talk.tryitonline.net

1:34 AM

@stasoid 65536

DLosc

2:15 AM

@Dennis Please pull Pip when you get a chance.

@DLosc Done.

DLosc

Thanks!

Phoenix

2:34 AM

@stasoid You could have tried it yourself in bash: tio.run/#bash

@Phoenix That would just give a permission error.

Phoenix

I've poked around a lot and the only place I'd found where I didn't have read permissions was /home/

3 hours later…

5:45 AM

@NieDzejkob In principle, yes. The official interpreter isn't working for me though, not even with its self tests.

HyperNeutrino

@Dennis What's /bin/alex?

A tool for generating lexical analysers in Haskell.

HyperNeutrino

Ooh. Interesting.

Fatalize

6:17 AM

@Dennis Thanks and thanks

6:55 AM

@ConorO'Brien I managed to compile it, but it hogs 2.3 GiB of disk space as is. I'll have to see if I can trim it down to an acceptable level.

feersum

7:25 AM

No level of Javascript is acceptable when our children's well-being is at stake.

3 hours later…

NieDzejkob

10:41 AM

@Dennis it's a bug in recent versions of flex, github.com/westes/flex/pull/233 should fix it

3 hours later…

caird coinheringaahing

1:59 PM

@Dennis could you pull Add++ please?

2:11 PM

would these lines be good enough for adding to TIO?

note that i'm not asking for to be added (yet) as it is very underdeveloped and i'd be asking you to pull every 4 hours or something

@Dennis Can you pull Dyalog APL?

@totallyhuman Wait, what? ",,,, 37 bytes"?

A: Hello, World! (Every other character)

Yup :3

,,,, 34 bytes 2"HHeelllloo,, WWoorrlldd!! "⟛ On removing the even numbered characters... "Hello, World!" Explanation With all the characters: 2"..."⟛ no-op 2 push 2 to the stack "..." push "HHeelllloo,, WWoorrlldd!! " to the stack ⟛ p...

2 hours later…

Uriel

3:57 PM

@Dennis are there any plans to add syntax markup to tio?

NieDzejkob

^ brilliant idea

4:54 PM

@NieDzejkob That seems to work indeed. Thanks!

@Uriel Yes, but not in the near future. That would require migrating from text areas to something else.

@totallyhuman That should do, yes.

@cairdcoinheringaahing Done.

@Adám I'll do that later. Dyalog APL requires much more than a simple pull. ;)

5:59 PM

Sweet, expect me to come in after a few months of figuring the quirks out

Mr. Xcoder

What if I am on Safari and receive this error?

Your browser seems to lack a required feature.

Currently, the only supported browser are Chrome/Chromium, Firefox, and Safari (recent versions), Edge (all versions), and Internet Explorer 11.

If you are using one of those browsers, you are receiving this message in error. Please send an email to feedback@tryitonline.net and include the error log below. You should be able to copy the error message from your console.

TypeError: undefined is not an object (evaluating 'language.unmask')

Solved, sorry for the mess ^

7:02 PM

@Dennis that's huge ._.

7:19 PM

@Mr.Xcoder Is this when you open a specific permalink or every time you visit TIO?

7:52 PM

@Dennis Would it bother you if Dyalog forked TIO and used it as an alternative to tryapl.org?

@Dennis are non-Turing complete languages allowed on TIO?

@Adám Not at all. TIO is licensed under MIT, so forks are expected.

@ConorO'Brien TIO has C, so yes.

wait C isn't turing complete ?

@Dennis ???!

C can only address a finite amount of memory.

7:58 PM

@Dennis Does TIO have any TC languages?

but in that case no language is turing complete, right ?

Implementations never are, but the C spec mandates a finite amount of memory.

waaaaaaaat

And that is why Turing Completeness is practically useless.

@Dennis Most people mean "theoretically TC, given infinite memory" when saying TC.

8:06 PM

But no C implementation can address infinite memory because the spec limits it to a finite amount.

BF is considered TC, BF is implemented in C, therefore, C can be considered TC

(even if it isn't in the most technical sense)

@ConorO'Brien Same goes for pretty much all languages. Actually, interesting question: Which programming languages are neither implemented in C nor in a language which was implemented in C, etc.?

I suppose B might qualify