« first day (3129 days earlier)      last day (1827 days later) » 
00:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

12:28 AM
9
Q: What is the best way to deal with NPC-NPC combat?

ErosRisingI'm about to run a premade adventure, and reading through it I see a potential situation where one group of monsters could, though PC actions, end up fighting each other. As a PC, I hate seeing my DM, for lack of better words, play with himself. NPC vs. NPC combats played out blow-for-blow in i...

 
Please, someone tell me I'm not wrong T_T
 
@Zachiel what are you not wrong about?
 
I hate being told that monks in 3.5e are OP
 
Ah. never played 3.5e so I wouldn't know :P
 
That being proven by a build that is basically "convince your DM to allow these 3.0 books, these optional rules, then multiclass a lot, take a lot of psionic things (wait, is that still a monk?)"...
 
12:33 AM
@Zachiel I've played a monk one time and was overshadowed by a grapple Barb and a caster
I forget if they were a warlock or a sorcerer
I even had a cool seeming prestige class that was way easier to put levels into as a monk and that hardly helped
Monk is not OP in 3.5
Freaking casters are, period
 
I'm basically getting a psionic warrior character with all the rest of the levels in monk.
 
Maybe monk is stronger than some classes? But not pretty much any of the casters
 
I played a Monk once. It sucked. I was literally useless. I was actually glad when the party got TPKed in the first session.
 
And even for martial classes it depends a lot on build
@Miniman I felt relatively similar, the only reason I had fun that one campaign was because of my backstory and prestige class and the group I was playing with
 
@Zachiel Why not take Tashalatora and have all the levels in psychic warrior?
 
12:38 AM
I certainly didn't get any time as the most useful person
To be fair I may have done it to myself a little with that prestige class but I doubt it
It seemed like I was missing some,... Honestly mostly useless monk stuff that would not have really made a difference
Err well actually at the end I was the most useful person
But that was like literally,.. because of my one time a day prestige class thing
It was definitely not a monk feature
XD
 
In my experience, 3.5 monks are useful in direct proportion to how much the GM thinks monks are useful.
In particular, the most effective monks I've seen were in campaigns where the GMs made a monk's non-combat utility particularly effective and filled combat scenes with enemies that were particularly vulnerable to monk specialties like trip attacks.
But everything a monk can do, somebody else can do better.
 
@BESW well, as with any class the build choices matter too, and what else you have In the party
 
The thing a monk's especially good at is surviving combat despite being largely unable to contribute to ending the fight.
 
Yeah
If you have an all caster party you are the least powerful person
 
Heck, the non-casting grappler outshone your monk at every turn.
 
12:50 AM
But if you can say, tie up a lot of opponents and not die, you can still contribute by making it so the casters have breathing room to do the caster stuff
@BESW yeah
I mentioned that
It was not the best
I was experimenting and he was still in min-max mode
I kinda blame his other group though
 
The best way to tie people up is a PrC that monks don't have the class skills for, and for which a monk's BAB would delay entry by 2 levels.
 
His stories about those games painted a picture of min-max or die
(and then die anyway because bad DM )
@BESW yeah
 
(And it duplicates a lot of the monk's abilities so boo.)
 
I'm just saying, they can contribute
 
12:54 AM
Not In any way that overshadows other classes very much though
 
@Zachiel I'm reminded of 4e Seeker builds.
(The way to make a Seeker powerful is to get as many generic power boosts as possible which would make ANY class better.)
 
This one actually focuses on dealing damage. I wonder how it fares.
 
And even Seeker builds don't open with "See what your GM will let you get away with."
 
@Zachiel I mean, that's never been the main goal of the class right?
That to me is a broken build for monk (assuming it is) not a reason the class is broken
That's like modifying your car to have those ridiculous wheels that stick out and then saying every model has those ridiculous wheels
It's not the same thing
Knowing how to break monk does not equal monk is broken
If people are looking to say that about a class out of the box in 3.5 look at druid
 
@trogdor well, if you can build even a single OP monk, then monk is OP (just play that build, other builds are suboptimal). Now, if it is overpowered against other monks or against other martial, that's the question.
 
1:00 AM
All the normal caster power plus an animal companion and wildshape
 
Druid has a single, big problem.
I'm not interested in playing a druid. XD
 
@Zachiel well my point is not everyone knows or wants to play that build
It isn't literally the incarnation of the class
 
@trogdor this
 
But if that build worked (and ok, if I had access to the required classes and feats, which I don't) at least I could use it without feeling useless.
 
@Zachiel oh that's not what I meant, I'm just making an example of my point
 
1:02 AM
@trogdor Yeah, mine was more a pun.
 
There are in fact out of the box "I'm more powerful than other classes",... Classes. And monk is just by no means in that category
@Zachiel lol
In fact I think monks take significantly more work to break than a lot of classes
 
1:15 AM
I just noticed it's a gestalt build
so, full BAB
Whatever
 
Full BAB as in as good as a fighter? Or full BAB as in not losing any BAB a monk normally gets?
 
1:32 AM
@Miniman remember this one? Ah, good times.
 
@nitsua60 Heh, long time ago now.
 
Just got an updoot today, though.
I just remember really being amused by the comment:
Guys...guys.... you dont have to get in to a bidding war just for my epic votes....but I also wont stop you :D — Airatome Aug 9 '17 at 1:45
 
hey there @nitsua60
 
Hiya
 
@nitsua60 you mind if I toss a couple things at you in Discord?
 
1:37 AM
@KorvinStarmast was it you that had the spell area of effect online tool? I can't remember what it as called
 
@Shalvenay Fine, but give me 20 min or so--I was just about to clean out a litter box.
 
@Shalvenay Any luck on getting other players for the one-shot?
 
@MikeQ I think we'll be fine with me and V2 playing, although there is someone (veteran RPer, albeit new to 5e specifically) from outside this Stack I could invite if that's cool with you
 
Sure. I'll remember to start with an icebreaker/table rules sort of spiel.
 
@KorvinStarmast (Nevermind it was @SirCinnamon)
 
2:00 AM
@Shalvenay 👀
 
@V2Blast all I got was a placeholder box :P
 
4
Q: What ability score does a Hexblade's Pact Weapon use for attack and damage when wielded by another character?

user55044I read this question about other PCs using pact weapons and realized that I'm not sure if the weapon would use the warlock's Charisma, or the other character's Strength/Dexterity for attack and damage rolls. Now, the text of Hex Warrior says "when you attack with that weapon you can use your Ch...

 
@HotRPGQuestions Q +4/0, 1 A +9/0, 36 views.
Tepid at best, bot.
 
Too bad there's no lich emoji
 
2:21 AM
@V2Blast 🏌️‍♂️ I guess I now have emoji resources.
That is what son in law and I did this past weekend. Good fun.
 
2:35 AM
@Shalvenay Actually, I'd appreciate if they contacted me a bit beforehand, just for a quick conversation so I get a sense of them and their style
 
@MikeQ OK, I can have them do that
 
 
2 hours later…
4:22 AM
looking at print costs for your RPG and throwing up a bit? consider not making your book standard letter size. the difference between making a 6x9 book and an 8.5x11 book is staggering. that's the key to high quality, low cost offset: 6x9inches, 200 pages or less.
 
4:35 AM
Our most popular character sheet. Is the #Faterpg and #dnd5e sheets inspired by @DreamWorksSheRa show! If you have had a chance to check em out, you can download them for free on the blog https://tmblr.co/ZJwLjY2eUvVjc #dnd #charactersheets #ttrpg #rpg
 
4:54 AM
@BESW it's just too bad they are for D&D
 
5:08 AM
There's a Fate one!
 
Oh well then that changes things
That's much better XD
 
5:52 AM
"She-Ra D&D sheet
She-Ra D&D printer friendly
She-Ra Fate sheet
She-ra Fate printer friendly"
links at the bottom of the Tumblr post
and then there's another post adding links to a D&D character sheet's spell page in addition to those
and one adding Spanish translations for the Fate sheets
 
6:20 AM
"The Avengers Assemble… in the Apocalypse World," by Stephen Morffew for Step into RPGs.
 
6:47 AM
24. My fav things I've written are sidebars where I break kayfabe & talk directly to players about identity things, frex: Pirate Nations p. 130, Emerald Empire 142 & 173, Iron Street Combat 10-11 & 22, Monsterhearts 2 40-43, SCUP 252-259, Scion: Hero 284-285. #AprilTTRPGmaker
"Subtle Forms of Racism to Avoid in SFF," transcript of speech by Helen Gould at Eastercon 2019.
 
stumbles into chatroom, swaying
I think I know what the person who discovered Pun-Pun might have felt like now.
If I'm correct about what I've not read in these rules...
There's a theoretically infinite loop I could make out of them.
Dunno if I can spin it into infinite stat boosts, but.
 
Which rules? And what's the infinite loop?
 
I'm like, half-drunk on "I should be sleeping" at the moment, but...exponential growth.
exponential growth.
this is literally quadratic wizardry
even if it takes a turn it's still quadratic wizardry
oh, wait, there's a question to be had there...
what happens if an item that started a chain of effects poofs out of existence, is the question
though, Reduced Recharge, and an extra charge stuck on top, those would definitely leave an infinite, and infinitely sustainable, loop...
probably
anyway, the siren song of sleep beckons.
 
7:45 AM
A good article by James Haeck on how to write a good backstory: dndbeyond.com/posts/478-roleplaying-101-building-a-backstory
Former Baldur's Gate I and II designer James Ohlen (who just released Heroes of Baldur's Gate on the #DMsGuild) is heading Wizards of the Coast's new game dev studio ... on a NON-D&D, NON-MAGIC project!? https://www.pcgamer.com/kotor-dragon-age-origins-lead-designer-will-lead-a-new-studio-for-wizards-of-the-coast/
 
8:28 AM
@Stackstuck Super-quadratic
 
8:41 AM
Working with computer science has kinda primed me to correct confusion between exponential and quadratic
 
 
2 hours later…
10:30 AM
I made a post on the Roll20 forums bringing up that the AiME-specific character sheet (forked from the 5th Edition OGL sheets that I've used for every regular 5e game long ago) hasn't been updated in 2 years 👀
(AiME = Adventures in Middle-earth)
 
10:41 AM
@Stackstuck this feels like the Anima Beyond Fantasy equivalent of the Peasant Railgun
not in its effect, but in the observations that apply to why it does or doesn't work
 
11:25 AM
With the release of Avengers: Endgame, I'd like to remind everyone you can disable the Hot Network Questions list in your user preferences. It's the fourth checkbox on that page, the one in the “Sidebar” section. This will hopefully minimise your chance of spoilers coming in the form of HNQ titles.
8
 
@doppelgreener ah thanks I didn't even know I could do that but it is now disabled
at least until I have seen that movie
 
lol
 
@trogdor it is a very new setting, was only added a couple of months ago.
 
@doppelgreener done, thanks
 
11:32 AM
@doppelgreener hot questions was only added recently too right?
 
@trogdor what do you mean?
 
didn't we not have it here?
until relatively recently?
or is that something else?
 
yes
I guess
 
that's been around forever, just became more visible recently.
 
11:34 AM
is that technically a different thing?
 
no relation to HNQ.
 
ah
then I blame that naming convention
calling them both hot question things
 
they probably use the same or similar hotness algorithm though, so questions in our Hot list would be the ones that stand a chance of making it to HNQ.
 
yeah,.. yeah that's it
 
it's not ideal lol
 
11:35 AM
I mean, like I don't think it ruins anything
but yeah it doesn't seem entirely ideal
 
12:23 PM
"How can I protect myself as a flying archer" has 0 score, 0 answers, 52 views, and is one of "today's hottest questions." It's amazing I don't set myself on fire every day with how much I clearly don't understand hot.
 
 
fnord of course
is that just an image or was it part of a page?
 
@nitsua60 what
How does that even happen?
 
it seems like eyes on it count towards the rating?
 
Oh. It's not on HNQ specifically. Phew.
 
12:35 PM
although I would have thought there would be a cap on how much just one of those three factors could contribute by itself
 
@nitsua60 just add all the numbers together. That is accurate right?
 
lol
good lord no
 
Honestly though determining "hotness" or "popularity" is a surprisingly difficult and common computing problem that I don't think I've ever seen solved fully well.
 
aye
 
yeah not sure how I would do it
like I figured they would cap any single of those three factors without at least a little of the others but I don't know just how to do that or in what ratio or anything
 
12:42 PM
Although sometimes a problem being hard is actually a good point to consider whether it needs to be solved in the way we think.
 
yeah in a general sense I think I get what you mean there
not sure how it specifically applies to this but I also feel like that's sort of the point you are making XD
 
6
Q: How does the mezzoloth's teleportation work?

ordiWe fought a Mezzoloth (MM, p. 313) last game and in the same turn he could use its Teleport action and then attack, or use magic (like dispel magic) and then attack. As I understand from the Monster Manual, a monster acts like a player character, and I can't see from the monster statblock how it ...

 
1:04 PM
it's cool to see someone coming in off of 2e
https://rpg.stackexchange.com/q/146822/34716
That's what I assumed when the question was "can I level up my first class later if I take a level in a second class?"
 
@goodguy5 You couldn't in 2e?
 
The easy answer is "no"
Once you multiclassed, you were locked out forever.
or was it called dual class?
whatever.
r1 --> r2 --> r3 --> r4 --> f1 (can never go back) --> f2 --> etc
 
@goodguy5 oh neat. I wondered if there was something like that when I read the question.
 
Wow. Is that by design or...?
 
It certainly discourages 'dips' into classes
 
1:17 PM
I would say it effectively eliminates dips unless you start in the dip right?
From what I understand from goodguy5 only
 
I bet that's the period the level 1 cleric dip was discovered & popularised. :)
 
this is purely a theory, but my guess as to the reasoning is that it was to support leaving maxed classes.

Certain race-class combinations only went so high. Like Gnome Sorcerer 12, or whatever. So after level 12, you just started a new class?

But that might not even be right. I'd have to read over how it worked again.
I feel like you weren't allowed to use your old class's abilities until you reached "level 1" of the new class, or something weird.
 
1:33 PM
From my recollection of AD&D2e:
Humans have no cool racial features, no multiclassing, but had uncapped levels and could dual-class.
Others had racial features like darksight, could multiclass, but had a level cap to compensate and couldn't dual-class.
You are locked into the class (including a multiclass) that you choose on chargen, except that humans could at some point perform the dual-classing and gain all future levels in the new class.
 
okay, looking over some old stuff/

"multiclassing" was splitting xp between a number of classes (usually two, but could be 3 or maybe 4) so you leveled each class slower.

Dual Classing was human only
the character would be reset to level one in a second class to keep going from there. Once they reached the same level in the second class as they had originally had in the first, the character would regain all the abilities learned from the first class.

And if you resorted to using any abilities from your first class, you forfeited all gained experience to the second class.
 
Though HP and maybe weapon skill points were retained even before the breakpoint.
 
I THINK hps was retained, but I'm not even 100% sure
 
HP was retained. An acquaintance made a big deal out of choosing Fighter and swapping to Mage later to retain HP.
 
@doppelgreener Yeah--I can imagine that being a basically-intractable problem that, no matter the dataset you train on/check against, the moment you put it into play you see 20% of your results are completely absurd.
 
1:38 PM
And - assuming I both understand and remember his explanation correctly - only single-class fighters had the right to buy the top-grade weapon skill points, which was why you always start a fighter and add another class later.
 
@goodguy5 as someone who has only played PF and 5e, this is straight-up bananas to me lol
 
@Rubiksmoose It's bananas to me as well, having played it.
 
But it seemed so natural at the time....
 
Elf and Dwarves being classes was only 1e thing right?
 
@Someone_Evil yea, I think so
 
1:40 PM
Not 1e. 0e.
1e they were races as we think of them now.
 
@Rubiksmoose The weirdest part was that I think you only got half hp from each multiclass
 
@nitsua60 I'll bet! Like there's no real reason that the current MC paradigm would be more natural really (except that its simpler maybe) except that it is the one that is currently in widespread use.
@goodguy5 Is that really the weirdest part? A lot of what you said earlier strikes me as very weird.
lol
 
@Rubiksmoose I mean... remember that wizards had a d4 hit die
and you rolled every level... including one
 
Thats how learning works! you can only learn one thing at a time and if you even practice anything else for a second you will instantly regress
3
 
@goodguy5 oof.
 
1:42 PM
it was entirely possible to have a level 1 wizard with 1hp
 
@Rubiksmoose If it helps, it's how it works in Wizardry 8.
 
@SirCinnamon No wonder my Japanese is progressing so slowly. I must isolate myself in monk-like single-minded study else I'll never learn anything. Thanks D&D!
 
Dual-classing I mean, not multiclassing.
 
I'm ready for my full social media blackout starting tonight. I want to go into endgame as blind as possible
 
@SirCinnamon I'm so pumped. First time pre-buying tickets for literally anything.
 
1:44 PM
i'm working from home tomorrow and shutting myself in until sunday
 
(not day 1 tickets, we're going on Sunday)
 
My work sometimes hosts private screenings on release days but this time it sold out in <20 minutes
 
@Miniman 2001 release. Presumably it was inspired directly by it?
 
So i had to get tickets to a regular show and by the time we sorted out who wants to come and when etc. then sunday matinee was the only option. But I like an afternoon movie anyway
 
@Rubiksmoose Oh yeah, it wears its D&D influences proudly on its sleeve.
 
1:46 PM
@goodguy5 The only time I tried playing AD&D, we had a fighter with 1 HP. (He wanted to be a paladin and protect everybody. This predates the widespread use of the word 'tank' in RPGs, at least in the region.)
 
The dual classing mechanic actually has a certain weird appeal to me. But maybe it's just me liking shiny new things (new to me anyways)
 
I just figured I'd mention it because it's how I managed to understand it.
 
@vicky_molokh oh no!!!!
 
@Rubiksmoose Multiclassing appeals to me more, personally.
Dual-classing is just a heavily restricted version of 3e and 5e multiclassing.
 
@Miniman I suspect my enthusiasm would drop precipitously once I went from the "oh that's really neat and new" phase to the "how the he** do I make this work" phase.
 
1:48 PM
I've opened a meta about people who have questions because of older editions, btw
 
@Rubiksmoose I forsee a problem with using milestone XP rules and a system built around splitting XP
 
@Someone_Evil Oh yeah, that would be a huge issue!
 
4
Q: Carrying misconcepts from previous editions - is this Question fine?

HellSaintContext Recently, we got this question about Wizard spellcasting. It was closed as a dupe and, from the OP comments and my answer being accepted, it's clear that he was carrying over a concept from Pathfinder to the 5e which was simply wrong. This problem is pretty frequent, see this confusion ...

 
@SirCinnamon I want to reiterate, so pumped for it.
 
There are a bunch of threads on gitp and reddit about introducing a 2e-style multiclass where you split xp
@Miniman dang it. I couldn't find that.
thanks
 
1:49 PM
@Rubiksmoose Big same
and game of thrones that night
 
@goodguy5 It's not the one I was looking for, I'm still browsing.
 
@Rubiksmoose It's solvable, but for the same reason as I'm using milestone, I don't want to go through solving that
 
@SirCinnamon which I'm almost caught up on again.
@Someone_Evil Yeah and all for the joy of making things...more complicated!
 
18
Q: Why can only humans dual-class and only demihumans multiclass?

wakaIs there an in-game explanation as to why some races can multi-class and others can dual-class? For example, is there an explanation in an article or book somewhere saying that It's the will of the gods or whatever that a half-elf can be a druid/ranger and an elf can't? I am aware (of and unconc...

Really, I think that the "reason" is that gygax had definite and arbitrary opinions on things
 
@kviiri I agree
@nitsua60 for sure
 
1:59 PM
anyone own a utilikilt?
 
@goodguy5 a what-now?
 
I mean, I like HNQ for features that are largely orthogonal to its specific implementation. I like the fact that our site gets visibility, but the visibility doesn't need to actually come from "hot" questions in any particular sense.
 
@goodguy5 I don't know what I expected...
 
0
Q: Should we have a way to denote questions that are caused by "edition baggage"?

goodguy5related: Carrying misconcepts from previous editions - is this Question fine? We've all seen it. Does Brunchin and Braggin - Third Edition require me to start the game with a full stomach? In a vacuum, that question doesn't make any sense, and is a bad "didn't you read the rules?!" questio...

 
2:03 PM
One thing I've been pondering is what if we had some sort of "featured question(s) of the week" based on community preferences, but I am a bit averse towards naïvely trusting democracy to produce the best results either
 
@TheOracle Thanks, Oracle!
 
@goodguy5 Hell, one of my favorite characters ever was a Fighter who had 1 HP at L1.
 
Oracle is my favorite SE bot.

The hotnessbot is in a distant second.

Then smoke detector belongs in the garbage
 
@SirCinnamon Yeah--it's hard to find the balance between that absurdity and "why does stabbing everything you meet make you any better at wizarding?"
 
the dice roller is good, but is native to our stack, I believe
@nitsua60 I'm all for jank characters, but no thanks
 
2:05 PM
@goodguy5 Without smokey, how would we know about those spiritualist and vampire success stories
 
Well, I've blocked him, so I don't
I'm happier not knowing
 
@goodguy5 0e just had a different ethos, in my experience.
 
never played anything pre 2eAD&D
 
In that case it was a clear case of "I want to be the big, strong guy but until then I'll let my bow do the talking."
 
how did 0e and 2e resolve 0hp?
 
2:08 PM
@TheOracle I could really go for some brunch, now. Thanks, Oracle.
 
user15026
Ooh yes pancakes would be good.
 
@nitsua60 I knew someone would enjoy "Brunchin and Braggin"
 
> When a character reaches 0 hit points, that character is slain. The character is immediately dead and unable to do anything unless some specialized magical effect takes precedence. (PHB2e p.105.)
(Taking 50 dmg in a single event, regardless of your current HP, also forced a save vs. death.)
 
oh saves vs death
 
I find it interesting that saves vs. death are so reviled these days. Back then, when the game was really lethal and we (in my play groups) were cautious, a save vs. death was seen a kindness visited on us by the rules. You had a chance of not dying, when you might rightly expect to die. Yay!
 
2:17 PM
It's not dissimilar to how nice it was for your job to give you insurance 15-20 years ago.

Now, if you're job doesn't offer insurance in some form, they're monsters.
 
@nitsua60 Usually when people use "save or die" as a pejorative, it pertains to cases where one wouldn't usually expect to die (eg. being sniped by a single instakill spell from full hit points to death)
 
@kviiri Yeah--that's the dissonance I'm experiencing. The notion that one would, sitting at a D&D table, not expect to die =)
 
@goodguy5 if you were very lucky, your level 10 wizard could even survive one (1) stabbing
 
"I cast burning hands and then go back to my character's hometown to await the conclusion of combat and regain my spell slots and hit points."
3.x at least changed it to "I cast burning hands and then pull out my crossbow"
 
@doppelgreener (To be fair, I'd consider myself lucky to survive a minute of someone using a dagger to try to murder me. And with 20+ years of schooling under my belt I might be getting close to L10 wizard....)
 
2:25 PM
Oh, well, yes, true. I would also feel lucky to survive one (1) stabbing.
 
Was there a point where D&D got more focused on RP and character story, so that players were encouraged to invest in their otherwise disposable character?
 
@nitsua60 based on the suggested ages in 3.x, you're likely closer to a level 1 wizard
arguably, always,

I feel like the big jump was 1e or 2e.

4e went backwards a step, imo.
 
@MikeQ I feel like that must have occurred between AD&D and D&D 3.5e. Original D&D was absolutely brutal, 3.5e was already very well inside that paradigm.
 
@doppelgreener While I personally haven't played pre-3.x, I've seen the material. It seems somewhere between classic wargame, and arcade-style roguelike game. e.g. See how far your nameless fighter can progress in the HALLWAY OF ABSURD DEATH SCENARIOS before the DM gives up and says that rocks fall and the party dies.
 
@MikeQ I've generally found 0e to be the edition where RP and story came most to the fore. Firstly, though characters were fragile they were definitely not disposable. Second, we didn't differentiate our characters based off of mechanical abilities. It was based off of how they acted, and what they'd done in game and the relationships they'd forged with the world.
(As always, this is just my experience--YMMV.)
 
2:36 PM
@nitsua60 I'm not judging the previous editions by newer standards - I'm asking if there was a clear shift between "D&D is where you roll for how many orc-filled rooms your fighter survives before inevitably dying" and "D&D is where you use combats to tell heroic fantasy stories"
 
@MikeQ I guess I'm just having trouble wrapping my head around the first half of that, because "roll to see how many orc-filled rooms your fighter survives" just wasn't a play-mode I experienced.
 
@MikeQ It's hard because there were always heroic fantasy stories.... they were just about how many orc fill rooms your character survived.
Especially published adventures.

Like the Temple of Elemental Evil?
That had a MFT of story and lore and things going on. but it was like 2 steps away from being a meatgrinder
 
@MikeQ I will say that back as early as Mentzer there's explicit talk about "what kind of story are you trying to tell?"
 
@nitsua60 Oh, that's an easy one. You absorb their karma and thereby progress to your idealized immortal self. (It's an important responsibility of immortals to "arrange" for high-potential mortals to come into contact with as many karmically indebted souls as they can handle.)
 
@MikeQ I think if you go back and read through 80's era Dragon you'll see that the table-variation amont 0e or B/X or 1e players encompassed the whole range you're describing. Though @KorvinStarmast might have better recollection of all those slow, long, Forum conversations than I do.
s/amont/among
 
2:47 PM
error, regular expression not closed.
s/amont/among
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \^
 
rm -rf /*
am i doing this right
 
I literally just shuddered.
 
@MikeQ Permisson denied
sudo rm -rf /*
there we go
 
I wonder if you can alias rm -rf /* to echo "don't do that"
 
@SirCinnamon That's why you should always use sudoer permission for everything. #lifehacks
 
2:53 PM
@MikeQ Stop, i'm going to be sick
 
@MikeQ I've played in some of it! And I've also played a bit of The Black Hack: it's one of the popular OD&D retroclones. I was asking how we should relate to our characters, if we should see ourselves as heroes-to-be or something who we should expect to have a long life expectancy, and someone said "Oh, no, definitely absolutely not. OD&D is brutal and it will kill you."
 
@goodguy5 Read the 1e DMG, Gygax explains his humanocentric world thing (In his own prose style ...). That's as close to "reasons" as I think you'll get.
 
yea, basically.
"There should be more humans, so we gave them bs powers so that people play them"!
 
@SirCinnamon Username is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
 
@goodguy5 Context: in a game where nonhumans were given other powers. I have the impression that this sometimes gets lost in discussions of avoiding the trope of humans being decently competent at everything.
 
3:01 PM
@Yuuki Reported to WHO? TELL ME MACHINE
 
@nitsua60 Yes, it was all over the map and each campaign was its own thing. And DM's freely imported stuff form books, movies, Metamorphisis Alpha, Gamma World, Boot Hill ...
 
@Yuuki I've somehow never seen that one.
 
@goodguy5 To be fair, there's a lot of xkcd comics.
 
o/~ He's copied on /var/spool/mail/root, so be good for goodness' sake! o/~
 
3:05 PM
@goodguy5 No, that is an incorrect summary. All of the non humans began with special powers that normal humans did not have. They are/were the exceptional ones. As EGG noted, getting to level 9 in two years of play was rare ... or intended to be so. Name level was 8 cleric, 9 Fighting Man, 11 Wizard, and IIRC 10 Thief. The number of times you'd get an elf to 4 Fighting Man / 8 Magic User was rare, given the lethality of the game.
Trying to see the OD&D experience using 2019 assumptions simply doesn't work.
2
 
@Yuuki 3-4 years ago, I was all caught up. Then I had a big move and job change and never went back to read the ones I missed
 
@Yuuki You can bypass these restrictions by deleting the sudoers file. If the OS can't prove that you don't have sudo permission, then it can't prevent you from doing anything.
 
@goodguy5 A whole lot of things were tried, in a very chaotic manner. (See first 15 years of Dragon Mag to get an idea of the chaotic "let's try this" approach the community embraced). I give TSR's 2e AD&D credit for attempting to be a bit more organized, and I tip my cap to WoTC 3e through 5e for trying to be more systematic / organized. The BECMI parallel effort to AD&D was a nice stream lining effort, or so I thought.
 
3:19 PM
@MikeQ do you need to be able to sudo to do that?
 
@doppelgreener Not if you delete the file
Or if you install the OS without the sudoer file in the first place
 
But if you want to delete the file don't you need to sudo first?
 
@doppelgreener No, it's a preemptive deletion
 
Preemptive Deletion is a good name for a Paranoia adventure. Or some kind of band.
 
@MikeQ Hmmm. Makes sense......
I feel like that's the kind of thing that would make for a very good Paranoia mission.
"You must use the equipment found in Bunker 02. The keys to Bunker 02 may be found inside Bunker 02."
 
3:26 PM
@doppelgreener Is Bunker 2 locked?
 
@Someone_Evil Probably!
 
@Someone_Evil That information would be above your clearance level.
;)
@doppelgreener amazing.
 
Is there an open window?
 
@Someone_Evil no, they're using linux
 
[slow clap]
 
3:28 PM
@goodguy but Dogs in the Vineyard uses winux, right?
I'll get my coat ...
 
sorry, kor, I don't get it
 
wine/vineyard
Not all attempts at humor work ...
 
[throws tomato]
1d20
 
ah. I was using a long I

and I didn't know DitV
 
3:29 PM
(DitV is an RPG)
I first learned about it on RPG.SE. But back then, we had game recommendation questions too ...
Hat, coat, exit ...
 
@Someone_Evil It is a bunker. ..... so maybe yes.
But probably not.
Remember, breaking and entering into bunkers is the work of saboteurs and is therefore treason.
 
You keep my choice of footwear out of this!
 
My apologies
It's the work of infiltrators and is therefore treason
 
3:51 PM
Could someone double-check my logic in marking this question a duplicate? rpg.stackexchange.com/q/146842/42386
I don't like having this much power.
It's scary.
 
I'm not sure if this is wise or looking for trouble but I think it is interesting that we have one of the first unambiguous cases of a question that previously would have gotten . : rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/146788/…
And needless to say, the world didn't explode or anything for lack of the tag.
 
@Rubiksmoose If that Q hadn't called out RAW, answers should have been the same, so there is an argument to be made that the Q didn't need to call it out (which leads to the tag isn't needed)
@Xirema Looks good to my eyes
 
@Someone_Evil well the point is they did call it out, which resulted in answers attempting to adhere to RAW interpretations (and one non RAW interpretation being deleted).
Which is good and how the site should work.
I do think the answers would have been different potentially without the RAW call-out (specifically, the one answer wouldn't have been deleted and there surely would have been some call-out in the answers to the fact that common sense at the very least gives an easy answer to the issue)
 
Is there a (stated or unstated) purpose to tags beyond attracting experts on the topic, things being organised afterwards?
 
@Someone_Evil nope that is just about the entire purpose of tags right there.
 
00:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

« first day (3129 days earlier)      last day (1827 days later) »