@cairdcoinheringaahing when did I argue?

@cairdcoinheringaahing What happened again? That's sad...

HI @HyperNeutrino

Hello

I am searching for a CMC, hopefully I'll find one soon

@HyperNeutrino Hyper invited you to trash. Really?

heh

Oh no, new challenges

@HyperNeutrino can I learn some more?

hi

Hi

Let me think of a CMC that will require things you haven't yet learned.

I wanna learn more about the = and logical stuff

and when to seperate into new monad/dyads

Like Logical AND, OR, etc.?

ya

Okay. Logical AND will take (x, y) and if x is falsy, it returns x, and if it's truthy, it returns y. Do you know about truthy/falsy?

true and false?

@HyperNeutrino

Not quite. 0 is falsy, [] is falsy, and "" is falsy. Essentially for Python 2 it's the __nonzero__ property and for Python 3 it's the __bool__ property. For Jelly, it's just 0, [], "" -> falsy, everything else -> truthy

ok

You use Python right?

yea

never nonzero

oops

bold

I get that now

That's a built-in property that usually isn't overriden.

Also None is falsy

but when do i break off into a new dyad?

/monad

Logical and is lambda x, y: y if x else x. Logical or is lambda x, y: x if x else y

@NoahCristino I will have to think of how to teach you that.

ok

challenge?

Good idea.

when I'm better at jelly

I'm going to make a youtube series

cuz the tutorial is really short

Hm. Interesting idea. Have you seen the Brachylog youtube tutorial?

bo

no*

Also darn it. I had a challenge idea that I thought would require making new chains but unfortunately for me, Jelly behaves that way already :( It also means that my previous thoughts about Jelly's chaining weren't quite correct.

Actually no worries; I'll just give you the opposite challenge.

Given numbers x and y, compute x + (y / 2)

kk

I tried this tio.run/##y0rNyan8/1/78ESP////m/43AQA

to seperete the dyad and monad

Hm. Let me look at the docs to see what that does.

Segfault!?!?!?

no

Ñ Next link as a monad.

quicks

Oh. No. That's not how it works. First of all, you only have 1 link anyway.

oh

How do I make the + not use the second arg

cuz I want the H to use it

and the H not at the end

Idea

brb

+ takes implicit left and right arguments. If you put something on the right side of the +, it will take the implicit left argument and use the explicit right argument.

spoiler :P

sigh no reverting the arguments' positions >.<

Also no using @

Aw

Hrm

hmm

@HyperNeutrino I can do it if I switch the args

tio.run/##y0rNyan8/99D@////6b/TQA

does the reverse

But I'm explicitly banning that (that's what totallyhuman did). I have another quick I want to teach you first.

ok

Look for another solution. Find a way to form the right argument as a single thing that isn't implicit (implicit monads take the result of the dyad)

I gotta go

sorry

I'll be back thi

Weird this room isn't loading for me on my computer

oh there it is

is ⁴ allowed? :P

Yes :P

but that's not what you're trying to teach noah right?

> I have another quick I want to teach you first

That's not a quick :P

oh huh

found the quick

spoiler again

what

that looks useful. I did not know about that :P

@HyperNeutrino wat

that's not the quick?

@totallyhuman lol

@totallyhuman not the one I thought of. That's really useful though

smart. instead of fiddling with 2,1-chains you just made it 2,2. :P nice

what was the quick you had in mind?

onetimesecret.com/secret/c6zsp9y5hedx1v7i7n1gvqoby6h7k1w

hmm

oh i see

anyway gtg now. o/

bye