« first day (2078 days earlier)      last day (2403 days later) » 

5:43 AM
@user21820 Why must the probability of an event be between 0 and 1? I agree with you that being closed as a duplicate of closed question (or of deleted question) is not ideal. So in my opinion, it might be reasonable to post in a reopen request thread.
The questions has currently three reopen votes (probably coming from this room). As you can see from the timeline, it already went through reopen review queue.
As duplicates are supposed to help to collect answers to the same question in one place and at the moment new answers cannot be added at either of the two questions, I would take this as quite a convincing argument for either reopening or finding a better duplicate target (which is not closed).
@user21820 Let me know what you think about this. If you prefer - for some reason - not to post in the reopen requests thread, I can do that.
 
 
7 hours later…
Did
1:11 PM
@SimplyBeautifulArt Indeed I fail to see how this addresses the question at all. The main purpose here might be to convince readers that the author is clever and funny... But the OP commented that they like it?!
 
2:05 PM
This Not-An-Answer should be deleted in my opinion.
@MartinSleziak I indeed voted to reopen the second one in my comment, because I want to delete the first one, which the system forbids me from voting to delete.
@amWhy @Did @Jack: We still need 2 more reopen votes, and then we can delete the first one. The relevant message is here:
yesterday, by user21820
This poor question should be deleted in my opinion but that would necessitate reopening this better question first. How's that?
 
@user21820 I have flagged this one - so that moderator can convert it to a comment. But it seems that I was too slow.
@user21820 It is reopened now - thanks to Did; revisions/timeline.
 
@MartinSleziak: Thanks for both!
Just one more delete vote needed for the first one now. =)
 
 
2 hours later…
4:09 PM
@Did Flagged as not an answer.
@user21820 tis been deleted
@user21820 unstarring
 
@SimplyBeautifulArt: Thanks! Going off now. See you next time! =)
 
 
1 hour later…
5:28 PM
0
Q: Natural deduction proof for the following sequent?

Jack WilliamsonI cannot solve the following sequent using natural deduction: ∃x∀y P(x,y) ⊢ ∃y∀xP(x,y) However the familiar example I have no issue in solving: ∃x∀y P(x,y) ⊢ ∀y∃xP(x,y) I am not sure how it is a valid statement, as it seems to be suggesting that you can swap the positions of 2-place predicate...

What do we do with wrong questions?
 
6:01 PM
@SimplyBeautifulArt Now deleted - revisions/timeline. I agree with user21820's assessment of the whole thing (see also my reply just after that).
 
 
1 hour later…
7:22 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Few unique characters in answer, repeating characters in answer: Is the infinite Cartesian product of \mathbb{Z} with itself "equivalent" to \mathbb{R}? by flawr on math.SE
 
7:44 PM
 
@SmokeDetector blacklisted ?
 
 
3 hours later…
10:48 PM
@SmokeDetector lol
I mean, I know flawr via chat
:P
@SmokeDetector And this occurred while the answer was deleted
So I don't think it really had much effect
Perhaps I shall go chat with him a big
 

« first day (2078 days earlier)      last day (2403 days later) »