@LeeWoofenden Thank you. I've seen it and replied. I don't think you've made a sound argument.

I suspect you'll have much to say in reply. I suggest after post a reply or two, open a chat room so we don't clutter things there, then link to it in a comment on your post.

@fredsbend I think the current definition could mark this site as a discriminatory site in the minds of a broad swath of its users. I do not think the parent company would want that in one of its sites. If you want to set up a separate chatroom, I would be happy to discuss it there.

I do not think they would want one of their sites to be seen as a discriminatory site that takes a conservative Christian stance against even the liberal end of Christianity, let alone the public as a whole, which has clearly expressed its majority support for defining "marriage" as including same-sex marriage.

@LeeWoofenden I've created another room:

Why am I in there talking to myself right now?

Because you're good at it :-P

lol. and Lee literally just replied.