Name of 80s or 90s tv series of a little boy working with a gypsy women blond hair and the setting is high class. I tried looking online but couldn't find it. Thank you. Angelo.
@TomCody I am not aware of a mark down..... I Am simply trying to copy a link and when I paste it into my answer, I get a notification that "this site does not accept this text". It only happens on my I-pad.
@TomCody I just read how I should not be invited into this room anymore. I am not sure why as I did not criticize anyone or drop f-bombs or slander anyone after a post was made that was disagreed upon. I'm Sorry, but I did nothing wrong here. That is fine, I will leave...pity, I really enjoyed this site. Thanks for all of your help with everything.
We know that Dorne is part of Westeros like other regions. Howcome, it is so different from them culturally. There is difference in other kingdoms also like North people respect Night Watch and give value to pride and honour. South people are relatively different. But that his minor difference.
B...
In this scene:
How does Korath show up exactly when Ronan is about to take the Infinity stone? How does he know Ronan is there?
Space is an extremely large place and the planet appears to be completely abandoned along with the Infinity Stone.
More importantly, how does Korath even know about...
@steelerfan What? Where? I don't see what you're talking about.
@steelerfan If you weren't allowed to be here, you wouldn't be able to chat here... You were not suspended... you'd know if you were. Please don't go away.
As we saw that Ramsey Bolton tortured, mentally and physically, almost constantly, Theon Greyjoy then why inspite of killing him he transformed him to Reek who is completely psychologically broken.
@steelerfan just because of one person you doesn't have to leave from here. He seems to have been banned automatically. If not than i might have banned him. And where did you read that?
@MovieReel Doesn't he still a Snow when this occurred.
If I remember correctly, little boys were throwing firecrackers at her. She floated up off the swing and everyone was dead. When she came back down there was a ring of fire around the swing. She was completely unharmed.
@steelerfan sigh Please, please do not also start to misread and misinterpret things now. Do we really need to intentionally get offended and driven away? It was not you forever I did not intend to invite back into the chatroom, it was you two at this point in time I chose to not invite back again for fear the discussion I deleted would just start again (neither was it about "invitation" but just about notification. Of course you have all the right to come back to chat whenever you want)...
@steelerfan ...While you did not throw around offensive language (and were in constrast to that other user also not suspended from chat), I still chose to delete the entire discussion since it didn't bring anything constructive at all. No matter if you meant your mental health diagnoses serious or not, they apparently did not contribute to resolving the situation. So I cleaned up the whole discussion. Now can we please move on and not get inadvertently pissed at this little incident anymore?
The plot involves a large, possibly black and yellow, ship/tanker has terrorist or hostages. A man is asked if his team can train to take the ship, they set up a large scaffold training ship with the black and yellow lines on it to look like the ship. When they take over they use diving gear to a...
@TomCody - No, it got marked as "migration rejected". It also got a note on it from Shoq9 asking not to migrate "questions like this" which I'm genuinely stumped by
@Richard "No, it got marked as "migration rejected"." - I know, all I said was that I think to get this note it has to get closed on the receiving site, which didn't happen here.
But it seems Shog9 realized that crappy ID questions are not a particularly great idea to migrate. I for myself would have waited till we actually close it for being crappy ID (or maybe not) and it get auto-rejected, but I can't say I disagree with him.
@TomCody - It met the criteria; good description of the film, that it's in colour, easily recognisable scene. Should have been a good match and an easy find.
@Richard Well, discuss it with Shog9, I don't really know the exact reasons why he rejected it manually and probably wouldn't have done so myself (even if I don't miss the question).
Husband and wife are watching tv together. Two intruders burst in, tie up the husband and rape his wife. It turns out the couple had organised this as an acting out of sexual fantasies. But afterwards, the husband can't cope with it.
What was the title of this movie. I think it was a TV-movie.
And given the currently very bad relationship between those two sites, due to certain users contantly fueling the fire, I wouldn't want the SciFi people to react to that rejection with a huffy "fine, then we just won't migrate anything anymore", which would be far from optimal.
Hereby I declare the 26th of August A&M Cookie day!
As some of you may have noticed in the chat lately, I have been looking into to how to provide the cookies I promised during the election. And after a few failed attempts to bribe some ♦ with cookies, I decided to change my approach. Leading to...
But if you really need to do this, please also try to link to the Meta Stack Exchange version, so people know what you're talking about and it doesn't look too confusing.
Main Meta site use to have memes
The Many Memes of Meta
Many other Stack Exchange sites also followed the trend
Travel
Gaming
Anime & Manga
Information Security
Code Review
Sci-Fi
English Language & Usage
Is it not good if follow the trend too? We can also gather few funny ideas and follow...
Anyway, I don't think it has much use to discuss this here now. I will utter a more direct question to Shog9, seeing how that topic gets more and more contentious.
Looking for the name of this movie that a man says feed the dogs to his lover/wife leaving her - Feed the dogs meaning "He loves her sooo much"
Does anyone know what this movie is called?
I'm looking for a movie from the 1970s - probably mid to late. It's set at a TV news-station (or possibly, the news-section of a TV-station) in San Francisco. It's about the conflict between a disillusioned male news-anchor and his relatively new boss... the anchor wants to report news, the bos...
After reading about Daniel day-Lewis method acting in Lincoln and Gangs of New York, it got me wondering when filming stops and he stays in full character between takes does he look and all surprised at and all this future technology , or does he acknowledge he is Lincoln but Lincoln acting in a ...
@AnkitSharma Indeed. Maybe I should have waited for other votes with mine. But I just felt too strongly about this thing. I still think we simply don't have many recurring memes, let alone a tight enough core userbase to coin and appreciate such memes.
I'm all for more community building efforts. But I don't think that such Many Memes meta posts even cotribute in that regard, rather than establishing some kind clique attitude, as memes usually do. And if ti will just become a deserted place or filled with things nobody knows, it might have a contrary effect.
But I can take my downvote back for now, so that the rest of the community can at least approach this thing unbiased.
@Walt Indeed it does, if only those other questions would now disappear from the face of the earth and collect their votes and views into this one.
@Walt Memes of the site and the chat. Read those other example posts to know what it's about. (But it's not as if I hadn't expected this reaction to some degree.)
@JimmyHoffa I don't even eat donuts. I rarely eat any cookie-like things when drinking coffee and if I do I might dip depending on the coffee. But if it's a yes/no, then I gotta say no!
@Walt Yeah, something like that. "I don't know if we have those." - Me neither. "Unless ID Rage is one." - Could count as one, but would be quite a bit too negative. We already confuse people here in chat with that attitude.
@AnkitSharma Well, there isn't even a majority of mods at all, let alone from one timezine, let alone from one continent, it's surprisingly well-balanced.
@TomCody we have less women in here even as user. Even from rest - One hate us, one is a runaway and want to chnage the whole site and delete every possible tag. ;-)
I really want to comment on that Dexter finale question in unopinionated way, but really, there's pretty much a consensus that it was one of the worst finales ever made; There's no lesson learned because the writers gave up.
You might as well look for one in the Two and a Half Men finale.
"Of Course He's Dead" is the series finale of the long-running sitcom Two and a Half Men. The series ran for twelve seasons, and the final episode aired on February 19, 2015. The hour-long program marks the 261st and 262nd half-hour episodes of the series.
The episode brought in the show's highest audience since April 2013, with 13.52 million viewers tuning in to the finale.
Former cast members Angus T. Jones, April Bowlby, and Jennifer Bini Taylor all made cameo appearances in the episode.
== Plot ==
Alan (Jon Cryer) receives a letter that Charlie has $2.5 million in unclaimed royalties. He needs...
But seriously, what's to learn from the finale of a sitcom? (Especially one that's not at all about development of any characters but merely the whole frigginly arrested morons all the time.)
@AnkitSharma TBH it reminds me of continuity error Qs. "Is there an explanation for it or is that just a goof?" Well, I'm sorry, the last Dexter episode (and season, really) was just a goof. It was poorly conceived and written. There's not much more that could be said about it.
Spoiler . . . When a resurrected old lady need sex with junior (looks like mother son sex) to heal and take down dome to serve dome to fuck around with audience then dreams seems better
@AnkitSharma Not necessarily bad, but that it should have ended with S05E13 (i.e. in the desert with Jack's gang) and was only prolonged for bureaucratic reasons. I'd have to dig it up, but it was an interesting answer here, with not too bad reasoning.
When pretty much everyone (including myself, though I never cared that much about HIMYM) said that the last season, which was pretty much forced on the creators, was by far the worst in the series. And, well, the finale.
@Walt I liked the last season very much and the ending was really inevaitable and very fitting. I don't know what all those people complain about. They should look into themselves and ask if it ever was about the "mother" at all. No, that only was a backdrop, it's clear it always had to be Robin.
Jack let Walter go for two reasons:
The series consistently demonstrates the neo-Nazis aren't a particularly intelligent assemblage of criminals and thus allowing a man who clearly had shown that he was willing to pay to commit mass murder for far less than stealing from him is yet another inst...
Through Netflix & Amazon streaming, I have recently "discovered" a bunch of really good British sitcoms that I never knew existed.
Although I think some of these comedies are as good or better than anything on U.S. television, my only complaint is that there aren't enough of them. I get hooked o...
All the soldiers and commanders from Tully and Stark family were killed during the bedding ceremony of Edmure Tully. What was his fate after this massacre. Did Walder Frey got his own son in law killed in his bedding ceremony in front of his daughter?? Or he left him as he is now family ?
If he ...
@Richard and @TomCody It's acually... my "fault"...
Is there any chance of reconsidering this? We get the occasional ID questions shunted to M&TV from Sci-Fi and they're much more accepting of ID questions that we are... so they usually end up on M&TV with several upvotes and nearly always get closed on our site for not having enough detail to be a good question. EG: This quesiton came to us with two upvotes despite being pretty crummy a question. — Catija9 hours ago
I saw the question disappear and saw that Ankit was on the site at that point, so I'd assumed that he'd done it... I didn't get pinged by Shog's response to my comment.
@TomCody Yeah. I did say "occasional"... I feel like I've seen a couple recently. I voted to close it as insufficient detail but I never thought that the migration would get rejected like that... As a note, the question's title when it was migrated was horrid. It was generic and non-specific to the subject.
My recollection of the prime-time television I watched growing up -- the 70s and 80s plus whatever were on at the time -- are almost invariably of episodic television. At the end of each episode, everything that had happened was completely and forgotten, and the show effectively "reset" for the n...
I recently saw the TV show Fargo, and the presence of Martin Freeman and Billy Bob Thornton (both legitimately successful movie actors) made me wonder: Is doing the switch from movies to TV more acceptable these days? It's my impression that it used to be the case that successful TV stars went on...
Meta SE is a powerful tool... but I had no clue that Shog would respond... I don't think it's fair to blame me. I also want to know how he responded without pinging me... I would like to know if it's related to the fact of who he is or if it's because it was on a seriously downvoted answer.
@Walt Uh, wut? I don't think that 180 would be remotely enoguh for that. Oh, or do you mean my favorites? Well, that could fit. But no, I'm looking got the duplicate to that GoT question I suspect exists.
@Catija I don't really know. I wouldn't actually believe it to be beyond him to just overreact a little with that deletion. "Want that thing gone, it's gone!". But the optimist in me believes he genuinely wanted to help you there.
@Walt I watched the first episode once after learning that it was by Joss Whedon and flying through Firefly in the wake of The Avengers/Avengers Assemble. Vowed to never watch another.
Hmm, must have just read that Edmure Tully thing in some answer.
@DrRDizzle Well, to me it's also something I'd never really watch again now. I liked it quite a bit when it ran originally, but it doesn't really have much rewatchability for me at all now.
And I'm still baffled by how much people are all up in arms (or the positive equivalent for utter hysteria) about that Whedon guy. I mean, it's a nice show, as is Angel and Firefly, and the Avengers movies are great, too. But how's this guy such an utter writing god that the internet claims him to be?
On a related note, Cabin in the Woods was nice, but I sure expected more from it. Entertaining, but largely forgettable. And I don't know if it was such a good idea to reveal that whole meta level in the very first minutes of the movie.
@TomCody The only reveal I regret is the eagle. It kinda ruins the tension in that motorcycle scene. Otherwise, I thought it was a great commentary on the horror genre and great fun regardless.
For a horror movie at its core, it was generally somehow lacking in tension. But sure, it had some nice meta ideas, like the pothead getting actually saved and reasonable by his stuff. Or the football star being actually a rather smart guy and acting out of character.
Yes, yes you should, @SQB. As a general rule, if the form of the question wouldn't be acceptable on your site (regardless of topic), then dropping it onto someone else's (where the author may not even have an account) is rude: it's probably not gonna get better. When in doubt, drop in a link to movies.stackexchange.com/tour and suggest that the asker read it and re-post. — Shog9 ♦1 min ago
@TomCody @Richard ^
Always acceptable to NOT migrate. If you're gonna migrate or ask someone else to do so, try to make sure the asker looks good when his question appears on the new site. Failing to do this creates a bad experience for everyone involved.
The additional problem is though, that the form of the question would be acceptable on SciFi, since they don't seem to have the same quality considerations for those questions like we do. And even we are not perfectly decided in every case on the matter and it mostly reveals itself by the close-votes coming in or not. So from the SciFi perspective they did migrate a perfectly fine question to us. But I appreciate your input.
@TomCody Yeah, it's funny how they were aggressively not the stereotypes they were suposed to represent. The 'fool' isn't one, the 'jock' is a bookworm, the 'bookworm' has the body of a jock, the 'virgin' is not really that etc.
@TomCody right. If the question had been asked directly on MTV, it may have been closed - at which point the asker would be able to improve it and perhaps get it reopened. That isn't an option for migrations.
@Shog9 Also true. The problem is though, that it's not clear if it would have been closed here or not and I would have left that up to the community and its mdoerators to decide.
But I don't want to make a big deal out of it either. It just happened and it caused a bit of dicsussion. So it's nice to hear your statement on it.
@Shog9 Indeed. I also wasn't aware of Catija's comment to your answer. It just seemed to come out of nowhere that an SE employee rejected some arbitrary migration on supposedly our behalf.
@TomCody yeah, I got pinged about it late last night while I was at a concert - wasn't able to engage in a whole lot of conversation then, but I did want to demonstrate how to handle these situations without requiring migration to get even more complicated.
@Catija talk to them. That's why I left an example for you; if someone suggests a migration that's unwise, leave a polite comment advising against it.
An awful lot of angst has been generated by migrations in the past simply because folks didn't talk to each other... Education is key.
A few sites actively monitor comments on other sites that talk about their own, so that they can step in and provide such education.
Wasn't trying to step on anyone's toes, BTW - but if y'all are reaching the point where you feel like the system is breaking down, it's better to step in and help than to ignore.
BTW, speaking of (OK, vaguely mentioning) *Angel*, what the hell, Henson? http://henson-alternative.wikia.com/wiki/Happytime_Murders https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smile_Time
@Shog9 - For the record, the question was in a fit state for SFF. Had it been on-topic, we'd have just tidied up the grammar and I'm sure it would have been answered by now since the description was pretty solid.
I actually thought this one was a no-brainer for migration and was surprised when it got (forcibly) kicked back with a somewhat curt admonishment.
Well, it's simply a borderline case and might as well have ended up open here. That's the problem with ID shit, it's not always entirely objective whether it's shit or good enough.
@Richard It would've been edited if it had hung around; as Catija notes, at very least the title would've been fixed. May not have been a show-stopper, but as I said above: try to make sure authors look their best when you're introducing them to a new site; they can't immediately respond (or even be notified of) feedback, so you are their proxy.
@Richard No worries; as I told Catija, this is an educational opportunity.
@Richard That close-reason is not about answerability but about details and effort, though. Every 2-line crap can be answerable (and usually will generate tons of answers anyway).
Afterall, the migration process is quite botched at the moment. For one, you can't migrate closed questions, even as a moderator, without first reopening. Though migration always should come after closure and not with it (or god beware, as a reason for it).
The problem with an existing migration path for users is, that you end up with users voting to migrate because it "fits better" somewhere else. And that's because the migration is the close reason, which it shouldn't be.
For more control over incompetent migrations (see example complaints in posts tagged migration-rejection), would it make sense to try a new kind review? I would call it
suggested migrations queue
Located at target site, it would contain a list of questions flagged / voted for migration. Target ...
Based on feedback from sites which have unsuitable questions handed to them from other sites (for example: Please stop using Programmers.SE as your toilet bowl):
Would it be possible to require that a migrated question be accepted by the destination site's moderators?
The question Adjust the sy...
@Catija usually, though of course the exceptions are the ones you want to have the ability to treat specially. Which is why migration exists: if it wasn't for those rare exceptions, just telling folks "re-ask over yonder after reading their asking help" would more than suffice.
@TomCody I'm personally of the opinion that we should drop that as an option, at least for non-mods (exception handlers need a path to handle exceptions)
Almost never.
These paths have a place when two conditions exist:
There is a clearly-defined topic that is wholly inappropriate on one site and wholly appropriate on another.
That topic is asked about daily on the former site.
This is pretty rare. Especially if the first site isn't Stack Ove...
@Vogel612 all else being equal, a question is gonna fair better if it is posted directly on Site B by its author than it will if posted on Site A and migrated.
The author has a chance to read the site's specific guidance, tag warnings, etc. They have a chance to be notified of and respond immediately to feedback after it is posted.
Still, it's not good to lose perfectly valid and good questions just because they were asked in the wrong place. Even if the OP doesn't migrate as well, it's better than not having the question at all. And if he would reask, he'd also migrate along with his question.
The migration system we have now is (read the post I linked to above) a relic of a time when we were literally carving off part of one large site into another site. And its usage reflects that.
But ok, it would also dampen some of the migration rage assholes, which we recently had one, ending up deleting his account on our site, because he wasn't content with the on-topic policy and migration from another site.
When Super User was still in private beta, and no migration tools existed, I would go around to the personal computing questions folks were asking on Stack Overflow at the time and politely recommend they sign up for the new beta. It was effective: instead of slamming the door closed in their face, I was opening a path by which they could get what they needed. Migration does not serve this purpose.
But it's hard to find the balance. You could advice to reask it rather than migrate. But how long should you wait for the reasking (which might never happen) before your close the off-topic question and migrate it.
@TomCody you can close it as off-topic immediately. Again, the only reason to migrate is if, failing that, something of value would be lost.
As a thought experiment, ask yourself: "would I still want this migrated if the asker had already deleted his account and left Stack Exchange forever?"