@ZacharySelk Finally the idea of comparing the delirium here with the practices of other SE sites seems to begin to percolate... Nothing done yet, though. :-)
@ZacharySelk "If you are unhappy with what is happening with homework questions right now, impose strong rules on how they are to be answered and enforce them." Yes, please!
I will repost the link from Zachary Selk's message in a format which makes easier to see what it's linking to. (Without having to actually click the link and go to the post.)
Jyrki Lahtonen's answer to the question: Three levels of Math. (Discussing further direction of the site and whether split would be feasible. Including some feedback collected from other mods in Teacher's Lounge.)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive title detected, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, repeating characters in body: Fuck the mods of math.Se by fthemods on math.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive answer detected, potentially bad keyword in answer, repeating characters in answer, toxic answer detected, blacklisted user: Fuck the mods of math.Se by fthemods on math.SE
@AloizioMacedo: I do not wish to prolong our thread of comments on the Meta post. Let me remark here that (independent of what other people do or say) I use my words as precisely and accurately as I can. I will call foul when I see it, in the same manner that I wish all scientists would call quacks quacks, because the general public is often incapable of a correct judgement if left to their own fancies.
2
In my opinion, any ruling body has a reasonable responsibility to restrict the freedoms of some people in order to preserve the freedoms of more deserving people. This is why we put some people into jail, and nobody should say that criminals should be let out because they suffer in there.
2
Consistent with that, I am against punishment/restriction for its own sake. So please do not associate what I do or write with anything of that sort.
Ouch someone is not a happy camper today... Me, I'm happy as a lark?
@Xander What about Q and R? I am also wondering about the fate of X, Y, Z?
@XanderHenderson It's one user's effort (the user who is not a happy camper today) to divert attention from their own wrong-doings to try to incriminate others, while, the material they have is innocent, speculation, etc.
I don't like deleting questions. I don't know why the OP of this question has been treated so harshly. However, I think it's better to have it deleted.
@GNUSupporter Are you suggesting that the question should have even more downvotes? O_o
That seems cruel.
That being said, I am guessing that the title of that question is click-baity in a bad way; people see the title and read the question just to downvote.
The questioner wrote a title that attracts attention, and the attention that the title attracts is not good attention. I don't think that there is anything particularly harsh about this, though it is unfortunate (and I'm not going to pile on).