I'm glad it all turned out okay. — Robin 14 secs ago

This is the best answer imho. — KPM 23 secs ago

-1 for two reasons: shooting yourself in the foot in order to hurt someone else is not the best idea. There's also no such thing as a credit score at the location of the questioner. — DonFusili 1 min ago

@Eff He was the one who came up with the 75% pay for 'house expenses' idea though, he wanted to have that documented in our partnership document. He did this so we could together afford a larger house. That was his proposition and he agreed on this. Just as with the car. His offer, his decision. I told him before I was uncomfortable spending 200 euro a month on a car and that I wanted to keep 100 as my limit to leave room for 'spending money' so he offered to to double it so I could drive a car he deemed better/safer. — JaneDoe1337 1 min ago

@RaduMurzea he does not have a boss — I am bored 21 secs ago

+1, because "If important, God will let me know too" is theologically correct in Christianity and is a very important principle, for this very reason. This person has very serious theological problems as well as social. — Nacht 1 min ago

@Steve-O While I appreaciate your consideration of her wishes, OP actually did not say that. She only asked us to take her word for Alice's "condition". Besides that, here on IPS we are allowed to challenge the frame of a question, as long as this provides a better answer to the question and does not just happen out of general disagreement. — Randolph Carter 1 min ago

baldPrussian is right, I wouldn't suggest anonymous notes. Even more, I strongly disagree. I did something similar once for the same reasons(lack of hygiene), and the person just raised up and asked "who put this here?". He was sad, angry and ashamed in the same time. I ended up being shown as the bad guy, that doesn't understand other's problem. I was also ashamed for doing it. It is for sure not the best option. I invite you to reconsider. — lukuss 33 secs ago

I don't disagree with you. However, consider that the situation is one where you keep giving in. How long do you continue giving in ? The OP is about to be at the point where they have no expendable income at all, because everything is going towards expenses that their partner should be paying. There really are only 2 solutions: 1 is dealing with it, and not have any money ever, 2 is a more aggressive approach. BTW, what country is this wonderland of no credit reports ? — xyious 24 secs ago

I do agree with you @baldPrussian and lukuss, I would never do that — I am bored 1 min ago

@Michael he originally agreed to an amount and then changed it, if a joint account set up was in place he wouldn't be able to change this split. — Jon.G 1 min ago

(-1) Terrible advice, there is no need to unnecessarily escalate the situation. First you try being polite, as you want to give him the benefit of the doubt. This assumes that he is intentionally trying to be annoying. The "nor is anyone else" is also reaching. — clark 9 secs ago

why the downvote? — reznor 1 min ago

? I didn't downvote! I appreciate the comedy here. — clark 46 secs ago

@CarlKevinson Noted — Ms Jackson 1 min ago