvements to expiration on bounties

Steven SagonaFirst a polite request: I think most active users are people who mostly answer questions and don't ask questions. As a result I think a lot of the "culture" among administrators & moderators promotes things that reward "answerers" as opposed to "askers." I am writing this opinionated post beca...

 
 
1 hour later…
11:31 PM
@bolbteppa worth noting that Loewen explicitly frames his commentary towards history teachers, not general science. The main difference is the textbooks: math/science books are generally written and reviewed by professional experts
Whereas most high school US history books aren’t, eg the role of the Texas State Board of Education in determining history textbooks across the US
So the context for US history is explicitly political in a way that science generally isn’t
 

« first day (3249 days earlier)      last day (1672 days later) »