« first day (2878 days earlier)      last day (2041 days later) » 

4:01 PM
so you can't be granted a position there?
 
@JohnRennie That is arguable on both accounts.
 
Anonymous
@CaptainBohemian Yeah, I don't think so
 
Anonymous
The people involved are all from different places
 
maybe only principal investigators can get a position there. research followers can't.
 
4:30 PM
Hello wonderful peoeple. I'm reading (and almost finished) a book on how the structure of the DNA was found (by James Watson and Francis Crick) and there's a chapter which I don't understand clearly. It talks about how A-T and G-C bases bond with hydrogen bonding in a specific way but I don't really understand. After all, if I ask myself the question why A-T specifically bond together (and not A-G for example), I can't answer.
 
This is because (if I did not mix up the order of the two) A-T forms only 2 hydrogen bonds while G-C forms 3
 
Ok, but if I try to bond A-G, it should still work because there will just be one hydrogen unbonded, which I'm not sure if it's a problem?
 
Anonymous
You can simulate those compounds and check out the distances. A and G are Purines while C and T are Pyrimidines.
 
Anonymous
A base pair (bp) is a unit consisting of two nucleobases bound to each other by hydrogen bonds. They form the building blocks of the DNA double helix and contribute to the folded structure of both DNA and RNA. Dictated by specific hydrogen bonding patterns, Watson-Crick base pairs (guanine-cytosine and adenine-thymine) allow the DNA helix to maintain a regular helical structure that is subtly dependent on its nucleotide sequence. The complementary nature of this based-paired structure provides a redundant copy of the genetic information encoded within each strand of DNA. The regular structure...
 
Anonymous
> Purines are complementary only with pyrimidines: pyrimidine-pyrimidine pairings are energetically unfavorable because the molecules are too far apart for hydrogen bonding to be established; purine-purine pairings are energetically unfavorable because the molecules are too close, leading to overlap repulsion.
 
4:38 PM
Hmm, got it. Thanks! Btw @Blue love your new pic :P
 
Anonymous
Heh :P
 
Anonymous
Thanks
 
Anonymous
It's from a childhood story book
 
Anonymous
(which I recently found after several years)
 
Also do the words purines and pyrimidines have any different meaning except to point to the corresponding nitrogenous bases in DNA, RNA...?
 
Anonymous
4:40 PM
Sure. They are a whole class of chemical compounds
 
Anonymous
A,T,G,C aren't the only ones
 
Uracil in RNA I suppose?
 
Anonymous
It's a pyrimidine derivative
 
Anonymous
Look up the structures
 
Ok then. How is uni going. High school started here :\
 
Anonymous
4:43 PM
LOTS of class tests ;_;
 
Same here ;___;
amazon.com/First-Song-Book-Anthem-Infinity-ebook/dp/B07HD2VQ9W Giving this bad boy a shot in the meanwhile.
 
hmmm
 
Anonymous
An ebook?
 
Oh yes, I have a kindle e-reader.
 
Anonymous
Ah. I don't read many books :P
 
4:47 PM
I didn't too, but I started a year ago and it's really nice. Gets you relaxed and 'out of this world'.
 
Anonymous
Are the modern Kindles worth buying?
 
Anonymous
I don't know much about the advantages of it over a normal tablet
 
Anonymous
@NovaliumCompany I can understand :)
 
@Blue Kindles have quite a small screen, so unless you make the font very small you don't see much of the text at a time.
 
I bought a refurbished fire tablet a few weeks ago and it's decent. Pretty bad as far as a tablet goes, but I only bought it to read ebooks, blog posts, and such
 
4:50 PM
I used a Kindle for a year or two but then switched to an eight inch tablet for reading books, and I find that far superior.
 
@JohnRennie Eyes don't hurt?
 
Yeah the screen is a bit small as well. I think they have multiple sizes though
 
@NovaliumCompany no, not at all. But you need to adjust the screen brightness to make it easy on your eyes.
 
Meh, I'm satisfied with the Kindle for now, but I can agree that the screen is not really big.
 
Also its app store is pretty bare unless you go through whatever effort to load the official play store
 
4:52 PM
@danielunderwood all the Kindles have fairly small screens. Amazon used to do a 10" Kindle some years ago but they discontinued it and now make nothing large than 6".
A shame, because if a 10" paperwhite Kindle was available I'd buy it in a moment.
 
Ahh I didn't know that. I think mine is either 7 or 8. It was a refurbished model from a couple years ago though
 
@danielunderwood The Kindle Fire tablet is completely different to the Kindle.
The Kindle uses an e-ink screen
 
Yeah I was talking about the fire. I'd be interested in one of the e-ink ones, but aren't you pretty locked down as far as what you can read?
 
lichess.org/XlbscNbc Anyone up for a quick chess (started playing a few days ago, I'm kinda addicted now :P )
 
@danielunderwood No, you can copy any book you want to the kindle. You just connect it to your PC with a USB cable and it appears as a USB drive. Copy the .mobi files across and away you go.
 
Use something like Calibre to convert your e-books to mobi format.
 
@danielunderwood Be careful with the pdf files, I use some sort of converter when the file is not the right size for kindle, but it still looks ugly.
 
@JohnRennie but you have to have a proper ebook, right? Like no bootleg pdf textbook scans?
 
@DanielSank I dodged earlier 'cause I didn't have anything in mind, but now I do: youtube.com/…
 
@danielunderwood the Kindle will read pdf files, but they're a bit slow. They take a lot of processing compared to a MOBI.
But really I'd advise using a tablet. Ideally one with a 1080p screen.
 
4:57 PM
Like any pdf? Say you have a scan like this
I always thought there was no way to have something like that on kindle
 
If I have to honest, the only reason I bought a Kindle 5 was because it was relatively cheap (around 75$), it works good enough for now. But if you have the money, like @JohnRennie says, better get a tablet. :P
 
@danielunderwood My Kindle would read PDFs. Just copy the PDF onto the Kindle. I assume the more modern Kindles will too, though I don't know that for certain.
 
Ok, good evening everyone. I'll be going. Thanks for being such an awesome community <3
 
@danielunderwood you're in the US aren't you?
 
Anonymous
@NovaliumCompany Biya!
 
Anonymous
5:02 PM
75$ is somewhat reasonable if they give you internet access. Should be similar to an entry-level tablet
 
Anonymous
The Chinese tablets are actually doing very well these days in India
 
Anonymous
On the other hand, I bought an iPad this year in January but I hardly ever use it. The associated keyboard isn't good enough for fast typing and almost all the good apps are paid!
 
Anonymous
The stylus is apparently the only good thing about it, but I think they can improve on the body texture
 
Anonymous
It's way too slippery
 
Anonymous
(I was actually thinking of selling it off and buying some recent Samsung tablet instead)
 
Anonymous
5:08 PM
Nah, actually I'd prefer a laptop to a tablet I guess :P
 
@Blue a laptop is far better as a general purpose tool. But tablets are very good for reading on.
 
Anonymous
Yeah, I mean for someone who reads casual novels, etc tablets might be more useful. It's difficult to carry a laptop around. But I sit at my desk almost 12 hours a day, so not as useful for me
 
Anonymous
I feel cheated after having bought the extra keyboard though :P
 
Anonymous
It's the most useless thing ever
 
Anonymous
 
Anonymous
5:21 PM
The keys are soft as cotton balls. It's way faster to type using the on-screen keyboard
 
@JohnRennie someone starred that? But yeah I am
And regarding laptops vs tablets, I thought a surface would be neat. Turns out that it's neither a good laptop nor a good tablet
 
Anonymous
@danielunderwood The microsoft one?
 
Yeah
I do have a friend with one that seems to like it. I can't understand why myself
 
Anonymous
It was very expensive; at least 2-3 years ago - $3000 or something
 
Anonymous
I remembering window shopping one :P
 
5:30 PM
That must have been the desktop one or one of the ones meant for businesses unless there's a crazy price difference between countries
I was mainly talking about this one (well the past versions of it) microsoft.com/en-us/surface/devices/surface-pro/overview
 
Anonymous
Goddamn, this costs Rs. 479,999.00
 
Anonymous
6,641 $
 
Anonymous
"Microsoft Surface Book 2 (Intel Core i7, 16GB RAM, 512GB) - 15" "
 
I certainly hope that's a "we're the only offer on amazon, so it's crazy high"
Otherwise that's insane
 
5:33 PM
o.O
 
Anonymous
I think the costs are a bit higher in India, since a lot of the things are imported
 
Anonymous
But still, that seems a bit too much
 
Anonymous
> This laptop will also help you to go from one place to another, all you have to do start it and sit on it , may be that’s why it’s costing about $6000 price of a car 🚘
 
Anonymous
LOL
 
Anonymous
(in the review)
 
5:35 PM
lol
This was more of what I was thinking...still about twice the cost I'd expect amazon.in/Microsoft-Surface-KJR-00015-Integrated-Graphics/dp/…
 
Anonymous
@danielunderwood Ah, that looks reasonable
 
Anonymous
If it has a nice keyboard, I'd definitely go with that
 
Anonymous
instead of the iPad which costs around the same
 
Anonymous
HP also has some convertibles
 
Anonymous
I don't know how good those are
 
@EmilioPisanty There is a certain pattern in the music you send me.
The vocals tend to be in Spanish and there's a trend of upbeatness.
 
Anonymous
> Sold both my kidneys and 1 of my eye to own it now i play vr games on it highly recommended
 
Anonymous
@AvnishKabaj Looks like you have a brother ^
 
6:00 PM
@DanielSank I am unsurprised by those features =P
 
6:11 PM
sup
 
6:34 PM
@Phase inf
 
6:45 PM
wow, typical man
minds always thinking about sets
 
Anonymous
@Phase Hi
 
Anonymous
Sep 15 at 19:04, by Blue
9 hours ago, by Blue
@user2646 $$\mathfrak{howzlife}$$
 
$$\mathscr{sick}$$
 
Anonymous
Aw
 
catch you on the $\mathfrak{flipside}$
$\mathfrak{narc}$
is chat usually this dead nowadays?
 
6:55 PM
$\mathfrak{negatory}$
 
hey @Blue is the pollution in India still pretty bad? I have someone telling me the rivers have been cleaned and that it's not super polluted and I'm pressing [x] to doubt pretty hard rn
@enumaris that is the weirdest y i've ever seen
 
$\mathfrak{y's}~\mathfrak{that}$
 
Anonymous
@Phase "rivers have been cleaned" - that's a funny claim, given that we have rivers stretching several 1000s of kilometers :P The pollution sort of depends on the area you live in. Near the Himalayan range in the North (near the source of the rivers) they are quite clean and you can even directly drink river water (it's basically molten water from the glaciers). It's further down the stream where the pollution begins ... esp due to the nearby industries
 
Anonymous
Maybe a certain area has been cleaned, but definitely not all.
 
Yeah idk, he's citing sources from Quora titled "positive tourism experiences in india"
I think I'm just gonna exit the argument
 
Anonymous
7:03 PM
You shouldn't get into arguments with people who cite Quora, in the first place :P
 
$\mathfrak{OOF}$
ok come on
those are meant to be O's
 
Anonymous
@CuriousFish Hi, can may I eat you?
 
Anonymous
@SirCumference Still alive? :D Had any break-the-fast meal?
 
hopefully he broke-the-fast with a dinner
since Yom Kippur is over a sun down
 
7:17 PM
0_o don't eat me
 
Anonymous
Don't worry. I found some Nutella
 
Anonymous
Sparing you for today
 
Thank god.
Lol
Okay I'm leaving bye
 
7:33 PM
@vzn
@Everyone
Atiyah presenting a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis Monday twitter.com/HLForum/status/1042670700652318720 ???
 
Baez had a Twitter reaction which wasn’t encouraging, lemme find it
 
This is going to be insane if true
 
So my attitude right now is: if he’s actually succeeded, it’ll be splendid. But I wouldn’t hold my breath.
 
That's a very very very snarky comment, yikes
Links to this thread below
34
Q: What is the current understanding regarding complex structures on the 6-sphere?

jdcIn October 2016, Atiyah famously posted a preprint to the arXiv, "The Non-Existent Complex 6-Sphere" containing a very brief proof $S^6$ admits no complex structure, which I immediately read and realized I lacked the background to understand. The preprint inspired interest in KR-theory and a few ...

 
Eh, snarky isn’t the right word imo
But it is rather bleak
It does rather read like that.
 
7:41 PM
10
Q: Atiyah's paper "Non-existent complex 6-sphere"

Max BorovkovI'm trying to understand the main idea of Atiyah's proof (https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.09366). Although there were discussions on MO year ago I couldn't find answers to my questions. Consider the isomorphism on the 4th page: "$KSp(\mathbb{R}^6) \rightarrow KR^{(7,1)}(pt) = \mathbb{Z}_2$" My quest...

 
Atiyah claimed that he has used work of Dirac, I am curious about what he have used from work of Dirac to prove Riemann hypo
 
Anonymous
apparently
 
(I do remember hearing about the 6-sphere in the math chat at the time. I don’t know of the reception tho)
 
Anonymous
> The Riemann Hypothesis is a famous unsolved problem dating from 1859. I will present a simple proof using a radically new approach. It is based on work of von Neumann (1936), Hirzebruch (1954), and Dirac (1928).
 
Anonymous
7:44 PM
As for which exact part of it, we gotta wait I guess :P
 
Anonymous
(not that I'd understand it anyway)
 
@Blue thanks, are u sure from this paper of Dirac he has used something?
@Blue Yeah :p
 
Anonymous
@taritgoswami That's what most sources are claiming
 
This is a huge deal tbh
 
Does Riemann hypo has any impact in Physics?
 
7:53 PM
probably
but I don't know of any
 
It’s a huge deal if he’s succeeded
 
@Semiclassical Yeah it will help to understand distribution of primes in Mathematics more clearly
 
And I definitely take Atiyah saying he has a proof more seriously than most
But it’s still if, not when
 
Anonymous
41
Q: What does proving the Riemann Hypothesis accomplish?

MythioI've recently been reading about the Millenium Prize problems, specifically the Riemann Hypothesis. I'm not near qualified to even grasp the entire problem, but seeing the hypothesis and the other problems I can't help wonder: what is the practical use of solving it? Many researchers have spent ...

 
Anonymous
@taritgoswami There was this nice thread ^
 
Anonymous
7:56 PM
95
Q: Consequences of the Riemann hypothesis

Andrea FerrettiI assume a number of results have been proven conditionally on the Riemann hypothesis, of course in number theory and maybe in other fields. What are the most relevant you know? It would also be nice to include consequences of the generalized Riemann hypothesis (but specify which one is assumed).

 
I was under the impression the Riemann Hypothesis was one of the most difficult Millenium problems to solve
so this must be very radical :O
 
@Blue And I think there is a Cryptographic scheme using Riemann hypo, don't know proof will help to make it better or not :-(
 
Anonymous
In cryptography RH is already assumed to be true afaik
 
Anonymous
If someone proved it to be wrong that could have some effects I guess
 
there are thousands of paper states if Riemann hypo is correct , and the conclusions works pretty well
 
Anonymous
8:02 PM
Yeah, that's what I hear
 
Anonymous
@taritgoswami Where are you studying physics currently? (if you don't mind) Not a lot of places offer courses in QI at the undergrad level
 
Anonymous
From the "Goswami" title I suspect you're from WB?
 
8:17 PM
crap
forgot to charge my phone
now it's at 17%
 
if it dies, I'm gonna be so bored
existential crisis
 
Anonymous
Borrow a USB
 
I don't really want to walk around asking people for a USB-C...
 
Anonymous
You have an office chat group or group mail? ;)
 
8:19 PM
That's why I always have a cable for my phone in my work bag
Just stand up and yell at them all. Much more efficient than asking one by one!
 
hmmm
 
Or just think of the person with a pixel. At least that's the only phone I know of with USB-C
 
samsungs are USB-C
it's what I got
 
Or one of those!
I have a spare if you can manage to figure out teleportation
 
might be physically impossible...as a physicist, I can not condone such an undertaking
 
8:27 PM
What about "speed of light translocation"
should be fast enough and possibly physically allowable
Or just download one of those phone charging apps
 
according to the no-clone theorem there are limits to that
maybe I should put my phone in a microwave
hope that samsung installed that capability
I heard it only works on iphones, but you never know
 
Just better make sure they don't have any microwave detection strips
 
hmmm
 
Like they used to have water detection strips in case you dropped your phone in water and tried to warranty it
Side note: Those water strips aren't activated by acetone
 
I can take a look
 
8:30 PM
Side note 2: Acetone dissolves solo cups
(as well as a variety of plastics)
 
Anonymous
The new iPhones aren't waterproof?
 
Are any of the popular new phones waterproof?
 
Anonymous
There was one by Sony
 
huh neat!
 
8:42 PM
This is like all or nothing
He's risking his rep on this on purpose probably
 
I mean...dude's 90...the chances of dementia/cognitive decline is quite high...which may lead to lowered inhibitions
 
The whole 6-sphere thing adds to the drama
 
9:11 PM
I might reach 2k reputation in the next months. This will give me the power to edit without peer review, but I feel like a drunk driver with a train on the highway at full speed. is there a way I can still pass by peer review
to begin with, i am not a native english speaker, and I do try to edit sometimes
big problem there ^^
 
If he’s correct, it’ll be immense. If he’s wrong in an interesting way, that will be disappointing but perhaps not so disheartening.
The worst-case scenario is that he’s wrong in a boring/obvious way.
 
"Shouldn't there be a negative sign there?"
sits down
 
To the mod who declined my flag for protecting a particular question: had you bothered to read the link you provided, you'd see it explicit started that the protection capabilities for the 20k+ non-mods require the post to be 1 day old and have an answer by a user with <10 rep, so no I most certainly could not protect the question.
 
@KyleKanos I was told to flag the mod if you want his/her/its attention
I guess you can know who it is? if so, use @
 
For reference, the Scholze-Stix objection to Mochizuki’s argument sounds to me like: Mochizuki is wrong in an interesting/nontrivial way
Whereas garden-variety crackpottery is wrong in boring ways
 
9:28 PM
That's how this could pan out
If wrong it's probably interesting enough to hint at something deep
Wonder what the Hirzebruch paper is about
 
@coniferous_smellerULPBG-W8ZgjR dunno who it was...I have a guess, but that doesn't do me any good
 
is the world building SE super laggy for anyone else?
it's always super laggy when I go there
I wonder if it's the background or something
not familiar with Mochizuki
 
Anonymous
@enumaris You haven't seen the IUT memes?
 
nope
 
The abc conjecture (also known as the Oesterlé–Masser conjecture) is a conjecture in number theory, first proposed by Joseph Oesterlé (1988) and David Masser (1985). It is stated in terms of three positive integers, a, b and c (hence the name) that are relatively prime and satisfy a + b = c. If d denotes the product of the distinct prime factors of abc, the conjecture essentially states that d is usually not much smaller than c. In other words: if a and b are composed from large powers of primes, then c is usually not divisible by large powers of primes. The precise statement is given below. The...
 
Anonymous
9:34 PM
 
oh, the dude who wrote all those papers that nobody understands
they're all wrong or just his ABC conjecture proof is wrong?
 
Anonymous
@enumaris Afaik I don't think he's been proven wrong
 
People stopped scrutinizing it?
it's been 6 years or w/e
should have been long enough for someone to figure it out lawl
 
Anonymous
> While there were no experts on IUT in 2012, their number increased to a two-digital one in 2017
 
Anonymous
9:39 PM
> Mochizuki refuses to travel outside Japan to help explain his work, and his written explanations can seem impenetrable.
 
From Motls blog comments:

'By the way, I guess that Atiyah's supposed proof is probably based in Hirzebruch' thesis

http://hirzebruch.mpim-bonn...Über%20vierdimensionale%20Riemannsche%20Flächen.pdf

rather than in the celebrated Hirzebruch-Riemann-Roch theorem of that same year (1954) that Atiyah likes so much. We shall not know until Atiyah's talk is published elsewhere.'
 
Anonymous
Chat doesn't accept non-ASCII URLs :/
 
This is the thing where Japanese mathematicians say "ABC Theorem" and everyone else still says "ABC Conjecture"?
 
Can anybody tell me what the Riemann-Roch theorem is
 
no clue
 
9:43 PM
What kind of memes are these
 
11% .... existential crisis intensifies
 
Need to read the Dirac paper the Hirze one and what's the von Neumann one :(
 
@bolbteppa I was supposed to understand that at one point
I failed
 
I think I meant to try :\
I mean vaguely I tried and failed if that counts
I would say it's to do with Dirac operators
 
The context in which I knew of it was the one sketched in the Wiki article, ie Riemann surface business
The Hirzebruch-RR stuff, by contrast, was well beyond me
 
9:57 PM
In mathematics, the Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem, named after Friedrich Hirzebruch, Bernhard Riemann, and Gustav Roch, is Hirzebruch's 1954 result contributing to the Riemann–Roch problem for complex algebraic varieties of all dimensions. It was the first successful generalisation of the classical Riemann–Roch theorem on Riemann surfaces to all higher dimensions, and paved the way to the Grothendieck–Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem proved about three years later. == Statement of Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem == The Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem applies to any holomorphic vector bundle E...
'It was the first successful generalisation of the classical Riemann–Roch theorem on Riemann surfaces to all higher dimensions'
The Riemann–Roch theorem is an important theorem in mathematics, specifically in complex analysis and algebraic geometry, for the computation of the dimension of the space of meromorphic functions with prescribed zeroes and allowed poles. It relates the complex analysis of a connected compact Riemann surface with the surface's purely topological genus g, in a way that can be carried over into purely algebraic settings. Initially proved as Riemann's inequality by Riemann (1857), the theorem reached its definitive form for Riemann surfaces after work of Riemann's short-lived student Gustav Roch ...
 
They do relate in the HRR entry to Atiyah-Singer
And the Atiyah-Singer page in turn indicates that HRR can be straightforwardly derived from A-S
The closest thing I come to understanding classical R-R is this bit: “the theorem may be roughly paraphrased by saying ‘dimension − correction = degree − genus + 1’.”
 
'Essentially, the theorem determines the number of linearly independent meromorphic functions on the surface that have at most a specified finite set of poles'
Why would Riemann or Roch even care about this, they obviously cared about something more basic
3
A: On the original Riemann-Roch theorem

danielA partial answer. According to the Wiki entry, it was originally proved by Riemann and generalized by his student Roch. The following contains the original statements. It does not address the question of how they were originally proved, which is given in the references. Roch's generalization fir...

 
Presumably that’s the more modern formulation
 
'A translation of Riemann's quote is: A function of the form $x+yi$, which is given on a part of the $(x,y)$-plane, can be extended continously in only one way.'
So something about analytic continuation of functions
 
The problem is that this all falls well short of the Dirac operator context
Classical R-R is presumably not the important idea
 
10:11 PM
If you're analytically continuing a function from a bounded region to the whole plane then in general you're working with meromorphic functions otherwise by Liouville's theorem you'd only be working with constant functions?
 
Sounds right?
 
'for an abstract Riemann surface, it is not immediately obvious that there are any non-constant meromorphic functions at all! As the poles are isolated and the surface is compact, a meromorphic function can only have finitely many poles'
 
this somehow gets to elliptic function and theta function madness
 
Hmm, if you took a holomorphic function on a given region of the plane and analytically continued it to the whole plane, you might think they'd all end up as constants or something, so maybe one has to prove the extension is unique at all points along the extension?
 
(The weirdness with elliptic functions I guess being that they’ve got infinitely many complex poles, but only finitely many in the fundamental domain.)
 
10:19 PM
My guess is the whole Atiyah stuff is about treating differential operators as like holomorphic functions and doing this with them
 
No idea
In particular, no idea how this is supposed to relate to the Riemann hypothesis
 
@Semiclassical I have a little E&M problem from Griffiths that bothers me :(
 
I’m on mobile right now so I probably can’t help much. But set it up
 
Can you view pictures? Might be easier if I just send a printscreen of the problem text
 
Maybe he analytically continued the Zeta function or some differential operator related to it in such a way that the zeros did X
 
10:24 PM
@Lozansky I can, yeah
 
@Blue damn.
> All the numerical data shows π(x) < Li(x), and Gauss thought this was always true, but in 1914 Littlewood used the Riemann hypothesis to show the inequality reverses infinitely often. In 1933, Skewes used RH to show the inequality reverses for some x below 10^10^10^34
 
@Semiclassical I have the solution, I just don't understand why it works :P Lemme send it as well
 
that's one large number
 
10:28 PM
 
I think I wrote up the solution to that problem myself as a TA, heh
 
Yaay :D
 
But, what don’t you understand?
 
So what does he mean "two cylinders of opposite[...]", like are they superimposed?
I guess I don't understand how to go from polarization to charge densities
 
That’s not obvious to me either. The way I remember doing the problem was to compute the surface bound charge
 
10:34 PM
I know polarization is defined as dipole moment per unit volume, so what we would want is to create "infinitesimal" dipoles (uniformly) in the cylinder by somehow bringing together a positive and a negative charge density? :/
 
maybe the idea is like this: suppose you take his setup but allow the two cylinders to be slightly off-center
That’d give you a few regions. outside and in the overlap, there will be no net charge
That’ll give two regions, one with positive charge and the other with negative charge
 
@Lozansky basically, yes
 
@Semiclassical But the polarization is not uniform then?
 
@Lozansky it is, but only in the limit of infinitesimal displacement
 
If I now move the cylinders close enough so that they almost entirely overlap, then the remainder looks a lot like a surface charge
 
10:39 PM
Fair
 
Not sure how to validate that, but it sounds very similar to what he does earlier in the chapter
 
Yeah with the sphere
 
@Semiclassical you can indeed formalize it, but you probably need to pull in some heavier guns from distribution theory.
The core of that is that the charge distribution of a point dipole is the directional derivative of a Dirac delta
with the upshot that any problem that says "calculate the field with uniform polarization $\mathbf P$" can be reduced to "calculate the field with uniform charge density in those same regions, and then take the directional derivative"
which is basically what the superposition of charged cylinders is doing
 
In more physical terms,
when you say "a region with uniform polarization $\mathbf P$", what you're really saying is that each (meso/)microscopic cell of your material, at some suitable level of magnification, is really two blobs of equal-but-opposite charge, and that those are displaced by some amount
the two-displaced-charged-regions is an extension of that mental model
take all your microscopic cells, take the negative charge, discard the positive charge, and then join up the charge from all the cells. That will yield one large cloud of negative charge.
do the same with the positive charges from all the cells, and you'll get one large cloud of positive charge
 
crap, something wrong with my query :(
 
10:47 PM
that will be displaced from the negative cloud by some amount
... and you get the method!
 
So essentially a capacitor? :P
 
I think I know where the problem is...
 
@Lozansky the dielectric inside one.
 
@enumaris is it in the query?
I bet it's in the query
 
I think I neglected to account for one issue in my WHERE statement
not entirely sure how to best fix it, but adding an absolute value helps a lot
I think I got it
I have to do date_diff<= 6 and date_diff>0 rather than just the first one
 
10:55 PM
Are you comparing some dates with the older one first and some with the newer one first?
 
gotta put the dates in there in the same order
 
pretty sure I got the order right
 
I really do want to see them get walloped
 
@EmilioPisanty @Semiclassical OK, well I think I can follow the rest of the solution. Thanksss
 
10:59 PM
@enumaris do date_diff(date1, date2) <= 6 and date_diff(date2, date1) <0 just to confuse the hell out of whoever tries to mess with your code
 

« first day (2878 days earlier)      last day (2041 days later) »