> This is exactly what we did. Using the composite function F(s) of 3.1 with a zero at b, off the critical line, we found another zero b0 which halves the distance |s-1/2| to the critical line. Continuing this process gives an infinite sequence of distinct zeros, converging to a point (on the critical line).But an analytic function which vanishes on such an infinite sequence must be identically zero. Applying this to F(s) (using 2.8 now instead of 2.6) shows that F(s) is identically zero and this then leads to a contradiction as argued in the last few lines after 3.3