« first day (2222 days earlier)      last day (2696 days later) » 

12:20 AM
@cfr Fails with -all, (same image as you posted); works with -most.
 
cfr
1:05 AM
@AlanMunn Thanks. I have a bunch of different versions of Forest floating around and I just wanted to check.
 
 
6 hours later…
6:49 AM
@cfr Room unfrozen
 
7:37 AM
@JosephWright can you do my car as well?
 
yo'
7:55 AM
@DavidCarlisle :) (I'm smiling all morning, seeing people removing frost from their cars. I've got a garage)
 
ebo
8:10 AM
@Zarko one night later thanks!
 
9:01 AM
Could someone with license knowledge plase have a look at this one:
0
Q: avoid embedding truetype font

Avner Shapiro\documentclass{book} \usepackage{polyglossia} \setdefaultlanguage{hebrew} \newfontfamily\hebrewfont[Script=Hebrew]{Frank Ruehl CLM} \begin{document} שלום \end{document} the specified font can be found in the culmus package (http://culmus.sourceforge.net/download.html). compiling with xelatex ....

 
9:27 AM
@daleif wikipedia entry looks clear enough, gpl for fonts seems suboptimal :(
 
9:45 AM
@samcarter Thanks for consideration, I need to shut down the silly-questions machine for a while :)
 
9:59 AM
@DavidCarlisle Indeed
@DavidCarlisle I see David Crossland (ex-UK-TUG secretary) gets a mention there :)
 
10:28 AM
English question:
I have a set of rules, should I go with rule set or rules set?
 
@PauloCereda rule set
 
@JosephWright Thank you!
 
@PauloCereda you would have liked to be in the UK this morning, bright sunshine, clear skys....
 
@DavidCarlisle Indeed
 
10:48 AM
@DavidCarlisle brrrrrrrr
 
@DavidCarlisle I just think the license file is formated a bit odd, but ok
 
@PauloCereda my car said it was -7 this morning, got up to -5 by time I got to work
 
@DavidCarlisle Cooler in Oxon that here in Norfolk
 
@DavidCarlisle oh my, that is very cold!
 
11:03 AM
@PauloCereda something about wind coming from that big white bit at the top of the map
 
@DavidCarlisle oooh that explains it
 
yo'
@PauloCereda really? :D
 
@yo' frozen ducks. :)
 
11:20 AM
I never thought of this...
 
yo'
@PauloCereda the tie is worn on the chest, so in the low position. However a bowtie would be in the top position.
 
@yo' oooh advanced giraffes. :)
 
@PauloCereda no one here wears a tie at work
 
@DavidCarlisle oh
 
11:30 AM
@yo' ooooh
 
yo'
@PauloCereda (no picture environments were hurt in making this figure)
 
@yo' <3
 
12:23 PM
@JosephWright It does!
 
 
1 hour later…
1:37 PM
@JosephWright -- makes sense to me, if that matters.
 
1:53 PM
I want to buy more rubber ducks!
They are so lovely.
@Lilith-Elina: Hi, welcome to the chat!
ooh more people
@DavidCarlisle: we need more tea
 
@PauloCereda I'll see if I can thaw some out
 
@DavidCarlisle ooh
@David: it's quite amusing that my winter is hotter than your summer. :)
 
2:09 PM
@PauloCereda meanwhile you're a proper computer scientist type person. Am I correct to equate "program no longer segfaults" with "program now bug free" ?
 
@DavidCarlisle I think it's relatively accurate. :)
 
@PauloCereda don't forget I watched the grand prix I know your climate is miserable, grey and wet.
@PauloCereda excellent.
 
@DavidCarlisle oh that's true. :)
 
@PauloCereda we have blue skys, lots of sunshine and a wind straight from santa claus.
 
@DavidCarlisle freezing breeze. :) When I was about to leave Brazil, I saw it was 28C in Barcelona. Nah, that's a nice temperature! I don't have to worry! Then I met this wind. :)
 
3:11 PM
@DavidCarlisle See the platex update notice? Support for FAM256 e-pTeX.
???
 
@JosephWright no (was working:-) where?
 
@DavidCarlisle c.t.t/CTAN RSS
 
@JosephWright odd. 256 math fam?
 
@DavidCarlisle Not sure at the moment: will check!
 
3:19 PM
@DavidCarlisle Ah, does look that way yes
 
@JosephWright diff here, we could have something in the kernel rather than patches on patches but...
 
@DavidCarlisle Yes, (u)pTeX isn't officially supported, or rather they make so many changes for platex it's hard to see it fits into the normal framework
 
3:32 PM
@PauloCereda Today's lecture.
 
@egreg aw <3 Thank you.
 
@PauloCereda You can circulate, if you like
 
@egreg Second person is taking a photo, I am sure everybody is with us.
It's a lovely tribute.
 
cfr
3:51 PM
@JosephWright Ta ;).
 
 
1 hour later…
5:13 PM
@egreg: ^^ Fifa 2017 today.
 
5:33 PM
Hello everyone
Good afternoon @egreg
I did not know that there was a chat
best regars
 
6:10 PM
@Sebastiano Ciao!
 
 
3 hours later…
8:53 PM
Cast your vote, folks:
12
Q: Winterbash 2016 participation

WernerLast year, TeX.SE joined in on Winterbash 2015. Winterbash 2016 is around the corner and sites will soon have the option of opting in/out. In order to solicit opinion from the community, please cast your vote in the answer below. More on the Winterbash Winter Bash is a fun, lighthearted event S...

Hats, or a regular day in the office...
 
 
2 hours later…
10:25 PM
Someone in my lab group came to me with a strange problem. All the math in his document is bold, and he isn't sure why.
Trying to get him to make a MWE and turn off packages till it goes away
But was wondering if this is a common problem or known with a certain package
 
@Canageek Some stray \boldmath declaration?
 
@egreg He says no, I'll tell me to search for it. He didn't even know you could redefine $ $
@egreg Would that propagate
@egreg Yes, that was what it is.
Excuse me while I slam my head on the desk.
He had \newcommand{\alphab}{\boldmath$\alpha$} instead of $\boldmath\alpha$
Wait, why is \boldmath even allowed in textmode?
You don't let me us \alpha in textmode but you can accidentally turn your entire document bold? WTF?
 
@Canageek no $\boldmath\alpha$ would be a syntax error, you have to do \boldmath out of math mode
@Canageek it's not allowed in math mode.
 
So it is {\boldmath$\alpha$}
 
@Canageek $\boldmath\alpha$ doesn't work. \newcommand{\alphab}{{\boldmath$\alpha$}}would be ok.
 
10:38 PM
@Canageek yes, typically you use \bfseries\boldmath as the style for a section heading if you want math in headings to be bold. but just as if you do \bfseries at the top level all your text goes bold, if you do \boldmath at the top level your math goes bold.
 
Ok, explained that to him
That is...odd
Waiting for his document to compile (PhD thesis, will take a while)
Also, what does newcommand* do vs newcommand?"
@DavidCarlisle Isn't \bf one of the verboten commands that Thy Shalt Not Use on the pain of @egreg giving you a disapproving look?
Dammit, does greater than need a special symbol in LaTeX? or is it just >?
 
@Canageek “Less than” is <
 
@egreg You said that before I could edit it
 
@Canageek \bf is verboten, \bfseries is kosher.
 
So \SI{>0.5}{\angstrom} is fine
@egreg Wait, what? o.0 What is the difference?
 
10:48 PM
@Canageek That \bf should not be used and \bfseries is good. They do different things, actually.
 
@egreg Sorry, I should be clear: What is the difference and why is \bf evil and \bfseries is OK?
@egreg Wait, does that mean my girlfriend can use \bfseries but not \bf, while I can use both?
 
@Canageek \bf has been deprecated for 20+ years. Neither of you is allowed to use \bf or the LaTeX police will chase after you.
 
@egreg (The joke was she is Jewish, and I'm not)
 
17
A: Is there any reason not to use \let to redefine a deprecated control sequence to the currently recommended one?

Ulrike FischerThe commands \rm, \bf etc are called "deprecated" because they have been removed from the latex kernel. The way the commands work don't fit in the (much better) "new font selection scheme" (nfss) used by latex2e. A number of classes nevertheless provide the definitions for these commands, but t...

 
@Canageek :)
 
10:52 PM
@egreg Which means when I went to Poland I ate a lottt of pork
 
11:07 PM
My boss wants me to add "-" to all the blank spaces on this table. Hmmmmm
 
@Canageek well not really (unless you use koma classes which stopped defining it at all) but I didn't use bf :-)
 
@DavidCarlisle Which I'm learning.
 
@Canageek latex doesn't define \bf but does define \bfseries so there is a real difference in behaviour
 
@DavidCarlisle So how does \bf work? I've seen documents that still use it.
 
@Canageek it's defined in (eg) article class for compatibility with latex 2.09
 
11:15 PM
@DavidCarlisle So when you ban the use of LaTeX 2.09, are you going to remove that to force people to stop using it?
@DavidCarlisle Or define it to detect if you use new features, then turn it off?
 
@Canageek ? latex 2.09 isn't installed in most tex distributions (although you can get the sources from ctan)
 
@DavidCarlisle So why is \bf still around? >.>
Oh crud, seminar
 
@Canageek because it's always been there and people should be able to take a document written in 1993 and have it still work
 
@DavidCarlisle Why isn't there a --legacy switch?
@DavidCarlisle Couldn't they just compile with an old binary?
 
@Canageek for most people no they would not know how to build that (and why should they have to)
 
11:43 PM
Karl has removed mpost from the restricted shell allowed programs. :-(
 

« first day (2222 days earlier)      last day (2696 days later) »