MathOverflow

« first day (1957 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (1997 days later) »

12:18 AM

And also in the tag-infos, like here: meta.mathoverflow.net/tags/trackbacks/info

I'd guess that there will be only a few links in the tag-infos and thei can be edited manually.

Probably it is worth checking after the next data dump whether something was missed: data.stackexchange.com/meta.mathoverflow/query/920211/… or data.stackexchange.com/meta.mathoverflow/query/920313/…

Although I cannot think of things other than posts (where on-site search can be used), comments (which clearly haven't been processed yet) and tag-infos.

Q: tea.mathoverflow.net deprecated

The Stack Exchange staff have asked us to remove tea (what came before meta) from the *.mathoverflow.net domain, for security reasons. The content of tea will remain at my private hosting, under mathoverflow.tqft.net. The SE staff have been rewriting links from meta and main to tea, to point to...

10 hours later…

Dattier

10:46 AM

@DavidRoberts : can you explain your point of view, here : hsm.stackexchange.com/questions/7907/…

Thanks

@Dattier: And what do you think modern mathematicians do? How many of them can state (without looking to books) the complete set of ZFC axioms? — Alexandre Eremenko 11 hours ago

1 hour later…

Martin Sleziak

11:54 AM

I think a permanent redirect from tea.mathoverflow.net to mathoverflow.tqft.net is in the works. I've pinged the relevant people at SE. This should fix all the broken links. — Scott Morrison ♦ 1 hour ago

@MartinSleziak Ok, so if there is going to be redirect, maybe it wasn't really necessary to change all the links. (I've recently made suggested edits to a few tag-wikis on meta.)

But probably it does not make the difference whether the link will be - for example - to mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/278/trackbacks-to-arxiv rather then to tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/278/trackbacks-to-arxiv (If there is going to be a redirect, I assume that both of those links will work eventually.)

2 hours later…

Martin Sleziak

1:47 PM

As far as I understand (IANAL), merely editing out these links does not change anything from the legal point of view, because the links are still there in the editing history; they just take two more clicks to reach. Or are we speaking about a different kind of 'editing out' that is accessible to moderators only and leaves no track in the history? In this case it would be good to have a complete picture of how it works, so that we can take a more informed decision when we vote. — Federico Poloni yesterday

I have checked meta and found out that moderators can now also remove/hide/redact past revisions. I did not know that - I thought that SE employee is needed for that. Meta Stack Exchange: Who has the privilege to delete a revision? and Allow moderators to hide a revision.

A: Who has the privilege to delete a revision?

We no longer hard delete revisions. Instead, we now redact them. And currently, moderators have that ability too. So instead of contacting us if you for some reason accidentally posted sensitive information, please proceed by editing your post to have said information removed and replaced with d...

A: Allow moderators to hide a revision

Up until last week, moderators would have to contact the Community Managers to redact private information from a post, but thanks to Jarrod this is now been turned on for moderators to handle. By going to the post revision page, mods will now see a redact option: Choosing this, you'll be...

In fact, I see that I have linked one of those posts before in another chatroom. Clearly, I have forgotten about this since then.

10 hours later…

Martin Sleziak

11:54 PM

I've fixed all the internal links on mathoverflow.tqft.net, but am still waiting for the redirect to be put in place as well. — Scott Morrison ♦ 3 hours ago

If I understand correctly, the above comment relates to links on the "main" site of tea. The links inside the discussion still have the old format.

But since the comment says that there are plans to get a redirect, this is probably a moot point anyway.

« first day (1957 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (1997 days later) »

all rooms