« first day (539 days earlier)      last day (4369 days later) » 

3:00 PM
His horn was sideways.
 
user19161
Of course one can type in other things to generate other unicorns, but that would not be representative.
 
Here is one I like from one of my email addresses
 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 I bought a bunch of Wasteland Skimmers and have been having limited success with them. Went back to strike/rush
Also bought the 100,000g card, but can't figure out how to use it.
 
The 100Kg card is old.
Its price isn't representative of its usability.
 
user19161
@Robusto Didn't it come with an instruction manual? Ask for a refund!
 
3:08 PM
I got a Savior and eight Skimmers just because I could. Don't intend to ever use them.
 
Active war. Trying out a new farming target.
 
Still sitting on 1.7 million, waiting for sealed Homeworld.
 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 Savior. That's the name of the card.
 
are there people here who care about this?
 
@JSBᾶngs me!
 
3:09 PM
@JSBᾶngs "Care" would be overstating the emotion.
 
@Robusto still countable to me. Just like Skimmers.
Or any card, for that matter.
 
I was just saying that as in, "Savior. Right, now I remember the name, which I couldn't think of before."
 
i'm actually Not A Fan of WoT... but this showed up in my feeds and i thought it looked interesting
 
Well, that cover isn't too bad, considering
 
@Robusto ah, sorry, I don't read your shit.
 
user19161
3:11 PM
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 No shit in this chat!
 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 Which is why I don't poop in chat.
 
I also bought a second Hephatat. Just for the art.
 
@JSB I think if I'd started reading the series in 1990 I probably would have grown disillusioned.
 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 I gotta get that, but the prospect of grinding it is daunting.
 
You no has monies?
 
3:12 PM
Does this seem on-topic here/would you be interested in a migration?
9
Q: Why does Juliet ask "Wherefore are thou Romeo" and not "... Montague"?

AngadaThe "wherefore" in the above quotation is often (mis)interpreted as meaning "where" instead of "why." Partially, I believe, because the two words sound alike, but also, because it kind of makes more sense. There is no problem with her beloved's surname being Romeo, only with his family name be...

 
The illustrator who did the first 13 WoT books died, so this last book has a new illustrator. But he's done a decent job, it looks like, in maintaining the style of the previous books. I find it incredibly annoying when publishers make it impossible to get an entire series of books with the same style of cover COUGH COUGH I'm looking at you, George R. R. Martin
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Considering what? Considering how girly it is? Why not just become a brony and be done with it!
 
Ah you mean grinding the raid.
Yeah the raid sucks.
 
@ladenedge Wherefore means why in that sentence.
 
@Robusto that's not the question, though.
 
3:14 PM
@Robusto no, don't misunderstand. The covers of the WoT books have been uniformly awful all along, since 1990. But more important to me: they have been uniform.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 You misspelled unicorn.
 
@ladenedge I looked at it the other day but couldn't make my mind up. The response in this room was meh.
 
Actually unicorns would have improved them.
uniform unicorns
 
Who can resist a unicorn in uniform?
 
3:15 PM
An uninformed Unimog.
 
user19161
It is interesting that there are unicorn, acorn and popcorn.
 
oh, uninformed unicorns: not a fan of those.
 
@Robusto: I think it's a pretty good question, but it's not about 'wherefore'.
 
Can't you just see them all, cute little brown-shirted unicorns, goose-stepping along with their horns at attention.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Unimog. Not unicorn. That is so not the same.
 
3:16 PM
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 Yeah. I was bringing the discussion back to my topic, not yours.
 
@JasperLoy you're an eggcorn.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 I was discussing your topic alright. You thankless unthanker.
 
user19161
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 Ah, I forgot that one. I even had to ask Jimmy what eggcorn and malapropism mean, and I am still confused.
 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 I'm not thankless! Just today someone thanked me for something.
I have at least one thank
 
@RegDwightB8: alright, 'meh' it is, heh.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Well that'll be the last time for today, I'll take the measures necessary. MUWAHAHA.
No thanking Mr Shiny and New in this chat today.
There.
Anyway, back on topic,
 
3:19 PM
@ladenedge Well, it's freshman-level stuff, regardless. Ultimately it can't be resolved by a vote, like most questions on Lit.SE.
 
This thing resists unicorns just fine. I tried.
 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 Have you tried it with phalanxes of uniformed unicorns? If you say yes, I will know you're lying.
 
Maybe means no.
 
3:21 PM
Better.
 
Kontingentflüchtling.
 
Imagine them, phalanxes of cute uniformed unicorns (though how could uniformed unicorns not be cute?) overriding whatever power your LEGO truck has to resist their charms. Soon there is nothing left but little plastic blocks and a few wires. You are pwned, utterly and completely, by unicorns.
 
user19161
Wow I am glad I can understand the maybe, maybe means no, no, better thing above.
 
Well you can't.
^ quote from which movie?
 
@JasperLoy How can you be sure it's not a language trap we have laid for you. We are constantly laying language traps for you, you know.
 
3:23 PM
@Robusto sometimes I have the feeling you spelled your age backwards when you said it was 70.
 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 Except I never said my age. But what I have done is admit to serial immaturity.
Mar 15 '11 at 10:53, by Robusto
@Cerberus — You're only young once, but that's no reason you can't be immature forever.
 
Except for the death thing.
 
user19161
@Robusto Well, I saw the double meaning of the no already, but there might be a higher trap.
 
24 hours ago, by Robusto
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 "On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero."
Actually, that doesn't take into account the apotheosis that would be concomitant with the Singularity.
But I'm not too worried about that.
 
@Robusto I challenge that. With mighty logic. At the age of 5, your chances of dying before turning 10 were rather high. At the age of 20, your chances of dying before turning 10 were zero, but the chances of dying before turning 30 were considerable. Now at the age of 70, your chances of dying with 10, or 20, or 30, are all zero. You're turning immortal.
 
user19161
3:28 PM
0
Q: Pronounciation using alphabet

AdobeSo there's a term vi and it should be pronounced vee-eye. I have a transcription for the word emacs: /ˈiːmæks/ How can I render this transription to a alphabet letters? The best I can do: ee-mex I can't find a better name for the question - if You'll come up with a better - please fix (ther...

 
user19161
OT
 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 What is this, Emo's Paradox? Pah!
 
@Robusto no, Elmo's Paradox.
 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 So it involves being tickled to death?
 
Immortality. Tickled to immortality.
That's the only way.
Think about it.
Cause I won't.
@JasperLoy yes, only proverbciation is on-topic here. Pronounciation is gen ref.
 
3:31 PM
Actually, when you're born your chances of living to be 80 are less than half. When you reach 60 they're about 50%. And your chances of living to 100 are, at birth, minuscule. But if you reach 90, they're actually rather improved.
 
Well that's what I'm saying.
 
But Jim Morrison said it best: "No one here gets out alive."
 
He lead by example.
 
You mean "leaded"?
 
user19161
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 He's not asking about the pronunciation which I would consider on topic. He asks for how to convert phonetics into letters there.
 
3:32 PM
@Robusto Let's settle for plumbumeted.
@JasperLoy would you please kindly whoosh yourself? I am too tired.
 
I think you need to double the m: plumbummeted.
 
user19161
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 Thwack.
 
No, it's doubled already. Plummeted -> plum-bu-meted. Like, Plum-fucking-meted.
Plumbummeted, on the other hand, makes you sound like Tom Green.
 
No. You are disqualified. Doubled means doubled, not one here and one there.
In baseball, two singles don't make a double. QED.
 
user19161
It is interesting that colours are used as last names, like green and brown.
 
3:35 PM
One and one makes two, you shouldn't have dropped out of the first grade.
 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 Hey, it took Bertrand Russell 60 pages to prove that 1 + 1 = 2. This stuff is hard, man.
 
@Robusto yeah that would be so like you, ignoring maths and applying baseballs, to forehead.
 
What, now you're trying to invent the mathpalm? That's so like you.
 
I'm the mathpalm pilot.
 
And just for the record, you can palm a ball but you can't palm a math.
 
3:36 PM
You just have to try harder. Like, second-grade harder.
 
Have you learned nothing from your slacker culture?
 
There's no stuff to learn in slacker culture, duh.
Learning is for people who fail at slacking.
 
Thanks for underlining my point.
 
__________________________
 
user19161
Kris sounds very authoritative in his comments. Sometimes they make me chuckle.
 
3:38 PM
That's too low. You have to move it up.
 
user19161
I moved it higher.
 
@Robusto Just tilt your head 52°.
 
That's a pineapple underline.
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 Fahrenheit or Celsius? Or Kelvin, perhaps?
 
user19161
@Robusto That's called a strikeout, duh.
 
@Robusto Reaumur.
 
3:39 PM
@JasperLoy Now look who's bringing up baseball.
 
For the zillionth time.
 
You mean Rohmer?
 
I never not don't.
 
Nice conversation-stopper.
3
Q: What is being in a state of being subdued called?

mfg In geology, subduction is the process that takes place at convergent boundaries by which one tectonic plate moves under another tectonic plate... (Wikipedia) Now I understand that quite literally, subduction is a process whereby one thing goes underneath another; and while figuratively an em...

Like Kosmonaut, sometimes I feel like I don't understand English anymore.
 
Try Chinese. I am told it has fewer grammer.
 
user19161
3:50 PM
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 I know you are just trolling me there.
 
Actually the answer seems to have some ideas.
 
@JasperLoy Well, I T-roll you wherever.
 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 Even Chinese people will tell you Chinese has no grammar.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 but they will tell me that in Chinese.
 
But this is really a question about psychology. At least jwpat's answer makes it so.
 
3:51 PM
What they mean is that you don't change verbs or nouns according to the verb tense or grammatical number.
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 Probably they won't, or else you wouldn't understand it.
 
I will try not to understand it regardless.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 No. They don't really mean anything. All Chinese "language" is just for show. Wake them up in the middle of the night and they'll yell at you in English, just like everyone else.
 
2
Q: Expression for when you've fixed something, but something else breaks? And repeatedly?

Shawn LeBlancIs there an expression for the situation where you've just fixed something, only to find out that your fix broke something else? So you fix that something else, and another thing breaks. And so on and so forth? Totally inspired by my current work at my job.

I think he's looking for "life".
 
@Robusto based on my sample size of one chinese person that i sometimes wake up in the middle of the night, I cannot refute your claim.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 QED.
 
user19161
3:53 PM
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 I wanted to say induction there.
 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 Is there a Schadenfreude badge yet? If so, he should get it.
 
What was that one all about, again?
Or you mean literally? Then there must be no badge. That's an integral part of any schadenfreude.
 
I don't know what it was all about. But part of it was about providing laughter material for ELU chat.
 
Ah.
Any question can do that.
I mean, we can do that to any question.
 
However they do it, if they make us laugh at their lameness they should get the badge.
Speaking of lameness.
 
3:58 PM
@Robusto I can't begin to understand that. Is it Chinese?
The title alone gives me headaches. Seven.
 
user19161
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 I wonder whether Russian or Chinese is harder to learn, hmm.
 
@JasperLoy Depends on whether you're a native speaker of Russian or Chinese.
 
user19161
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 I mean if neither.
 
There's people like that?
We'll bring an end to that. Or put that to an end.
 
user19161
We will need to ask someone who has learnt both.
 
4:00 PM
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 We'll put an end to that. I think that's what you meant to say.
 
Actually, no.
 
Well, then you're just wrong. QED.
 
Which is why I corrected it before your intermezzo arrived.
 
Actually it was an entr'acte.
 
user19161
Quiet elegant dude, quit explaining dictionaries.
 
4:02 PM
Another county heard from.
 
@Robusto it's "put an end to" but "bring to an end". I was deliberately mixing them up. What's not to love?
Another day, another sophisticated joke.
Another Robusto not on top of things.
 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 And I was messing that up by stating the obvious, as you did to me earlier. What's not to love.
 
And I am messing that up now.
What's not to not hate?
 
And btw, last time I checked I was still on top of things in ELU. QED.
 
Only if you tilt your head 52° Reaumur.
 
4:04 PM
Is it too late to get that in Imperial gallons?
 
No, but the calculations involve several hippos and are also quite complicated.
 
I can wait.
 
That you shall.
Meanwhile I'm communisting again. Laters.
 
Wait!
Before you go, I have this question about a vs. an! Oh, damn ... he's gone.
Now I'll never know the answer.
 
Wait? What for? The bus? I can do that at the bus stop?
CU
 
4:06 PM
Laters.
 
Hey, look whom I have just missed.
 
Whom? You missed whom? That strikes me as rather careless.
 
Why?
It's whom's fault.
 
Ssshhh. You're not supposed to ask indelicate questions here.
 
I'm never supposed to do anything!
 
4:08 PM
Correct.
 
Next thing you're saying I can't say the things Kit's son says.
 
Correct.
 
Next thing you're saying "correct".
 
Right.
 
Next thing you're trying to sabotage my schemes.
 
4:15 PM
Elephants. Or something like them.
 
In the room or outside?
 
I don't have a big enough room. We'll have to do it at your place.
 
I don't exactly have rooms.
More like giant caves.
With comfortable furnishings, where appropriate.
 
@JasperLoy Chinese is harder to learn than Russian, because the writing system is designed to be hard to use.
 
So can you explain to me what the advantages of a common-law system are over a more statutory/legislative system?
 
user19161
4:20 PM
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Ah OK. For one there is no alphabet.
 
@Cerberus are you asking me?
Are you asking me to compare the advantages of, say, France's legal system, with England's?
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 If you have an answer, then, yes!
 
(England having the common-law system)
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 For example, though I am mostly interested in general or principal differences that lead to advantages.
 
As I understand it, the main distinction is that case law sets precedent in common-law systems. This is supposed to lead to more uniform application of laws.
 
4:22 PM
(I know.)
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Yes, sort of. Courts in non-c-l systems also set precedents, but they have a far narrower window of interpretation.
If the law does not say anything about a certain action, and it is not deemed bad beyond any reasonable doubt, a judge will have to allow it.
If there is a law that is clearly applicable, but the details are unclear, the judge will have to interpret the law.
And judges will take rulings by other judges into account.
Especially those of appellate courts. And the High Council (at least here) is binding for lower courts until Parliament changes the law. But usually the HC sets a precedent for decades to come.
So the difference is gradual.
 
According to wikipedia, most contract law in England, and countries whose legal system derives from England's (i.e. USA, Canada, etc), is based on common law, i.e. judge-decreed laws.
wikipedia also says that most civil-law (non-c-l) countries have evolved a sort of "jurisprudence" which strongly resembles common-law
 
Yeah.
So I sometimes wonder how large the actual difference is.
Perhaps it is because here laws have changed more in the past? After a big overhaul by Parliament / some new government, old precedents would disrupt the system.
 
I'm pretty sure that even in a common-law system new laws trump old precedents.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Yes, but perhaps they are common-law systems precisely because Parliament would never enact such laws if they ran counter to precedents?
 
the cowardly downvoter is really pissing me off.
and hello.
 
4:37 PM
Don't look at me!
 
I can't!
 
Good.
 
you're... wherever
at the gates of hell
or the underworld. no, that's someone else
piper at the gates of hell
chatkillah out
 
@Cerberus Well, I don't think parliament feels itself beholden to precedents. In Canada there have been many cases of new laws overturning old precedents. Often laws are specifically designed for that. Otherwise there would be no way to change the laws.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Right, but perhaps it happens much less frequently?
I'm trying to establish the actual differences between the systems.
Are they really that different anyway?
 
4:41 PM
@Cerberus I have no evidence for this, but I suspect that parliament does not actually look at precedents.
Parliament's function is to change law (add, delete, modify)
I don't think it matters much what the old laws are
except where they need to consider interactions with existing laws, and ensuring that the new law is itself legal.
 
But if judges all across the country have abided(abidden?) by a certain precedent for decades, Parliament might feel more inclined to stick with the status quo?
 
@Cerberus why?
let's say a judge decides that the standard for jail-time for drunkenness is "staggering, fall-down drunk". (I actually was present at a court case where this very precedent was cited). Parliament might decide "we need to get tough on drunkenness" and decree "blood alcohol content 0.08" is the new standard. poof! old precedent gone.
 
Yeah OK, but the difference would be gradual: they would just be more inclined to let precedents be.
I know that Dutch Parliament sometimes issues a new law that directly counters a verdict by the High Council, but doing so is considered brash and brazen.
Unless it really fixes a loophole that everybody agrees upon.
 
In Canada I don't think parliament is so inclined to kowtow to the supreme court. If parliament agrees with the court, they let it be. if they disagree, they make new laws.
 
Then Holland would seem to be more common-lawish than Canada?
I still can't put my finger on the practical differences.
 
4:56 PM
@Cerberus I think you are misunderstanding the point of common-law. common-law is just judge-made law. Why should parliament care about the existing laws when they change the laws? they are changing the laws, after all.
 
I don't know, because greater weight is given to verdicts by judges than in non-c-l countries?
 
@Cerberus as in, the law is somehow more important than if the same law had simply been made in parliament?
 
Jez
lol
So I was badgered 2 days ago evening by a recruiter into going to an interview that I said I didn't want to go to because the parking there was awful and the wage was too low
he insisted it was worth trying and the wage was totally negotiable
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 No: more important than a verdict in a non-c-l country.
@Jez Hah, you're popular!
 
Jez
today, the feedback: you were too late there (parking was shit), and you wanted too high a wage
lol
 
5:00 PM
Haha, that sucks.
 
Jez
i wonder whether my gut instinct about not going was right?
 
@Cerberus But a verdict's importance is only important to other judges. Parliament supersedes judges.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 That applies to both Ways.
But what are the differences?
 
@Cerberus the differences are supposed to be in how judges interpret "the law". In common law that's "every decision ever", in civil law it's "what's in the law book"
anyway time for luncho
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 "every decision ever"?
 
5:12 PM
What will be code + delicious? Codecious or codicious?
 
The latter.
 
user19161
@Santosh Er, what do you want to use it for?
 
user19161
It's not a real word anyway, so use whatever you like.
 
According to grammar?
 
user19161
What grammar? There's no such word.
 
5:16 PM
There is no Grammar to decide on these things.
 
@Santosh i'd say codelicious
portmanteaux with delicious generally preserve the L
 
@JasperLoy Whats your preference?
 
NB i'm the only native speaker in the room right now
 
I agree.
But between those two it would be codicious.
Or maybe pick an entirely different word.
 
user19161
I would pick neither. I only use words in the dictionary. QED.
 
5:40 PM
@Santosh I agree with JSB
 
Jez
soooooo, that's today's job hunting work over
how's you lot?
 
5:56 PM
@Jez Pretty good. washing dishes at the mo. How's the hunt?
 
Jez
6:07 PM
hectic
funny how one man's perfect candidate is one man's crappy one
I had to practically beat off one employer with a stick as I didn't want the job
but another's feedback was that I didn't present myself well so they didn't want me
mind you, they had programmers that had been there for years and were still on £28k... avoid avoid avoid
 
Job hunting is hard, I find. Although now I've several years experience they're easier to find.
 
Jez
piss easy for me. i wish online dating were this easy.
 
I'm sticking where I am for now. I might be able to get better money, but I doubt it'd be as much fun
 
@MattЭллен Same. Codelicious is the confection that works here.
 
Have you got a Stack Overflow Careers account, @Jez? That could turn up some gems for you.
 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 ah! Dating advice for @Jez!
 
0
Q: Meaning of sentences

user1014521Do the following sentences have meaning? Tom was extremely sad. Tom was frustrated. In dictionary, Frustrated means annoyed. Can it also mean 'extremely sad' or upset or only annoyed?

 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 no, they do not have meaning. nothing has any meaning.
 
Okay, just when I think I have been tortured in every way imaginable, people come up with new ways. Such creativity!
 
look at that last sentence
> I don't understand many emotions but I know what 'happy' and 'sad' face means.
clearly, this was written by a sentient AI which has learned about human feelings only by observing our emoticons
 
6:21 PM
then it will soon be ready to conquer the humans
I might as well stop running from this robot
 
"I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to use my telephone." — Bjarne Stroustrup, computer scientist and creator of the C++ programming language
We just had phone training today.
 
did you have to learn how to dial a number?
 
Remind me again, please: what exactly is it that we're supposed to use desk phones for?
@MattЭллен I'm not sure. I was playing with my smart phone.
 
@Robusto I use them for answering wrong numbers
 
user19161
They're making telephones like iPhones too, it's true. The fax machines are even harder to use.
 
6:30 PM
the what machines? ;)
 
@MattЭллен Yes, that is one use. Also for ignoring telemarketing calls and political pollsters.
 
@Cerberus precedents don't exactly expire, though judges tend to not put much weight on old ones.
@Cerberus Between the moldy shoe and the broken glass bottle, which is the better hammer?
 
Yes, I know it well. And that's Harry Nilsson's The Moonbeam Song playing in the background, if you're following along at home.
 
@JasperLoy I think Stroustrup's quote is older than the iphone, a bit.
 
6:35 PM
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 But you're right. Smashing sanctimonious rebound fucks in the teeth is another excellent use for them. The problem is, the new ones are so light i doubt they'd do enough damage.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 you mean computers are now easier to use than phones, a bit?
 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 no, I mean Jasper's comment about "they're making phones like the iphone too", which I infer to mean "They're making landlines which are as complicated as iphones" doesn't say anything about what Stroustrup was saying, since he said it way before the iphone came about.
 
user19161
The printers are quite complicated too. I even have to set the time before I can use my printer after switching off.
 
and iphones are both phones and computers, so a phone is as easy to use as a computer, qed.
@JasperLoy you print stuff? like, on paper?
You don't just save the document to your smartphone/tablet/ereader?
 
user19161
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Very rarely.
 
6:40 PM
I was pleased the other day when an insurance company let me scan a paper contract they gave me, so that I could email it to them with my signature on it. Beats mailing it or trying to figure out how to fax it.
 
less than 100 reps before the big 10K!
 
user19161
I prefer print books to ebooks. I guess there will always be print books, just like laptops won't fully replace desktops.
 
user19161
@MattЭллен Wow, very fast increase in rep recently!
 
I scored over 1K in both march and april
 
Also good.
 
user19161
6:45 PM
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 I don't quite get what it is trying to say, as usual.
 
@JasperLoy @Reg is just telling you he loves you, in as threatening a way as he can.
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 I'm experience meta-frustration at this.
 
user19161
@MattЭллен Maybe we are all robots too. All our actions are determined by our neurons from the day we were born.
 
@MattЭллен Are you ready for that much responsibility? More to the point, did you remember to put on clean underwear?
 
Cleaner than the underwear I was previously wearing
 
I guess that will have to do.
@JasperLoy My neurons get daily updates. It costs a little more, but it's worth the price.
 
6:54 PM
Well, I'll only need clean underwear when I actually breach 10K. the last question I answered is towards the bottom of the multicollider, so I won't be capping today
 
@Robusto How did you set the viewing time on your Youtube post?
 
Add t=n to the query string, where n is the number of seconds. Alternatively, t=1m32s (one minute, thirty-two seconds). You get the idea.
 
Yes, thank you :D
 

« first day (539 days earlier)      last day (4369 days later) »